I have the following code using Spring #Transactional annotation.
//in A.java
Class A {
#Transactional(propagation=propagation.???)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
b.bMethod(); // success and committed
aPrivateMethod(); // failure
}
private void aPrivateMethod() { //something }
}
//in B.java
Class B {
#Transactional(propagation=propagation.???)
public void bMethod() { //something }
}
The behavior I expect of A.aMethod() is:
If b.bMethod() succeeds and has committed but aPrivateMethod() fails,
then A.aMethod() is rolled back including b.bMethod().
How can I set the #Transactional propagation parameters to achieve this?
Here's the conclusion.
Example 1
// A.java
class A {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
try {
b.bMethod("111", false); // bMethod() is NOT rolled back, record of "111" has been created
} catch (Exception e) {
// Do nothing, let it go
}
b.bMethod("222", true); // record of "222" has been created
}
// The annotation below is ignored
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void bMethod(String id, bool success) {
createRecordInDB(id);
if (!success) {
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
}
}
Example 2
// A.java
class A {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
b.bMethod("111", true); // record of "111" has been rolled back and NOT created
b.bMethod("222", true); // record of "222" has been rolled back and NOT created
createRecordInDB("333"); // record of "333" has been rolled back and NOT created
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
// The annotation below is ignored
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void bMethod(String id, bool success) {
createRecordInDB(id);
if (!success) {
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
}
}
Example 3
// A.java
class A {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
try {
b.bMethod("111", false); // bMethod() has been rolled back, record of "111" has NOT been created
} catch (Exception e) {
// Do nothing, let it go
}
b.bMethod("222", true); // record of "222" has been created
}
}
// B.java
class B {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void bMethod(String id, bool success) {
createRecordInDB(id);
if (!success) {
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
}
}
Example 4
// A.java
class A {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
b.bMethod("111", true); // record of "111" has been created
b.bMethod("222", true); // record of "222" has been created
createRecordInDB("333"); // record of "333" has been rolled back and NOT created
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
}
// B.java
class B {
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void bMethod(String id, bool success) {
createRecordInDB(id);
if (!success) {
throw new Exception("Throw exception explicitly!");
}
}
}
All posted examples will open up a new transaction context irrespective of any outer transactions. Hence REQUIRES_NEW will only work within its transactional block and rollback changes within this scope only.
You just need to provide:
Class A {
#Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRED)
public void aMethod() {
B b = new B();
b.bMethod(); // success and committed
aPrivateMethod(); // failure
}
private void aPrivateMethod() { //something }
}
Related
I have below class where I used #Transactional, I want when any error occurs in any of the method then transaction should be rolled back.
#Service
#Slf4j
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class CspConfigurationDeployer implements CspConfigurationDeployerInterface {
private CSPConfigDBService cspConfigDBService;
#Override
#Synchronized
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public Boolean deploy(Map<String, InputStream> inputStreams) throws Exception {
Boolean success = true;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
CarrierinfoEntity carrierinfo = null;
CarrierversionEntity carrierversionEntity = null;
try {
if (onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity != null && !ObjectUtils.isEmpty(carrierinfo)) {
carrierversionEntity = cspConfigDBService.getCarrierVersion(carrierinfo.getId(),
onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity.getCarrierversion().getMajorversion());
}
if (ObjectUtils.isEmpty(carrierversionEntity)) {
if (!cspConfigDBService.doesRequestFormExist(carrierinfo.getId(), availablecarrierdetailsEntity.getVersion())) {
availablecarrierdetailsEntity.setCarrierinfo(carrierinfo);
cspConfigDBService.updateEntity(availablecarrierdetailsEntity); // Add request form data
}
}
}
if (onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity != null && ObjectUtils.isEmpty(carrierversionEntity)) {
CarrierversionEntity carrierVersion = onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity.getCarrierversion();
List<CspparametersEntity> cspparametersEntities = carrierVersion.getCarrierParameters();
CarrierversionEntity updatedCarrierVersion = updateCarrierVersion(carrierVersion, carrierinfo.getId());
updateCspParameter(updatedCarrierVersion, carrierinfo.getId(), cspparametersEntities);
List<EnvSpecificParametersEntity> envSpecificParametersEntities = onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity.getEnvSpecificParameters();
OnboardingcarrierdetailsEntity updatedOnboradingDetails = updateOnboardingDetails(onboardingcarrierdetailsEntity,
carrierinfo, updatedCarrierVersion);
updateEnvSpecificParams(updatedOnboradingDetails, envSpecificParametersEntities);
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
log.error("CspConfiguration deployment encountered exception: " + ex.getMessage(), ex);
throw ex;
}
#Repository
#Slf4j
#AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public class CSPConfigDBServiceImpl implements CSPConfigDBService {
private final SessionFactory cspConfigurationSessionFactory;
private Session getCspConfigurationSessionFactory() {
return cspConfigurationSessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
}
#Override
public void updateEntity(Object entity) {
Session session = getCspConfigurationSessionFactory();
session.merge(entity);
session.flush();
}
}
when I don't use flush with merge operation then rollback is working but I need the id stored in db immediately for further use so I need to flush it.
