I'm a bit confused about using method injection (lookup-method) and aop scoped-proxy (Since both used for different scoped beans injection) so
1) When to use method injection and when to use aop-scoped proxy ?
2) What is the reason why a aop-scoped proxy will not be used for a prototype bean ?
Both lookup method injection and scoped proxy are means to inject shorter lived beans into longer lived beans. However, they serve different use cases.
Method injection is useful in cases where a singleton-scoped bean has a dependency on a prototype-scoped bean.
A proxy gets injected in place of the desired bean and provides that bean depending on the context. For example, if a singleton bean (such as a Spring MVC controller) auto-wires a session scoped bean, then the proxy delivers that bean belonging to the current HTTP session.
Such a proxy doesn't apply well to a situation where a prototype bean shall be obtained at runtime. Lookup method injection is one way to obtain prototype instances at runtime.
However, method injection has limitations because it builds upon abstract methods. Hence, certain things like writing unit tests are more cumbersome, as you need to provide a stub implementation of the abstract method. Component scanning doesn't work with abstract classes either.
One alternative to method injection is Spring's ObjectFactory, or its JSR equivalent Provider.
Another, straightforward way of creating prototype bean instances at runtime (which even makes it possible to provide constructor arguments) is to implement a bean factory like the following:
#Configuration
public class MyProvider {
#Bean
#Scope(ConfigurableBeanFactory.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public MyThing create(String name) {
return new MyThing(name);
}
}
Usage:
#Component
public class MySingleton {
#Autowired
private MyProvider myProvider;
public void doStuffThatNeedsAPrototypeBeanInstance() {
MyThing thing = myProvider.create("some name");
...
}
}
For the question 1. When to use method injection and when to use aop-scoped proxy?
Let's say you have a singleton bean A has dependency on the prototype bean B. A has a method m which has B involved.
You got the object a of A and execute the method m several times. Every time m executing, a new object b of B needs to inject to a. That's the time you use the method injection.
Besides, if you have a singleton bean A has dependency on the session bean B. A has a method m which has B involved.
You got the object a of A and execute the method m several times. As long as the execution time is in a same session, a has the same object b of B. That's the time you use proxy.
Related
In my spring-boot application i have "normal" singleton beans that "autowire" the stuff they need via a private constructor. So it is not possible to call "new" anywhere in the code.
But i also have "prototype" beans that need runtime arguments to be created. To create such beans i could use this approach (lazy instantiated protype beans): Spring bean with runtime constructor arguments
The problem is that the constructor is used and hence must be "visible". Is there any way in Spring to create such prototype beans with a private constructor? I want to enforce the usage of BeanFactory to create them.
You can try to build your prototype beans with an implementation of
factoryBean,public interface FactoryBean<T> {
T getObject() throws Exception;
Class<T> getObjectType();
boolean isSingleton();
}
So you can encapsulate more complexe logic inside,
A full exemple here
I was trying to understand the difference between BeanFactoryPostProcessor and BeanPostProcessor.
I understood that BeanFactoryPostProcessor operates on bean definition i.e. before the bean instance is getting created it gets executed and BeanPostProcessor gets executed after bean is instantiated and lifecycle events are called.
Does this mean BeanFactoryPostProcessor is not a part of spring lifecycle events as it's called before instantiation while BeanPostProcessor is the part of Spring lifecycle events? Kindly verify if my understanding is right.
BeanFactoryPostProcessor is an interface and beans that implement it are actually beans that undergo the Spring lifecycle (Example below) but these beans don't take part of the other declared beans' lifecycle.
public class CustomBeanFactory implements BeanFactoryPostProcessor {
#Override
public void postProcessBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
for (String beanName : beanFactory.getBeanDefinitionNames()) {
BeanDefinition beanDefinition = beanFactory.getBeanDefinition(beanName);
// Manipulate the beanDefiniton or whatever you need to do
}
}
}
The differences about BeanFactoryPostProcessor and BeanPostProcessor:
A bean implementing BeanFactoryPostProcessor is called when all bean definitions will have been loaded, but no beans will have been instantiated yet. This allows for overriding or adding properties even to eager-initializing beans. This will let you have access to all the beans that you have defined in XML or that are annotated (scanned via component-scan).
