INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.bootstrap.Command Apache NiFi is currently running, listening to Bootstrap on port 20740, PID=31405
That means NiFi is running, and I can see its log in logs/nifi-app.log.
The UI is available at https://servername:9443/nifi. It successfully initiated communication with Bootstrap.
But i have this error, and the UI fails to appear. Do you have any solutions?
Failed to invoke #OnEnabled method of JettyWebSocketServer[id=01591009-1d2b-177f-e304-a7cc87d735ce] due to java.net.BindException: Address already in use
"java.net.BindException: Address already in use" means a port is already in use by something else on your system.
In this case it shows that it is coming from the JettyWebSocketServer controller service which is trying to bind to port 9998.
You can use "netstat -lntp" to see what is using port 9998. It could also be possible that you have more than one instance of the controller service with both of them configured with port 9998 and one of them is binging to it and the other fails.
Seems like a Controller Service that fails... Try browsing your flow.xml.gz and check for any ControllerServices named JettyWebSocketServer. Change their <state></state> from <state>ENABLED</state> to <state>DISABLED</state> and try running NiFi again.
You can tell it is a controller service by the #enabledannotation which invokes a method that needs to run when the controller service is enabled.
NiFi shouldn't fail to start because of a failing controller service but it seems to be the problem(probably a bug).
After it start back up, you can configure the controller service to run on a different port.
I also suggest, that if it is the case, that you open an issue to Apache about this since it seems like a pretty major bug.
Related
When binding to Memgraph I get the error Cannot bind to socket on endpoint {}. How can I avoid this error?
Make sure that the specified port (the default port Memgraph runs on is 7687) isn't being used by another process or that you haven't already started another Memgraph instance on the same port.
I wrote a Go program which doesn't need to retrieve external http calls at all by default. I tried to deploy it on Google Cloud Run and received the following error:
The user-provided container failed to start and listen on the port
defined provided by the PORT=8080 environment variable. Logs for this
revision might contain more information.
I understand it happens because my code doesn't provide a port. As this answer states:
container must listen for incoming HTTP requests on the port
that is defined by Cloud Run and provided in the $PORT environment
variable
My question is what can I do if wouldn't like define any ports and just want to run the same code I run locally? Is there an alternate solution to deploy my code without it, or I must add it anyway if I want run the code from Cloud Run?
For containers that do not require an HTTP listener (HTTP server), use Cloud Run Jobs.
Cloud Run Jobs is in preview.
Your Go program must exit with exit code 0 for success and non-zero for failure.
Your container should not listen on a port or start a web server.
Environment variables are different from Cloud Run.
Container instances run until the container instance exits, until the task timeout is reached, or until the container crashes. Task timeout default is 10 minutes, max is one hour.
Cloud Run - Create jobs
I've installed a application with a service on a Windows Server 2012 R2. The status of the service is paused. When I start the service, he runs for two seconds and he's again paused.
In the instructions from the manufacturer is written:
Note: If the service shows as paused, check the restSecureServicesPort is available.
What does that mean? What should I do?
This could mean, that you application hosts a REST service on this Windows service. REST (REpresentational State Transfer) is a simple stateless architecture that generally runs over HTTP. This means it needs a port on which the application listens and receive data. This port is probably already busy and another application uses it. To view all busy ports you could use the netstat command via the command line on your server. But first you have to find out on which port your application wants to listen (maybe through some documentation of the application).
After this you could check if it's possible to change the port of your application or the port of the application which occupies this port.
Hope this helps!
Apologies if this is a pretty simple question, but I'm pretty new to IWS.
When ever I startup IWS (it's running on Microsoft Server that I remote desktop into) and enter my login details I get this message:
Failed to start TCP/IP Server, please check if the TCP port is already in use
During this same session I will also get the message below whenever I try to change tags in my trend sheets:
WARNING: Tag changes in any trend group will only take place in the next day history file.
It seems any changes I make in relation to tags and driver sheets are ignored and I want to know if this is related to the above error messages and how do I go about debugging/fixing this?
Note: I do not get these messages in other IWS sessions on other servers and I don't experience these problems.
Projects running the TCP/IP Server task use a TCP Port that is defined in the InduSoft Project Settings - Communication tab. By default, InduSoft uses port 1234. The error message you mention can occur if another process binds to that port before InduSoft has started the TCP/IP Server task.
Change the TCP Port. 1234 is the standard Port for Indusoft.
Try to Map your useds Ports before chosing some.
Or kill the process that are using the Port 1234, as explained in the link.
https://receitasdecodigo.com.br/java/listar-e-matar-processo-pela-porta-em-uso-no-windows-pelo-cmd
Is it possible to check if an Oracle listener is running on a remote machine without using the Oracle client?
Perhaps by connecting to specific port on a remote server?
It depends on exactly what you want to check.
You could try to telnet to port 1521 (or whatever port you expect the listener to be listening on). If the connection is successful, that would imply that there is a listener. You're not going to be able to see, however, what services are registered with the listener. And you won't be able to see whether the listener would actually be able to hand off a connection to the database. That's why it generally doesn't make a lot of sense to monitor the listener in isolation-- you generally want to monitor whether you can successfully connect to the database not whether the listener process is running.