How to analyze this Golang cpu pprof snapshot? [closed] - debugging

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
This problem occurs about 10 minutes after the program starts. CPU costs 300%. What's the problem? stackoverflow doesn't support .svg image. Please download the .svg file uploaded to github.
https://github.com/.../raw/master/pprof001.svg

You are jammed in runtime (see https://godoc.org/runtime) presumably because of poor choices in the com/smdduck/xsys/xcron/NewRateLimiter
But no idea what to recommend, as there is no source code
Voting to close as off-topic due to a lack of code to look at

Related

Debugging Illegal Address Error within CUDA kernel using NVIDIA's Nsight (Ubuntu) [closed]

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
My cudaPeekAtLastError() call after my kernel execution is catching an "Illegal address" error. My block and grid sizes are large enough that I'm overwhelmed by trying to find out which access is causing the error. How would you go about figuring it out in nsight?
Under "Debug Configuration", CUDA-memcheck should be enabled.

RestKit - Deprecations and Semantic Issue Warnings in Xcode 5 [closed]

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm getting 26 warnings due to Semantic Issue and Deprecations for RestKit, and I've looked through the Issues on her for the fix because I'd assume there is one, but I can't find it.
Can anyone post the link or help me out here? I'm newer to this, thanks!
Per Wain's response, I followed the install guide to reinstall.

Saving Silverlight source files takes ages [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question appears to be off-topic because it lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Describe your problem in more detail or include a minimal example in the question itself.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
After hitting Save button and saving the files in a Silverlight project takes almost a minute. Same thing happens after exiting debugging mode and this happens only with Silverlight projects.
Anyone have a similar problem?
These are just shots in the dark but....
Disable addons (ReSharper, DevExpress, etc..)
Checkout C:\Documents and Settings\\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\WebsiteCache
(more info at http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/347228/large-numbers-of-websitecache-files-slowing-visual-studio-2005-and-windows-performance)
Remove projects from the solution
Disable Intellisense.

Suppress UCM default head scripts from generated webpages [closed]

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
By default UCM adds a bunch of JavaScript to the head of each webpage. Is there a way to suppress the insertion of these scripts at the page level?
I found a resolution to the issue. It is Site Studio Designer that automatically inserts scripts into the head of documents you work with. The solution is to write your .hcsp source in another editor (I use Notepad++), then manually check your code into UCM.

Is there a performance hit when running obfuscated code? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
All,
I am proposing the addition of code obfuscation to the standard build process at my organization. One of the questions being asked is whether there is a performance hit to running obfuscated code vs. running unobfuscated code.
What is your experience? Have you seen a reduction in performance at runtime because you obfuscated your Java or C# code?
Thanks,
VI
It depends on how you are obfuscating it. If you use one of the tools that replaces all the names of objets and functions, then there should be no change at all. The compilers don't care what you call anything, whether it's useful to a developer (fetchProjects()) or just (funcA()).
You may wish to read about my over-obfuscation experiments: Impact of Flow Obfuscation on Performance.

Resources