What will be the behavior of class loading of injecting singleton into prototype bean ?
I have tried other way round injecting prototype in singleton and resolving the issue using lookup method.
It depends, if you use a BeanFactory or not. A BeanFactory can load classes lazily.
Without BeanFactory
If from the start until the end of a Spring-Context the concrete Implementation of the Singleton and the Prototype is known, they are load at least if the start-method of the Context is called. The default class-initializations of a Class in java is done by the used ClassLoader.
That means, before the beans are autowirable,
implements-interfaces and extends-classes are iniaitlized.
the static-class-scope is called,
the static fields are initialized and set.
After that, the Context starts using the start-method.
The Default-Constructor of the Singleton is called.
The {} scope is called.
All #Autowired fields are set.
If the Singleton extends the SmartSingletonInitializer, its inherited methods are called.
The #PostConstruct-method is called.
Then if a prototype Bean is required (either by context.getBean or by direct #Autowired, the Prototype's.
The Default-Constructor of the Singleton is called.
The {} scope is called.
All #Autowired fields are set.
If the Prototype extends the SmartSingletonInitializer, its inherited methods are called.
The #PostConstruct-method is called.
The Prototype-Instance is injected.
With BeanFactory
It might behave different because the Prototype bean can return a instance of a Bean that not yet has been load from the corresponding classloader. If so, the prototype bean is load in this order in-time:
implements-interfaces and extends-classes are iniaitlized.
the static-class-scope is called,
the static fields are initialized and set.
The Default-Constructor of the Singleton is called.
The {} scope is called.
All #Autowired fields are set.
If the Prototype extends the SmartSingletonInitializer, its inherited methods are called.
The #PostConstruct-method is called.
The Prototype-Instance is injected.
Related
I wanted to know if we only do ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context=new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("applicationContext.xml"); in our main method and don't do Coach coach1=context.getBean("myCoach5",Coach.class); where suppose "Coach" is my class and "myCoach5" is id of bean having prototype scope defined in applicationContext.xml. Then in case of prototype-scope will constructor led dependency be injected? Will its constructor's content run?
I observe it does not work in prototype scope but works in case of singleton scope with everything else remaining the same.
I am new to spring and trying to understand the framework. I have a class (say ClassA) which has execute() method. I am using "prototype" scope (#Scope) for this class.I am using #Async("customThreadPoolTaskExecutor) for this execute() method. I have already defined this customThreadPoolTaskExecutor in another class with #Configuration. Then I have another class (say ClassB) which uses BeanFactory of spring to get an object of ClassA using beanFactory.getBean(ClassA).
I am getting an error on this line inside ClassB
ClassA A = (ClassA) beanFactory.getBean(ClassA);
Error is as below
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanNotOfRequiredTypeException: Bean named 'ClassA' is expected to be of type 'ClassA' but was actually of type 'jdk.proxy2.$Proxy103'
Note that above code works fine and returns an object of ClassA if I remove #Async from execute() method of ClassA.
I am looking to understand the root of the problem and clear some of my concepts about spring. What is the relationship between #Async and bean creation using BeanFactory's getBean method. Why does it work without #Async but not with #Async.
Note : The fix/workaround I have so far is to add "ScopedProxyMode" for ClassA as "TARGET_CLASS". After adding this to ClassA's #Scope annotation, things work ok but I am not able to understand the root cause of the issue.
I'm a bit confused about using method injection (lookup-method) and aop scoped-proxy (Since both used for different scoped beans injection) so
1) When to use method injection and when to use aop-scoped proxy ?
2) What is the reason why a aop-scoped proxy will not be used for a prototype bean ?
Both lookup method injection and scoped proxy are means to inject shorter lived beans into longer lived beans. However, they serve different use cases.
Method injection is useful in cases where a singleton-scoped bean has a dependency on a prototype-scoped bean.
A proxy gets injected in place of the desired bean and provides that bean depending on the context. For example, if a singleton bean (such as a Spring MVC controller) auto-wires a session scoped bean, then the proxy delivers that bean belonging to the current HTTP session.
Such a proxy doesn't apply well to a situation where a prototype bean shall be obtained at runtime. Lookup method injection is one way to obtain prototype instances at runtime.
However, method injection has limitations because it builds upon abstract methods. Hence, certain things like writing unit tests are more cumbersome, as you need to provide a stub implementation of the abstract method. Component scanning doesn't work with abstract classes either.
One alternative to method injection is Spring's ObjectFactory, or its JSR equivalent Provider.
