I've exported some of the User-Interface components inside of the Adobe Animate into a .swc file to be used at runtime:
public class Main extends Sprite {
public function Main() {
var checkbox:CheckBox = new CheckBox(); // fl.controls.CheckBox
checkbox.label = "Row";
addChild(checkbox);
}
}
It's working nice with the Adobe Flash Builder; but using the IntelliJ IDEA, that I do need to go with, only behaves weirdly sometimes, and argues in unexpected ways of:
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.
at fl.controls::CheckBox/drawLayout()
at fl.controls::LabelButton/draw()
at fl.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher()
or sometimes, argues with the following message (with a fl.controls.NumericStepper in the following example):
TypeError: Error #2007: Parameter child must be non-null.
at flash.display::DisplayObjectContainer/addChildAt()
at fl.controls::BaseButton/drawBackground()
at fl.controls::BaseButton/draw()
at fl.core::UIComponent/drawNow()
at fl.controls::NumericStepper/drawLayout()
at fl.controls::NumericStepper/draw()
at fl.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher()
for the really no rational reason!! I've been searching for solutions (and even reasons!) for many hours and tried what I could've thought of! (e.g: I put the routine in an Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE handler; I tested multiple combinations of the components for the exported file, and I do use the latest versions of the applications and the SDK.)
Please shed some lights on this as it randomly appears with identical code just for the fun of annoyment!! I appreciate any feedback as I'm totally out of ideas!
Thank you in advance :)
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a winforms application that is installed on multiple computers. Most of the time it works perfectly but for a small subset of users the application fails to launch. The only resolution I have found for this issue is to reinstall the application on the users machine.
I have included screenshots below showing the application working after a successful launch and also a screenshot showing what the user sees when the application fails
Normal Launch:
Failed Launch:
When the application fails, the startup form does not get rendered at all. On the users desktop there is nothing visible at all and the program is not outside of any visible area.
If anyone could provide answers or insight into the following questions it would be much appreciated.
What could cause this problem?
Windows or program related?
How could this be fixed?
I have included code snippets from the startup form below
Starting code:
private static void Main()
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.SetUnhandledExceptionMode(UnhandledExceptionMode.CatchException);
Application.Run(new Timelord());
}
public Timelord()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
this.BringToFront();
this.Focus();
// Displays a date and gets the version of the program
lblDate.Text = DateTime.Now.ToShortDateString();
Version version = System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Version;
if (ApplicationDeployment.IsNetworkDeployed)
{
lblVersion.Text = string.Format("v{0}", ApplicationDeployment.CurrentDeployment.CurrentVersion.ToString(4));
}
// Loads the comboboxes for selection
this.loadComboUser();
this.loadComboCompany();
this.loadComboTick();
}
I think what is happening is that there is an error being thrown in your Timelord constructor under certain conditions. Since Timelord is the "startup" object for your application, a failure to create its instance properly would cause serious problems. Here is what I would recommend doing to identify those conditions, and to eliminate the issue with the form only being partially created.
I am assuming based on your comment about the program reading from a database that one or more of the following methods perform data access calls to a database
this.loadComboUser();
this.loadComboCompany();
this.loadComboTick();
You typically want to avoid method calls, ESPECIALLY data access calls in a constructor. There are many reasons for this that I won't list here, but this other stackoverflow article explains some of them.
Is it OK to put a database initialization call in a C# constructor?
To correct these issues, implement an eventhandler for the load event and move all of your Timelord constructor code into the Load event handler. The Form.Load event fires after the constructor is complete but before a form is displayed for the first time.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.windows.forms.form.load?view=netframework-4.7.2
Here is how I would recommend restructuring your Timelord object.
public Timelord()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
}
Private Sub Timelord_Load(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
{
Try
{
this.BringToFront();
this.Focus();
// Displays a date and gets the version of the program
lblDate.Text = DateTime.Now.ToShortDateString();
Version version = System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Version;
if (ApplicationDeployment.IsNetworkDeployed)
{
lblVersion.Text = string.Format("v{0}", ApplicationDeployment.CurrentDeployment.CurrentVersion.ToString(4));
}
// Loads the comboboxes for selection
this.loadComboUser();
this.loadComboCompany();
this.loadComboTick();
}
Catch(Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show($"The following error occurred in the Timelord constructor {Environment.NewLine}{ex.Message}")
}
}
Making this change will allow the Timelord constructor to completely create the object, then the Load event will run and load any data into the UI. This way, if an error occurs, you will have at least completely created the Timelord Form and can catch the error.
