If my model looks like:
type alias Application = { id : Int , term : Int , amount : Int }
type alias Model = { application : Application }
and I am trying to update the term value, I have onInput UpdateTerm on an input inside my update case statement how do I update this value?
so far I have UpdateTerm term ->; but unsure how I can update only the term value inside application?
Record field update is described in the guide and also in the reference documentation. Updating a field in a record nested inside another record is simply a matter of doing one after the other. Assuming you have a binding named model:
let
application =
model.application
updatedApplication =
{ application | term = term }
in
{ model | application = updatedApplication }
for a better readability you can make function like this:
update msg model =
case msg of
changeNestedProperty property ->
({ model | record= setNestedProperty property model.record } , Cmd.none)
setNestedProperty : String -> Record-> Record
setNestedProperty property record =
{ record | nestedProperty = property }
Related
I have two objects.
[DataContract]
public class Record
{
[DataMember]
public string Id { get; set; }
}
And this class:
public class BatteryStatus : Record
{
[DataMember]
public DateTime RetrieveTime { get; set; }
}
I'm using Lite DB as a local NoSQL option to query and save the data. I'm needing to find and delete the values based after some time. Here's my code doing so:
var col = db.GetCollection<BatteryStatus>(CollectionName);
var test = col.FindAll()
.Where(x => x.Id == status.Id).ToList();
var result = col.Find(Query.EQ("Id", status.Id.ToString())).ToList();
Test returns with the with the object, but the result value doesn't. Lite DB only uses the Query or the BSONId as a way to delete an object. I don't have a BSON id attached to it (it's a referenced definition so I can't change it).
How can I use the "Query" function in order to get a nested value so I can delete it?
Classes has properties, BSON documents has fields. By default, LiteDB convert all property names to same name in BSON document except _id field which is document identifier.
If you want query using Linq, you will use properties expressions. If you are using Query object class, you must use field name.
var result = col.FindById(123);
// or
var result = col.FindOne(x => x.Id == 123);
// or
var result = col.FindOne(Query.EQ("_id", 123));
Find using _id always returns 1 (or zero) document.
I figured out the problem with LiteDB, since I was using the property name of "Id", the BSON interpreted that as the "_id" of the JSON object, and merging their two values. I solve the issue by renaming the "Id" property to something else.
I typically do mobile app development, which doesn't always have .Select. However, I've seen this used a bit, but I don't really know what it does or how it's doing whatever it does. It is anything like
from a in list select a // a.Property // new Thing { a.Property}
I'm asking because when I've seen code using .Select(), I was a bit confused by what it was doing.
.Select() is from method syntax for LINQ, select in your code from a in list select a is for query syntax. Both are same, query syntax compiles into method syntax.
You may see: Query Syntax and Method Syntax in LINQ (C#)
Projection:
Projection Operations - MSDN
Projection refers to the operation of transforming an object into a
new form that often consists only of those properties that will be
subsequently used. By using projection, you can construct a new type
that is built from each object. You can project a property and perform
a mathematical function on it. You can also project the original
object without changing it.
You may also see:
LINQ Projection
The process of transforming the results of a query is called
projection. You can project the results of a query after any filters
have been applied to change the type of the collection that is
returned.
Example from MSDN
List<string> words = new List<string>() { "an", "apple", "a", "day" };
var query = from word in words
select word.Substring(0, 1);
In the above example only first character from each string instance is selected / projected.
You can also select some fields from your collection and create an anonymous type or an instance of existing class, that process is called projection.
from a in list select new { ID = a.Id}
In the above code field Id is projected into an anonymous type ignoring other fields. Consider that your list has an object of type MyClass defined like:
class MyClass
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
}
Now you can project the Id and Name to an anonymous type like:
Query Syntax:
var result = from a in list
select new
{
ID = a.Id,
Name = a.Name,
};
Method Syntax
var result = list.Select(r => new { ID = r.Id, Name = r.Name });
You can also project result to a new class. Consider you have a class like:
class TemporaryHolderClass
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Then you can do:
Query Syntax:
var result = from a in list
select new TemporaryHolderClass
{
Id = a.Id,
Name = a.Name,
};
Method Syntax:
var result = list.Select(r => new TemporaryHolderClass
{
Id = r.Id,
Name = r.Name
});
You can also project to the same class, provided you are not trying to project to classes generated/created for LINQ to SQL or Entity Framework.
