I've got an Inspec-control containing a http-block. The URL is saved in a variable called DNScloudui['value'] - I want to add https:// to the beginning of the URL.
DNScloudui = attribute('DNS_name_cloudui')
control 'Website reachability' do
title 'Check reachability by GET requests'
describe http(DNScloudui['value'], method: 'GET') do
its('status') { should cmp 200 }
end
end
How can I achieve that?
assuming that DNScloudui returns you a non-nil value, then you can use string interpolation to get the value of the DNScloudui variable. for instance:
DNScloudui = attribute('DNS_name_cloudui')
control 'Website reachability' do
title 'Check reachability by GET requests'
describe http("https://#{DNScloudui['value']}", method: 'GET') do
its('status') { should cmp 200 }
end
end
also, looking at the name of your DNScloudui variable, i would suggest to stick to ruby naming conventions and style guides
Related
So I have a string from a rendered template that looks like
"Dear {{user_name}},\r\n\r\nThank you for your purchase. If you have any questions, we are happy to help.\r\n\r\n\r\n{{company_name}}\r\n{{company_phone_number}}\r\n"
All those variables like {{user_name}} are optional and do not need to be included but I want to check that if they are, they have {{ in front of the variable name. I am using liquid to parse and render the template and couldn't get it to catch if the user only uses 1 (or no) opening brackets. I was only able to catch the proper number of closing brackets. So I wrote a method to check that if these variables exist, they have the correct opening brackets. It only works, however, if all those variables are found.
here is my method:
def validate_opening_brackets?(template)
text = %w(user_name company_name company_phone_number)
text.all? do |variable|
next unless template.include? variable
template.include? "{{#{variable}"
end
end
It works, but only if all variables are present. If, for example, the template created by the user does not include user_name, then it will return false. I've also done this loop using each, and creating a variable outside of the block that I assign false if the conditions are not met. I would really, however, like to get this to work using the all? method, as I can just return a boolean and it's cleaner.
If the question is about how to rewrite the all? block to make it return true if all present variable names have two brackets before them and false otherwise then you could use something like this:
def validate_opening_brackets?(template)
variables = %w(user_name company_name company_phone_number)
variables.all? do |variable|
!template.include?(variable) || template.include?("{{#{variable}")
end
end
TL;DR
There are multiple ways to do this, but the easiest way I can think of is to simply prefix/postfix a regular expression with the escaped characters used by Mustache/Liquid, and using alternation to check for each of your variable names within the template variable characters (e.g. double curly braces). You can then use String#scan and then return a Boolean from Enumerable#any? based on the contents of the Array returned by from #scan.
This works with your posted example, but there may certainly be other use cases where you need a more complex solution. YMMV.
Example Code
This solution escapes the leading and trailing { and } characters to avoid having them treated as special characters, and then interpolates the variable names with | for alternation. It returns a Boolean depending on whether templated variables are found.
def template_string_has_interpolations? str
var_names = %w[user_name company_name company_phone_number]
regexp = /\{\{#{var_names.join ?|}\}\}/
str.scan(regexp).any?
end
Tested Examples
template_string_has_interpolations? "Dear {{user_name}},\r\n\r\nThank you for your purchase. If you have any questions, we are happy to help.\r\n\r\n\r\n{{company_name}}\r\n{{company_phone_number}}\r\n"
#=> true
template_string_has_interpolations? "Dear Customer,\r\n\r\nThank you for your purchase. If you have any questions, we are happy to help.\r\n\r\n\r\nCompany, Inc.\r\n(555) 555-5555\r\n"
#=> false
I'm new to SoapUI. I wanted to know how can we add 2 property value into one Header value.
For instance, I got some response like in XML format:
<Response xmlns="Http://SomeUrl">
<access_token>abc</access_token>
<scope>scope1</scope>
<token_type>Bearer</token_type>
</Response>
I want to send both access_token & token type to a single header value like:
"Authorization":"Bearer abc"
I am not getting how to do this using property transfer step.
Can anyone please help me?
You can use XPath concat function to concatenate the both values in one variable in your property transfer steps, in your case you can use the follow XPath:
concat(//*:token_type," ",//*:access_token)
concat function concatenates two or more strings, //*:token_type gets the Bearer value and //*:access_token gets the abc.
Hope this helps,
Add a script step after the step returning what you describe above.
def tokenType = context.expand('${STEP RETURNING STUFF#Response#//Response/token_type}');
def token = context.expand('${STEP RETURNING STUFF#Response#//Response/access_token}');
//add header to all steps
for (def stepEntry : testRunner.testCase.testSteps) {
if (!(stepEntry.value instanceof com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.teststeps.WsdlTestRequestStep)) {
continue;
}
def headers = stepEntry.value.httpRequest.requestHeaders;
headers.remove("Authorization");
headers.put("Authorization", token_type + " " + token);
stepEntry.value.httpRequest.requestHeaders = headers;
}
Here is another way without using additional property transfer step, but uses script assertion
Add a script assertion for the request test step.