What could cause this problem?
Your startup object (Timelord()) throwing an error in the constructor, therefore not properly creating object.
Windows or program related?
Program related
How could this be fixed?
Separating your Forms logic so that the only code in the constructor is your instantiation logic.
Implementing Try/Catch blocks to trap errors
I made a custom report in AX2012, to replace the WHS Shipping pick list. The custom report is RDP based. I have no trouble running it directly (with the parameters dialog), but when I try to use the controller (WHSPickListShippingController), I get an error saying "Pre-Processed RecId not found. Cannot process report. Indicates a development error."
The error is because in the class SrsReportProviderQueryBuilder (setArgs method), the map variable reportProviderParameters is empty. I have no idea why that is. The code in my Data provider runs okay. Here is my code for running the report :
WHSWorkId id = 'LAM-000052';
WHSPickListShippingController controller;
Args args;
WHSShipmentTable whsShipmentTable;
WHSWorkTable whsWorkTable;
clWHSPickListShippingContract contract; //My custom RDP Contract
whsShipmentTable = WHSShipmentTable::find(whsWorkTable.ShipmentId);
args = new Args(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
args.record(whsShipmentTable);
args.parm(whsShipmentTable.LoadId);
contract = new clWHSPickListShippingContract();
controller = new WHSPickListShippingController();
controller.parmReportName(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
controller.parmShowDialog(false);
controller.parmLoadFromSysLastValue(false);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpName(classStr(clWHSPickListShippingDP));
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdlContract().parmLanguageId(CompanyInfo::languageId());
controller.parmArgs(args);
controller.startOperation();
I don't know if I'm clear enough... But I've been looking for a fix for hours without success, so I thought I'd ask here. Is there a reason why this variable (which comes from the method parameter AifQueryBuilderArgs) would be empty?
I'm thinking your issue is with these lines (try removing):
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpName(classStr(clWHSPickListShippingDP));
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdlContract().parmLanguageId(CompanyInfo::languageId());
The style I'd expect to see with your contract would be like this:
controller = new WHSPickListShippingController();
contract = controller.getDataContractObject();
contract.parmWhatever('ParametersHere');
controller.parmArgs(args);
And for the DataProvider clWHSPickListShippingDP, usually if a report is using a DataProvider, you don't manually set it, but the DP extends SRSReportDataProviderBase and has an attribute SRSReportParameterAttribute(...) decorating the class declaration in this style:
[SRSReportParameterAttribute(classstr(MyCustomContract))]
class MyCustomDP extends SRSReportDataProviderBase
{
// Vars
}
You are using controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract); wrong, as this is more for run-time modifications. It's typically used for accessing the contract for preRunModifyContract overloads.
Build your CrossReference in a development environment then right click on \Classes\SrsReportDataContract\parmRdpContract and click Add-Ins>Cross-reference>Used By to see how that is generally used.
Ok, so now I feel very stupid for spending so much time on that error, when it's such a tiny thing...
The erronous line is that one :
controller.parmReportName(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
Because WHSPickListShipping is the name of the AX report, but I renamed my custom report clWHSPickListShipping. What confused me was that my DataProvider class was executing as wanted.
I'm currently using MvvmCross DownloadCache -- and it's working alright -- especially nice when I just need to drop in an Image URL and it automagically downloads / caches the image and serves up a UIImage.
I was hoping to leverage the code for one other use case -- which is I'd like to grab source images from URL's and cache the files on the local file system, but what I really want for this other use case is the image path on the local file system instead of the UIImage itself.
What would help me most if I could get an example of how I might accomplish that. Is it possible to make that happen in a PCL, or does it need to go into the platform specific code?
Thanks -- that works, but just in case anyone else is following along, I wanted to document how I got the Mvx.Resolve<IMvxFileDownloadCache>() to work. In my setup.cs (in the touch project), I had:
protected override void InitializeLastChance ()
{
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.DownloadCache.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.File.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.Json.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
...
}
But that wasn't enough, because nothing actually registers IMvxFileDownloadCache inside the DownloadCache plugin (which I was expecting, but it's just not the case).
So then I tried adding this line here:
Mvx.LazyConstructAndRegisterSingleton<IMvxFileDownloadCache, MvxFileDownloadCache>();
But that failed because MvxFileDownloadCache constructor takes a few arguments. So I ended up with this:
protected override void InitializeLastChance ()
{
...
var configuration = MvxDownloadCacheConfiguration.Default;
var fileDownloadCache = new MvxFileDownloadCache(
configuration.CacheName,
configuration.CacheFolderPath,
configuration.MaxFiles,
configuration.MaxFileAge);
Mvx.RegisterSingleton<IMvxFileDownloadCache>(fileDownloadCache);
...