Another, straightforward way of creating prototype bean instances at runtime (which even makes it possible to provide constructor arguments) is to implement a bean factory like the following:
#Configuration
public class MyProvider {
#Bean
#Scope(ConfigurableBeanFactory.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public MyThing create(String name) {
return new MyThing(name);
}
}
Usage:
#Component
public class MySingleton {
#Autowired
private MyProvider myProvider;
public void doStuffThatNeedsAPrototypeBeanInstance() {
MyThing thing = myProvider.create("some name");
...
}
}
For the question 1. When to use method injection and when to use aop-scoped proxy?
Let's say you have a singleton bean A has dependency on the prototype bean B. A has a method m which has B involved.
You got the object a of A and execute the method m several times. Every time m executing, a new object b of B needs to inject to a. That's the time you use the method injection.
Besides, if you have a singleton bean A has dependency on the session bean B. A has a method m which has B involved.
You got the object a of A and execute the method m several times. As long as the execution time is in a same session, a has the same object b of B. That's the time you use proxy.
I am studying for the Spring Core certification an I have some doubts about how Spring handle the beans lifecycle and in particular about the bean post processor.
So I have this schema:
It is pretty clear for me what it means:
The following steps take place in the Load Bean Definitions phase:
The #Configuration classes are processed and/or #Components are
scanned for and/or XML files are parsed.
Bean definitions added to BeanFactory (each indexed under its id)
Special BeanFactoryPostProcessor beans invoked, it can modify the definition of any bean (for example for the property-placeholder values replacements).
Then the following steps take place in the beans creation phase:
Each bean is eagerly instantiated by default (created in right order with its dependencies injected).
After dependency injection each bean goes through a post-processing
phase in which further configuration and initialization may occur.
After post processing the bean is fully initialized and ready for use (tracked by its id until the context is destroyed)
Ok, this is pretty clear for me and I also know that there are two types of bean post processors which are:
Initializers: Initialize the bean if instructed (i.e. #PostConstruct).
and All the rest: that allow for additional configuration and that may run before or after the initialize step
And I post this slide:
So it is very clear for me what does the initializers bean post processors (they are the methods annotated with #PostContruct annotation and that are automatically called immediately after the setter methods (so after the dependency injection), and I know that I can use to perform some initialization batch (as populate a cache as in the previous example).
But what exactly represents the other bean post processor? What do we mean when we say that these steps are performed before or after the initialization phase?
So my beans are instantiated and its dependencies are injected, so then the initialization phase is completed (by the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method). What do we mean by saying that a Bean Post Processor is used before the initialization phase? It means that it happens before the #PostContruct annotated method execution? Does it means that it could happen before the dependency injection (before that the setter methods are called)?
And what exactly do we mean when we say that it is performed after the initialization step. It means that it happens after that the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method, or what?
I can easily figure into my head why I need a #PostContruct annotated method but I can't figure some typical example of the other kind of bean post processor, can you show me some typical example of when are used?
Spring doc explains the BPPs under Customizing beans using BeanPostProcessor. BPP beans are a special kind of beans that get created before any other beans and interact with newly created beans. With this construct, Spring gives you means to hook-up to and customize the lifecycle behavior simply by implementing a BeanPostProcessor yourself.
Having a custom BPP like
public class CustomBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
public CustomBeanPostProcessor() {
System.out.println("0. Spring calls constructor");
}
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
}
would be called and print out the class and bean name for every created bean.
To undersand how the method fit the bean's lifecycle, and when exactly the method's get called check the docs
postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance before any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance after any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
The important bit is also that
The bean will already be populated with property values.
For what concerns the relation with the #PostConstruct note that this annotation is a convenient way of declaring a postProcessAfterInitialization method, and Spring becomes aware of it when you either by registerCommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor or specify the <context:annotation-config /> in bean configuration file. Whether the #PostConstruct method will execute before or after any other postProcessAfterInitialization depends on the order property
You can configure multiple BeanPostProcessor instances, and you can
control the order in which these BeanPostProcessors execute by setting
the order property.
The typical example for a bean post processor is when you want to wrap the original bean in a proxy instance, e.g. when using the #Transactional annotation.
The bean post processor will be handed the original instance of the bean, it may call any methods on the target, but it also gets to return the actual bean instance that should be bound in the application context, which means that it can actually return any object it wants. The typical scenario when this is useful is when the bean post processor wraps the target in a proxy instance. All invocations on the bean bound in application context will pass through the proxy, and the proxy then gets to perform some magic before and/or after invocations on the target bean, e.g. AOP or transaction management.
