I'm new to postman. I have an array of 8000 URLS that i'm testing for 200s. Currently testings using the application (using the front end of it and also the console)
It seems really slow and hangs alot, The array of URLs is only 5MB and it's testing for 200's in a loop, currently takes about 30 mins.
I'm thinking it's a memory issue maybe, is there anyway to check or increase the memory allocation for postman?
Thanks!
Related
I am testing REST API, each of which returns a 10 MB response body.
Now during load test, JMeter gives Out of Memory exception at 20 threads.
Concluded that this is due to APIs have huge response body. When other APIs with fairly low size Response Body are tested I am able to scale up to 500 Threads
Have tried all options shared under hacks to avoid Out of Memory exception:
Running in Non GUI mode
All Listeners Off - generating JTL from command line
Disabled all assertions, relying on application logs
Groovy used as scripting language in JSR223, using to emulate Pacing between requests
Heap Size increased to 12 GB
JMeter 5.4.1 and JDK used
Going for distributed load testing from multiple JMeter host machines also seems to have problem, as when I reduced No. of Threads to 10 for same APIs, Out of Memory Exception still came up.
How to effectively handle huge response body to a request made from JMeter ?
If you don't need to read or assert the response then you can reduce disk space usage, check Save response as MD5 hash in your HTTP Request Advanced tab
Save response as MD5 hash? If this is selected, then the response is not stored in the sample result. Instead, the 32 character MD5 hash of the data is calculated and stored instead. This is intended for testing large amounts of data.
I have been running my JMeter script with the following setup
Users: 100
Loop Controller: 5
I used Loop Controller on the http request where transactions are needed to iterate.
My question is, there is a particular request which is searching where after 5 successful search the proceeding searches displayed “Customer API. Unable to establish connection”
Please see image below:
1 First Image displays lower load time while second image displays higher load time
It looks like you discovered a bottleneck in your application or at least it is not properly configured for high loads. Almost a minute response time for transfering 600 kilobytes is not something I would expect from a well-behaved application.
The error message you're getting is very specific so I would recommend checking your application logs as the very first step. The remaining steps would be inspecting application and middleware configuration and ensuring that it's properly set up for high performance and it has enough headroom to operate in terms of CPU, RAM, Network, Disk, etc.
I have a spring boot application which has a post endpoint which takes the request and send it to another service and get the response back and save it to mongo database and returned the response back to user. The application is deployed on embedded tomcat of spring boot. I am using jmeter to see the max response time, throughput etc.
When i ran a test from jmeter with 500 threads for 10 minutes, i got maximum time as around 3500ms.
When i repeat the test from jmeter the maximum time gets reduced to 900ms.
Again, if i run the test after a long time, the maximum again goes upto 3500ms.
I am not able to get any information regarding this behavior of tomcat.
Could you please help me with understanding this behavior of tomcat?
What do you mean by "unexpected"? Lower response time when you repeat the test can be explained by either your application implementation, like when you start load test against the application which is just deployed it's performance might not be optimal and when you repeat the test the cache is "warmed up" so you're getting better performance.
Another explanation could be JIT optimization as JVM is analyzing the pattern of your application usage and does inner improvements of the bytecode to better serve the given load pattern.
Third possible explanation is MongoDB caching, if 500 users are sending the same responses it might be the case the database stores the result sets in memory and when you repeat the test it doesn't actually access the storage but returns the results directly from the memory which is fast and cheap. Consider properly parameterizing your JMeter test so each thread (virtual user) would use its own credentials and perform different query than the other thread(s), but keep in mind that the test needs to be repeatable so don't use unique data each time, it's better to have sufficient set of pre-defined test data
I am using Anypoint 6.1 and Mule 3.8.1 and I'm finding problems with the performance and it looks like it is down to the cache scope.
The cache is a managed store (so I can invalidate the cache when new data is loaded) and has the following values:
Max Entries: 1000
Entry TTL: 84600
Expiration Interval: 84600
The response returns approx 200 JSON records.
Is there anyway to improve this and make this a faster response?
Thanks
Expiration Interval is the frequency with which the object store checks for expired cached response events. It can be set as low as 1 seconds to hours, depending upon the message rate you are expecting, you can try different values to test performance of your application.
Also, try in-memory-object-store for your caching strategy, as it saves responses in system memory, so a little bit faster but have to be careful in usage to avoid OutOfMemory errors.
This is kind of a 2 part question
1) Is there a max number of HttpWebRequests that can be run at the same time in WP7?
I'm going to create a ScheduledTaskAgent to run a PeriodicTask. There will be 2 different REST service calls the first one will get a list of IDs for records that need to be downloaded, the second service will be used to download those records one at a time. I don't know how many records there will be my guestimage would be +-50.
2.) Would making all the individual record requests at once be a bad idea? (assuming that its possible) or should I wait for a request to finish before starting another?
Having just spent a week and a half working at getting a BackgroundAgent to stay within it's memory limits, I would suggest doing them one at a time.
You lose about half your memory to system libraries and the like, your first web request will take another nearly 20%, but it seems to reuse that memory on subsequent requests.
If you need to store the results into a local database, it is going to take a good chunk more. I have found a CompiledQuery uses less memory, which means holding a single instance of your context.
Between each call I would suggest doing a GC.Collect(), I even add a short Thread.Sleep() just to be sure the process has some time to tidying things up.
Another thing I do is track how much memory I am using and attempt to exit gracefully when I get to around 97 or 98%.
You can not use the debugger to test memory limits as the debug memory is much higher and the limits are not enforced. However, for comparative testing between versions of your code, the debugger does produce very similar result on subsequent runs over the same code.
You can track your memory usage with Microsoft.Phone.Info.DeviceStatus.ApplicationCurrentMemoryUsage and Microsoft.Phone.Info.DeviceStatus.ApplicationMemoryUsageLimit
I write a status log into IsolatedStorage so I can see the result of runs on the phone and use ScheduledActionService.LaunchForTest() to kick the off. I then use ShellToast notifications to let me know when the task runs and also when it completes, that way I can launch my app to read the status log without interrupting it.
Tyler,
My 2 cents here.
I don't believe there is any restriction on how mant HTTPWebequests you can spin up. These however have to be async, off course, and may be served from the browser stack. Most modern browsers including IE9 handle over 5 concurrently to the same domain; but you are not guaranteed a request handle immediately. However, it should not matter if you are willing to wait on a separate thread, dump your content on to the request pipe & wait for response on yet another thread. This post (here) has a nice walkthrough of why we need to do this.
Nothing wrong with this approach either, IMO. You're just going to have to wait until all the requests have their respective pipelines & then wait for the responses.
Thanks!
1) Your memory limit in a PeriodicTask or ResourceIntensiveTask is 5 MB. So you definitely should control your requests really careful. I dont think there is a limit in the code.
2)You have only 5 MB. So when you start all your requests at the same time it will terminate immediately.
3) I think you should better use a ResourceIntensiveTask because a PeriodicTask should only run 15 seconds.
Good guide for Multitasking features in Mango: http://blogs.infosupport.com/blogs/alexb/archive/2011/05/26/multi-tasking-in-windows-phone-7-1.aspx
I seem to remember (but can't find the reference right now) that the maximum number of requests that the OS can make at once is 7. You should avoid making this many at once though as it will stop other/system apps from being able to make requests.