Using Mapbox GL JS and following the provided example which shows how to attach markers to the map
// add markers to map
geojson.features.forEach(function(marker) {
// create a HTML element for each feature
var el = document.createElement('div');
el.className = 'marker';
// make a marker for each feature and add to the map
new mapboxgl.Marker(el)
.setLngLat(marker.geometry.coordinates)
.addTo(map);
});
how can I hide/show on click event different markers
Something like this?
function hide() {
let markers = document.getElementsByClassName("marker");
for (let i = 0; i < markers.length; i++) {
markers[i].style.visibility = "hidden";
}
}
function show() {
let markers = document.getElementsByClassName("marker");
for (let i = 0; i < markers.length; i++) {
markers[i].style.visibility = "visible";
}
}
Related
NEW:
So here is the code at codepen:
http://codepen.io/cmer41k/pen/pRJNww/
Currently function UpdateCoords(draggable) - is commented out in the code.
What I wanted is to update on mouseup event the coordinates of the path (circle as path here) to the absolute ones and remove transform attribute.
But I am failing to do that;(( sorry only learning
OLD:
In my code I have an svg element (path) that gets dragged around the root svg obj (svg) via transform="translate(x,y)" property.
I wanted to update such path element's attribute "d" (the string that describes all coords) to use absolute coordinates and get rid of transformed\translate thing.
Basically:
was: d="M10,10 30,10 20,30" + transform="translate(20,0);
to be: d="M30,10 50,10 40,30" + transform="translate(0,0)" (or if we can delete the transform - even better)
So I did the code that does the thing for me, but there is a bug that prevents proper result.
I am sure I am doing something wrong in here:
var v = Object.keys(path.controlPoints).length
// controlPoints here is just a place in path object where I store the coords for the path.
var matrix = path.transform.baseVal.consolidate();
//I validated that the above line does give me proper transform matrix with proper x,y translated values. Now below I am trying to loop through and update all control points (coordinates) of the path
for (i=0; i<v; i++) {
var position = svg.createSVGPoint();
position.x = path.controlPoints["p"+i].x;
position.y = path.controlPoints["p"+i].y;
// so for each of path's control points I create intermediate svgpoint that can leverage matrix data (or so I think) to "convert" old coords into the new ones.
position = position.matrixTransform(matrix);
path.controlPoints["p"+i].x = position.x;
path.controlPoints["p"+i].y = position.y;
}
// I am sure I am doing something wrong here, maybe its because I am not "cleaning"/resetting this position thing in this loop or smth?
Sorry I am not a programmer, just learning stuff and the question is - in this code snipped provided the goal that I described - is something wrong with how I handle "position"?
Alright, the code snipped is now functioning properly!
So after I figured how to obtain properly the matrix I still had a weird displacement for any subsequent draggables.
I became clear that those displacements happen even before my function.
I debugged it a bit and realized that I was not clearing the ._x and ._y params that I use for dragging.
Now code works!
