Issue Description
If I create a relation and use the relation.add() method on it nothing happens.
Steps to reproduce
let Booking = Parse.Object.extend("Booking")
let bookingQuery = new Parse.Query(Booking)
bookingQuery.get(newBookingObject.id, {
success: booking => {
console.log("invites", invites)
// prints array of existing ParseObjects from another class
let relation = booking.relation("invites")
console.log(relation)
// prints new relation with key "invites" and parent "Booking"
relation.add(invites)
console.log(relation)
// prints exactly the same relation object as before - nothing changed
booking.save().then(res => console.log(res))
// an empty relation is added
},
error: error => console.log("error", error)
// no errors
})
Expected Results
relation.add(arrayOfParseObjects) should add objects to relation
Actual Outcome
Nothing happens
insted of
relation.add(invites)
please try the following
for (var i =0; i<invites.length;i++){
relation.add(invites[i])
}
Regards
Related
I am running parse server in NodeJS environment with express.
Generally, Parse automatically figures out which data has changed so only “dirty” fields will be sent to the Parse Cloud. So, I don’t need to worry about squashing data that I didn’t intend to update.
But why this following code is saving new data every time instead of updating the existing document data with name "Some Name".
// Parse code
Parse.initialize(keys.parseAppID);
Parse.serverURL = keys.parseServerURL;
var GameScore = Parse.Object.extend("GameScore");
var gameScore = new GameScore();
let data = {
playerName: "Some Name",
score: 2918,
cheatMode: true
};
gameScore.save(data, {
success: (gameScore) => {
// let q = new Parse.Query("GameScore");
// q.get(gameScore.id)
console.log("ID: " + gameScore.id)
},
error: function (gameScore, error) {
// Execute any logic that should take place if the save fails.
// error is a Parse.Error with an error code and message.
alert('Failed to create new object, with error code: ' + error.message);
}
});
// End of Parse code
The problem is that you're executing the query to find which object you want to update, but then you're not using the results when you go to save data.
query.first({ // This will result in just one object returned
success: (result) => {
// Check to make sure a result exists
if (result) {
result.save(data, {
// Rest of code
Note: You're treating playerName as a unique key. If multiple users can have the same playerName attribute, then there will be bugs. You can use id instead which is guaranteed to be unique. If you use id instead, you can utilize Parse.Query.get
Edit:
Since you want to update an existing object, you must specify its id.
var GameScore = Parse.Object.extend("GameScore");
var gameScore = new GameScore();
gameScore.id = "ID"; // This id should be the id of the object you want to update
I am not able to display records on my report.
Report Source: Group Approval(sysapproval_group) table
Condition:Sys Id - is one of - javascript: new GetMyGroupApprovals().getSysIds();
Script Include : MyGroupApproval
Note : Active is checked, Accesible is all application score & Client callable unchecked
var GetMyGroupApprovals = Class.create();
GetMyGroupApprovals.prototype = {
initialize: function() {
},
getSysIds : function getMyGroupMembers(){
var ga = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_group');
ga.addQuery('parent.sys_class_name', '=', 'change_request');
ga.query();
gs.log("TotalRecords1 Before:: " + ga.getRowCount());
var sysIdArray = [];
while(ga.next()){
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id);
}
return sysIdArray;
},
type: 'GetMyGroupApprovals'
};
Kindly note that I have to achieve with script approach. I am not able to get records on my report.
This line is probably causing unexpected behavior:
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id);
ga.sys_id returns a GlideElement object, which changes for each of the iterations in the GlideRecord, so the contents of sysIdArray will just be an instance of the same object for each row in the result set, but the value will just be the last row in the set.
You need to make sure you push a string to the array by using one of the following methods:
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id+''); // implicitly call toString
sysIdArray.push(ga.getValue('sys_id')); // return string value
Quick suggestion, you can use the following to get sys_ids as well:
sysIdArray.push(ga.getUniqueValue());
Well the title says it all, details following.
