I know there is an option to ignoreAnnotations in the CPD CLI reference guide but I can't seem to get this to work using maven pmd:cpd plugin. When I view the mvn pmd page it doesn't list 'ignoreAnnotations' as a usable parameter but seems like it should support if can do through CLI no??
I tried in pom like this
<configuration>
<ignoreAnnotations>true</ignoreAnnotations>
</configuration>
Thanks
Update, 2019:
maven-pmd-plugin version 3.11.0 added the ignoreAnnotations configuration option.
See plugin documentation: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pmd-plugin/cpd-mojo.html#ignoreAnnotations
Related
When I run "mvn clean tomcat:run" (without specifying any tomcat version) command from command prompt for running my web application, it download tomcat 6.0.29 version dependency as shown below:
org/apache/tomcat/juli/6.0.29/juli-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/annotations-api/6.0.29/annotations-api-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/catalina-ha/6.0.29/catalina-ha-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/coyote/6.0.29/coyote-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/tribes/6.0.29/tribes-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/jasper-el/6.0.29/jasper-el-6.0.29.pom
org/apache/tomcat/dbcp/6.0.29/dbcp-6.0.29.pom
pom.xml file of the application does not contain any tomcat version it require to run
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.2</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.6</source>
<target>1.6</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
<finalName>esa</finalName>
</build>
So my query is how does it decide to download particular this tomcat version dependency.
Probably the default settings of the tomcat plugin you run.
Try running mvn tomcat:help -Ddetails to see what version of the plugin you use, and how it can be configured.
I think it is an earlier version of the plugin, and you can now use explicit versions, such as
mvn org.apache.tomcat.maven:tomcat6-maven-plugin:2.0:run
mvn org.apache.tomcat.maven:tomcat7-maven-plugin:2.0:run
(or the shorter form)
Seems, you are running the tomcat-maven-plugin from codehaus, whihc has tomcat 6.0.29 built-in. (Seems there was no activity since 2010.)
You should try the tomcat7 plugin from apache.
Regards
Tibor
In command line for maven use --debug option to get explanation of build process. For our case output looks like:
...[DEBUG] Resolving plugin prefix tomcat from [org.apache.maven.plugins, org.codehaus.mojo]
...
[DEBUG] Resolved plugin version for org.codehaus.mojo:tomcat-maven-plugin to 1.1 from repository central (http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2, releases)...
Actually to explain why we've got tomcat v1.1 without specifying anything about tomcat, remember that maven build process has been customized with build plugins. And each build plugins has own build plugins. So it is enough to examine effective pom file to get clear understanding that almost empty initial pom.xml has quite big effective pom.xml.
To overcome issue just use explicit version of the tomcat plugin.
Please let me know how to configure sonar to use cobertura instead of jacoco which is the default.
i have this in my parent pom.xml
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</plugin>
Apart from this i dont know how to add configuration properties.Cobertura setting is there in child poms which will build n show coverage with cobertura locally.
I problem is configuring the right setting in parent pom.and what are the changes i should make in the sonar web interface ->General Settings.
Help Appreciated.Thank you.
There is documentation about the properties. I suspect you want to redefine the sonar.java.coveragePlugin property as a starter.
You'll have to configure that in Sonar directly. Besides, in order to use Cobertura for Java 7 projects you need Cobertura >= 2.0 which was only released a few days ago.
As a sidenote, here a two somewhat older comparisons of the various coverage tools for Sonar:
http://java.dzone.com/articles/code-coverage-tools-comparison
http://www.sonarsource.org/pick-your-code-coverage-tool-in-sonar-2-2/
I'm trying to run wro4j maven plugin according to the documentation
I add the plugin to my pom.xml:
<plugin>
<groupId>ro.isdc.wro4j</groupId>
<artifactId>wro4j-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.5.0</version>
</plugin>
and run the goal:
mvn wro4j:run -Dminimize=true -DtargetGroups=all
However the build fails with error:
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Internal error in the pl
ugin manager executing goal 'ro.isdc.wro4j:wro4j-maven-plugin:1.5.0:run': Unable
to load the mojo 'ro.isdc.wro4j:wro4j-maven-plugin:1.5.0:run' in the plugin 'ro
.isdc.wro4j:wro4j-maven-plugin'. A required class is missing: org/codehaus/plexu
s/util/Scanner
Do you know how to avoid this error?
Since wro4j-1.5.0, the maven 3.0 is required to run the plugin. The reason is a feature called incremental build support which depends on a library which is not available on older version of maven by default.
The issue is on your local environment.
Go to this folder on my windows machine:${user.home}/.m2/repository, then delete everything in this folder. (Well you can keep a copy.)
After deleting, run the Maven command:mvn clean install -U.
See: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wro4j/ZPSFBQ_5lI8
When I run mvn site, the maven-project-info-reports-plugin is creating a folder in my project base folder called "${project.basedir}". My plugin is defined like so with no extra configuration:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${version.maven-project-info-reports-plugin}</version>
</plugin>
When this happens, the site generation gives me a warning:
[WARNING] The repository url 'file://${project.basedir}' is invalid -
Repository 'studio.repository' will be blacklisted.
Why is this oddly-named folder being created, and how can I prevent it from being created? What other configuration can I look at that might be related to this plugin?
UPDATE (the plugin is version 2.2, the latest as far as I know as of this writing)
There is a (dated) discussion in maven mailing list which looks related. The issue seems to be due to using repository mirrors.
You would want to try with the latest version of the plugin, as well as the workaround suggested, which is to set <dependencyLocationEnabled> to false.
I dont know if this is a question or suggestion. But I am going to ask it as a question cos may be i am doing something wrong.
My problem was that I wanted to skip tests in maven build, In eclipse plugin I checked the Skip Test option in configuration when running maven. It was still failing on the Test surefire plugin as it couldn't download the version 2.4.3 (even though my previous maven project used a 2.7.2 and it was already there in my repo) So i tried with skipping tests and it still failed.
I configured my POM to use the 2.7.3 plugin of surefire which i already had and it went forward only to say Skipping Tests. Now, my confusion is that when it was already going to SKIP the test part why bother going into the download and confirming if the plugin for surefire is there or not. Just Skip it I say..
well, Is that the normal behavior of maven that when you skip something the plugin is still downloaded as if you are going to use it. Or was I doing it wrongly that made it download it.
May be because there was something new called "Effective POM" and it contained a listing of surefire plugin 2.4.2 in the plugin management area, when i imported my maven project in eclipse using the m2eclipse and i couldnt edit the Effective POM. I had not seen this before in the NetBeans when making the maven project.
In order to work i added an unnecessary surefire plugin entry in my build profile and skipped the tests there as well and added the version that I had in my repo already. I only did this so that my project can be built under eclipse as well. other wise my project works in NetBeans and simple command line without any issues.
Any comments!!
I think maven should be able to see first the SKIP part and then proceed into the usage of the plugin.
Syed..
Based on what you mentioned you didn't understand the difference between using a plugin and configuring the plugin. In this case you are using the plugin (it's in your build area or as you already figured out coming via super-pom). Furthermore you are trying to skip the tests despite the fact that maven-surefire-plugin in version 2.7.3 does not exist.
The configuration parameter skip will not execute the tests as well as not compile them. If you wan't just ignore the tests for a limited time you can use the "skipTest" parameter which in contradiction to skip will continue to compile the tests.
I would recommend to use a pluginManagement section of your project or your parent pom to define the version of the maven-surefire-plugin (which in the meantime exists in version 2.12)...
The following snippet add the pluginManagement part to a pom which controls which version of the maven-surefire plugin will be used.
<build>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.11</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
<plugins>
..
</build>
After you inserted that into your project pom the output effective pom should give you the version...otherwise you might need to update the project configuration first.
Compiling and running tests is part of the default lifecycle of maven. Since maven uses surefire to do run tests, it needs to download surefire. skipTests is not a maven configuration, but a surefire plugin configuration. The plugin determines that maven needs to skip tests.
As for 2.4.3 of surefire plugin, it is a valid version, but will work with 2.0.6 version of maven. Most likely you are using a newer maven, but, for some reason have the super pom of the older maven version on your system.
skipTest doesn't tell maven to skip the test lifecycle, it tells the surefire plugin not to run them. The plugin is still part of the lifecycle (it just does nothing when it's called). Hence your error.
If you want to NOT have surefire at all, you need to define your own packaging (since surefire is part of the standard jar packaging lifecycle) - which is a lot more work than just choosing a version of surefire that works for you (add a section with the right in your section).