I wanted to draw three gradients on top of the other on a HTML5 Canvas. But it wasn't not producing the desired effect. So I dug into the thing a little bit, and found out that rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) was not completely transparent when used in canvas gradient. Rather it was producing an unexpected blackish tone.
In CSS, it works fine though.
How can I have the same effect as it works in CSS? (see attached screenshot please)
CSS properties:
background: linear-gradient(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 0, 0));
Canvas properties:
var grad = ctx.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 0, height);
grad.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)');
grad.addColorStop(1, 'rgb(255, 0, 0)');
Indeed the algorithms seem to be different.
Not quite sure why, but I'd say that CSS doesn't consider rgba(0,0,0,0) as transparent black pixel like canvas does, but instead just as transparent.
The 2D canvas will composite straight from all the 4 RGBA channels values, until the ones of the next stop, while CSS one seems to comprehend transparent as a particular case.
To get the same result as CSS on a canvas, you'd have to set your first transparent stop to the next one, by only changing the alpha value:
var ctx = c.getContext('2d'),
grad = ctx.createLinearGradient(0,0,0,150);
grad.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(255,0,0,0)'); // transparent red
grad.addColorStop(1, 'rgba(255,0,0)');
ctx.fillStyle = grad;
ctx.fillRect(0,0,300,150);
#html{
background: linear-gradient(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 0, 0));
height: 150px;
width: 300px;
display: inline-block;
}
<div id="html"></div>
<canvas id="c"></canvas>
Related
I have a view that I want to overlay with a transparent black layer whose edges match the view exactly. The view does not clip its bounds, so subviews may be hanging off.
The obvious solution is the mask property of CALayer, but the docs say that the mask layer "must not have a superlayer" or the behavior is undefined.
I was hoping that using the presentationLayer of that view would be an effective workaround, but I don't think I fully understand what presentation layers are, as that property returns nil.
Does anyone have tips on how I could mask my transparent black layer to match the shape of the view over which it will be drawn? Thanks.
There’s a less obvious solution to this that should work better than masking: a blend-mode filter, specifically source-atop. If you add your transparent layer as a sibling of the layers it’s supposed to dim, and assign it the appropriate CI compositing filter, it will dim those layers without affecting anything outside of their boundaries. As a bonus, you’ll get correct antialiasing at the edges, unlike the masked-overlay approach.
Here’s an example. For illustrative purposes I made the dimming layer only half the height of the area it covers, but you’d of course want to make it larger.
let container = CALayer()
container.backgroundColor = NSColor.systemBlue.cgColor
container.frame = CGRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: 200, height: 200)
let dimmedRoot = CALayer()
let dimmedLayer1 = CALayer()
dimmedLayer1.frame = CGRect(x: 20, y: 20, width: 100, height: 100)
dimmedLayer1.backgroundColor = NSColor.systemGreen.cgColor
dimmedLayer1.transform = CATransform3DMakeRotation(0.3, 0, 0, 1)
let dimmedLayer2 = CALayer()
dimmedLayer2.frame = CGRect(x: 80, y: 80, width: 100, height: 100)
dimmedLayer2.backgroundColor = NSColor.systemPurple.cgColor
dimmedLayer2.transform = CATransform3DMakeRotation(-0.1, 0, 0, 1)
let dimmingLayer = CALayer()
dimmingLayer.frame = CGRect(x: 0, y: 50, width: 200, height: 100)
dimmingLayer.backgroundColor = NSColor(white: 0, alpha: 0.5).cgColor
dimmingLayer.compositingFilter = CIFilter(name: "CISourceAtopCompositing")
dimmedRoot.sublayers = [ dimmedLayer1, dimmedLayer2, dimmingLayer ]
container.addSublayer(dimmedRoot)
I am new to Kivy. Currently i have problem, i want to have a Label with Background colours. I wrote these code but it seems that the Label of the background colour is still displaying black.
May I know if there is any other solution to resolve this issue?
label = Label(text='test',pos=(20, 20),size=(180, 100),size_hint=(None,None))
with label.canvas:
Color(0, 1, 0, 0.25)
Rectangle(pos=label.pos, size=label.size)
The way I do it, is by using my own label MyLabel
In the .py
class MyLabel(Label):
pass
In the .kv:
<MyLabel>:
back_color: .1, .1, .1, 1
canvas.before:
Color:
rgba: root.back_color
Rectangle:
pos: self.pos
size: self.size
After that, you can just do:
a_label = MyLabel()
a_label.back_color = [1, 0, 1, 1]
I have this codepen: https://codepen.io/giorgiomartini/pen/OjQpKd?editors=0010
Where I paint some shapes and some text, now I want to add a radial overlay between the shapes and the text.
So I created a drawgradient function and call it between the shapes and the text:
function drawGradient() {
blendMode(MULTIPLY)
for (let r = canvasX; r > 0; --r) {
let lightnes = map(r,0,canvasX,255,0)
fill(0, 0, lightnes)
ellipse(0, 0, r*1.8, r*2)
}
}
I want this gradient to have a multiply blend mode, so that it makes the whole thing a bit darker where the pixels are darker in the gradient.
But all i get is a full black overlay...
In photoshop or gimp, if you add a black and white radial gradient with a multiply blend mode it makes the background darker where there are darker pixles in the gradient.. but here in p5js it just makes everything black.
any ideas what am I doing wrong?