Use below code into that script, modify element XPath are required
def element1Xpath = '//*:token_type'
def element2Xpath = '//*:access_token'
def groovyUtils = new com.eviware.soapui.support.GroovyUtils( context )
def response = groovyUtils.getXmlHolder(messageExchange.responseContentAsXml)
def field1 = response.getNodeValue(element1Xpath)
def field2 = response.getNodeValue(element2Xpath)
if (!field1) { throw new Error ("${element1Xpath} is either empty or null") }
if (!field1) { throw new Error ("${element2Xpath} is either empty or null") }
context.testCase.setPropertyValue('TEMP_PROPERTY', "${field1} ${field2}")
Now the expected value(merged) is available in a property 'TEMP_PROPERTY'. You may rename the property name as you wish in the last line of the code.
You may the new wherever it is needed within the test case.
This is a sort of followup to my other MongoDB question about the torrent indexer.
I'm making an open source torrent indexer (like a mini TPB, in essence), and offer both SQLite and MongoDB for backend, currently.
However, I'm having trouble with the MongoDB part of it. In Sinatra, I get when trying to upload a torrent, or search for one.
In uploading, one needs to tag the torrent — and it fails here. The code for adding tags is as follows:
def add_tag(tag)
if $sqlite
unless tag_exists? tag
$db.execute("insert into #{$tag_table} values ( ? )", tag)
end
id = $db.execute("select oid from #{$tag_table} where tag = ?", tag)
return id[0]
elsif $mongo
unless tag_exists? tag
$tag.insert({:tag => tag})
end
return $tag.find({:tag => tag})[:_id] #this is the line it presumably crashes on
end
end
It reaches line 105 (noted above), and then fails. What's going on? Also, as an FYI this might turn into a few other questions as solutions come in.
Thanks!
EDIT
So instead of returning the tag result with [:_id], I changed the block inside the elsif to:
id = $tag.find({:tag => tag})
puts id.inspect
return id
and still get an error. You can see a demo at http://torrent.hypeno.de and the source at http://github.com/tekknolagi/indexer/
Given that you are doing an insert(), the easiest way to get the id is:
id = $tag.insert({:tag => tag})
id will be a BSON::ObjectId, so you can use appropriate methods depending on the return value you want:
return id # BSON::ObjectId('5017cace1d5710170b000001')
return id.to_s # "5017cace1d5710170b000001"
In your original question you are trying to use the Collection.find() method. This returns a Mongo::Cursor, but you are trying to reference the cursor as a document. You need to iterate over the cursor using each or next, eg:
cursor = $tag.find_one({:tag => tag})
return cursor.next['_id'];
If you want a single document, you should be using Collection.find_one().
For example, you can find and return the _id using:
return $tag.find_one({:tag => tag})['_id']
I think the problem here is [:_id]. I dont know much about Mongo but `$tag.find({:tag => tag}) is probably retutning an array and passing a symbol to the [] array operator is not defined.
I am just wondering if it is possible to have a condition that passes information to the request body once it is complete, I doubt conditions can do it and are the right place even if they could, because it implies they are to do conditional logic, however the authorisation example also redirects so it has a blur of concerns... an example would be something like:
set(:get_model) { |body| { send_to_request_body(Model.new(body)) } }
get '/something', :get_model => request.body.data do
return "model called #{#model.name}"
end
The above is all psudocode so sorry for any syntax/spelling mistakes, but the idea is I can have a condition which fetches the model and puts it into some local variable for the body to use, or do a halt with an error or something.
I am sure filters (before/after) would be a better way to do this if it can be done, however from what I have seen I would need to set that up per route, whereas with a condition I would only need to have it as an option on the request.
An example with before would be:
before '/something' do
#model = Model.new(request.body.data)
end
get '/something' do
return "model called #{#model.name}"
end
This is great, but lets say I now had 20 routes, and 18 of them needed these models creating, I would need to basically duplicate the before filter for all 18 of them, and write the same model logic for them all, which is why I am trying to find a better way to re-use this functionality. If I could do a catch-all Before filter which was able to check to see if the given route had an option set, then that could possibly work, but not sure if you can do that.
In ASP MVC you could do this sort of thing with filters, which is what I am ideally after, some way to configure certain routes (at the route definition) to do some work before hand and pass it into the calling block.
Conditions can set instance variables and modify the params hash. For an example, see the built-in user_agent condition.
set(:get_model) { |body| condition { #model = Model.new(body) } }
get '/something', :get_model => something do
"model called #{#model.name}"
end
You should be aware that request is not available at that point, though.
Sinatra has support for before and after filters:
before do
#note = 'Hi!'
request.path_info = '/foo/bar/baz'
end
get '/foo/*' do
#note #=> 'Hi!'
params[:splat] #=> 'bar/baz'
end
after '/create/:slug' do |slug|
session[:last_slug] = slug
end
Does anyone know what the regular expression in Ruby is to verify an email address is in proper RFC 2822 email format?
What I want to do is:
string.match(RFC_2822_REGEX)
where "RFC_2822_REGEX" is the regular expression to verify if my string is in valid RFC 2882 form.
You can use the mail gem to parse any string according to RFC2822 like so:
def valid_email( value )
begin
return false if value == ''
parsed = Mail::Address.new( value )
return parsed.address == value && parsed.local != parsed.address
rescue Mail::Field::ParseError
return false
end
end
This checks if the email is provided, i.e. returns false for an empty address and also checks that the address contains a domain.
http://theshed.hezmatt.org/email-address-validator
Does regex validation based on RFC2822 rules (it's a monster of a regex, too), it can also check that the domain is valid in DNS (has MX or A records), and do a test delivery to validate that the MX for the domain will accept a message for the address given. These last two checks are optional.
Try this: