I keep doing google of how to store object data in Laravel.
I have an Model object which is using among functions and the Model data will not be changed indeed. So I want to store it into the global area for access.
I think it should be stored in something like the ServletContext(Application Scope) in tomcat. But I can't find such concept in Laravel at all.
Could anyone help?
Thanks!
If you want to store it for the current session, just store it in session. That will be the easiest way to share it between methods.
Related
I'm planning to distribute load from my database making a copy on several servers (each server will have the same tables but with different company data).
In order to do this, I will need to programmatically change the Datastore associated to my Data Views. For other tables I'm using the "Before Connect" property.
It's possible to handle this in Genexus?
Thanks,
Yes, you can use dbConnection Data Type.
Just create a variable based on this data type, and use it's methods and properties to set it up when you need it to be changed...
In Meteor, I have a little confusion between Session and Local Collection.
I know that Session is a temporary reactive key-value store, client-side only, and is cleaned on page refresh.
Local collection seems to be the same: reactive, temporary client-side storage, cleaned on page refresh with more flexible function like insert, update & remove query like server-side Mongo collection.
So I guess I could manage everything in Local Collection without Session, or, everything in Session without Local Collection.
But what is the best and efficient way to use Session and/or Local collection?
Simply, when to use Session and not use it?
And when to use Local collection and when not use it?
As I read your question I told myself that this is a very easy question, but then I was scratching my head. I tried to figure out an example that you can just accomplish with session or collections. But I didn't found any use-case. So let's rollup things from begin. Basically you already answered the question on your own, because it is the little sugar that makes collections something special.
When to use a collection?
Basically a collection is a database artifact. Imagine you have a client-server-application. All the data is persisted in the server side storage. Now you can use a local collection to provide the user a small subset of the servers collection. So a client collection is a database with reduced amount of data. The advantage is that you can access the collection with queries. You can use the same queries on server and client. In additon a collection always contains multiple objects of the same type. Sometimes you produce data on client for the client. No server interaction needed. Than you can use a local collection. A local collection provides the same functionality as a normal collection without server communication. This should be used if you have multiple objects with the same structure and in special if you'd like to use query operators.
You can also save the data inside a session object. Session objects can contain multiple objects as well. But imaging you want to find an object in an objectarray indexed with a special id. Than you need to iterate throw the whole array in order to find this object. You have to write additional logic, that can be handled with collection like magic. Further, collections return cursors. A cursor is an reactive object that just changes if the selected data changes. That means if you use find with an id. Than this object just rerenders when the object to this id changes. With session you can't. When a session changes you need to rerender all depending objects.
When to use a session?
For everything else. Sessions are often just small objects that contain some configuration logic. It is basically just one object and not a multiple occurency of equal objects. Haven't time now to go in detail but if it does not fit the collection use-cases you can use sessions.
Have a look at this post that describes why sessions should not be overused.
I assume that by local collection you mean: new Mongo.Collection(null)
The difference is that local collections do not survive hot code pushes. A refresh will erase Session, but hot code push will not, there's special code in Meteor to persist the values of the Session variable in the case of a hot code push..
You would use Session whenever you're storing temporary values that do NOT need to be persisted to the database.
Trivial examples could include a users selection of filters or the item in an index vies that is currently selected.
manipulated data in minimongo (insert, update, delete etc) is intended to be sent back to the server and stored in the database. For example this could be updating a users profile information etc.
For application developers, I suppose the traditional paradigm for writing an application with domain objects that can be persisted to an underlying data store (SQL database for arguments sake), is to write the domain objects and then write (or generate) the table structure. There is a tight coupling between what the domain object looks like and what the structure of underlying data store looks like. So if you want to add a piece of information to your domain object, you add the field to your code and then add a column to the appropriate database table. All familiar?
This is all well and good for data stores that have a well defined structure (I'm mainly talking about SQL databases whereby the tables and columns are pre-defined and fixed), but now a number of alternatives to the ubiquitous SQL database exist and these often do not constrain the data in this way. For instance, MongoDB is a NoSQL database whereby you divide data into collections but aside from that there is no structuring of the data. You don't define new columns when you want to add a new field.
