Pass collection into custom angular schematic? - angular-schematics

I want to create a custom angular schematic that can accept a collection of action names. I will then generate 3 ngrx actions for every action name provided from the user.
for example I want to create a schematic that can be invoked like this:
ng g my-collection:my-schematic --actions=GetById,GetByFirstName
Then I'll generate code for GetById, GetByIdSuccess, GetByIdError, GetByFirstName, GetByFirstNameSuccess, GetByFirstNameError.
The issue is I've only seen angular schematics that will accept a single value as an input parameter. Anyone know how to handle collections in a custom angular schematic?

you can follow this blog, it will teach you how to create your own schematics project:
https://blog.angular.io/schematics-an-introduction-dc1dfbc2a2b2
after you generate your schematics project in file collection.json you can extend the #ngrx/schematics:
{
...
"extends": ["#ngrx/schematics"],
}
and then use the ngrx schematics to generate 3 actions like this:
externalSchematic('#ngrx/schematics', 'action')

I haven't found a good example of how to an array of string into a schematic parameter, but I found a workaround. What I did was have a simple string input parameter that is consistently delimited (I used , to delimit the values). Here is my schema:
export interface Schema {
name: string;
path?: string;
project?: string;
spec?: boolean;
actions: string;
__actions: string[];
store?: string;
}
I parse the actions param that is provided and generate the string array __actions and use that property in my templates. Here is a snippet from my index.ts:
export default function(options: ActionOptions): Rule {
return (host: Tree, context: SchematicContext) => {
options.path = getProjectPath(host, options);
const parsedPath = parseName(options.path, options.name);
options.name = parsedPath.name;
options.path = parsedPath.path;
options.__actions = options.actions.split(',');
options.__actions = options.__actions.map(_a => classify(_a));
If you know of a better way to process these please share. Thanks!

You need to pass the actions multiple times.
ng g my-collection:my-schematic --actions=GetById --actions=GetByFirstName
Define the parameter as an array within your schema.json file.
...
"actions": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": "The name of the actions."
},
...
Also in your schema.ts.
export interface Schema {
actions: string[]
}

If you want to pull them right off of the command args, you can do the following:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"$id": "Sample",
"title": "Sample Schematic",
"type": "object",
"description": "Does stuff.",
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"things": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
},
"$default": {
"$source": "argv"
},
"description": "Things from the command-line args."
}
}
}
Then when you run your schematic you can do:
schematics schematic-lib:sample stuff other-stuff more-stuff
In this case, the things property will be ['stuff', 'other-stuff', 'more-stuff'].
Edit: Note that the required value in the schema won't cause the schematic to fail if you don't provide any args. You'd need to do validation on that property in your schematic.

Related

fetch attribute type from terraform provider schema

am trying to find out a way to fetch the attribute type of a resource/data_source from a terraform providers schema (am currently using gcp, but will be extending to pretty much all providers).
My current flow of setup
Am running the terraform providers schema -json to fetch the providers schema
This will generate a huge json file with the schema structure of the provider
ref:
How to get that list of all the available Terraform Resource types for Google Cloud?
https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/cli/commands/providers/schema
And from this am trying to fetch the type of each attribute eg below
`
"google_cloud_run_service": {
"version": 1,
"block": {
"attributes": {
"autogenerate_revision_name": {
"type": "bool",
"description_kind": "plain",
"optional": true
},
`
4) My end goal is to generate variables.tf from the above schema for all resources and all attributes supported in that resource along with the type constraint
ref: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/language/values/variables
I already got some help on how we can generate that
ref: Get the type of value using cty in hclwrite
Now the challenge is to work on complex structures like below
The below is one of the attributes of "google_cloud_run_service".
`
"status": {
"type": [
"list",
[
"object",
{
"conditions": [
"list",
[
"object",
{
"message": "string",
"reason": "string",
"status": "string",
"type": "string"
}
]
],
"latest_created_revision_name": "string",
"latest_ready_revision_name": "string",
"observed_generation": "number",
"url": "string"
}
]
],
"description": "The current status of the Service.",
"description_kind": "plain",
"computed": true
}
`
7) so based on the above complex structure type, I want to generate the variables.tf file for this kind of attribute using the code sample from point #5, and the desired output should look something like below in variables.tf
`
variable "autogenerate_revision_name" {
type = string
default = ""
description = "Sample description"
}
variable "status" {
type = list(object({
conditions = list(object({
"message" = string
"reason" = string
"status" = string
" type" = string
}))
"latest_created_revision_name" = string
"latest_ready_revision_name" = string
"observed_generation" = number
"url" = string
}))
default = "default values in the above type format"
}
`
The above was manually written - so might not exactly align with the schema, but i hope i made it understood , as to what am trying to achieve.
The first variable in the above code is from the first eg i gave in point #3 which is easy to generate, but the second eg in point #6 is a complex type constraint and am seeking help to get this generated
Is this possible to generate using the helper schema sdk (https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2#v2.24.0/helper/schema) ? along with code eg given in point #5 ?
Summary : Am generating json schema of a terraform provider using terraform providers schema -json, am reading that json file and generating hcl code for each resource, but stuck with generating type constraints for the attributes/variables, hence seeking help on this.
Any sort of help is really appreciated as am stuck at this for quite a while.
If you've come this far, then i thank you for reading such a lengthy question, and any sort of pointers are welcome.

