I have a TCL script that say, has 30 lines of automation code which I am executing in the dc shell (Synopsys Design Compiler). I want to stop and exit the script at line 10, exit the dc shell and bring it back up again after performing a manual review. However, this time, I want to run the script starting from line number 11, without having to execute the first 10 lines.
Instead of having two scripts, one which contains code till line number 10 and the other having the rest, I would like to make use of only one script and try to execute it from, let's say, line number N.
Something like:
source a.tcl -line 11
How can I do this?
If you have Tcl 8.6+ and if you consider re-modelling your script on top of a Tcl coroutine, you can realise this continuation behaviour in a few lines. This assumes that you run the script from an interactive Tcl shell (dc shell?).
# script.tcl
if {[info procs allSteps] eq ""} {
# We are not re-entering (continuing), so start all over.
proc allSteps {args} {
yield; # do not run when defining the coroutine;
puts 1
puts 2
puts 3
yield; # step out, once first sequence of steps (1-10) has been executed
puts 4
puts 5
puts 6
rename allSteps ""; # self-clean, once the remainder of steps (11-N) have run
}
coroutine nextSteps allSteps
}
nextSteps; # run coroutine
Pack your script into a proc body (allSteps).
Within the proc body: Place a yield to indicate the hold/ continuation point after your first steps (e.g., after the 10th step).
Create a coroutine nextSteps based on allSteps.
Protect the proc and coroutine definitions in a way that they do not cause a re-definition (when steps are pending)
Then, start your interactive shell and run source script.tcl:
% source script.tcl
1
2
3
Now, perform your manual review. Then, continue from within the same shell:
% source script.tcl
4
5
6
Note that you can run the overall 2-phased sequence any number of times (because of the self-cleanup of the coroutine proc: rename):
% source script.tcl
1
2
3
% source script.tcl
4
5
6
Again: All this assumes that you do not exit from the shell, and maintain your shell while performing your review. If you need to exit from the shell, for whatever reason (or you cannot run Tcl 8.6+), then Donal's suggestion is the way to go.
Update
If applicable in your case, you may improve the implementation by using an anonymous (lambda) proc. This simplifies the lifecycle management (avoiding re-definition, managing coroutine and proc, no need for a rename):
# script.tcl
if {[info commands nextSteps] eq ""} {
# We are not re-entering (continuing), so start all over.
coroutine nextSteps apply {args {
yield; # do not run when defining the coroutine;
puts 1
puts 2
puts 3
yield; # step out, once first sequence of steps (1-10) has been executed
puts 4
puts 5
puts 6
}}
}
nextSteps
The simplest way is to open the text file, parse it to get the first N commands (info complete is useful there), and then evaluate those (or the rest of the script). Doing this efficiently produces slightly different code when you're dropping the tail as opposed to when you're dropping the prefix.
proc ReadAllLines {filename} {
set f [open $filename]
set lines {}
# A little bit careful in case you're working with very large scripts
while {[gets $f line] >= 0} {
lappend lines $line
}
close $f
return $lines
}
proc SourceFirstN {filename n} {
set lines [ReadAllLines $filename]
set i 0
set script {}
foreach line $lines {
append script $line "\n"
if {[info complete $script] && [incr i] >= $n} {
break
}
}
info script $filename
unset lines
uplevel 1 $script
}
proc SourceTailN {filename n} {
set lines [ReadAllLines $filename]
set i 0
set script {}
for {set j 0} {$j < [llength $lines]} {incr j} {
set line [lindex $lines $j]
append script $line "\n"
if {[info complete $script]} {
if {[incr i] >= $n} {
info script $filename
set realScript [join [lrange $lines [incr j] end] "\n"]
unset lines script
return [uplevel 1 $realScript]
}
# Dump the prefix we don't need any more
set script {}
}
}
# If we get here, the script had fewer than n lines so there's nothing to do
}
Be aware that the kinds of files you're dealing with can get pretty large, and Tcl currently has some hard memory limits. On the other hand, if you can source the file at all, you're already within that limit…
Related
I need to filter the response from getWater and getSoda. The problem I have is when I try to get response in API I get both querys. So in cli lets say i put CLI:getWater the response it gives for both water and soda i need to distinguish between the two if you look at the end line it gives you 1 for Water and 0 for Soda. I'm trying to make filter in TCL file so if i put getWater it only pulls out the query with whatever ends with 1 and vice versa.