Now to the question: given the flexibility of a data store like MongoDB, how would one go about achieving a similar kind of flexibility in the domain objects that represent this data? So for instance if I'm using Spring and creating my own domain obejcts, when I add a "middleName" field to my data, how can I avoid having to add a "middleName" field to my domain object? I'm looking for some kind of mechanism/approach/framework to dynamically inspect the data and have access to it in my domain object without having to make a code change every time. All ideas welcome.
I think you have a couple of choices:
You can use a dynamic programming language and not have domain objects (clojure for example)
If you're fixed on using java, the mongo java driver returns data in DBObject which is essentially a Map. So the default behavior already provides what you want. It's only when you map the DBObject into domain objects, using a library like morphia (or spring-data), that you even have to worry about domain objects at all.
But, if I was using java, I would stick with the standard convention of domain objects mapped via morphia, because I think adding a field is a very minor inconvenience when compared against the benefits.
I think the question is inherintly paradoxical-
On one hand, you want to have domain objects, i.e. objects that represent the data (and behaviour) of your problem domain.
On the other hand, you say that you don't want your domain objects to be explicitly influenced by changes to the data.
But when you have objects that represent your problem domain, you want to do just that- to represent your problem domain.
So that if, for example, middle name is added, then your representation of the real-life 'User' entity should change to accomodate this change to the real-life user; perhaps not only by adding this piece of data to your object, but also adding some related behaviour (validation of middle name, or some functionality related to it).
In essense, what I'm trying to say here is that when you have (classic OO) domain objects, you may need to change your behaviour / functionality along with your data, and since you don't have any automatic way of changing your behaviour, the question of automatically changing your data becomes irrelevant.
If you don't want behaviour associated with your data, then you essentialy have DTOs, and #Kevin's answer is what you're looking for.
Honestly, it sounds more like you're looking for some kind of blackbox DTO where, like you describe, fields are added or removed "arbitrarily" depending on the data. This makes me inclined to suggest a simple Map to do the job. You can't really have a domain-driven design if your domain model is constantly changing.
I'm looking to save some data in the Magento database without hassling with creating a new EAV object (or even a DB table if I can avoid it). Is there any place that you all know about that Magento will let you store serialized data?
If it matters, the data is a serialized set of SKUs that I need to retrieve. I know that I could create a new model, or possibly even create an attribute as a flag on each product, but those are both really overkill for my purposes.
Thanks,
Joe
First, it's possible to setup a simple, non-EAV model with Magento. You still need to do some configuration and setup, but it's much less complicated than a full on EAV store.
Second, if you're storing information specific to users you can throw it in a session object. I can't recall the syntax right now (will update later), but search through your codebsae for ::getModel followed by the phrase "session".
Third, you still have access to all the old PHP tools you'd normally have. Writing/reading out of a file or memcached space (or bringing in a third party Model library) is another option.
If you just want to run some database queries directly then you can do so with the underlying Zend Db abstractions.
I've been using Core Data for about a week now, and really loving it, but one minor issue is that setting default values requires going through and setting up a temp interface to load the data, which I then do away with once I have the data seeded. Is there any way to edit values in a table, like how you can use phpMyAdmin to manipulate values in a MySQL database? Alternately, is there a way to write a function to import seed values from something like a Numbers spreadsheet if it doesn't detect the storedata XML file?
For your first question, you could edit the file directly but it's highly recommended you don't. How to edit it depends entirely on the store type you selected.
Regarding importing or setting up pre-generated data, of course: you can write code to manually insert entity instances into your Managed Object Context. There's a dedicated section on this very topic in the documentation. Further, if you have a lot of data to import, there's even a section on how to do this efficiently.
Is there any way to edit values in a
table, like how you can use phpMyAdmin
to manipulate values in a MySQL
database?
Xcode has a means of creating a quick and dirty interface for a data model. You just drag the data model file into a window in interface builder and it autogenerates an interface for you. This lets you view the data without having to have your entire app up and running.