http://codepen.io/cmer41k/pen/XpbpQJ
var svgNS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
var draggable = null;
var canvas = {};
var inventory = {};
var elementToUpdate = {};
//debug
var focusedObj = {};
var focusedObj2 = {};
// to be deleted
window.onload = function() {
canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
inventory = document.getElementById("inventory");
AddListeners();
}
function AddListeners() {
document.getElementById("svg").addEventListener("mousedown", Drag);
document.getElementById("svg").addEventListener("mousemove", Drag);
document.getElementById("svg").addEventListener("mouseup", Drag);
}
// Drag function //
function Drag(e) {
var t = e.target, id = t.id, et = e.type; m = MousePos(e); //MousePos to ensure we obtain proper mouse coordinates
if (!draggable && (et == "mousedown")) {
if (t.className.baseVal=="inventory") { //if its inventory class item, this should get cloned into draggable
copy = t.cloneNode(true);
copy.onmousedown = copy.onmouseup = copy.onmousemove = Drag;
copy.removeAttribute("id");
copy._x = 0;
copy._y = 0;
canvas.appendChild(copy);
draggable = copy;
dPoint = m;
}
else if (t.className.baseVal=="draggable") { //if its just draggable class - it can be dragged around
draggable = t;
dPoint = m;
}
}
// drag the spawned/copied draggable element now
if (draggable && (et == "mousemove")) {
draggable._x += m.x - dPoint.x;
draggable._y += m.y - dPoint.y;
dPoint = m;
draggable.setAttribute("transform", "translate(" +draggable._x+","+draggable._y+")");
}
// stop drag
if (draggable && (et == "mouseup")) {
draggable.className.baseVal="draggable";
UpdateCoords(draggable);
console.log(draggable);
draggable._x = 0;
draggable._y = 0;
draggable = null;
}
}
I am working on a project for my programming class. I'd like to essentially have a canvas with a background element (say a room.jpg) and then maybe three interactive objects in the room (lamp.jpg, couch.jpg, desk.jpg). I'd like for it to be that if you hover over the lamp a small box or text pops out, giving you some information. Or maybe have it so if you click an image, the same concept happens. You know, something interactive with the objects in the canvas. Again, I'm new to canvas but we have to use it in our assignment. My current code is:
function loadImages(sources, callback) {
var images = {};
var loadedImages = 0;
var numImages = 0;
// get num of sources
for(var src in sources) {
numImages++;
}
for(var src in sources) {
images[src] = new Image();
images[src].onload = function() {
if(++loadedImages >= numImages) {
callback(images);
}
};
images[src].src = sources[src];
}
}
var sources = {
room: 'room.jpg',
title: 'title.jpg'
};
loadImages(sources, function(images) {
context.drawImage(images.room, 0,0);
context.drawImage(images.title, 0,0);
});
}
But from what I understand, it makes the two jpegs a "permanent" canvas element (unable to be messed with). I had been trying to get it so that when I clicked I'd go from the title.jpg to the room.jpg but I've since given up. Essentially, all I want now is just to have the room.jpg appear when the page is first loaded, and have three other png objects on top (as objects in the room). Are these able to be interacted with, or do I have to put the images into the canvas in another way? Thanks for all your help and your patience!
// --- Image Loader ----
var images = {};
var loadedImages = 0;
var pictures = {
room: 'room.jpg',
title: 'title.jpg'
lamp1: 'lampoff.jpg'
lamp2: 'lampon.jpg'
};
function loadImages(sources, callback) {
var numImages = 0;
for(var src in sources)numImages++;
for(var src in sources) {
images[src] = new Image();
images[src].onload = function() {
if(++loadedImages >= numImages) {
callback(images);
}
};
images[src].src = sources[src];
}
}
// --- Mouse Down Functionality ----
$('#canvas').addEventListener('mouseDown', function(e){
if(e.clientX){
var rect = this.getBoundingClientRect();
if(rect) clickCanvas(e.clientX - rect.left, e.clientY - rect.top)
else clickCanvas(e.clientX - this.offsetLeft, e.clientY - this.offsetTop);
}else if(e.offsetX) clickCanvas(e.offsetX, e.offsetY);
else if(e.layerX) clickCanvas(e.layerX, e.layerY);
else console.warn("Couldn't Determine Mouse Coordinates");
})
var lampOn;
function drawCanvas(showLamp){
lampOn = showLamp;
canvas.width = canvas.width //clears canvas
context.drawImage(images.room, 0,0);
context.drawImage(images.title, 0,0);
if(lampOn){
context.drawImage(images.lamp2, 100,100);
}else{
context.drawImage(images.lamp1, 100,100);
}
}
function clickCanvas(x,y){
console.log('clicked canvas at:',x,y)
if(clickedLamp){
drawCanvas(!lampOn)
}
}
loadImages(pictures, function(images) {
drawCanvas(false)
});
Make sure to replace "clickedLamp" and "#canvas"! The idea here is that you redraw the same canvas, using the same function. Everytime you modify any of it, you rerender ALL of it. See if you can get this example working, it will help clarify alot. If you don't understand something comment
Let's say I have three Views. AppView, MenuView and StripView. MenuView contains multiple StripViews and AppView contains one MenuView. How can I trigger event from StripView and listen on that event on AppView.