I have a problem when using microservice and Kafka
for example, I have Service A and Service B they communicate by Kafka and they share the same database inside the database and I have two entities A and B and they share a one-to-many relationship, when I update entity A in service A entity B gets updated/changed as wanted but when I view service B. I can't see the changes that happened in service A.
In my case example code :
here we are in service A:
KafkaService:
public synchronized void getDriverService(Long orderId, Double longitude, Double latitude) {
driverService.getDriver(orderId,longitude,latitude);
driverService.collectionOrder(orderId);
}
driverService:
public void getDriver(Long orderId, Double longitude, Double latitude) {
final Driver [] y={new Driver()};
ascOrderRepository.findById(orderId).ifPresentOrElse(x->{
List<DriverDTO> drivers = findAllCarNearMe(latitude, longitude);
if(drivers.isEmpty())
throwEmptyDriver();
AscOrderDTO orderDto = ascOrderMapper.toDto(x);
int check;
for (DriverDTO dr : drivers) {
check = checkDriver();
if (check < 8) {
log.debug("///////////////////////// driver accept" + dr.getId().toString());
dr.setStatus(UNAVAILABLE);
dr.updateTotalTrip();
Driver driver=driverMapper.toEntity(dr);
driver.addOrders(x);
y[0]=driverRepository.save(driver);
log.debug(dr.toString());
log.debug("/////////////////////////////////////driver accept here /////////////////////////////////////////");
break;
}
}
},this::throwOrder);
}
// find All Car near me
public List<DriverDTO> findAllCarNearMe(Double latitude, Double longitude) {
checkDistance(latitude,longitude);
Point point = createPoint(latitude, longitude);
List<Driver> driver = driverRepository.findNearById(point, 10);
return driverMapper.toDto(driver);
}
public void collectionOrder(Long orderId)
{
ascOrderRepository.findById(orderId).ifPresentOrElse(y->{
if(y.getDriver()!=null) { // here new updated and find this updated into service A
try {
driverProducer.driverCollectionOrder(y.getId());
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
else
{
throwDriverNotFind();
}
},this::throwOrder);
}
This is Producer:
#Component public class DriverProducer {
public
DriverProducer(KafkaTemplate<String, String> kafkaTemplate) {
this.kafkaTemplate = kafkaTemplate; }
public void driverCollectionOrder(Long orderId) throws Exception{ ObjectMapper obj=new ObjectMapper();
kafkaTemplate.send("collecting",obj.writeValueAsString(orderId));
}
Service B:
This is Consumer:
#KafkaListener(topics = "collecting",groupId= groupId)
public void doneOrderStatus(String data) throws NumberFormatException, Exception {
try
{
log.debug("i am in done order status order consumer");
OrderEvent event=OrderEvent.TO_BE_COLLECTED;
orderService.changeStatus(event, Long.parseLong(data));
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
}
}
This Method Has my Error:
public void changeStatus(OrderEvent event, Long orderId) throws Exception {
try {
Optional<AscOrder> order=ascOrderRepository.findById(orderId);
if (!order.isPresent()) {
throw new BadRequestAlertException("cannot find Order", "Order entity", "Id invalid");
}
if(order.get().getDriver()!=null) { // cant find Change Here
log.debug("===============================================================================================");
log.debug(order.get().getDriver().toString());
log.debug("===============================================================================================");
}
log.debug("i am in changeStatus ");
stateMachineHandler.stateMachine(event, orderId);
stateMachineHandler.handling(orderId);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
}
}
The problem may be about the separate ORM sessions held by the services.
To overcome this you may try to reload the entity. To do that,
1- wire the entity manager
#Autowired
EntityManager entityManager;
2- Decorate changeStatus function with #Transactional annotation, unless there is an active transaction already going on.
3- Refresh the order entity
entityManager.refresh(order)
I want a fallback method to be invoked after a service takes more than 350 milliseconds to complete. Even after 10,000 milliseconds, the method is still not invoked.