My summary is it takes results (or a subset of results) and allows you to quickly restructure it for use in the local context.
The select clause produces the results of the query and specifies the
"shape" or type of each returned element. For example, you can specify
whether your results will consist of complete Customer objects, just
one member, a subset of members, or some completely different result
type based on a computation or new object creation.
Source: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397927.aspx
There are a lot of possible uses for this but one is taking a complex object which of many other contains a property that is a string -- say Name -- and allows you to return an enumeration with just the entries of Name. I believe you can also do the opposite -- use that property ( for example) and create / return new type of object while passing in a property or properties.
It means "mapping". Map each element of a sequence to a transformed sequence. I hadn't comprehended its meaning before I looked at the image.
Where does the meaning of the word come from?
Simply, math! https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Projection.html
Using Linq commands and Linq To SQL datacontext, Im trying to instance an Entity called "Produccion" from my datacontext in this way:
Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION pocoProduccion =
(
from m in db.MEDICOXPROMOTORs
join a in db.ATENCIONs on m.cmp equals a.cmp
join e in db.EXAMENXATENCIONs on a.numeroatencion equals e.numeroatencion
join c in db.CITAs on e.numerocita equals c.numerocita
where e.codigo == codigoExamenxAtencion
select new Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION
{
cmp = a.cmp,
bonificacion = comi,
valorventa = precioEstudio,
codigoestudio = lblCodigoEstudio.Content.ToString(),
codigopaciente = Convert.ToInt32(lblCodigoPaciente.Content.ToString()),
codigoproduccion = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
codigopromotor = m.codigopromotor,
fecha = Convert.ToDateTime(DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString()),
numeroinforme = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
revisado = false,
codigozona = (c.codigozona.Value == null ? Convert.ToInt32(c.codigozona) : 0),
codigoclinica = Convert.ToInt32(c.codigoclinica),
codigoclase = e.codigoclase,
}
).FirstOrDefault();
While executing the above code, I'm getting the following error that the stack trace is included:
System.NotSupportedException was caught
Message="The explicit construction of the entity type 'Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION' in a query is not allowed."
Source="System.Data.Linq"
StackTrace:
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMemberInit(MemberInitExpression init)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSelect(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression selector)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitFirst(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression lambda, Boolean isFirst)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.ConvertOuter(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.BuildQuery(Expression query, SqlNodeAnnotations annotations)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.System.Data.Linq.Provider.IProvider.Execute(Expression query)
en System.Data.Linq.DataQuery`1.System.Linq.IQueryProvider.Execute[S](Expression expression)
en System.Linq.Queryable.FirstOrDefault[TSource](IQueryable`1 source)
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.realizarProduccionInforme(Int32 codigoExamenxAtencion, Double precioEstudio, Int32 comi) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 602
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.UpdateEstadoEstudio(Int32 codigo, Char state) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 591
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.btnGuardar_Click(Object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 683
InnerException:
Is that now allowed in LINQ2SQL?
Entities can be created outside of queries and inserted into the data store using a DataContext. You can then retrieve them using queries. However, you can't create entities as part of a query.
I am finding this limitation to be very annoying, and going against the common trend of not using SELECT * in queries.
Still with c# anonymous types there is a workaround, by fetching the objects into an anonymous type, and then copy it over into the correct type.
For example:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new {Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.ToList();
List<User> users = new List<User>(r.Select(new User
{
Name = r.Name,
EmployeeId = r.EmployeeId
}));
And in the case when we deal with a single value (as in the situation described in the question) it is even easier, and we just need to copy directly the values:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.FirstOrDefault();
User user = new User { Name = r.Name, EmployeeId = r.ID };
If the name of the properties match the database columns we can do it even simpler in the query, by doing select
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { emp.First, emp.Last, emp.ID }
One might go ahead and write a lambda expression that can copy automatically based on the property name, without needing to specify the values explictly.
Here's another workaround:
Make a class that derives from your LINQ to SQL class. I'm assuming that the L2S class that you want to return is Order:
internal class OrderView : Order { }
Now write the query this way:
var query = from o in db.Order
select new OrderView // instead of Order
{
OrderID = o.OrderID,
OrderDate = o.OrderDate,
// etc.