EDIT
Let's say I want to click on ImageSurface on StripView and reigster that event on AppView, and then do some transitionig.
MY SOLUTION
Everything is based on Timbre app, created in Famou.us Starter Kit Reference Tutorials
// StripView.js (_setListeners() is called in StripView constructor and bodySurface is defined in code)
function _setListeners() {
var eventScope = this._eventOutput;
this.backgroundSurface.on('click',function(){
eventScope.emit('test', { somedata:'some value'} );
}.bind(this));
}
// MenuView.js (_createStripViews() is called in MenuView constructor)
function _createStripViews() {
this.stripModifiers = [];
var yOffset = this.options.topOffset;
for (var i = 0; i < this.options.stripData.length; i++) {
var stripView = new StripView({
iconUrl: this.options.stripData[i].iconUrl,
title: this.options.stripData[i].title
});
var stripModifier = new StateModifier({
transform: Transform.translate(0, yOffset, 0)
});
this.stripModifiers.push(stripModifier);
this.add(stripModifier).add(stripView);
yOffset += this.options.stripOffset;
stripView.pipe(this._eventOutput);
}
}
//AppView.js (menuView is defined in code and _setListeners() is called in AppView constructor)
function _setListeners() {
this.menuView.on('test',function(){
console.log("IT WORKS");
}.bind(this));
}
You want to use Views built in handlers to achieve this. These are _eventInput and _eventOutput.. Here is an example using an ImageSurface in StripView and responding to a click in AppView..
Hope it helps!
// In StripView.js
var imageSurface = new ImageSurface();
imageSurface.on('click',function(){
this._eventOutput.trigger('image-click', { somedata:'some value'} );
}.bind(this));
// In AppView.js
var stripView = new StripView();
this.subscribe(stripView);
this._eventInput.on('image-click',function(data){
// Do Something
});
I read in this article http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/flex-mobile-performance-checklist.html that I should not initialize a View's appearance in a creationComplete handler. Instead, I should change view's appearance in an overridden data setter.
The section in the article is:
Override the data setter instead of using bindings or initializing a View's appearance in a creationComplete handler
1-First, I would like to know if I got this right by doing the following:
//My code is loading a set of images and adding them in a View.
//On creationComplete of the View I am adding the images in case this is the first time
//the view is shown. In case the view has been already accessed I use the data:
protected function view1_creationCompleteHandler(event:FlexEvent):void
{
if(!data) //On first creation of the view I create the data object
{
data = new Object();
data.imageArray = new Array(); //set an array that will cache my images.
for(var i:int = 0; i<36;i++)
{
var img:Image = new Image();
img.source = 'assets/0'+i.toString()+'.png';
container.addElement(img);
(data.imageArray as Array).push(img);//Override the data for next time!
}
}
else//Next time use the save images
{
for(var ix:int = 0; ix<(data.imageArray as Array).length;ix++)
{
container.addElement((data.imageArray as Array)[ix]);
}
}
}
If I am doing this correctly, I would like to know which approach is best. The above one, or the next one I am going to show which uses the images contentLoader with caching and queuing enabled with a ContentCache:
protected function view1_creationCompleteHandler(event:FlexEvent):void
{
{
for(var i:int = 0; i<36;i++)
{
var img:Image = new Image();
img.contentLoader = ldr;
img.contentLoaderGrouping = 'gr1';
img.source = 'assets/0'+i.toString()+'.png';
container.addElement(img);
}
}
<fx:Declarations>
<s:ContentCache id="ldr" enableQueueing="true"
maxActiveRequests="1" maxCacheEntries="36"/>
</fx:Declarations>
Also if someone could tell me what is the contentLoaderGrouping for. I would be very grateful.
Thanks a lot!!!
PS:By the way both approaches work. The first approach is instant while the second approach shows the images beeing added in a very smooth way which actually gives a cool effect.