This is the mouseClicked function, and at the bottom, you can see the gradient function being called:
function mouseClicked(){
blendMode(BLEND)
const colsArray = randomColor({luminosity: 'light', format: 'hsl',count: 4})
background(colsArray[0])
translate(width/2, height/2)
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// amt initial range
const arrayOfRandomNumsOfFirstProbStepX = createArrayOfRandomNums(amtOfSpotsInFirstProb,startProbStep,firstProbStepX)
const arrayOfRandomNumsOfFirstProbStepY = createArrayOfRandomNums(amtOfSpotsInFirstProb,startProbStep,firstProbStepY)
const arrayOfRandomNumsOfSecondProbStepX = createArrayOfRandomNums(amtOfSpotsInSecondProb,startProbStep,secondProbStepX)
const arrayOfRandomNumsOfSecondProbStepY = createArrayOfRandomNums(amtOfSpotsInSecondProb,startProbStep,secondProbStepY)
drawLinesAtRandomspots(6,random(50),colsArray)
//args => element, arrayOfRandomNumsOfProbStepX, arrayOfRandomNumsOfProbStepY, elmntSizeMin, elmntSizeMax,rot, colors
drawElmntsOnSomeProbabilityStep('ellipse',arrayOfRandomNumsOfFirstProbStepX, arrayOfRandomNumsOfFirstProbStepY , 10, 80, true, colsArray )
drawElmntsOnSomeProbabilityStep('rect',arrayOfRandomNumsOfSecondProbStepX, arrayOfRandomNumsOfSecondProbStepY, 5, 30, true, colsArray)
drawGradient()
addText()
}
Placing clear() at the beginning of the draw() function will clear the pixels within a buffer. This lets you use blendMode(MULTIPLY) without your overlapping shapes turning black after the first few frames.
If the effect you're going for is a linear gradient, it seems a little weird that you're drawing a bunch of ellipses to the screen.
ellipse(0, 0, r*1.8, r*2)
What do you expect this line to do?
Instead, I would think it would make more sense if you would draw a series of lines, a little bit darker or lighter each time. Here's an example:
function drawGradient() {
blendMode(MULTIPLY);
for (let lineX = 0; lineX < width; lineX++) {
let lightness = map(lineX, 0, width, 0, 255);
stroke(0, lightness)
line(lineX, 0, lineX, height)
}
}
This creates a horizontal gradient that fades from light to dark.
Edit: If you want a radial gradient, right now you're drawing a ton of dark circles on top of each other, so they're "stacking" to just become entirely black. You need to do a combination of drawing fewer circles (every 10 pixels instead of every 1 pixel, for example) and drawing them lighter. Here's an example:
function drawGradient() {
blendMode(MULTIPLY);
for (let r = 600; r > 0; r-=10) {
let lightness = map(r, 0, 600, 20, 0);
fill(0, lightness);
noStroke();
ellipse(0, 0, r, r);
}
}
This code draws circles every 10 pixels, and the darkest circle has an alpha of 20 instead of 255. This causes a much lighter gradient. You'll have to play with the exact values to get the effect you're going for.
If you have a follow-up question, please post a MCVE instead of your whole project. Just a couple of hard-coded shapes and a single gradient function would be enough, as long as we can run it. As of now your code is a little hard to debug because it contains a bunch of stuff not directly related to the problem. Good luck.
I am creating a few charts using Highcharts.
THe plotbackground color I use is #f0f0f0.
However instead of the light gray background that I am expecting to see. In FF I notice a pinkish shade to the background. I tried using the rgb equivalent instead of #F0F0F0 but that was of no use as well.
Below is how I am setting my option.Any pointers will be really appreciated! Thanks!
chart: { width: 325, height: 225, marginBottom: 30, spacingBottom: 0, marginLeft: 3, marginRight: 45, spacingRight: 0, spacingBottom: 30, borderRadius: 0, marginTop: 2, type: 'area', plotBackgroundColor: '#F0F0F0' }
Even worse, In case of column chart, I have drawn vertical white plotlines. The effect is alternate bands of gray and pinkish shades.
Well , the problem is the next :
canvas = GreenCanvas.get(0).getContext('2d');
grad = canvas.createLinearGradient(0,0,255,0);
grad.addColorStop(0, 'rgb('+r+','+0+','+b+')');
grad.addColorStop(1, 'rgb('+r+','+255+','+b+')');
canvas.fillStyle = grad;
canvas.fillRect(0,0,256,34);
256 pixels . from for example rgb(0,0,0) to rgb(0,255,0)
Chrome 6.0.472: gradient (0,0,0) (0,1,0) (0,2,0) (0,3,0) (0,4,0) ... (0,255,0)
Firefox 3.6.6: gradient (0,0,0) (0,0,0) (0,1,0) (0,2,0) ... (0,255,0)
i would like to see who programs that gradient function in firefox . But anyway , i would like to know if its a real problem , or is that in firefox the gradient is done that manner. Or if it exist another manner to do a well done gradient without using too much memory.
It's known that Chrome has problems with the Canvas gradients at the moment.
I submitted a bug to Chromium because of how many of hixie's (the specification writer) tests were failing on Chrome.
In short, you can't make your 'grad' variable. You have to set it directly.
This works:
var context = document.getElementsByTagName('canvas')[0].getContext('2d');
context.fillStyle = context.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 500, 300);
context.fillStyle.addColorStop(0, '#0000ff');
context.fillStyle.addColorStop(1, '#ff00ff');
context.fillRect(0, 0, 500, 300);
This does NOT work, even though they are SUPPOSED to do the same thing:
var context = document.getElementsByTagName('canvas')[0].getContext('2d');
var g = context.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 500, 300);
g.addColorStop(0, '#0000ff');
g.addColorStop(1, '#ff00ff');
context.fillStyle = g;
context.fillRect(0, 0, 500, 300);
For now, just do it the first way.
Here's the filed bug report from early September.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=54070&can=4&colspec=ID%20Stars%20Pri%20Area%20Feature%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Modified%20Owner%20Mstone%20OS