Springdocs: Specifying an explicit type for Paged responses

I'm working on a "global search" for my application.
Currently, I'm using hibernate-search to search for instances of multiple different objects and return them to the user.
The relevant code looks as follows:
Search.session(entityManager)
.search(ModelA.classs, ModelB.class)
.where(...)
.sort(...)
.fetch(skip, count);
Skip and count are calculated based on a Pageable and the result is used to create an instance of Page, which will be returned to the controller.
This works as I'd expect, however, the types generated by swagger-docs obviously doesn't know, what the type within the Page is, and therefore uses Object.
I'd like to expose the correct types, as I use them to generate the types for the frontend application.
I was able to set the type to an array, when overwriting the schema like this:
#ArraySchema(schema = #Schema(anyOf = {ModelA.class, ModelB.class}))
public Page<?> search(Pageable pageable) {
However, this just disregards the Page and also isn't correct.
The next thing I tried is extending the PageImpl, overwriting the getContent method, and specifying the same schema on this method, but this wasn't included in the output at all.
Next was implementing Page<T> myself (and later removing the implements reference to Page<T>) and specifying the same schema on getContent, iterator, and the field itself, but also to no effect.
How do I tell spring-docs, what the content of the resulting Page might be?
I stumbled upon this when trying to solve a similar problem
Inspired from this thread Springdoc with a generic return type i came up with the following solution, and it seems to apply to your case also. Code examples are in Kotlin.
I introduced a stub class that will just act as the Schema for the response:
private class PageModel(
#Schema(oneOf = [ModelA::class, ModelB::class]))
content: List<Object>
): PageImpl<Object>(content)
Then i annotated my Controller like this:
#Operation(
responses = [
ApiResponse(
responseCode = "200",
content = [Content(schema = Schema(implementation = PageModel::class))]
)
]
)
fun getPage(pageable: Pageable): Page<Object>
This generated this api response:
"PageModel": {
"properties": {
"content": {
"items": {
"oneOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/ModelA"
},
{
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/ModelB"
}
],
"type": "object"
},
"type": "array"
},
... -> more page stuff from spring's PageImpl<>
And in the "responses" section for the api call:
"responses": {
"200": {
"content": {
"application/json": {
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/components/schemas/PageModel"
}
}
},
"description": "OK"
}
All generated openapi doc is similar to the autogenerated json when returning a Page, it just rewrites the "content" array property to have a specific type.

GraphQL: Explore API without a wildcard (*)?