I'm running a JUnit test that uses Mockito.
UnitTesting.java
...
#Test
public void test1() {
when(service.getId()).thenAnswer(new Answer<Integer>() {
public Integer answer(InvocationOnMock invocation){
try {
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return -1;
}});
LateralService latService= new LateralService(service);
ArrayList<IdService> returnedIdServices = latService.getIdServices(); //getId() is invoked in this method
...
}
LateralService.java
...
#HystrixCommand(groupKey = "fallback",
commandKey = "fallback",
fallbackMethod = "idServiceFallBack",
commandProperties = {
#HystrixProperty(name = "execution.isolation.thread.timeoutInMilliseconds", value = "350")})
public ArrayList<IdService> getIdServices() {
int id = service.getId();
...
}
public ArrayList<IdService> idServiceFallBack(){
return new ArrayList<IdService>() { add(new IdService(1)) }
}
We are working with project reactor and having a huge problem right now. This is how we produce (publish our data):
public Flux<String> getAllFlux() {
return Flux.<String>create(sink -> {
new Thread(){
public void run(){
Iterator<Cache.Entry<String, MyObject>> iterator = getAllIterator();
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
while(iterator.hasNext()) {
try {
sink.next(mapper.writeValueAsString(iterator.next().getValue()));
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
sink.complete();
}
} .start();
});
}
As you can see we are taking data from an iterator and are publishing each item in that iterator as a json string. Our subscriber does the following:
flux.subscribe(new Subscriber<String>() {
private Subscription s;
int amount = 1; // the amount of received flux payload at a time
int onNextAmount;
String completeItem="";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
#Override
public void onSubscribe(Subscription s) {
System.out.println("subscribe");
this.s = s;
this.s.request(amount);
}
#Override
public void onNext(String item) {
MyObject myObject = null;
try {
System.out.println(item);
myObject = mapper.readValue(completeItem, MyObject.class);
System.out.println(myObject.toString());
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println(item);
System.out.println("failed: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
}
onNextAmount++;
if (onNextAmount % amount == 0) {
this.s.request(amount);
}
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable t) {
System.out.println(t.getLocalizedMessage())
}
#Override
public void onComplete() {
System.out.println("completed");
});
}
As you can see we are simply printing the String item which we receive and parsing it into an object using jackson wrapper. The problem we got now is that for most of our items everything works fine:
{"itemId": "someId", "itemDesc", "some description"}
But for some items the String is cut off like this for example:
{"itemId": "some"
And the next item after that would be
"Id", "itemDesc", "some description"}
There is no pattern for those cuts. It is completely random and it is different everytime we run that code. Ofcourse our jackson is gettin an error Unexpected end of Input with that behaviour.
So what is causing such a behaviour and how can we solve it?
Solution:
Send the Object inside the flux instead of the String:
public Flux<ItemIgnite> getAllFlux() {
return Flux.create(sink -> {
new Thread(){
public void run(){
Iterator<Cache.Entry<String, ItemIgnite>> iterator = getAllIterator();
while(iterator.hasNext()) {
sink.next(iterator.next().getValue());
}
}
} .start();
});
}
and use the following produces type:
#RequestMapping(value="/allFlux", method=RequestMethod.GET, produces="application/stream+json")
The key here is to use stream+json and not only json.
We are trying to use google cloud datastore in our project and trying to use objectify as the ORM since google recommends it. I have carefully used and tried everything i could read about and think of but somehow the transactions don't seem to work. Following is my code and setup.
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#EnableAspectJAutoProxy(proxyTargetClass = true)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { CoreTestConfiguration.class })
public class TestObjectifyTransactionAspect {
private final LocalServiceTestHelper helper = new LocalServiceTestHelper(
// Our tests assume strong consistency
new LocalDatastoreServiceTestConfig().setApplyAllHighRepJobPolicy(),
new LocalMemcacheServiceTestConfig(), new LocalTaskQueueTestConfig());
private Closeable closeableSession;
#Autowired
private DummyService dummyService;
#BeforeClass
public static void setUpBeforeClass() {
// Reset the Factory so that all translators work properly.