cli% getWater {2 Fiji - {} 1 {} b873-367ef9944d48 **1**} {3 Coke - {} 1 {} 9d39-56ad9be6ee9f **0**} {6 Dasani - {} 1 {} 9d39-56ad9be6ee9f **1**} {9 Fanta - {} 1 {} 9d39-56ad9be6ee9f **0**}
im having hard time coding it because in not familiar with TCL
but so far to get query i got this.
proc API::get {args} {
set argc [llength $args]
if {$argc == 1} {
# get all sets based on set type
set objtype [lindex $args 0]
catcher getset_int $objtype {} {}
I'm guessing that you have some command (that I'll call getListOfRecords for the sake of argument) and you want to filter the returned list by the value of the 8th element (index 7; TCL uses zero-based indexing) of each record? You can do that with either lmap+lindex or with lsearch (with the right options).
proc getRecordsOfType {typeCode} {
lmap r [getListOfRecords] {
if {[lindex $r 7] eq $typeCode} {set r} else continue
}
}
proc getRecordsOfType {typeCode} {
lsearch -all -inline -exact -index 7 [getListOfRecords] $typeCode
}
Using lsearch is probably faster, but the other approach is far more flexible. (Measure instead of guessing if it matters to you.)
getWater is just getRecordsOfType 1.
I am trying to read data(multiline of key:value pair) from file, which I have written line by line to file, In Jenkinfile
However when I tried to do each line it is read char by char
Example:
echo "1234:34" >> dataList.txt
echo "2341:43" >> dataList.txt
echo "3412:54" >> dataList.txt
echo "4123:38" >> dataList.txt
When I tried to read line by line using commands
def buildData = readFile(file: "dataList.txt")
println buildData
buildData.each { line ->
println line
//def (oldBuildNumber, oldJobId) =line.tokenize(':')
//println oldBuildNumber oldJobId
}
}
displaying as
1
2
3
4
:
3
4
2
3
4
1
:
4
3
...
Any input on this will be very useful.
From the readFile documentation:
readFile: Read file from workspace
Reads a file from a relative path (with root in current directory, usually workspace) and returns its content as a plain string.
This means the the returned value, buildData in your case, is actually a string, and therefore when you iterate over it using the each you are actually iterating over the characters (as a characters array) and that is why you see each character being printed for each iteration.
What you actually want is to iterate over the lines, for that you can split the string using the new line separator (\n) which will give you a list of all lines which you can then iterate over.
Something like the following:
def buildData = readFile(file: "dataList.txt")
println buildData
// split the content into lines and go over each line
buildData.split("\n").each { line ->
println line
}
// or by using the default iterator parameter - it
buildData.split("\n").each {
println it
}
I have a CSV file like below:
E Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Mean
1 0.7019 0.6734 0.6599 0.6511 0.701 0.6977 0.680833333
2 0.6421 0.6478 0.6095 0.608 0.6525 0.6285 0.6314
3 0.6039 0.6096 0.563 0.5539 0.6218 0.5716 0.5873
4 0.5564 0.5545 0.5138 0.4962 0.5781 0.5154 0.535733333
5 0.5056 0.4972 0.4704 0.4488 0.5245 0.4694 0.485983333
I'm trying to use find the row number where the final column has a value below a certain range. For example, below 0.6.
Using the above CSV file, I want to return 3 because E = 3 is the first row where Mean <= 0.60. If there is no value below 0.6 I want to return 0. I am in effect returning the value in the first column based on the final column.
I plan to initialize this number as a constant in gnuplot. How can this be done? I've tagged awk because I think it's related.
In case you want a gnuplot-only version... if you use a file remove the datablock and replace $Data by your filename in " ".
Edit: You can do it without a dummy table, it can be done shorter with stats (check help stats). Even shorter than the accepted solution (well, we are not at code golf here), but additionally platform-independent because it's gnuplot-only.
Furthermore, in case E could be any number, i.e. 0 as well, then it might be better
to first assign E = NaN and then compare E to NaN (see here: gnuplot: How to compare to NaN?).