Neither. The point of the suggestion was to NOT alter the displaylist after creationComplete, which requires an additional update cycle. Instead you should inject the data property when you push your view on the stack, and initiate your changes in the setter. Using the ContentCache has nothing to do with it (and can sometimes cause additional overhead if not used correctly).
override public function set data(value:Object):void
{
super.data = value;
//this was poorly optimized, so I made it
//a little better...
var imageArray:Array = (value == null || value.imageArray == null)?
null : value.imageArray as Array;
if(imageArray == null) //On first creation of the view I create the data object
{
imageArray = new Array(36); //set an array that will cache my images.
for(var i:int = 0; i<36;i++)
{
var img:Image = new Image();
img.source = 'assets/0'+i.toString()+'.png';
container.addElement(img);
imageArray[i] = img;
}
super.data = {imageArray:imageArray}
}
else//Next time use the save images
{
var n:int = imageArray.length;
for (var j:int = 0; j < n; j++)
{
container.addElement(IVisualElement(imageArray[j]));
}
}
}
EDIT
I was mistaken about when the data property is set during the view life-cycle.
Here is how it works:
So you are correct that container would be null at that point. I was going to write up an example for you, but I'm having trouble figuring out what your end goal is here. Is there a specific reason you are storing the images on the data property? I think what you might actually want to do is this:
private var _data:Object = {cache: new ContentCache()};
protected function show_clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void
{
this.navigator.pushView(views.MyView, _data);
}
And in the view...
<s:View xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" title="MyView">
<fx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import spark.components.Image;
import spark.core.ContentCache;
override protected function createChildren():void
{
super.createChildren();
//you might want to do a sanity first check to make sure the
//data was passed in correctly...
var cache:ContentCache = ContentCache(this.data.cache);
for(var i:int = 0; i < 36; i++)
{
var img:Image = new Image();
img.contentLoader = cache;
img.source = 'assets/0' + i.toString() + '.png';
container.addElement(img);
}
}
]]>
</fx:Script>
<s:VGroup id="container" />
</s:View>
I'm using an imported png with an alpha gradient that I'm setting as a mask that reveals the bitmap it is assigned to. The mask object is draggable (kind of like a flashlight). I know I'm supposed to use an AlphaMaskFilter as one of the filters, and I know I'm supposed to use .updateCache()... I'm just not sure I'm using them correctly?
var stage;
var assetQueue;
var bg;
var bgMask;
var container;
var amf;
$(document).ready(function(){
loadImages();
});
function loadImages()
{
// Set up preload queue
assetQueue = new createjs.LoadQueue();
assetQueue.addEventListener("complete", preloadComplete);
assetQueue.loadManifest([{id:"img_bg",src:"images/Nintendo-logo-red.jpg"}, {id:"img_bg_mask",src:"images/background_mask.png"}]);
}
function preloadComplete()
{
assetQueue.removeEventListener("complete", preloadComplete);
init();
}
function init()
{
stage = new createjs.Stage("stage_canvas");
setBackgrounds();
sizeStage();
$(document).mousemove(function(evt){
trackMouse(evt);
});
}
function trackMouse(evt)
{
var mouseX = evt.pageX;
var mouseY = evt.pageY;
// Move the containing clip around
container.x = mouseX - (bgMask.image.width / 2);
container.y = mouseY - (bgMask.image.height / 2);
// Offset the position of the masked image.
bg.x = -container.x;
bg.y = -container.y;
container.updateCache();
stage.update();
}
function setBackgrounds()
{
bg = new createjs.Bitmap(assetQueue.getResult("img_bg"));
bgMask = new createjs.Bitmap(assetQueue.getResult("img_bg_mask"));
container = new createjs.Container();
container.addChild(bg);
amf = new createjs.AlphaMaskFilter(bgMask.image)
container.filters = [amf];
container.cache(0, 0, bg.image.width, bg.image.height);
stage.addChild(container);
stage.update();
}
function sizeStage()
{
var windowW = 600;
var windowH = 600;
stage.canvas.width = windowW;
stage.canvas.height = windowH;
stage.update();
}
Solution found (for anyone interested). The key is to add the image you want to mask to a container. Move the container to any position you want, then offset the contained image within the container. The code has been updated to reflect this.