ObjectifyService.setFactory(new ObjectifyFactory());
}
/**
* #throws java.lang.Exception
*/
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
System.setProperty("DATASTORE_EMULATOR_HOST", "localhost:8081");
ObjectifyService.register(UserEntity.class);
this.closeableSession = ObjectifyService.begin();
this.helper.setUp();
}
/**
* #throws java.lang.Exception
*/
#After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
AsyncCacheFilter.complete();
this.closeableSession.close();
this.helper.tearDown();
}
#Test
public void testTransactionMutationRollback() {
// save initial list of users
List<UserEntity> users = new ArrayList<UserEntity>();
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
UserEntity user = new UserEntity();
user.setAge(i);
user.setUsername("username_" + i);
users.add(user);
}
ObjectifyService.ofy().save().entities(users).now();
try {
dummyService.mutateDataWithException("username_1", 6L);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
List<UserEntity> users2 = this.dummyService.findAllUsers();
Assert.assertEquals("Size mismatch on rollback", users2.size(), 10);
boolean foundUserIdSix = false;
for (UserEntity userEntity : users2) {
if (userEntity.getUserId() == 1) {
Assert.assertEquals("Username update failed in transactional context rollback.", "username_1",
userEntity.getUsername());
}
if (userEntity.getUserId() == 6) {
foundUserIdSix = true;
}
}
if (!foundUserIdSix) {
Assert.fail("Deleted user with userId 6 but it is not rolledback.");
}
}
}
Since I am using spring, idea is to use an aspect with a custom annotation to weave objectify.transact around the spring service beans methods that are calling my daos.
But somehow the update due to ObjectifyService.ofy().save().entities(users).now(); is not gettign rollbacked though the exception throws causes Objectify to run its rollback code. I tried printing the ObjectifyImpl instance hashcodes and they are all same but still its not rollbacking.
Can someone help me understand what am i doing wrong? Havent tried the actual web based setup yet...if it cant pass transnational test cases there is no point in actual transaction usage in a web request scenario.
Update: Adding aspect, services, dao as well to make a complete picture. The code uses spring boot.
DAO class. Note i am not using any transactions here because as per code of com.googlecode.objectify.impl.TransactorNo.transactOnce(ObjectifyImpl<O>, Work<R>) a transnational ObjectifyImpl is flushed and committed in this method which i don't want. I want commit to happen once and rest all to join in on that transaction. Basically this is the wrong code in com.googlecode.objectify.impl.TransactorNo ..... i will try to explain my understanding a later in the question.
#Component
public class DummyDaoImpl implements DummyDao {
#Override
public List<UserEntity> loadAll() {
Query<UserEntity> query = ObjectifyService.ofy().transactionless().load().type(UserEntity.class);
return query.list();
}
#Override
public List<UserEntity> findByUserId(Long userId) {
Query<UserEntity> query = ObjectifyService.ofy().transactionless().load().type(UserEntity.class);
//query = query.filterKey(Key.create(UserEntity.class, userId));
return query.list();
}
#Override
public List<UserEntity> findByUsername(String username) {
return ObjectifyService.ofy().transactionless().load().type(UserEntity.class).filter("username", username).list();
}
#Override
public void update(UserEntity userEntity) {
ObjectifyService.ofy().save().entity(userEntity);
}
#Override
public void update(Iterable<UserEntity> userEntities) {
ObjectifyService.ofy().save().entities(userEntities);
}
#Override
public void delete(Long userId) {
ObjectifyService.ofy().delete().key(Key.create(UserEntity.class, userId));
}
}
Below is the Service class
#Service
public class DummyServiceImpl implements DummyService {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DummyServiceImpl.class);
#Autowired
private DummyDao dummyDao;
public void saveDummydata() {
List<UserEntity> users = new ArrayList<UserEntity>();
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
UserEntity user = new UserEntity();
user.setAge(i);
user.setUsername("username_" + i);
users.add(user);
}
this.dummyDao.update(users);
}
/* (non-Javadoc)
* #see com.bbb.core.objectify.test.services.DummyService#mutateDataWithException(java.lang.String, java.lang.Long)
*/
#Override
#ObjectifyTransactional
public void mutateDataWithException(String usernameToMutate, Long userIdToDelete) throws Exception {
//update one
LOGGER.info("Attempting to update UserEntity with username={}", "username_1");
List<UserEntity> mutatedUsersList = new ArrayList<UserEntity>();
List<UserEntity> users = dummyDao.findByUsername(usernameToMutate);
for (UserEntity userEntity : users) {
userEntity.setUsername(userEntity.getUsername() + "_updated");
mutatedUsersList.add(userEntity);
}
dummyDao.update(mutatedUsersList);
//delete another
UserEntity user = dummyDao.findByUserId(userIdToDelete).get(0);
LOGGER.info("Attempting to delete UserEntity with userId={}", user.getUserId());
dummyDao.delete(user.getUserId());
throw new RuntimeException("Dummy Exception");
}
/* (non-Javadoc)
* #see com.bbb.core.objectify.test.services.DummyService#findAllUsers()
*/
#Override
public List<UserEntity> findAllUsers() {
return dummyDao.loadAll();
}
Aspect which wraps the method annoted with ObjectifyTransactional as a transact work.
