If I change the strokesLimit=25 to 5 in undomanager, to allow people to undo less, do you foresee any other issues for the users?
If no, Why is the strokeslimit so high, google docs and other tools seems to have time based limit or less key strokes? Do CKEditor have time based limits?
Will upgrading CKeditor from 4.5 to recent(5+) will help?
Related
I'm trying to find the Metrics Launch Time of my app by using Xcode Organizer but it does not show the result of the 3 most recent versions. Only for older versions.
I'm using Xcode 12.2 (12B45b), and even after upgrade to 12.3 (12C33), still doesn't work!
Does anyone run into the same problem and know how to fix it?
TLDR: Versions with limited usage will not appear in the Xcode Organizer Metrics.
We were curious why this is happening to our app aswell. We had 52 releases in 2021 and the Battery Usage section from Xcode Organiser Metrics menu shows us only 5 of them, while Scrolling section shows only 4 at the moment of writing this answer.
After doing some research and watching this WWDC20 session on Diagnose performance issues with the Xcode Organizer I have learned that apple is using some usage threshold for each version of the app to determine wether it should show up in the metrics or not. According to the linked session, in Xcode 12 they have lowered the required usage threshold by a factor of five.
Another thing is that now you will see a limited usage icon attached to versions which have passed the new threshold but their usage is still low enough so you will need to be aware of the margin or error while analysing those metrics.
So even though the threshold have been lowered, it's still not really helpful If you update the app often like we do. Which is sad since we are not really able to provide improvements to these metrics since we do not really know with what we are dealing with. Let's hope future versions of Xcode will at more information about how much usage is enough, because apparently tens of thousands of users on a version are literally not enough for it to be included on a list.
Resources:
Diagnose performance issues with the Xcode Organizer
We will be developing a new web site for a client who already has a Kentico 8.2 license. I am trying to make a case for developing the site using Kentico 9. Some key features I have found so far include:
faster performance (how much in real-world terms?)
better integration with .Net MVC
content staging tasks can be synchronized per user account
better rollback functionality: previously we had to make full database backups, content staging in Kentico 8.2 causes issues for restoring previous versions of a page.
built in source control support for GIT
It looks like Kentico integration with the client's existing database may be possible. Has anyone done this? What are the limitations or caveats?
Is there a discount for upgrading the license from 8.2 to 9?
Thanks in advance for your feedback!
faster performance (how much in real-world terms?)
there are major (official) improvements for content and contact management
better integration with .Net MVC
there is whole new way to develop sites using ASP.NET MVC with Kentico
content staging tasks can be synchronized per user account
there is pretty good blogpost describing new staging improvements
better rollback functionality: previously we had to make full database
backups, content staging in Kentico 8.2 causes issues for restoring
previous versions of a page.
I am not sure what do you mean by new rollback functionality
built in source control support for GIT
you might confused with continuous integration feature
You can find release notes with all new features and improvements here.
It looks like Kentico integration with the client's existing database
may be possible. Has anyone done this? What are the limitations or
caveats?
there is tested upgrade utility for upgrading to Kentico 9
Is there a discount for upgrading the license from 8.2 to 9?
for pricing you should definitely contact Kentico sales department
See the answer I posted on the DevNet (which by the way, no need to cross-post on both)
If they have a license for 8.2, is their maintenance current? If so, simply go to the client portal and upgrade it for free. This can be done without any cost. Either way, the licensing cost doesn't come from the version, it comes from the type (base, ultimate, ems, etc.).
So assuming they purchased their license about a year ago, their maintenance should be current or close to current and you either get current on your maintenance or just go to the client portal and see if it will allow you to upgrade your license and get a new key for v9.
If they don't have the site built, there is no reason to build it on v8.2 at all.
Is it possible to cache specific resources while developing with disable cache option turned on in Chrome Dev Tools?
One might want to cache https://fonts.googleapis.com/css while testing local projects with caching disabled, for example.
You can't using DevTools. The disable cache disables the entire cache possible.
You may star a recent feature request in the Chromium issue tracker asking for just this feature. Please remember that +1, me too, and any other un-constructive comments are not needed. Simply login and click the star beside the issue number in the left sidebar. That will let the developers know others want this functionality as well.
We’re using Magento Community version 1.7 and have a standard desktop theme and a mobile theme. We’ve added matched expressions to the General > Design > Themes section to display the relevant theme based on browser user agent.
Everything works great when the cache is switched off. However, when the cache is switched on and cleared, the theme which is loaded first gets cached. Is there a way around this? Either creating a separate cache for each theme or even switching the cache off altogether for the mobile theme?
Many thanks in advance for any advice you can give.
One way to bypass this is to leave the block cache and layouts not cached. These two are probably causing the issue to happen. This won't be that great of a performance hit since Magento is a resource hog anyway. I would recommend enabling Zend Full Page Cache and perhaps even using something like memcached or APC to supplement the default magento caching.
Hope this helps!
So far they're the only people I can find that are doing a chart control...
What happens when the beta expires? How does it expire? (Does it expire?). They look great but there is no pricing information or expiry information.
Here is a direct quote from the EULA:
“You may distribute the Programs as embedded in Your Integrated Products to Your end-users only pursuant to an end-user license that meets the requirements of this Section.”
So, yes, you can ship Apps built with Telerik Windows 8 Controls Beta to the Store.
"Beta," by definition, suggests not ready for production use.
There are at least a couple of things you should think about before moving forward:
Does the license agreement for the controls allow use in a production app (you did read the license, right?)
Are you willing to risk the possibility that the app might suddenly stop working for any and all users who have downloaded it, until such time as you replace the controls with working versions (and get the updated version of your app submitted to the store)?
As long as the controls fit the Windows 8 app design, and don't cause performance or crashing issues, they may not have any impact on whether or not the app gets through certification.
But the larger issue is one of risk. Betas are for testing. IMO, unless the beta includes a "go-live" license, you should probably stick with using beta software for evaluation and testing only.
To be clear, that's no knock on Telerik's beta quality (or anyone else's, for that matter). Just a reminder that beta software isn't finished yet.