Script:
### conditional extraction into a variable
reset session
$Data <<EOD
E Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Mean
1 0.7019 0.6734 0.6599 0.6511 0.701 0.6977 0.680833333
2 0.6421 0.6478 0.6095 0.608 0.6525 0.6285 0.6314
3 0.6039 0.6096 0.563 0.5539 0.6218 0.5716 0.5873
4 0.5564 0.5545 0.5138 0.4962 0.5781 0.5154 0.535733333
5 0.5056 0.4972 0.4704 0.4488 0.5245 0.4694 0.485983333
EOD
E = NaN
stats $Data u ($8<=0.6 && E!=E? E=$1 : 0) nooutput
print E
### end of script
Result:
3.0
Actually, OP wants to return E=0 if the condition was not met. Then the script would be like this:
E=0
stats $Data u ($8<=0.6 && E==0? E=$1 : 0) nooutput
Another awk. You could initialize the default return value to var ret in BEGIN but since it's 0 there is really no point as empty var+0 produces the same effect. If the threshold value of 0.6 is not met before the ENDis reached, that is returned. If it is met, exit invokes the END and ret is output:
$ awk '
NR>1 && $NF<0.6 { # final column has a value below a certain range
ret=$1 # I want to return 3 because E = 3
exit
}
END {
print ret+0
}' file
Output:
3
Something like this should do the trick:
awk 'NR>1 && $8<.6 {print $1;fnd=1;exit}END{if(!fnd){print 0}}' yourfile
I am performing a tiny speed test in order to compare the speed of the Agda programming language with the Tcl scripting language. Its for scientific work and this is just a pre-test, not a real test. I am not in anyway trying to perform a realistic speed comparison!
I have come up with a small example, in which Agda is 10x times faster than Tcl. There are special reasons I use this example. My main concern is that my Tcl code is badly programmed and this is the sole reason Tcl is slower than Agda in this example.
The goal of the code is to parse a line that represents a list of integers and check if it is indeed a list of integers.
Example "(1,2,3)" would be a valid list.
Example "(1,a,3)" would not be a valid list.
My input is a file and I check every third line (3rd) of the file. If any line is not a list of integers, the program prints "false".
My input file:
(613424,505980,317647,870930,75580,897160,716297,668539,689646,196362,533020)
(727375,472272,22435,869407,320468,80779,302881,240382,196077,635360,568517)
(613424,505980,317647,870930,75580,897160,716297,668539,689646,196362,533020)
(however, my real test file is about 3 megabyte large)
My current Tcl code to solve this problem is:
package require Tcl 8.6
proc checkListNat {str} {
set list [split [string map {"(" "" ")" ""} $str] ","]
foreach l $list {
if {[string is integer $l] == 0} {
return 0
}
}
return 1
}
set i 1
set fp [open "/tmp/test.txt" r]
while { [gets $fp data] >= 0 } {
incr i
if { [expr $i % 3] == 0} {
if { [checkListNat $data] == 0 } {
puts "error"
}
}
}
close $fp
How can I optimize my current Tcl code, so that the speed test between Agda and Tcl is more realistic?
The first thing to do is to put as much code in procedures (or lambda terms) as possible and ensure that all expressions are braced. Those were your two key problems that were killing performance. We'll do a few other things too (you hardly ever need expr inside an if test and this wasn't one of those cases, string trim is more suitable than string map, string is really ought to be done with -strict). With those, I get this version which is relatively similar to what you already had yet ought to be substantially more performant.
package require Tcl 8.6
proc checkListNat {str} {
foreach l [split [string trim $str "()"] ","] {
if {[string is integer -strict $l] == 0} {
return 0
}
}
return 1
}
apply {{} {
set i 1
set fp [open "/tmp/test.txt" r]
while { [gets $fp data] >= 0 } {
if {[incr i] % 3 == 0 && ![checkListNat $data]} {
puts "error"
}
}
close $fp
}} {*}$argv
You might get better performance by adding fconfigure $fp -encoding iso8859-1; you'll have to test that yourself. But the key changes are the ones due to the bold items earlier, as each substantially impacts on the efficiency of compilation strategy used. (Also, Tcl 8.5 is a little faster than 8.6 — 8.6 has a radically different execution engine that is a bit slower for some things — so you might test the new code with 8.5 too; the code itself appears to be valid with both versions.)