#Aspect
#Component
public class ObjectifyTransactionAspect {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ObjectifyTransactionAspect.class);
#Around(value = "execution(* *(..)) && #annotation(objectifyTransactional)")
public Object objectifyTransactAdvise(final ProceedingJoinPoint pjp, ObjectifyTransactional objectifyTransactional) throws Throwable {
try {
Object result = null;
Work<Object> work = new Work<Object>() {
#Override
public Object run() {
try {
return pjp.proceed();
} catch (Throwable throwable) {
throw new ObjectifyTransactionExceptionWrapper(throwable);
}
}
};
switch (objectifyTransactional.propagation()) {
case REQUIRES_NEW:
int limitTries = objectifyTransactional.limitTries();
if(limitTries <= 0) {
Exception illegalStateException = new IllegalStateException("limitTries must be more than 0.");
throw new ObjectifyTransactionExceptionWrapper(illegalStateException);
} else {
if(limitTries == Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
result = ObjectifyService.ofy().transactNew(work);
} else {
result = ObjectifyService.ofy().transactNew(limitTries, work);
}
}
break;
case NOT_SUPPORTED :
case NEVER :
case MANDATORY :
result = ObjectifyService.ofy().execute(objectifyTransactional.propagation(), work);
break;
case REQUIRED :
case SUPPORTS :
ObjectifyService.ofy().transact(work);
break;
default:
break;
}
return result;
} catch (ObjectifyTransactionExceptionWrapper e) {
String packageName = pjp.getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName();
String methodName = pjp.getSignature().getName();
LOGGER.error("An exception occured while executing [{}.{}] in a transactional context."
, packageName, methodName, e);
throw e.getCause();
} catch (Throwable ex) {
String packageName = pjp.getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName();
String methodName = pjp.getSignature().getName();
String fullyQualifiedmethodName = packageName + "." + methodName;
throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected exception while executing ["
+ fullyQualifiedmethodName + "] in a transactional context.", ex);
}
}
}
Now the problem code part that i see is as follows in com.googlecode.objectify.impl.TransactorNo:
#Override
public <R> R transact(ObjectifyImpl<O> parent, Work<R> work) {
return this.transactNew(parent, Integer.MAX_VALUE, work);
}
#Override
public <R> R transactNew(ObjectifyImpl<O> parent, int limitTries, Work<R> work) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(limitTries >= 1);
while (true) {
try {
return transactOnce(parent, work);
} catch (ConcurrentModificationException ex) {
if (--limitTries > 0) {
if (log.isLoggable(Level.WARNING))
log.warning("Optimistic concurrency failure for " + work + " (retrying): " + ex);
if (log.isLoggable(Level.FINEST))
log.log(Level.FINEST, "Details of optimistic concurrency failure", ex);
} else {
throw ex;
}
}
}
}
private <R> R transactOnce(ObjectifyImpl<O> parent, Work<R> work) {
ObjectifyImpl<O> txnOfy = startTransaction(parent);
ObjectifyService.push(txnOfy);
boolean committedSuccessfully = false;
try {
R result = work.run();
txnOfy.flush();
txnOfy.getTransaction().commit();
committedSuccessfully = true;
return result;
}
finally
{
if (txnOfy.getTransaction().isActive()) {
try {
txnOfy.getTransaction().rollback();
} catch (RuntimeException ex) {
log.log(Level.SEVERE, "Rollback failed, suppressing error", ex);
}
}
ObjectifyService.pop();
if (committedSuccessfully) {
txnOfy.getTransaction().runCommitListeners();
}
}
}
transactOnce is by code / design always using a single transaction to do things. It will either commit or rollback the transaction. there is no provision to chain transactions like a normal enterprise app would want.... service -> calls multiple dao methods in a single transaction and commits or rollbacks depending on how things look.
keeping this in mind, i removed all annotations and transact method calls in my dao methods so that they don't start an explicit transaction and the aspect in service wraps the service method in transact and ultimately in transactOnce...so basically the service method is running in a transaction and no new transaction is getting fired again. This is a very basic scenario, in actual production apps services can call other service methods and they might have the annotation on them and we could still end up in a chained transaction..but anyway...that is a different problem to solve....
I know NoSQLs dont support write consistency at table or inter table levels so am I asking too much from google cloud datastore?