It is possible to supply batch commands directly with the -b flag, but if the commands become very long, this is no longer an option. Is there a way to give the path to an .scm script that was written to a file, without having to move the file into the scripts directory?
No as far as I know. What you give in the -b flag is a Scheme statement, which implies your function has already been loaded by the script executor process. You can of course add more directories that are searched for scripts using Edit>Preferences>Folders>Scripts.
If you write your script in Python the problem is a bit different since you can alter the Python path before loading the script code but the command line remains a bit long.
Related
Is there a way to see the original code of a executable sh script. (I am very new to Linux and trying to understand what things do and such.)
If you know how I need very clear step by step process so I can just type i the commands and run them.
Thanks for your help. Trying to learn (Windows man for 25 years here)
A shell script specifically can be seen in the original text form by simply printing the contents of the file:
cat disk-space.sh.x
Several caveats:
If you mean an executable rather than a script the situation is different. Scripts are read by an interpreter at runtime, which then executes it line by line. Executables may be either scripts or ELF binaries. The latter have been transformed from the original source code to a machine readable form which is very much harder to read for humans.
The extension of the file (.sh.x or .x) does not control whether the file contents are executed as a binary or script.
If the file really is a script it may have been obfuscated, meaning that the source code on your system has deliberately been changed to make the resulting file hard to read.
I'm trying to run several sets of commands in parallel on a few remote hosts.
I've created a script that constructs these commands, and then writes the output in a local file, something along the lines of:
ssh <me>#<ip1> "command" 2> ./path/to/file/newFile1.txt & ssh <me>#<ip2>
"command" 2> ./path/to/file/newFile2.txt & ssh <me>#<ip2> "command" 2>
./path/to/file/newFile3.txt; ...(same repeats itself, with new commands and new
file names)...
My issue is that, when my script runs these commands, I am getting the following errors:
bash: ./path/to/file/newFile1.txt: No such file or directory
bash: ./path/to/file/newFile2.txt: No such file or directory
bash: ./path/to/file/newFile3.txt: No such file or directory
...
These files do NOT exist but will be written. That being said, the directory paths are valid.
The strange thing is that, if I copy and paste the whole big command, then it works without any issue. I'd rather have it automated tho ;).
Any ideas?
Edit - more information:
My filesystem is the following:
- home
- User
- Desktop
- Servers
- Outputs
- ...
I am running the bash script from home/User/Desktop/Servers.
The script creates the commands that need to be run on the remote servers. First thing first, the script creates the directories where the files will be stored.
outputFolder="./Outputs"
...
mkdir -p ${outputFolder}/f{fileNumb}
...
The script then continues to create the commands that will be called on remotes hosts, and their respective outputs will be placed in the created directories.
The directories are there. Running the commands gives me the errors, however printing and then copying the commands into the same location works for some reason. I have also tried to give the full path to directory, still same issue.
Hope I've been a bit clearer.
If this is the exact error message you get:
bash: ./path/to/file/newFile1.txt: No such file or directory
Then you'll note that there's an extra space between the colon and the dot, so it's actually trying to open a file called " ./path/to/file/newFile1.txt" (without the quotes).
However, to accomplish that, you'd need to use quotes around the filename in the redirection, as in
something ... 2> " ./path/to/file/newFile1.txt"
Or the first character would have to something else than a regular space. A non-breaking space perhaps, possible something that some editor might create if you hit alt-space or such.
I don't believe you've shown enough to correctly answer the question.
This doesn't look like a problem with ssh, but the way you are calling the (ssh) commands.
You say that you are writing the commands into a file... presumably you are then running that file as a script. Could you show the code you use to do that. I believe that's your problem.
I suspect you have made a false assumption about the way the working directory changes when you run a script. It doesn't. You are listing relative paths, so its important to know what they are relative to. That is the most likely reason for it working when you copy and paste it... You are executing from a different working directory.
I am new to bash scripting and was building my script based on another one I had seen. I was "running" the command by simply calling the variable where the command was stored:
$cmd
Solved by using:
eval $cmd
instead. My bad, should have given the full script from the start.
I have a Ruby script that I wrote that sorts some files in a jumble of directories based on it's file extension. It would be very difficult to sort it using a GUI, and its easier for me to just put the file in the topmost directory and let the sorter do the work.
Problem is, I'm a bit of a noob to unix scripting. What I want to be able to do is be able to run that sorter script from anywhere on my computer, without having to
cd Desktop/Whatever/Foo
ruby sorterscript.rb
just write sortfolders at the commandline and have the program be run.
I've tested the script many times, and it works fine, I just want a bit more convenience.
Bonus: If possible, and not too difficult, it would be even better if I could have the program run, say, every hour automatically.
As far as your first question goes, you need to do couple of things:
Add a shebang line to your script (make it the first line of the script):
#!/usr/bin/ruby (or whatever the path to the Ruby interpreter's executable is, I forget its exact location)
Make the script executable, either via the Finder's "Get Info" context menu, or via the command line, for example:
chmod 755 my_script.rb
Add the directory location of your script to the PATH environment variable to OS X's launchd.conf file, as described here. You need to add this line:
setenv PATH /path/to/my/script:$PATH (substitute the real path to your script)
As far as your bonus question goes, you can use cron to set up a recurring job. I never really do this, but here's Apple's cron man page to get you started.
I have a bunch of scripts (which can't be modified) written on Windows. Windows allows relative paths in its #! commands. We are trying to run these scripts on Unix but Bash only seems to respect absolute paths in its #! directives. I've looked around but haven't been able to locate an option in Bash or a program designed to replace and interpreter name. Is it possible to override that functionality -- perhaps even by using a different shell?
Typically you can just specify the binary to execute the script, which will cause the #! to be ignored. So, if you have a Python script that looks like:
#!..\bin\python2.6
# code would be here.
On Unix/Linux you can just say:
prompt$ python2.6 <scriptfile>
And it'll execute using the command line binary. I view the hashbang line as one which asks the operating system to use the binary specified on the line, but you can override it by not executing the script as a normal executable.
Worst case you could write some wrapper scripts that would explicitly tell the interpreter to execute the code in the script file for all the platforms that you'd be using.
I have a .sh file which i am trying to run using runtime api.
It runs perfectly if .sh file is under main project folder, but I want it to be accessed from outside the project folder.
example: /home/test/test.sh.
When i try to run this I get /home/test/test.sh not found error
Can anyone tell me how to execute .sh file using runtime accessing the file from local system?
is the .sh file chmoded to be executable?
if its not you could either:
chmod +x /home/test/test.sh
or
when you call the script pass it through sh so:
sh /home/test/test.sh
Runtime.exec() is not a command line
One pitfall to cover with Runtime.exec() is mistakenly assuming that exec() accepts any String that your command line (or shell) accepts. Runtime.exec() is much more limited and not cross-platform. This pitfall is caused by users attempting to use the exec() method to accept a single String as a command line would. The confusion may be due to the fact that command is the parameter name for the exec() method. Thus, the programmer incorrectly associates the parameter command with anything that he or she can type on a command line, instead of associating it with a single program and its arguments.