I am new to GraphQL and I wonder how I can explore an API without a possible wildcard (*) (https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/127).
I am currently setting up a headless Craft CMS with GraphQL and I don't really know how my data is nested.
Event with the REST API I have no chance of just getting all the data, because I have to setup all the endpoints and therefore I have to know all field names as well.
So how could I easily explore my CraftCMS data structure?
Thanks for any hints on this.
Cheers
merc
------ Edit -------
If I use #simonpedro s suggestion:
{
__schema {
types {
name
kind
fields {
name
}
}
}
}
I can see a lot of types (?)/fields (?)...
For example I see:
{
"name": "FlexibleContentTeaser",
"kind": "OBJECT",
"fields": [
{
"name": "id"
},
{
"name": "enabled"
},
{
"name": "teaserTitle"
},
{
"name": "text"
},
{
"name": "teaserLink"
},
{
"name": "teaserLinkConnection"
}
]
But now I would like to know how a teaserLink ist structured.
I somehow found out that the teaserLink (it is a field with the type Entries, where I can link to another page) has the properties url & title.
But how would I set up query to explore the properties available within teaserLink?
I tried all sorts of queries, but I am always confrontend with messages like this:
I would be really glad if somebody could give me another pointer how I can find out which properties I can actually query...
Thank you
As far as I'm concerned currently there is no graphql implementation with that capability. However, if what you want to do is to explore the "data structure", i.e, the schema, you should use schema instrospection, which was thought for that (explore the graphql schema). For example, a simple graphql instrospection query would be like this:
{
__schema {
types {
name
kind
fields {
name
}
}
}
}
References:
- https://graphql.org/learn/introspection/
UPDATE for edit:
What you want to do I think is the following:
Make a query like this
{
__schema {
types {
name
kind
fields {
name
type {
fields {
name
}
}
}
}
}
}
And then find the wished type field to grab more information (the fields) from it. Something like this (I don't know if this works, just an idea):
const typeFlexibleContentTeaser = data.__schema.types.find(t => t === "FlexibleContentTeaser")
const teaserLinkField = typeFlexibleContentTeaser.fields.find(f => f.name === "teaserLink")
const teaserLinkField = teaserLinkField.type.fields;
i.e, you have to transverse recursively through the type field.

How do I use FreeFormTextRecordSetWriter

I my Nifi controller I want to configure the FreeFormTextRecordSetWriter, but I have no Idea what I should put in the "Text" field. I'm getting the text from my source (in my case GetSolr), and just want to write this, period.
Documentation and mailinglist do not seem to tell me how this is done, any help appreciated.
EDIT: Here the sample input + output I want to achieve (as you can see: not ransformation needed, plain text, no JSON input)
EDIT: I now realize, that I can't tell GetSolr to return just CSV data - but I have to use Json
So referencing with attribute seems to be fine. What the documentation omits is, that the ${flowFile} attribute should containt the complete flowfile that is returned.
Sample input:
{
"responseHeader": {
"zkConnected": true,
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0,
"params": {
"q": "*:*",
"_": "1553686715465"
}
},
"response": {
"numFound": 3194,
"start": 0,
"docs": [
{
"id": "{402EBE69-0000-CD1D-8FFF-D07756271B4E}",
"MimeType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document",
"FileName": "Test.docx",
"DateLastModified": "2019-03-27T08:05:00.103Z",
"_version_": 1629145864291221504,
"LAST_UPDATE": "2019-03-27T08:16:08.451Z"
}
]
}
}
Wanted output
{402EBE69-0000-CD1D-8FFF-D07756271B4E}
BTW: The documentation says this:
The text to use when writing the results. This property will evaluate the Expression Language using any of the fields available in a Record.
Supports Expression Language: true (will be evaluated using flow file attributes and variable registry)
I want to use my source's text, so I'm confused
You need to use expression language as if the record's fields are the FlowFile's attributes.
Example:
Input:
{
"t1": "test",
"t2": "ttt",
"hello": true,
"testN": 1
}
Text property in FreeFormTextRecordSetWriter:
${t1} k!${t2} ${hello}:boolean
${testN}Num
Output(using ConvertRecord):
test k!ttt true:boolean
1Num
EDIT:
Seems like what you needed was reading from Solr and write a single column csv. You need to use CSVRecordSetWriter. As for the same,
I should tell you to consider to upgrade to 1.9.1. Starting from 1.9.0, the schema can be inferred for you.
otherwise, you can set Schema Access Strategy as Use 'Schema Text' Property
then, use the following schema in Schema Text
{
"name": "MyClass",
"type": "record",
"namespace": "com.acme.avro",
"fields": [
{
"name": "id",
"type": "int"
}
]
}
this should work
I'll edit it into my answer. If it works for you, please choose my answer :)

How can I sort GeoJson file showing defined tags?