The difference is BeanPostProcessor will hook into context initialization then call postProcessBeforeInitialization and postProcessAfterInitialization for all defined beans.
But #PostConstruct is just used for the specific class you want to customize bean creation after constructor or set method.
What is the difference between implementing the BeanPostProcessor interface and either using the init/destroy method attributes in the XML configuration file in Spring or implementing InitializingBean/DisposableBean interface?
This is pretty clearly explained in the Spring documentation about the Container Extension Points.
The BeanPostProcessor interface defines callback methods that you can
implement to provide your own (or override the container's default)
instantiation logic, dependency-resolution logic, and so forth. If you
want to implement some custom logic after the Spring container
finishes instantiating, configuring, and initializing a bean, you can
plug in one or more BeanPostProcessor implementations.
So in essence the method postProcessBeforeInitialization defined in the BeanPostProcessor gets called (as the name indicates) before the initialization of beans and likewise the postProcessAfterInitialization gets called after the initialization of the bean.
The difference to the #PostConstruct, InitializingBean and custom init method is that these are defined on the bean itself. Their ordering can be found in the Combining lifecycle mechanisms section of the spring documentation.
So basically the BeanPostProcessor can be used to do custom instantiation logic for several beans wheras the others are defined on a per bean basis.
Above answers clearly explains some of the very important aspect.
Apart from that it's also important to understand that both beanPostProcessor and init and destroy methods are part of the Spring bean life cycle.
BeanPostProcessor class has two methods.
1) postProcessBeforeInitialization - as name clearly says that it's used to make sure required actions are taken before initialization. e.g. you want to load certain property file/read data from the remote source/service.
2) postProcessAfterInitialization - any thing that you want to do after initialization before bean reference is given to application.
Sequence of the questioned methods in life cycle as follows :
1) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitialization()
2) init()
3) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization()
4) destroy()
You may check this by writing simple example having sysout and check their sequence.
Init and Destroy callback methods are part of Spring bean life cycle phases. The init method is going to be executed after bean instantiation. Similarly, The destroy method is going to be executed before bean finalization.
We can implement this functionality using implementing interfaces InitializingBean and DisposableBean, or using annotations #postconstruct and #predestroy, or declare the <bean> with init-method and destroy-method attributes.
BeanPostProcessor interface is used for extending the functionality of framework if want to do any configuration Pre- and Post- bean initialization done by spring container.
For Example: By default, Spring will not aware of the #PostConstruct and #PreDestroy annotation. To enable it, we have to either register CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor or specify the <context:annotation-config /> in bean configuration file. Here CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor is predefined BeanPostProcessor implementation for the annotations. Like:
#Required enables RequiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor processing tool
#Autowired enables AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor processing tool
And one more main diff is InitializingBean,DisposableBean related afterPropertiesSet() & destory() methods did not accept any paratmeters and return type also void, so we did not implement any custom logic.
But coming to BeanPostProcess methods postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean,String beanName) and postProcessAfterInitilization(Object bean,String beanName) are accept those two paramaters and return type also Object so we are able to write initilzation logics as well as any custom login based on the passing bean...
These both callback method feautes are including the bean life cycle and the following are the life cycle as follows
1) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitilazation()
2) #postConstruct or InitializingBean.afterPropertiesSet() or initialization method which is
defining in xml /* here also it's following the same oredr if three ways are availiable **/
3) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization()
4) #preDestroy or DisposibleBean.destroy() or destroy method which is defining in xml
/* here also it's following the same oredr if three ways are availiable **/
Just a short supplement to all the answers above: If you have any generic logic, common logic that needs to be universally applied to all your Spring beans, such as the injection of a logger to your beans, setting of a properties file, setting default values to fields of your beans through reflection; you could put that logic into ONE single place: the #Overriden callbacks (eg: postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object arg0, String arg1) if you are implementing the BeanPostProcessor interface); instead of duplicating the same logic across all your beans.
a)The postProcessBeforeInitialization() will be called before initialization of the bean.
b)Once the bean gets initialized, the different callbacks methods are called in the following order as per the Spring docs:
Methods annotated with #PostConstruct
afterPropertiesSet() as defined by the InitializingBean callback interface
init method defined through the XML.
The main difference is that the above 3 methods get called after the initialization get completed by the postProcessBeforeInitialization() method.
Once these methods get completed the method postProcessAfterInitialization() will be called and then the destroy methods are called in the same order:
Methods annotated with #PreDestroy
destroy() as defined by the DisposableBean callback interface
destroy() method defined through the XML.