I have two related models, User & Role.
User has roles defined as:
Ext.define('App.model.security.User', {
extend: 'App.model.Base',
entityName: 'User',
fields: [
{ name: 'id' },
{ name: 'email'},
{ name: 'name'},
{ name: 'enabled', type: 'bool'}
],
manyToMany: 'Role'
});
Then I have a grid of users and a form to edit user's data including his roles.
The thing is, when I try to add or delete a role from the user a later call to session.getSaveBatch() returns undefined and then I cannot start the batch to send the modifications to the server.
How can I solve this?
Well after reading a lot I found that Ext won't save the changed relationships between two models at least on 5.1.1.
I've had to workaround this by placing an aditional field on the left model (I named it isDirty) with a default value of false and set it true to force the session to send the update to the server with getSaveBatch.
Later I'll dig into the code to write an override to BatchVisitor or a custom BatchVisitor class that allow to save just associations automatically.
Note that this only occurs when you want to save just the association between the two models and if you also modify one of the involved entities then the association will be sent on the save batch.
Well this was interesting, I've learned a lot about Ext by solving this simple problem.
The solution I came across is to override the BatchVisitor class to make use of an event handler for the event onCleanRecord raised from the private method visitData of the Session class.
So for each record I look for left side entities in the matrix and if there is a change then I call the handler for onDirtyRecord which is defined on the BatchVisitor original class.
The code:
Ext.define('Ext.overrides.data.session.BatchVisitor', {
override: 'Ext.data.session.BatchVisitor',
onCleanRecord: function (record) {
var matrices = record.session.matrices
bucket = null,
ops = [],
recordId = record.id,
className = record.$className;
// Before anything I check that the record does not exists in the bucket
// If it exists then any change on matrices will be considered (so leave)
try {
bucket = this.map[record.$className];
ops.concat(bucket.create || [], bucket.destroy || [], bucket.update || []);
var found = ops.findIndex(function (element, index, array) {
if (element.id === recordId) {
return true;
}
});
if (found != -1) {
return;
}
}
catch (e) {
// Do nothing
}
// Now I look for changes on matrices
for (name in matrices) {
matrix = matrices[name].left;
if (className === matrix.role.cls.$className) {
slices = matrix.slices;
for (id in slices) {
slice = slices[id];
members = slice.members;
for (id2 in members) {
id1 = members[id2][0]; // This is left side id, right side is index 1
state = members[id2][2];
if (id1 !== recordId) { // Not left side => leave
break;
}
if (state) { // Association changed
this.onDirtyRecord(record);
// Same case as above now it exists in the bucket (so leave)
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
});
It works very well for my needs, probably it wont be the best solution for others but can be a starting point anyways.
Finally, if it's not clear yet, what this does is give the method getSaveBatch the ability to detect changes on relationships.
I have the following issues with my knockout model validations and not sure how to resolve them. Following is my model first of all, with the validation rules:
var Data = function (data) {
this.Val = data;
}
function ViewModel(item) {
var parse = JSON.parse(item.d);
var self = this;
this.Name = ko.observable(parse.Name);
this.UserType = ko.observable(parse.UserType);
this.ID = ko.observable(parse.ID).extend({ required: { params: true, message: "ID is required" }, decimal: { params: 2, message: "Should be decimal"} });
this.Username = ko.observable(parsed.Username).extend({ required: {
onlyIf: function () {
return self.UserType() > 1;
}
}
});
this.WeeklyData = ko.observableArray([]);
var records = $.map(parse.WeeklyData, function (data) { return new Data(data) });
this.WeeklyData(records);
this.WeeklyData2 = ko.observableArray([]);
var records = $.map(parse.WeeklyData2, function (data) { return new Data(data) });
this.WeeklyData2(records);
}
ko.extenders.numeric = function (target, precision) {
var result = ko.dependentObservable({
read: function () {
return target().toFixed(precision);
},
write: target
});
result.raw = target;
return result;
};
Here are my problems:
1) with the ID() observable, I want to restrict it to two decimal points, so I've created the validation extender 'numeric' but it's not working. Is there anything wrong with how I'm using it and how to correct it?
