Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 5 years ago.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Improve this question
My code is apparently not working, can you help? Its for school project.
x=msgbox("Hello. Make sure you dispose of this computer properly. You can donate to a local school, retirement home, charitable organization, or a community center. You can recycle it or resell it. Let's protect our enviornment one piece of tech at a time. Our tech. Our future. Our job.",1,"Proper Care")
If vbCancel then
CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run("http://bestanimations.com/Military/Explosions/earth-explosion-animated-gif-2.gif")
If vbOK then
CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run("https://www.cta.tech/Consumer-Resources/Greener-Gadgets/Recycle-Electronics.aspx")
x=msgbox("If you don't, we might have a horrible future.",16,"Help the environment")
End If
If x=vbCancel then CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run("http://bestanimations.com/Military/Explosions/earth-explosion-animated-gif-2.gif")
If x=vbOK then
CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run("https://www.cta.tech/Consumer-Resources/Greener-Gadgets/Recycle-Electronics.aspx")
x=msgbox("If you don't, we might have a horrible future.",16,"Help the environment")
End If
You have two If statements, but only one End If statement. I'm guessing you may want your second If to actually be an ElseIf.
Also, saying If vbCancel doesn't do what you think it does. If you're trying to test the value of x, then you need to be testing the value of x.
Related
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 3 months ago.
Improve this question
I have a long object update.PostType.RecievedFrom.Id that I need to access many times inside my program,
but I want to shorten it, so it will be more readable, by creating a variable for it id := update.PostType.RecievedFrom.Id. now my question is would this variable be a "zero overhead" variable and will be just replaced as a macro in compile time, or it does affect my program (and if it is, how can I avoid it?)
will be just replaced as a macro in compile time [?]
No.
or it does affect my program
Yes, but in a totally negligible way
(and if it is, how can I avoid it?)
You cannot and you should not bother.
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 7 months ago.
Improve this question
What is problem? I don't understand.
There are 2 things that could be happening. First, you meant to list Article.all, referencing the class. Second, you're referencing article.all as a array, in which case it hasn't been defined as such in your code.
Also, please don't post images of code. Just copy/paste and use the code formatting tools. It really helps us understand what is going on.
Also, it helps to give as much background as possible, meaning what the code is supposed to do, why you're doing it, etc. The more thorough you are, the more helpful we can be.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for an explanation of the Kameda-Weiner algorithm.
I found the paper "On the State Minimization of Nondeterministic Finite Automata" which, I assume, contains this, though it's unfortunately behind a paywall, and I'm just a hobbyist.
Can someone explain the algorithm, or point me to another source?
Although I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, I think these two pdf files contain some sort of explanation.
Link1
Link2
I just tried to answer it, because I know how frustrating it can be, when you something you really want is behind a paywall! Hope it helps.
Cheers!
It's implemented here: https://github.com/coder0xff/parlex_legacy/blob/132e4a23a599140d22b18ead832626f0c607340f/Automata/NFA.cs#L641
(updated to fix dead link)
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have applied to couple of startups and most of them are asking to solve programming challenge before they start on the interviewing candidate.
I have submitted couple of the solution and all the time getting rejected in the initial screening.
Now what i think is, they will see my coding style, algorithm and OOD concepts that i have used to solve the problem. Can you guys input more on it as what other details are taken into consideration and how can i improve my coding for getting selected.
By the way, i did all my coding in either Java/Perl.
Nice question, I am a new grad too... One thing I notice: When you do the exercise home, they expect you to use the best algorithm out there. In my opinion code modularity, even on a small function is key. Put lot effort into the code because they are not just judging you, but comparing you against other candidate. The one which seems to have put the more effort wins.
ps: Ask this question on programmers.stackexchange, you will obtain some good inputs there.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
We are thinking of using a Wizard pattern to help a user complete a task.
The Wizard pattern seems to solve our problem. We are also interested in what human factors research might have to say about the basic problem of a non-expert user needing to accomplish an infrequent and complicated task-–-are there other, possibly better paradigms for doing this than a wizard?
You posted this question over two years ago and no one has offered a better interaction design pattern than the wizard.
That looks like an answer to me.