}
And the resolve works okay now.
Question:
I do wonder what happens if two MvxFileDownloadCache objects that are configured in exactly the same way will cause issues by stepping on each other. I could avoid that question by changing the cache name on the one I'm constructing by hand, but I do want it to be a single cache (the assets will be the same).
If you look at the source for the plugin, you'll find https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/blob/3.2/Plugins/Cirrious/DownloadCache/Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.DownloadCache/IMvxFileDownloadCache.cs - that will give you a local file path for a cached file:
public interface IMvxFileDownloadCache
{
void RequestLocalFilePath(string httpSource, Action<string> success, Action<Exception> error);
}
You can get hold of a service implementing this interface using Mvx.Resolve<IMvxFileDownloadCache>()
To then convert that into a system-wide file path, try NativePath in https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/blob/3.2/Plugins/Cirrious/File/Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.File/IMvxFileStore.cs#L27
How do I troubleshoot the following error being thrown by a Microsoft AJAX JavaScript framework method? It is an automatically generated line of JavaScript from a custom User Control in a Web Forms App (Sitefinity 5 CMS)
Error Message:
Unable to get property 'FancyBlockDesigner' of undefined or null reference
Here is the JavaScript that is throwing the error:
Sys.Application.add_init(function() {
$create(SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor.FancyBlockDesigner, null, null, {"Editor":"propertyEditor_ctl00_ctl00_ctl00_ctl00_ctl00_Editor","propertyEditor":"propertyEditor"}, $get("propertyEditor_ctl00_ctl00_ctl00"));
});
Rather than discuss the ascx and cs files that try to abstract this detail away from me, I want to know what this error means. If I understand the detail, the abstraction might make more sense.
"$create" function in ASP.NET Ajax creates an instance of JavaScript class. Microsoft had their own opinion on how to make JavaScript object orientated and as time had shown, their approach wasn't exactly perfect.
Anyhow, to try to explain what is happening, let me give a bit of an overview oh how it works. We start by a server side control which implements IScriptControl interface which mandates two members: GetScriptDescriptors and GetScriptReferences. The second one is pretty straightforward - it lets you register references to all JavaScript files that you control will require. The GetScriptDescriptors, on the other hand, let's you define all the instances of JavaScript classes you want to use as well as it lets you set their properties - initialize them, if you will.
What the autogenerated JavaScript code you've pasted says is basically that you have defined in GetScriptDescriptors that you will need an instance of type "SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor.FancyBlockDesigner" where you want Editor property to be initialized. This code will go and look for a JavaScript constructor that looks like this:
function SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor.FancyBlockDesigner(element) {
}
that most probably also has a prototype defined, something like:
SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor.FancyBlockDesigner.prototype = {
}
Now, since the error you have posted states: "Unable to get property 'FancyBlockDesigner' of undefined or null reference", most probably one of the following is the problem:
You have not included the JavaScript file which contains the class (constructor + prototype) that I've talked about above
You have forgot to add the "FancyBlockDesigner" to the constructor (it seems that you do have other object, perhaps through MS Ajax namespaces - "SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab"
You have not registerd the "SampleHtmlEditor" namespace. Make sure at the top of your JS file you have this: Type.registerNamespace("SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor");
So, short story long, the function with name "SitefinityWebApp.Esd.TheLab.SampleHtmlEditor.FancyBlockDesigner" cannot be found.
Hope this helps,
Ivan
I know I can control the way Visual Studio handles exceptions according to their type and to the fact that they're eventually caught using the "Exception" dialog.
However, I've got a library that's internally throwing (and catching) an ArgumentOutOfRange exception when I'm calling a specific method. The exception is thrown (and caught by the library) maybe 1% of the time, but I'm calling this method a lot. The editor says it's by design (and indeed, the design they've chosen makes sense).
The thing is that I don't want Visual Studio to break each time the exception is thrown.
I don't want to stop breaking on ArgumentOutOfRange exceptions, as I may have some in my code and want to break on those.
I don't want to enable "just my code" debugging because I'm concerned about the exceptions thrown outside of my code (notably for performance reasons)
Is there a way to achieve this? I've been looking into attributes (such as DebuggerStepThrough), but haven't find something adequate yet.