2) Also, if I want to restrict an observable to whole numbers, how can I do that?
3) when I define a rule with a condition, (i.e. Username()), how do I define a custom message for that? I was able to do it for default rules, but with the conditional rules, it's not working
4) I have two observable arrays WeeklyData1 and WeeklyData2 both of which contains Data() objects. I want to have separate min/max rules for these two, for example, min/max - 1,7 for WeeklyData1 and min/max - 1,150 for WeeklyData2. How can I get it done?
4) Right now my error messages appear right next to the data field, but I want all those to appear in a single validation summary, while displaying '*' against the field. I've been told to use Validation-bindings, but I'm not sure how to use it, can someone please give an example?
It's a lot of questions, I know, but I appreciate if someone could help.
Thanks in advance
Instead of diving in your code i have created a small-small demonstrations for your questions. Ok so here we go,
1) with the ID() observable, I want to restrict it to two decimal points.... and 2) Also, if I want to restrict an observable to whole numbers....
Your 1 and 2 question are pretty similar so i covered both of this in a single fiddle. Check this fiddle.
3) when I define a rule with a condition, (i.e. Username()), how do I define a custom message ....
You can use message property to set custom messages, Check this fiddle.
4) I have two observable arrays WeeklyData1 and WeeklyData2 both of which contains Data() objects
I am not clear which this question, what type of data both of these array contains and for what you want to set min/max rule ( array length or other ). So please clear this, than i will try to help on this.
5) Right now my error messages appear right next to the data field.....
This questions answer i already given in your how to? with knockout js validations question (Check update).
Let me know if it helps!
I have a couple of tables with similar relationship structure to the standard Order, OrderLine tables.
When creating a data context, it gives the Order class an OrderLines property that should be populated with OrderLine objects for that particular Order object.
Sure, by default it will delay load the stuff in the OrderLine property but that should be fairly transparent right?
Ok, here is the problem I have: I'm getting an empty list when I go MyOrder.OrderLines but when I go myDataContext.OrderLines.Where(line => line.OrderId == 1) I get the right list.
public void B()
{
var dbContext = new Adis.CA.Repository.Database.CaDataContext(
"<connectionString>");
dbContext.Connection.Open();
dbContext.Transaction = dbContext.Connection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
//!!!Edit: Imortant to note that the order with orderID=1 already exists
//!!!in the database
//just add some new order lines to make sure there are some
var NewOrderLines = new List<OrderLines>()
{
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=300 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=301 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=302 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=303 }
};
dbContext.OrderLines.InsertAllOnSubmit(NewOrderLines);
dbContext.SubmitChanges();
//this will give me the 4 rows I just inserted
var orderLinesDirect = dbContext.OrderLines
.Where(orderLine => orderLine.OrderID == 1);
var order = dbContext.Orders.Where(order => order.OrderID == 1);
//this will be an empty list
var orderLinesThroughOrder = order.OrderLines;
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException e)
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
throw;
}
finally
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
dbContext.Dispose();
dbContext = null;
}
}
So as far as I can see, I'm not doing anything particularly strange but I would think that orderLinesDirect and orderLinesThroughOrder would give me the same result set.
Can anyone tell me why it doesn't?
You're just adding OrderLines; not any actual Orders. So the Where on dbContext.Orders returns an empty list.
How you can still find the property OrderLines on order I don't understand, so I may be goofing up here.
[Edit]
Could you update the example to show actual types, especially of the order variable? Imo, it shoud be an IQueryable<Order>, but it's strange that you can .OrderLines into that. Try adding a First() or FirstOrDefault() after the Where.