try checking with regex {^[0-9,]+$} $line instead of the checkListNat function.
update
here is an example
echo "87,566, 45,67\n56,5r5,45" >! try
...
while {[gets $fp line] >0} {
if {[regexp {^[0-9]+$} $line] >0 } {
puts "OK $line"
} else {
puts "BAD $line"
}
}
gives:
>OK 87,566, 45,67
>BAD 56,5r5,45
I have some R code inside a file called analyse.r. I would like to be able to, from the command line (CMD), run the code in that file without having to pass through the R terminal and I would also like to be able to pass parameters and use those parameters in my code, something like the following pseudocode:
C:\>(execute r script) analyse.r C:\file.txt
and this would execute the script and pass "C:\file.txt" as a parameter to the script and then it could use it to do some further processing on it.
How do I accomplish this?
You want Rscript.exe.
You can control the output from within the script -- see sink() and its documentation.
You can access command-arguments via commandArgs().
You can control command-line arguments more finely via the getopt and optparse packages.
If everything else fails, consider reading the manuals or contributed documentation
Identify where R is install. For window 7 the path could be
1.C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.2\bin\x64>
2.Call the R code
3.C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.2\bin\x64>\Rscript Rcode.r
There are two ways to run a R script from command line (windows or linux shell.)
1) R CMD way
R CMD BATCH followed by R script name. The output from this can also be piped to other files as needed.
This way however is a bit old and using Rscript is getting more popular.
2) Rscript way
(This is supported in all platforms. The following example however is tested only for Linux)
This example involves passing path of csv file, the function name and the attribute(row or column) index of the csv file on which this function should work.
Contents of test.csv file
x1,x2
1,2
3,4
5,6
7,8
Compose an R file “a.R” whose contents are
#!/usr/bin/env Rscript
cols <- function(y){
cat("This function will print sum of the column whose index is passed from commandline\n")
cat("processing...column sums\n")
su<-sum(data[,y])
cat(su)
cat("\n")
}
rows <- function(y){
cat("This function will print sum of the row whose index is passed from commandline\n")
cat("processing...row sums\n")
su<-sum(data[y,])
cat(su)
cat("\n")
}
#calling a function based on its name from commandline … y is the row or column index
FUN <- function(run_func,y){
switch(run_func,
rows=rows(as.numeric(y)),
cols=cols(as.numeric(y)),
stop("Enter something that switches me!")
)
}
args <- commandArgs(TRUE)
cat("you passed the following at the command line\n")
cat(args);cat("\n")
filename<-args[1]
func_name<-args[2]
attr_index<-args[3]
data<-read.csv(filename,header=T)
cat("Matrix is:\n")
print(data)
cat("Dimensions of the matrix are\n")
cat(dim(data))
cat("\n")
FUN(func_name,attr_index)
Runing the following on the linux shell
Rscript a.R /home/impadmin/test.csv cols 1
gives
you passed the following at the command line
/home/impadmin/test.csv cols 1
Matrix is:
x1 x2
1 1 2
2 3 4
3 5 6
4 7 8
Dimensions of the matrix are
4 2
This function will print sum of the column whose index is passed from commandline
processing...column sums
16
Runing the following on the linux shell
Rscript a.R /home/impadmin/test.csv rows 2
gives
you passed the following at the command line
/home/impadmin/test.csv rows 2
Matrix is:
x1 x2
1 1 2
2 3 4
3 5 6
4 7 8
Dimensions of the matrix are
4 2
This function will print sum of the row whose index is passed from commandline
processing...row sums
7
We can also make the R script executable as follows (on linux)
chmod a+x a.R
and run the second example again as
./a.R /home/impadmin/test.csv rows 2
This should also work for windows command prompt..
save the following in a text file
f1 <- function(x,y){
print (x)
print (y)
}
args = commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE)
f1(args[1], args[2])
No run the following command in windows cmd
Rscript.exe path_to_file "hello" "world"
This will print the following
[1] "hello"
[1] "world"