Any hints on how to do this ?
I don't want to enable "just my code" debugging
Yeah, stop there right now. That is exactly the feature you need to not get the unwanted debugger breaks. If you don't want to know about somebody else's crappy code then flip that checkbox back on.
This invariably goes off the rails when programmers use exceptions for flow control. A very common crime. It takes two of them to turn that into a mess that turns a debugging session into a very tedious click nightmare. When you need the debugger feature that breaks on the first-chance exception then you basically lost if somebody else needed that as well.
Everybody hopes that they can magically use the [DebuggerNonUserCode] or [DebuggerHidden] or [DebuggerStepThrough] attributes to make that problem disappear. It doesn't. The other programmer did not think his code was unimportant enough to deserve those attributes. And, well, it wasn't because there's always a bug hidden in code that uses try/catch-em-all code. Pokémon code.
So Microsoft had to find another way to help programmers deal with crappy library code. They did. Tick that checkbox, bam, solved. Nothing you can do about that crappy code anyway, other than sending a nasty-gram to the author. Don't let us or Microsoft slow you down doing that as well, y'all have to get along to create a product that people like to use.
I think it's not possible in visual studio but it certainly is in WinDbg.
See for example http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alejacma/archive/2009/08/24/managed-debugging-with-windbg-breaking-on-an-exception-part-1.aspx
On a side note it seems that starting with visual studio 2010 you can load and use WinDbg extension DLLs directly providing aditional functionality (including possibly the one that you need) but I haven't tried this yet - see for example http://www.dotnetcurry.com/ShowArticle.aspx?ID=648
What you can do is use Concord, the debug engine that ships with Visual Studio (starting with version 2012). It's quite extensible through a nice managed API (and deployable using vsix technology), but it's not fully documented.
Concord has the concept of debug monitors, that we can hook using the IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification Interface
The cool thing is this interface can monitor all exceptions thrown. It can also "suppress" any detected exception event, which is exactly what we need.
What I suggest is to start with the Hello World sample: . Download it, and make sure it runs as expected for you.
Now, just modify HelloWorld.vsdconfigxml like this:
<!--TODO: If you copy the sample, ensure to regenerate the GUID in this file -->
<!-- 1. change component level to something higher than 40500 -->
<ManagedComponent
ComponentId="51736b11-9fb4-4b6d-8aca-a10a2b7ae768"
ComponentLevel="40501"
AssemblyName="HelloWorld">
<!-- 2. change class full name to HelloWorld.ExceptionHandler, for example -->
<Class Name="HelloWorld.ExceptionHandler">
<Implements>
<InterfaceGroup>
<NoFilter/>
<!-- 3. change supported interface -->
<Interface Name="IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification"/>
</InterfaceGroup>
</Implements>
</Class>
</ManagedComponent>
Then, just create an ExceptionHandler.cs class and put something like this in there:
public class ExceptionHandler : IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification
{
private bool _unhandledDetected;
// we're being called!
public void OnDebugMonitorException(DkmExceptionInformation exception, DkmWorkList workList, DkmEventDescriptorS eventDescriptor)
{
if (_unhandledDetected)
{
// this will cause the program to terminate
eventDescriptor.Suppress();
return;
}
if (exception.ProcessingStage.HasFlag(DkmExceptionProcessingStage.Unhandled))
{
_unhandledDetected = true;
}
else if (exception.ProcessingStage.HasFlag(DkmExceptionProcessingStage.Thrown))
{
if (SuppressException(exception))
{
eventDescriptor.Suppress();
}
}
}
// should we suppress a thrown (1st chance) exception?
private bool SuppressException(DkmExceptionInformation exception)
{
// implement any custom logic in here, for example use the exception's name
if (exception.Name == typeof(ArgumentOutOfRangeException).FullName)
{
// for example, use the module (assembly) name
var clrAddress = (DkmClrInstructionAddress)exception.InstructionAddress;
var clrModule = clrAddress.ModuleInstance;
if (clrModule.Name == "TheUglyOne.dll")
return true; // we don't want this one!
}
return false;
}
}
When you run the project, you should see all exceptions being monitored (regardless of your 'just my code' and/or exception triggers settings), so what you just need to do is implement some logic to suppress the ones you really don't want to see. I've not checked but I suppose you could build your logic using custom attributes as the Dkm classes provide quite a lot of .NET metadata information.
Note: as you can see, there is some trickery to make sure the program will terminate normally.