I'm trying to put together a Makefile that will create a folder and clone repositories from GIT
I'm having trouble putting it all together so I'm starting with a generic Makefile
My makefile:
$(shell mkdir -p myDir)
$(shell git.sh)
The shell script that I am trying to get to invoke
#!/bin/sh
REPOSRC="my bitbucket repo URL"
LOCALREPO="myDir"
# We do it this way so that we can abstract if from just git later on
LOCALREPO_VC_DIR=$LOCALREPO/.git
if [ ! -d $LOCALREPO_VC_DIR ]
then
git clone $REPOSRC $LOCALREPO
else
cd $LOCALREPO
git pull $REPOSRC
fi
# End
When I run make I'm getting the following error:
Makefile:2: *** missing separator. Stop.
Also, is this the correct way to go about this task?
What you have is not a makefile. It's really a shell script written in makefile syntax (and, as you've discovered from the errors, not correct makefile syntax).
Make is a tool that allows commands to be run to update a set of target files, or not run if any of the target files don't need to be updated, based on comparing timestamps of the target files and their prerequisite files. These dependency relationships can be chained.
That's all that make is for.
To prototypical example is compiling a program: if any of the source files have been modified then you need to recompile the object files for those sources; if object files are updated then libraries might need to be re-created; if object or library files are updated then programs might need to be re-linked.
If your problem space doesn't map, or can't be made to map, to that mechanism, then make and makefiles are not the correct tool for the job you have in mind. Based on your description of your problem, make is not the right tool for this job.
You should just write a shell script, as you've basically done here already, and move forward.
If you do want to write a makefile you should spend some time understanding the syntax of makefiles and how they work, rather than just searching on Stack Overflow and trying to put together a makefile based on the answers. For example, try reading at least the introduction of the GNU make manual.
With $(shell ...) construct you substitute shell command output into the makefile. Of course after calling mkdir or invoking git the output is not a valid makefile.
Your makefile should be like this
all:
mkdir -p myDir
./git.sh
note that indentation after all: has to be done with tabs.
And it looks like you don't need make for your task. Just shell script would be enough.
Related
I tried to use a make file in code::blocks but I am doing it wrong. I have the version installed with the compilers included. http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/10.05/Windows/codeblocks-10.05mingw-setup.exe/download. What do I do with the make file? It starts with:
CC=gcc
best, US
You don't tend to execute the make file itself, rather you execute make, giving it the make file as an argument:
make -f pax.mk
If your make file is actually one of the standard names (like makefile or Makefile), you don't even need to specify it. It'll be picked up by default (if you have more than one of these standard names in your build directory, you better look up the make man page to see which takes precedence).
As paxdiablo said make -f pax.mk would execute the pax.mk makefile, if you directly execute it by typing ./pax.mk, then you would get syntax error.
Also you can just type make if your file name is makefile/Makefile.
Suppose you have two files named makefile and Makefile in the same directory then makefile is executed if make alone is given. You can even pass arguments to makefile.
Check out more about makefile at this Tutorial : Basic understanding of Makefile
I'm learning about makefiles. I've written a simple hello world like makefile named just makefile2 but when I run mingw32-make makefile2 I get:
Nothing to be done for 'makefile2'.
When I run just only mingw32-make (without supplying the file name) it works.
My question is it a rule to have only one makefile in the folder and to run it we don't provide a file name at all?
Is it possible to run specific makefile providing it's name?
PS. I'm using MinGW on Windows 10
Usually you need the -f option to tell make to use another file than Makefile or makefile, like
make -f makefile2
Without the -f flag, you tell make to build the target named (in your case) makefile2.
Hi I am new to creating makefile.
I have written the following commands in a makefile but they do not seem to execute when i type make in my terminal.
However, if i type the command separately in the terminal, it works.
I am trying to open a vivado project in this tcl file and do some spyglass analysis on it and save the result in a txt file.The tcl file also runs properly if executed separately.
I cd to my project folder where all the files- sources folder, project folder, makefile is present. I named it "makefile" so that i can execute it by typing make in the terminal.The makefile contents are as follows.
.PHONY : vivado_open
vivado_open:
$(info Hello Make)
bsub -Is -q i_soc_rh7 -R "rusage[mem=32000, temp=1GB] affinity[core(8):membind=localonly]" vivado -nolog -nojou -mode batch -source vivado.tcl
Here is the result from the terminal
$make
Hello Make
make: Nothing to be done for `vivado_open'.
Sorry, but there has to be something else going on here, that you haven't told us about. It's simply not possible for you to get that output if you typed make with that makefile.