A bean implementing BeanPostProcessor operate on bean (or object) instances which means that when the Spring IoC container instantiates a bean instance then BeanPostProcessor interfaces do their work.
BeanFactoryPostProcessor implementations are "called" during startup of the Spring context after all bean definitions will have been loaded while BeanPostProcessor are "called" when the Spring IoC container instantiates a bean (i.e. during the startup for all the singleton and on demand for the proptotypes one)
Here is a flow diagram that might help to understand the spring bean initialisation life cycle.
As we can see, the implementation of theBeanFactoryPostProcessor is executed before any spring bean instantiation, contrary to the BeanPostprocessor, where the implemented method will be executed only when the bean is instantiated.
The source image is from the Spring 5 Design Patterns Book.
I pick the explanation from the book:
After loading the bean definitions from all styles of configurations,
BeanFactoryPostProcessor comes into the picture to modify the
definition of some beans, and then the container instantiates the
beans. Finally, BeanPostProcessor works on the beans, and it can
modify and change the bean object. This is the initialization phase.
Bean Factory Post Procesor (BFPP):
Used when we want to override XML / annotations, because Spring reads XML / annotations to create the beans. If you want to provide a different configuration to Spring during creation (at run time), then you need to use BFPP. Creating the internal dependency graph is a one time process.
Bean Post Processor (BPP):
The above step happened only once. It's like creating the "menu" of beans. After creating the bean, if you want to change the bean properties, you can't make any changes to the XML / annotations. Instead, you can use the BPP for bean configuration change after creation. The BPP has 2 execution areas, one before #postconstruct and one after #postconstruct.
Real Time Example:
You want to place an online food order from Zomato. While ordering online, you give a list of food (XML/annotations) to the restaurant. But, just before the restaurant starts making the food, you call them and ask them to change the dish (BFPP). Now the food is ready to be delivered and you've received it (Bean is created). But you want to make some modifications (like salt or chilly powder), and you can do this before tasting the food (because you know restaurants never put enough salt), or even after tasting the food (this is before and after #postconstruct). Once the taste is good, then the food is ready (the bean is ready to use).
The BeanFactoryPostProcessor executes before bean Object instantiation (ie at the time Applicationcontext container is initialized)
BeanPostprocessor is executed after the bean object is created, as it can be executed before init() and after init().
I am studying for the Spring Core certification an I have some doubts about how Spring handle the beans lifecycle and in particular about the bean post processor.
So I have this schema:
It is pretty clear for me what it means:
The following steps take place in the Load Bean Definitions phase:
The #Configuration classes are processed and/or #Components are
scanned for and/or XML files are parsed.
Bean definitions added to BeanFactory (each indexed under its id)
Special BeanFactoryPostProcessor beans invoked, it can modify the definition of any bean (for example for the property-placeholder values replacements).
Then the following steps take place in the beans creation phase:
Each bean is eagerly instantiated by default (created in right order with its dependencies injected).
After dependency injection each bean goes through a post-processing
phase in which further configuration and initialization may occur.
After post processing the bean is fully initialized and ready for use (tracked by its id until the context is destroyed)
Ok, this is pretty clear for me and I also know that there are two types of bean post processors which are:
Initializers: Initialize the bean if instructed (i.e. #PostConstruct).
and All the rest: that allow for additional configuration and that may run before or after the initialize step
And I post this slide:
So it is very clear for me what does the initializers bean post processors (they are the methods annotated with #PostContruct annotation and that are automatically called immediately after the setter methods (so after the dependency injection), and I know that I can use to perform some initialization batch (as populate a cache as in the previous example).
But what exactly represents the other bean post processor? What do we mean when we say that these steps are performed before or after the initialization phase?
So my beans are instantiated and its dependencies are injected, so then the initialization phase is completed (by the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method). What do we mean by saying that a Bean Post Processor is used before the initialization phase? It means that it happens before the #PostContruct annotated method execution? Does it means that it could happen before the dependency injection (before that the setter methods are called)?
And what exactly do we mean when we say that it is performed after the initialization step. It means that it happens after that the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method, or what?
