I created my project by using S/4HANA SDK (spring boot archetype), now I need the functionality to provision some ODATA services so I also introduce the dependency com.sap.cloud.servicesdk.provodatav4 to my project and then create metadata file and odata service implementation class. However, after packaging my project into jar file and run it, I get null pointer exception from the class com.sap.cloud.sdk.service.prov.v4.rt.core.web.ODataApplicationInitializer. After seeing the source code of this class, it seems it use "File" object to get metadata file from classpath, but this way doesn't work in a jar file. My question is: does it mean I have to change the packaging way to "war" in order to use this SDK for odata service development? Thanks very much.
The unfortunate answer is that, as of today, the Service SDK (not the S/4HANA Cloud SDK) is only compatible with pure Tomcat environments and assumes the Servlet standard as well as surrounding mechanisms as the default mean. The reasons for this is that the Service SDK is an integral part (the runtime) of the SAP Cloud Application Programming Model which is self-contained and may not be combined with arbitrary frameworks such as Spring Boot.
Adding to Philipp's answer that this is not supported, you may be able to use the traditional deployment here. However, since this is likely not supported officially, I would encourage to consider an alternative approach.
Related
I am working on creating an internal library/starter for my team that will add support for creating native images, providing all of the hints that our currently unsupported dependencies will need. I really like providing the metadata via code (using RuntimeHintsRegistrar), but there are also certain classes that need to be initialized at build time for whatever reason.
Right now I'm passing the --initialize-at-build-time and the classes to the Spring Boot Maven Plugin via the BP_NATIVE_IMAGE_BUILD_ARGUMENTS, but ideally I'd like to avoid each consuming app having to include this in their own POM's plugin configuration.
I also understand that I can go more low-level and provide the argument inside of the META-INF/native-image directory in a native-image.properties file, but I'm not sure whether that will play nice with the Spring-provided RuntimeHintsRegistrar effectively creating that underneath the covers.
What is the best way to tell native-image the classes that should be initialized at build time without each consuming app having to pass it in their own POM? Also, if I use the GraalVM tracing agent to generate hints, will those hints play nicely with the ones that RuntimeHintsRegistrar generates?
Thanks in advance!
When creating a new Spring Boot project using Spring Initializr and adding Azure Support, it adds a dependency to com.microsoft.azure:azure-spring-boot-starter.
implementation 'com.microsoft.azure:azure-spring-boot-starter'
The spring cloud documentation says:
The Azure Support entry contains auto-configuration support for Azure
managed services [...]
Now I'd like to send and receive messages from Azure Service Bus and the documentation wants me to add a dependency to azure-servicebus.
implementation 'com.microsoft.azure:azure-spring-boot-starter'
implementation 'com.microsoft.azure:azure-servicebus'
Okay fine. When I now switch over to Microsoft and read the documentation about Service Bus there, it mentions two libraries, where Microsoft states the second one is dated and legacy.
azure-messaging-servicebus (latest) implementation 'com.azure:azure-messaging-servicebus:7.0.0'
azure-servicebus (legacy) 'com.microsoft.azure:azure-servicebus'
Question
Is the Spring Boot documentation just outdated?
I have read somewhere that libraries in com.microsoft.com are for managing the resource itself, while libraries in com.azure are for managing the data. Is this true?
What is meant by auto-configuration support?
As you can see I am very confused which dependencies I need to add. Also I don't get the difference between packages from com.azure and com.microsoft.azure.
Can someone please shed some light on this?
I have been using the Spring Framework for about 4 years now, and now Spring Boot for the last couple of months. My Spring MVC applications are usually deployed on a Java EE container such as JBoss/WildFly or WebLogic. Doing so allows me to use JNDI for things like datasources or any other sensitive data that involve secrets/passwords. That makes my app "consume" that JNDI resource based on its name.
Now with Spring Boot and especially for self-contained microservices (embedded tomcat), that information is now stored within the application (application.properties and/or in Spring Java Config classes), so versioned in Git.
That makes that information a lot more exposed to other developers, which I'm not very comfortable with. I also don't like having those details show up in SonarQube and Jenkins (through workspaces).
Question is: Are there any best practices for this specific requirement?
* UPDATE *
I see some articles here and there about the use of Jasypt, but I wonder if it's still a valid library to use since the last stable release is dated from 2014.