You are using a variable, not a target named vivado_open, so make would never print nothing to be done for 'vivado_open'. It would say instead something like: nothing to be done for ../projectfiles/test.prj
Further, you didn't answer my question about TABs vs. spaces. If both the info and bsub lines are indented with TABs, there's no possible way that make would print Hello Make, without also printing the bsub command and trying to run it.
You must have another makefile in your directory, maybe named Makefile or GNUmakefile, that is being used instead of makefile. Or maybe you have an environment variable like MAKEFILES set which is causing other makefiles to be read.
If none of those appear to be true, you'll have to run make -d and see if you can figure out what's happening. That output is far too large to post to StackOverflow, so you'll have to try to read it yourself.
EDITED
OK, the problem is you're using spaces to indent your rules. In make, all recipe lines must be indented with a hard TAB character. Normal spaces don't mean anything special to make. Basically your makefile is interpreted as if you'd written this:
.PHONY : vivado_open
vivado_open:
$(info Hello Make)
bsub -Is -q i_soc_rh7 -R "rusage[mem=32000, temp=1GB] affinity[core(8):membind=localonly]" vivado -nolog -nojou -mode batch -source vivado.tcl
This is why you get this message "nothing to be done": you haven't actually defined a recipe for vivaldo_open, so there is literally nothing that make knows to do to update that target.
As an aside, normally you would get a syntax error for the bsub line because make doesn't know what that is. However, if you look carefully at your line you'll see that it contains a :. So, make is interpreting this as a set of targets and set of prerequisites, like this:
bsub ... affinity[core(8) : membind=localonly]" vivado ... vivado.tcl
(make doesn't care about quotes or other special characters like [] etc.)
So. Be sure you indent your recipe lines with TAB characters and you'll be fine. This is probably the single most common issue people have with makefiles.
I'm using automake.
I'd like to have a script run each time I run 'make'.
This script does a git diff and generates an MD5 sum of the diff.
The hash is written as a #define in repos_version.h
e.g.:
#define REPOS_DIFF "-190886e9f895e80c42cf6b426dc85afd"
The script only rewrites this file if it doesn't exist or if the diff has is different to what is in repos_version.h already. But the script needs to be run for each make.
main.c includes repos_version.h and prints out the hash when the executable is run.
Here's Attempt 1 for Makefile.am
all: config.h
#chmod +x gen_diff_hash.sh
#./gen_diff_hash.sh
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) all-recursive
This work, but I get the following error
Makefile:1234: warning: overriding recipe for target all'
Makefile:734: warning: ignoring old recipe for targetall'
Here's Attempt 2 for Makefile.am
all-local:
#chmod +x gen_diff_hash.sh
#./gen_diff_hash.sh
main.c: repos_version.h
However, this doesn't work, as all-local seems to be run too late. A second run of 'make' does get the desired result, but that's not a runner.
So neither are great.
Any ideas?
I've been reading through the automake hooks documentation, but I can't see anything that suits my needs.
You could ensure the script is always run every time Make loads the Makefile, by executing it via $(shell ./gen_diff_hash.sh) and assigning it to a throwaway variable (or using it in some other construct like an ifeq or something).
Note, that this is not POSIX, and on Make implementations other than GNU this isn't valid syntax. GNU Make 4.x supports using VAR != ./gen_diff_hash.sh as well, which is compatible with BSD Make at least.
But maybe it would be a better idea to create a .PHONY: gendiff target that runs the script, and make the header depend on this gendiff. The target would then be re-evaluated every time Make checks if repos_version.h is up-to-date, rather than every time Make is run at all.
I have a tricky issue with gmake, when I build from the parent directory, something is different and the make does not build all the .o(s) it needs and fails, but if I cd to the directory and do a make it builds them fine.
How can I get GNUmake to tell me the difference between these two runs? There must be some make variables set in the parent that break the child, but I need help figuring out how to track them down.
If running make from the parent directory fails to build foo.o, then try make foo.o. If that fails then try running make -n foo.o in both directories (to print the commands instead of executing them) to see what it's doing differently. If it succeeds, then it's not even trying to build foo.o when run from the parent directory; make -n may shed some light, and as a last resort make -d will give you a torrent of information about the decision process, why it's doing what it's doing.
Here's a handy trick to see the value of variables. Put this rule in your makefile:
show_%:
#echo $# is $($*)
Now you can run make show_FOO and it will tell you the value of the variable FOO.
Finally, are you sure you know where you build your .o files? Make is very good at using things there to build files here, but not the other way around, so it can lose track of intermediate files if you're not careful.