};
Cast the result back into Order, like this:
return query.Cast<Order>().ToList(); // or .FirstOrDefault()
(or use something more sensible, like BLToolkit / LINQ to DB)
Note: I haven't tested to see if tracking works or not; it works to retrieve data, which is what I needed.
I have found that if you do a .ToList() on the query before trying to contruct new objects it works
I just ran into the same issue.
I found a very easy solution.
var a = att as Attachment;
Func<Culture, AttachmentCulture> make =
c => new AttachmentCulture { Culture = c };
var culs = from c in dc.Cultures
let ac = c.AttachmentCultures.SingleOrDefault(
x => x.Attachment == a)
select ac == null ? make(c) : ac;
return culs;
I construct an anonymous type, use IEnumerable (which preserves deferred execution), and then re-consruct the datacontext object. Both Employee and Manager are datacontext objects:
var q = dc.Employees.Where(p => p.IsManager == 1)
.Select(p => new { Id = p.Id, Name = p.Name })
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(item => new Manager() { Id = item.Id, Name = item.Name });
Within the book "70-515 Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET Framework 4 - Self paced training kit", page 638 has the following example to output results to a strongly typed object:
IEnumerable<User> users = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new User
{
Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last,
EmployeeId = emp.ID
}
Mark Pecks advice appears to contradict this book - however, for me this example still displays the above error as well, leaving me somewhat confused. Is this linked to version differences? Any suggestions welcome.
I found another workaround for the problem that even lets you retain your result as IQueryale, so it doesn't actually execute the query until you want it to be executed (like it would with the ToList() method).
So linq doesn't allow you to create an entity as a part of query? You can shift that task to the database itself and create a function that will grab the data you want. After you import the function to your data context, you just need to set the result type to the one you want.
I found out about this when I had to write a piece of code that would produce a IQueryable<T> in which the items don't actually exist in the table containing T.
pbz posted a work around by creating a View class inherited from an entity class that you could be working with. I'm working with a dbml model of a table that has > 200 columns. When I try and return the whole table I get "Root Element missing" errors. I couldn't find anyone who wanted to deal with my particular issue so I was looking at rewriting my entire approach. Just creating a view class for the entitiy class worked in my case.
As pbz suggests : Create a view class that inherits from your entity class. For me this is tbCamp so :
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
Then use the view class in your query :
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
var camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
SmartTableViewer(camps, dg1);
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
Here is what happens when you try and create an entity class object in the query.
I didn't want to have to use an anonymous type if I could help it because I wanted the type to be tbCamp. Since tbCampView is of type tbCamp the is operator works well. see Brian Hasden's answer Passing a generic List<> in C#
I'm surprised this is even an issue but with larger tables I run into this error so I thought I would just show it here :
When trying to read this table into memory I get the following error. There are < 2000 rows but the columns are > 200 for each. I don't know if that is an issue or not.
If I just want a few columns I need to create a custom class and handle that which isn't that big of a pain. With the approach pbz provided I don't have to worry about it.
Here is the entire project in case it helps someone.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private const bool Dev = true;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void btnGetAllCamps_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
IQueryable<tbCampView> camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
// Project columns as needed.
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
// pass in as a
SmartTableViewer(camps);
}
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
//var newRecord = record;
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
}
I'm getting a strange error when running what appears to be a simple query.
return (from x in session.Query<Contact>()
.Where(x => x.Id == 10)
select new ContactIndexViewModel
{
Id = x.Id,
Name = x.BasicInfo.FirstName + " " + x.BasicInfo.LastName,
Filters = x.Filters
}).FirstOrDefault();
Is generating the following SQL
select
contact0_.[Id] as col_0_0_,
contact0_.[BasicInfoFirstName] as col_1_0_,
contact0_.[BasicInfoLastName] as col_2_0_,
. as col_3_0_,
filters1_.[Id] as column1_16_,
filters1_.Criteria1 as Criteria2_16_,
// .. .more filters1_ fields
filters1_.ContactId as ContactId16_
from
[MyServer].[dbo].[Contact] contact0_
inner join [MyServer].[dbo].[Filter] filters1_
on contact0_.[Id]=filters1_.ContactId
where
contact0_.[Id]=#p0
Notice the fourth column being selected. BasicInfo is a component and the select (in the query) includes all the fields defined in the ViewModel.
I am not having any other problems with the Contact or Filter objects in other parts of the application. Contact -> Filter has a one to many relationship.
Any idea's on how to debug or what may cause this?
UPDATE
If I remove the reference to Filters in the select, the problem goes away.
UPDATE Relevant Mappings
Contact
public partial class ContactMap : ClassMap<Contact>
{
/// <summary>Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="ContactMap"/> class.</summary>
public ContactMap()
{
Table("[MyServer].[dbo].[Contact]");
OptimisticLock.Version();
DynamicUpdate();
LazyLoad();
Id(x=>x.Id)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Column("[Id]")
.GeneratedBy.Identity();
Version(x=>x.RecordVersion)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Column("[RecordVersion]")
.CustomSqlType("timestamp")
.Not.Nullable()
.UnsavedValue("null")
.CustomType("BinaryBlob")
.Generated.Always();
Map(x=>x.Active).Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
// other scalar properties
Component(x0=>x0.BasicInfo, m0=>
{
m0.Map(x1=>x1.FirstName).Column("[BasicInfoFirstName]").Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
m0.Map(x1=>x1.LastName).Column("[BasicInfoLastName]").Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
// other scalar properties
});
// other relationships
HasMany(x=>x.Searches)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Fetch.Select()
.Inverse()
.LazyLoad()
.KeyColumns.Add("ContactId");
}
}
Search
public partial class SearchMap : ClassMap<Search>
{
public SearchMap()
{
Table("[MyServer].[dbo].[Search]");
OptimisticLock.Version();
DynamicUpdate();
LazyLoad();
Id(x=>x.Id)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Column("[Id]")
.GeneratedBy.Identity();
Map(x=>x.Controller).Not.Nullable().Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
Map(x=>x.Module).Not.Nullable().Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
Map(x=>x.Name).Column("[Name]").Not.Nullable().Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
References(x=>x.Contact)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.All()
.Fetch.Select()
.Columns("ContactId");
HasMany(x=>x.DataFilters)
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Fetch.Select()
.Inverse()
.LazyLoad()
.KeyColumns.Add("SearchId");
}
}
Did you map Filters with FetchMode.Join?
By the way, it may be easier to create the ContactIndexViewModel in memory, with the trade off that it fetches too many columns from the database. On the other side, Get doesn't flush the session, which may be performance relevant.
var contact = session.Get<Contact>(10);
return new ContactIndexViewModel
{
Id = contact.Id,
Name = contact.BasicInfo.FirstName + " " + contact.BasicInfo.LastName,
Filters = contact.Filters
};
Your mapping for the table is unusual to me.
Table("[MyServer].[dbo].[Contact]");
Normally the server name is provided during configuration, the schema is stated separately, and the delimiters ("[...]") are set by NHibernate. I would map it as:
Schema("dbo");
Table("Contact");
That may be causing a parsing problem leading to the odd select. If that's not it, then I think it's a bug -- NHibernate should never issue a select without a table alias and column name.
Is it possible to apply a WHERE clause on a SubSonic query?
For example, I get get a single based on id...
db.Single<Storage>(id);
But how can I get a single based on a simple WHERE clause?
db.Single<Storage>(WHERE columnname == "value");
that's possible:
// Will return a Storage instance with property IsNew = true, if record does not exist
// since an object created with new never can be null
var storage1 = new Storage(1); // id = 1
var storage1 = new Storage(Storag.Columns.ColumnName, "value");
// Will return 0 if record not found (subsonic3 only)
var storage3 = (from s in Storage
where s.ColumnName == "value"
select s).SingleOrDefault();
// Will throw an exception if record not found (subsonic3 only)
var storage3 = (from s in Storage
where s.ColumnName == "value"
select s).Single();
Since db is a partial class you can extend it. Just create a new File within the same namespace (but another folder in your solution). This applies to subsonic 2 but will be similar to subsonic 3, I think.
public static partial class DB
{
public static T Single<T>(String columName, Object columnValue) where T: RecordBase<T>, new()
{
return Select().From<T>()
.Where(columnName).IsEqualTo(columnValue)
.ExecuteSingle<T>();
}
}
Thanks for the above, this was a help and eventually I simplified this to the below...
db.Single<Storage>(s => s.ColumnName == "value");