I can easily figure into my head why I need a #PostContruct annotated method but I can't figure some typical example of the other kind of bean post processor, can you show me some typical example of when are used?
Spring doc explains the BPPs under Customizing beans using BeanPostProcessor. BPP beans are a special kind of beans that get created before any other beans and interact with newly created beans. With this construct, Spring gives you means to hook-up to and customize the lifecycle behavior simply by implementing a BeanPostProcessor yourself.
Having a custom BPP like
public class CustomBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
public CustomBeanPostProcessor() {
System.out.println("0. Spring calls constructor");
}
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
}
would be called and print out the class and bean name for every created bean.
To undersand how the method fit the bean's lifecycle, and when exactly the method's get called check the docs
postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance before any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance after any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
The important bit is also that
The bean will already be populated with property values.
For what concerns the relation with the #PostConstruct note that this annotation is a convenient way of declaring a postProcessAfterInitialization method, and Spring becomes aware of it when you either by registerCommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor or specify the <context:annotation-config /> in bean configuration file. Whether the #PostConstruct method will execute before or after any other postProcessAfterInitialization depends on the order property
You can configure multiple BeanPostProcessor instances, and you can
control the order in which these BeanPostProcessors execute by setting
the order property.
The typical example for a bean post processor is when you want to wrap the original bean in a proxy instance, e.g. when using the #Transactional annotation.
The bean post processor will be handed the original instance of the bean, it may call any methods on the target, but it also gets to return the actual bean instance that should be bound in the application context, which means that it can actually return any object it wants. The typical scenario when this is useful is when the bean post processor wraps the target in a proxy instance. All invocations on the bean bound in application context will pass through the proxy, and the proxy then gets to perform some magic before and/or after invocations on the target bean, e.g. AOP or transaction management.
The difference is BeanPostProcessor will hook into context initialization then call postProcessBeforeInitialization and postProcessAfterInitialization for all defined beans.
But #PostConstruct is just used for the specific class you want to customize bean creation after constructor or set method.
I'm trying to inject an existing bean into a Groovy class and I know Grails bean injection doesn't work for normal Groovy classes (in src/groovy folder). I can get access to a bean via
Holders.applicationContext.getBean('beanName')
However, I'm wondering if this is the best approach (from a execution speed and memory usage point of view). I will be calling a bean from a method that's called hundreds of times during the normal use of the application and I'm wondering if there might be a better approach. At the very least, should I be storing the bean reference (maybe in the constructor) so that I don't call the above code over and over again? Could I store a static reference to the bean so that each class doesn't have to store its own? Any other suggestions or improvements?
Your Groovy (or Java) class cannot use dependency injection, but it is very likely called directly or indirectly from a class that can, e.g. a controller or a service. Rather than having this class pull in its dependencies (which runs pretty strongly against the ideas of dependency injection and inversion of control), pass into the class the beans that it needs, or at a minimum the ApplicationContext if the beans aren't always known up front.
So for example rather than doing this in your service (where Thing is your src/groovy class):
def someServiceMethod(...) {
def thing = new Thing()
thing.doSomething(42, true)
}
add a dependency injection for the bean it needs in the service and pass it along with the other args, either in the constructor or in individual methods, e.g.
class MyService {
def someBean
def someServiceMethod(...) {
def thing = new Thing(someBean)
thing.doSomething(42, true)
}
}
Groovy classes in src/groovy are not picked up for dependency injection by default. But you can configure them manually by adding a bean definition to conf/spring/resources.groovy:
import your.class.from.src.groovy.MyBean
beans = {
myBean(MyBean)
}
Using this way you can configure how dependencies should be resolved.
You can do this manual, e.g.
myBean(MyBean) {
myService = ref('myService') // assumes you have a MyService bean that can be injected to the `myService` field
}
Or you can use autowiring (what grails does by default for services/controllers):
myBean(MyBean) { bean ->
bean.autowire = 'byName'
}
By adding beans to resources.groovy you can also inject these beans into services and controllers.
For more details see the Spring section in the Grails documentation
What is the difference between implementing the BeanPostProcessor interface and either using the init/destroy method attributes in the XML configuration file in Spring or implementing InitializingBean/DisposableBean interface?
