I've installed OmniPascal extension in Visual Studio Code to use it for coding in Delphi and I am loving it. Code completion, parameters hint, go to declarations, all working 100%! Nonetheless, I am missing the refactor commands like rename (CTRL+SHIFT+E). Is that already implemented in OmniPascal?
There are currently no refactoring tools implemented in OmniPascal. Rename and Extract method are planned for the future but there are other features that need to be implemented before OmniPascal can turn into a reliable refactoring tool.
As long as OmniPascal doesn't handle all language features correctly (like with-blocks or class helpers) the rename command would produce wrong results. You don't want to work with such a refactoring tool.
Related
I want to have google-style like code style checker that would automatically run within Clion.
However, what I found as solutions (predeclared code style for google and others, direct Editor settings and EditorConfig support in Clion help) are all rather primitive. For example, I want to use snake case with final underscore for class member fileds (e.g. my_class_member_) and usual snake case for function arguments (e.g. some_argument), and none of the suggested options would do the trick as far as I am concerned. Furthermore, some politics associated with endless loops and so are to be added, which is even more context-specific.
I consider creating cpplint.py-like script for this, but it is going to be very time-consuming and is likely to be run outside Clion. Are there any elegant ways to solve my problem?
Yeah, you able to do this! Look into Clion plug-in Clion-cpplint and use with cpplint.py script, provided by Google. You will get highlights on the fly when you are editing C++ source code.
You able to install add-on through Plugins tab in settings. In the end you will get something like:
Is there a way to run my .fs file with either a breakpoint or a command like System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Launch() in it so that I can use FSI to examine values, apply functions to them, plot them, etc.?
I know this question has been asked before but I tried the answers and could not make them work. Clear instructions or a link to a write-up explaining the process would be of great help not only to myself, but also, I believe, to all beginners.
Unfortunately, you cannot hit a breakpoint and jump into FSI. The context of a running .NET program is quite different to that of an interactive FSI session and they are not compatible enough to just switch between one or the other. I can understand an expectation of this kind of debugging when coming from other dynamic/interpreted languages such as JavaScript, Python etc. It is a really powerful feature.
As you have already noted, you can use the VS immediate window but you need to use its C#-like syntax and respect its limitations. Also, since it's not F#, you need to understand the F# to .NET conversion in order to make full use of it.
If you use Paket for dependency management in your project you have another option: Add generate_load_scripts: true to your paket.dependencies. This will give you a file like .paket\load\net452\main.group.fsx, which you can load into FSI to get all of the dependencies for your project. However, you are still responsible for loading in your own source files and building up some state similar to what is found at your desired breakpoint.
To hit a break point, in visual studio or visual studio code, you just click to the left of the line number you want to set your breakpoint. This is very much a supported feature in .fs files.
I use Visual Studio for development and I am quite used to Intellisense. But when writting CoffeeScript you don't really get any Syntax Checking or Intellisense.
Is there a plugin for VS that would allow this?
Thanks
You can't have more than syntax checking/coloring with coffeescript (on any IDE) AFAIK.
As an alternative, you can use TypeScript to get the full Visual Studio tooling support (and stay close to the javascript), or some transcompilers that transform code to javascript, for C# there is Saltarelle and for CIL (.NET bytecode, so compatible with any .NET language), I just found JSIL but I have no idea how well it works.
Note than the generated code "look" can be important for debugging and using external libraries get a bit of work to be included in Typed languages.
For js code readability I would recommand TypeScript (similar to coffeescript, even easier, but less powerfull as a language).
Saltarelle code looks readable (didn't tried a lot), for JSIL I have no idea.
A list of languages that compiles to JS: https://github.com/jashkenas/coffee-script/wiki/List-of-languages-that-compile-to-JS
Webstorm and all of the JetBrains IDEs recently added some code completion and refactoring support. It knows what methods are in my own classes and will prompt to complete as I type. The red squiggly underline compile as you type is not quite there yet but it is coming. I bet Webstorm is the first to implement CS source map also. They have added so much in the last 11 months.
Check this out: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/2b96d16a-c986-4501-8f97-8008f9db141a
Here is another: http://chirpy.codeplex.com/
I think this should do what you want.
Does a refactoring (able do conscious language-aware rename classes/variables renaming and replace simple constructions instead of doing dumb string search-and-replace) tool exist which can be used without IDE/editor?
I am particularly interested in Scala, C# and PHP languages.
For Scala there is a refactoring library that can be used standalone: http://scala-refactoring.org/
Not exactly what you are looking for, but Bicycle Repair Man, a Python refactoring tool, ships as an editor-agnostic refactoring library. It's actually used via editor/IDE plugins though.
After some searching I've found that Microsoft Visual Studio does not provide the "complex.h" header file, but I have some C code that unfortunately uses it. I've tried using <complex> and compiling as C++ code; this requires changing
complex
to
_complex
I don't even know what I would need to change
long complex
to. Any ideas how I can get around this?
Have you tried this link?
If you can't use third-party libraries, then I think you're going to be compelled to re-implement complex functionality yourself. The good news is that most complex math is actually really simple to write, unless you need some fairly advanced features.