Thank you
You could consider using a vault. Spring supports a few of them out of the box. You can find more information here http://projects.spring.io/spring-vault/.
If you have spring cloud in your stack, then it's very easy. Use encrypt the value and put it in the application properties. Follow the instruction mentioned here.
Other way is, set the values as environmental variables and using the environmental variables in the application properties. Instructions here
We run Restlet 2.1 in an OSGi environment (Equinox) as bundle (ie. not as library within a bundle). The problem is that the Restlet Engine does not detect helpers (like converters) that are provided by Restlet extensions. Specifically, the EngineClassLoader#getResources() call does not return any result. The extensions are also deployed as OSGi bundles in the target platform.
Is automatic converter registration actually supposed to work within OSGi environments?
In fact, Restlet supports such feature thanks to a dedicated activator (see the Activator class in the package org.restlet.engine.internal).
This activator introspects bundles to find out the following things:
servers corresponding to registered servers
servers corresponding to registered clients
authenticators corresponding to registered clients
converters
Be aware that to use this feature, we must use the OSGi edition of Restlet since it's the only that has the MANIFEST file of the org.restlet bundle with the activator class specified. Otherwise you don't have to care about the bundle loading order...
Hope it helps you.
Thierry
Unless the Restlet-bundle explicitly imports the packages that contain the extensions (and I doubt it does, and it shouldn't), it wouldn't be able to load them, because bundles have isolated class-spaces.
A possible solution would be to provide the extensions as fragments attached to the Restlet-bundle. Thus, if you make it use the bundle-classloader (the documentation says this can be done by setting the Engines classloader), it would be able to load classes from the fragments.
Indeed it doesn't quite work for OSGi, as it depends on the ability to see the entire class space.
The way to do this in OSGi would be to use the service registry for the extensions, but that only works for OSGi aware libraries.
There is some help on the way: In the recently released OSGi 5 (Service Loader Mediator) there will be support to 'bridge' META-INF/services (I don't know if Restlet uses those, though) onto OSGi services, so 'legacy' libraries should work well within OSGi.
There is an implementation in Apache Aries called Spi-Fly. I looked at it briefly a while back. It might do the trick for you, it might not.
As an OSGi newbie, I'm trying to wrap my head around the boundaries of the OSGi runtime. My app, which is not build on OSGi, i.e. it's not running in an OSGi container, starts an OSGi container into which we deploy OSGi bundles at run time. Some of these bundles register services. Later, in our non-OSGi code, we obtain those services and use them.
I'm having trouble wrapping my feeble mind around the OSGi boundaries here. To be specific, when I obtain a service and invoke one of its methods, can I assume that all of the subsequent execution is executing within the OSGi container (Felix)? In other words, are dependencies in that code resolved via the OSGi modularity mechanisms? Or did I lose that OSGi management because I am using the service from non-OSGi code?
If my question seems founded in obvious mistaken assumptions about OSGi, please feel free to point them out.
Chad, to more effectively answer your question, I'd like to know a few things:
1) How exactly are you getting the service reference from an external application?
2) Is the external application a stand-alone application, or is it inside of a different container? If so, there are ways to make that happen.
The question you pose is interesting. Lets put it into a context. Lets assume you are able to get a reference to an OSGi service from Felix by an external application. When you use this service, you will be interacting with it via an interface. In that interface in OSGi, you will have import statements referenced which will be used in the method signatures of the interface and also in any final attributes. These import statements will have thier matching dependant libraries defined in your pom.xml file.
In order to use the service by an external application, you will need to publish an API ".jar" file that will contain the interface, and will reference the interfaces' dependancies. Your external application will need to use that API, and will likely have it assembled into your .war, .jar, or .ear file's lib directory. Because of this, none of your external application's dependancies can conflict with your API dependancies.
As long as you can use the API, then you're right, none of the SPI's dependencies matter. You can use Spring 3.0.4.RELEASE in your external app and still use Spring 2.5.6.SNAPSHOT in your OSGi application. As long as the API doesn't have any dependancies that conflict with the external application, you should be ok. The trick here is that you need to put your interfaces into a minimal .jar file as your API, and then put your implementation details into an SPI. Your external ap will use the API, and inside OSGI, you will use both the API and SPI.
Please let me know if this helps.
If you can get the service, then the dependencies are satisfied by definition, because bundles cannot provide services unless their dependencies are satisfied. Executing services on the outside doesn't really change anything.