Good morning to all and thank you for your help.
I'm working in a map page (map.html) create by leaflet library that take data from a external geojson file called water_well.js. This file, previously generated by overpass service is just a list of markers. every Marker have some proprerties. Follow an exemple:
"properties": {
"operator:type": "international",
"is_in:district": "west_mamprusi",
"is_in:region": "northern",
"source:date": "2012-02-11",
"source:ele": "gps",
"water_wells:source_type": "borehole"
},
The main page extract those data from the file before with this javascript:
var wwMarker = L.geoJson(water_well, {
pointToLayer : function (feature, latlng) {
lat = feature.geometry.coordinates[0];
lng = feature.geometry.coordinates[1];
//following code that make error
op_type = feature.properties.operator_type;
district = feature.properties.is_in:district;
region = feature.properties.is_in:region;
source_date = feature.properties.source:date;
source_ele = feature.properties.source:ele;
source_type = feature.properties.water_wells:source_type;
.....
I'm sure the problem is my Zero javascript knowledge, but I'm not a programmer and I do this map for my NGO engaged in water wells in Burkina Faso.
The script for extraction of the data don't work in this point:
op_type = feature.properties.operator:type;
The problem is ":" because is invalid character.
The second question is that not all markers in the first file called water_well.js have the same "properties" filled ad actually it is possible that someone have different group of "properties like those two:
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": "node/1606958159",
"properties": {
"#id": "node/1606958159",
"amenity": "drinking_water",
"man_made": "water_well",
"name": "puits 4"
},
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-3.6235696,
12.02171
]
}
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": "node/1913126817",
"properties": {
"#id": "node/1913126817",
"ele": "170.8000030517578",
"grid_proximity": "grid_further_500_m",
"is_in:district": "builsa",
"is_in:region": "upper_east",
"man_made": "water_well",
"operational_status": "open",
"operator:type": "individual",
"pipe_connection": "no",
"pump": "manual",
"seasonal": "another_pattern",
"source": "MVP,Columbia University",
"source:date": "2012-02-14",
"source:ele": "gps",
"water_wells:source_type": "unprotected_well"
},
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-1.2430456,
10.3233693
]
}
},
maybe it is possible to extract all properties of each item independently from which one is present or not..... This can be de better way to solve the problem but I've no idea how to do that.
This is what I do (ckick the water tap to see pop-up): www.h2openmap.org/map
This is almost what I would like to do (ckick the water tap to see pop-up): overpass-turbo.eu/s/7Ov
Thank you for spending your time reading my question.
Have a nice day everyone, Francesco
You can access those properties using the bracketnotation, instead of using:
district = feature.properties.is_in:district;
Use bracketnotation:
district = feature.properties['is_in:district'];
Reference on property-accessors: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Property_Accessors
Now if you want to do something based on if a property exists there is a hasOwnProperty method available on objects. Since feature.properties is an object you can use that in a condition:
if (features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district')) {
// Property exists, do stuff
}
// or
if (!features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district')) {
// Property does not exist, do stuff
}
If you want to do something base on wether multiple properties exist you can use the && (and) operator:
if (features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district') &&
features.properties.hasOwnProperty('source:data')) {
// Properties exist, do stuff
}
// Or
if (!features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district') &&
!features.properties.hasOwnProperty('source:data')) {
// Properties do not exist, do stuff
}
You could use the || (or) operator to see if at least one of the conditions matches:
if (features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district') ||
features.properties.hasOwnProperty('source:data')) {
// At least one of the properties exist, do stuff
}
// Or
if (!features.properties.hasOwnProperty('is_in:district') ||
!features.properties.hasOwnProperty('source:data')) {
// At least one of the properties does not exist, do stuff
}
Reference for this can be found here under "Logical operators": https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Expressions_and_Operators
You can use something like to build (or don't build) the data object that you need for your popup. Hope that helps.

Resources