I'm using spring data mongo. I have a collection within a document that when I add an item to it I would like to assign a new automatically generated unique identifier to it e.g. (someGeneratedId)
#Document(collection = "questionnaire")
public class Questionnaire {
#Id
private String id;
#Field("answers")
private List<Answer> answers;
}
public class Answer {
private String someGeneratedId;
private String text;
}
I am aware I could use UUID.randomUUID() (wrapped in some kind of service) and set the value, I was just wondering if there was anything out of the box that can handle this? From here #Id seems to be specific to _id field in mongo:
The #Id annotation tells the mapper which property you want to use for
the MongoDB _id property
TIA
No there is no out of the box solution for generating ids for properties on embedded documents.
If you want to keep this away from your business-logic you could implement a BeforeConvertCallback which generates the id's for your embedded objects.
#Component
class BeforeConvertQuestionnaireCallback implements BeforeConvertCallback<Questionnaire> {
#Override
public Questionnaire onBeforeConvert(#NonNull Questionnaire entity, #NonNull String collection) {
for (var answer : entity.getAnswers()) {
if (answer.getId() == null) {
answer.setId(new ObjectId().toString());
}
}
return entity;
}
}
You could also implement this in a more generic manner:
Create a new annotation: #AutogeneratedId.
Then listen to all BeforeConvertCallback's of all entities and iterate through the properties with reflection. Each property annotated with the new annotation gets a unique id if null.
I have a requirement to mark certain properties in my REST beans as ignored using #JsonIgnore. (I am using Spring Boot). This helps in avoiding these properties in my Swagger REST documentation.
I also would like to ensure that if the client passes these properties, an error is sent back. I tried setting spring.jackson.deserialization.fail-on-unknown-properties=true, but that works only for properties that are truly unknown. The properties marked with #JsonIgnore passes through this check.
Is there any way to achieve this?
I think I found a solution -
If I add #JsonProperty(access = Access.READ_ONLY) to the field that is marked as #JsonIgnore, I get back a validation error. (I have also marked the property with #Null annotation. Here is the complete solution:
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class Employee {
#Null(message = "Id must not be passed in request")
private String id;
private String name;
//getters and setters
}
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class EmployeeRequest extends Employee {
#Override
#JsonIgnore
#JsonProperty(access = Access.READ_ONLY)
public void setId(String id) {
super.setId(id);
}
}
PS: By adding #JsonProperty(access = Access.READ_ONLY), the property started showing up in Swagger model I had to add #ApiModelProperty(hidden = true) to hide it again.
The create method takes EmployeeRequest as input (deserialization), and the get method returns Employee as response (serialization). If I pass id in create request, with the above solution, it gives me back a ConstraintViolation.
PS PS: Bummer. None of these solutions worked end-to-end. I ended up creating separate request and response beans - with no hierarchical relationship between them.
I have a Spring Boot application using Spring Data REST. I have a domain entity called User with a boolean field isTeacher. This field has been already setup by our DBA in the User table with type bit and a default value of 1:
#Data
#Entity
public class User {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Long id; // This Id has been setup as auto generated in DB
#Column(name = "IS_TEACHER")
private boolean isTeacher;
}
And the User repository:
public interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>{
}
I was able to add a new user by giving the below request and POST to http://localhost:8080/users, a new user was created in the DB having isTeacher value 1:
{
"isTeacher" : true
}
However, when I tried to change IS_TEACHER by giving PATCH (or PUT) and this request:
{
"isTeacher" : false
}
The response showed that "isTeacher" is still true and the value didn't get changed in the table either. Can someone please let me know why this is happening?
The issue is due to #Data annotation of lombok is ignoring if you have a field that start with isXx it generates getters and setters to boolean with isTeacher for getters and setTeacher for setters then you are not able to update correctly your property, if you put "teacher" when updating should work but you should solve this by overriding that setter.
#Setter(AccessLevel.NONE) private boolean isTeacher;
public void setIsTeacher(boolean isTeacher) {
this.isTeacher = isTeacher;
}
I have the following document:
#Document(collection = "decision_analysis")
public class DecisionAnalysis implements Serializable {
#Id
private String id;
...
}
I need to delete multiple MongoDB documents via List<String> decisionAnalysisIds
How to properly write Spring Data MongoDB repository method in order to do it?
The following doesn't work :
void deleteByIds(List<String> decisionAnalysisIds); - error: No property ids found for type DecisionAnalysis! Did you mean 'id'?
void deleteById(List<String> decisionAnalysisIds); - works, but delete only one document
Use the in clause like this:
void deleteByIdIn(List<String> ids);
I have a database service using Spring Boot 1.5.1 and Spring Data Rest. I am storing my entities in a MySQL database, and accessing them over REST using Spring's PagingAndSortingRepository. I found this which states that sorting by nested parameters is supported, but I cannot find a way to sort by nested fields.
I have these classes:
#Entity(name = "Person")
#Table(name = "PERSON")
public class Person {
#ManyToOne
protected Address address;
#ManyToOne(targetEntity = Name.class, cascade = {
CascadeType.ALL
})
#JoinColumn(name = "NAME_PERSON_ID")
protected Name name;
#Id
protected Long id;
// Setter, getters, etc.
}
#Entity(name = "Name")
#Table(name = "NAME")
public class Name{
protected String firstName;
protected String lastName;
#Id
protected Long id;
// Setter, getters, etc.
}
For example, when using the method:
Page<Person> findByAddress_Id(#Param("id") String id, Pageable pageable);
And calling the URI http://localhost:8080/people/search/findByAddress_Id?id=1&sort=name_lastName,desc, the sort parameter is completely ignored by Spring.
The parameters sort=name.lastName and sort=nameLastName did not work either.
Am I forming the Rest request wrong, or missing some configuration?
Thank you!
The workaround I found is to create an extra read-only property for sorting purposes only. Building on the example above:
#Entity(name = "Person")
#Table(name = "PERSON")
public class Person {
// read only, for sorting purposes only
// #JsonIgnore // we can hide it from the clients, if needed
#RestResource(exported=false) // read only so we can map 2 fields to the same database column
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "address_id", insertable = false, updatable = false)
private Address address;
// We still want the linkable association created to work as before so we manually override the relation and path
#RestResource(exported=true, rel="address", path="address")
#ManyToOne
private Address addressLink;
...
}
The drawback for the proposed workaround is that we now have to explicitly duplicate all the properties for which we want to support nested sorting.
LATER EDIT: another drawback is that we cannot hide the embedded property from the clients. In my original answer, I was suggesting we can add #JsonIgnore, but apparently that breaks the sort.
I debugged through that and it looks like the issue that Alan mentioned.
I found workaround that could help:
Create own controller, inject your repo and optionally projection factory (if you need projections). Implement get method to delegate call to your repository
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/people")
public class PeopleController {
#Autowired
PersonRepository repository;
//#Autowired
//PagedResourcesAssembler<MyDTO> resourceAssembler;
#GetMapping("/by-address/{addressId}")
public Page<Person> getByAddress(#PathVariable("addressId") Long addressId, Pageable page) {
// spring doesn't spoil your sort here ...
Page<Person> page = repository.findByAddress_Id(addressId, page)
// optionally, apply projection
// to return DTO/specifically loaded Entity objects ...
// return type would be then PagedResources<Resource<MyDTO>>
// return resourceAssembler.toResource(page.map(...))
return page;
}
}
This works for me with 2.6.8.RELEASE; the issue seems to be in all versions.
From Spring Data REST documentation:
Sorting by linkable associations (that is, links to top-level resources) is not supported.
https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/rest/docs/current/reference/html/#paging-and-sorting.sorting
An alternative that I found was use #ResResource(exported=false).
This is not valid (expecially for legacy Spring Data REST projects) because avoid that the resource/entity will be loaded HTTP links:
JacksonBinder
BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder throws
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.MismatchedInputException: Cannot construct instance of ' com...' no String-argument constructor/factory method to deserialize from String value
I tried activate sort by linkable associations with help of annotations but without success because we need always need override the mappPropertyPath method of JacksonMappingAwareSortTranslator.SortTranslator detect the annotation:
if (associations.isLinkableAssociation(persistentProperty)) {
if(!persistentProperty.isAnnotationPresent(SortByLinkableAssociation.class)) {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
}
Annotation
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target(ElementType.FIELD)
public #interface SortByLinkableAssociation {
}
At project mark association as #SortByLinkableAssociation:
#ManyToOne
#SortByLinkableAssociation
private Name name;
Really I didn't find a clear and success solution to this issue but decide to expose it to let think about it or even Spring team take in consideration to include at nexts releases.
Please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/66135148/6673169 for possible workaround/hack, when we wanted sorting by linked entity.