This is pretty clearly explained in the Spring documentation about the Container Extension Points.
The BeanPostProcessor interface defines callback methods that you can
implement to provide your own (or override the container's default)
instantiation logic, dependency-resolution logic, and so forth. If you
want to implement some custom logic after the Spring container
finishes instantiating, configuring, and initializing a bean, you can
plug in one or more BeanPostProcessor implementations.
So in essence the method postProcessBeforeInitialization defined in the BeanPostProcessor gets called (as the name indicates) before the initialization of beans and likewise the postProcessAfterInitialization gets called after the initialization of the bean.
The difference to the #PostConstruct, InitializingBean and custom init method is that these are defined on the bean itself. Their ordering can be found in the Combining lifecycle mechanisms section of the spring documentation.
So basically the BeanPostProcessor can be used to do custom instantiation logic for several beans wheras the others are defined on a per bean basis.
Above answers clearly explains some of the very important aspect.
Apart from that it's also important to understand that both beanPostProcessor and init and destroy methods are part of the Spring bean life cycle.
BeanPostProcessor class has two methods.
1) postProcessBeforeInitialization - as name clearly says that it's used to make sure required actions are taken before initialization. e.g. you want to load certain property file/read data from the remote source/service.
2) postProcessAfterInitialization - any thing that you want to do after initialization before bean reference is given to application.
Sequence of the questioned methods in life cycle as follows :
1) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitialization()
2) init()
3) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization()
4) destroy()
You may check this by writing simple example having sysout and check their sequence.
Init and Destroy callback methods are part of Spring bean life cycle phases. The init method is going to be executed after bean instantiation. Similarly, The destroy method is going to be executed before bean finalization.
We can implement this functionality using implementing interfaces InitializingBean and DisposableBean, or using annotations #postconstruct and #predestroy, or declare the <bean> with init-method and destroy-method attributes.
BeanPostProcessor interface is used for extending the functionality of framework if want to do any configuration Pre- and Post- bean initialization done by spring container.
For Example: By default, Spring will not aware of the #PostConstruct and #PreDestroy annotation. To enable it, we have to either register CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor or specify the <context:annotation-config /> in bean configuration file. Here CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor is predefined BeanPostProcessor implementation for the annotations. Like:
#Required enables RequiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor processing tool
#Autowired enables AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor processing tool
And one more main diff is InitializingBean,DisposableBean related afterPropertiesSet() & destory() methods did not accept any paratmeters and return type also void, so we did not implement any custom logic.
But coming to BeanPostProcess methods postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean,String beanName) and postProcessAfterInitilization(Object bean,String beanName) are accept those two paramaters and return type also Object so we are able to write initilzation logics as well as any custom login based on the passing bean...
These both callback method feautes are including the bean life cycle and the following are the life cycle as follows
1) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitilazation()
2) #postConstruct or InitializingBean.afterPropertiesSet() or initialization method which is
defining in xml /* here also it's following the same oredr if three ways are availiable **/
3) BeanPostProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization()
4) #preDestroy or DisposibleBean.destroy() or destroy method which is defining in xml
/* here also it's following the same oredr if three ways are availiable **/
Just a short supplement to all the answers above: If you have any generic logic, common logic that needs to be universally applied to all your Spring beans, such as the injection of a logger to your beans, setting of a properties file, setting default values to fields of your beans through reflection; you could put that logic into ONE single place: the #Overriden callbacks (eg: postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object arg0, String arg1) if you are implementing the BeanPostProcessor interface); instead of duplicating the same logic across all your beans.
a)The postProcessBeforeInitialization() will be called before initialization of the bean.
b)Once the bean gets initialized, the different callbacks methods are called in the following order as per the Spring docs:
Methods annotated with #PostConstruct
afterPropertiesSet() as defined by the InitializingBean callback interface
init method defined through the XML.
The main difference is that the above 3 methods get called after the initialization get completed by the postProcessBeforeInitialization() method.
Once these methods get completed the method postProcessAfterInitialization() will be called and then the destroy methods are called in the same order:
Methods annotated with #PreDestroy
destroy() as defined by the DisposableBean callback interface
destroy() method defined through the XML.