I'm trying to create a "Global OptionSet"-attribute (sd_MyAttribute) for an existing entity (entity ID = 70816501-edb9-4740-a16c-6a5efbc05d84) via Dynamics CRM WebAPI.
The JSON I send is this using method "POST":
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.PicklistAttributeMetadata",
"OptionSet": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.OptionSetMetadata",
"IsGlobal": true,
"Name": "sd_MyPickList",
"OptionSetType": "Picklist",
"MetadataId": "a50cfc0a-e206-ea11-a811-000d3ab82e70"
},
"AttributeType": "Picklist",
"SchemaName": "sd_MyAttribute",
"Description": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.Label",
"LocalizedLabels": [
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.LocalizedLabel",
"Label": "This is the attribute I want to create.",
"LanguageCode": 1033
}
]
},
"DisplayName": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.Label",
"LocalizedLabels": [
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.LocalizedLabel",
"Label": "This is the attribute I want to create.",
"LanguageCode": 1033
}
]
},
"RequiredLevel": {
"Value": "None",
"CanBeChanged": true
}
}
I expected to get a status 204 response, indicating that a new Picklist attribute on the entity using the sd_MyPickList option set has been created.
Unfortunately, the response is:
{
"error": {
"code": "0x80048403",
"message": "Only Local option set can be created through the attribute create. IsGlobal flag must be set to 'false'.",
"innererror": {
"message": "Only Local option set can be created through the attribute create. IsGlobal flag must be set to 'false'.",
"type": "Microsoft.Crm.CrmException",
"stacktrace": " ...)"
}
}
}
There is already an issue in the github project (see https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-customer-engagement/issues/601), but I wonder whether there is a way around this problem - what json do I need to send to create an attribute adressing a global option set? Is there someone who has successfully created such an entity attribute via web-api?
There is a usecase, I don't have the ability to use an existing library for that and importing a solution is not an option in my case.
Would be perfect if someone can provide a simple json that can be send e.g. using the Contact entity and any global optionset.
Finally, I found a way to accomplish what I need. To specify the global option set I need to use the "#odata.bind" action in the JSON data. For an attribute "sd_MyAttribute" that uses the global OptionSet with the MetaDataId "62654906-7A0b-ea11-a817-000d3ab826fd", I need to do POST:
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.PicklistAttributeMetadata",
"GlobalOptionSet#odata.bind": "/GlobalOptionSetDefinitions(62654906-7A0b-ea11-a817-000d3ab826fd)",
"AttributeType": "Picklist",
"SchemaName": "sd_MyAttribute",
"Description": { ... },
"DisplayName": { ... },
"RequiredLevel": { ... }
}
If the entity does have the MetaDataId "70916b01-edb2-4840-a16b-6a2efbc75d84", the URI for the POST would be "/api/data/v9.0/EntityDefinitions(70916b01-edb2-4840-a16b-6a2efbc75d84)/Attributes" (logical- or schema-names are not supported).
Hope my question and answer does help someone who gets the same error message.
Related
I created a default solution from BoilerPlate's website with angular.
I need to create a new permission to assign to a user. So I added it in my authorization provider:
public class PilotoConciliacaoAuthorizationProvider : AuthorizationProvider
{
public override void SetPermissions(IPermissionDefinitionContext context)
{
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_Users, L("Users"));
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_Users_Activation, L("UsersActivation"));
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_Roles, L("Roles"));
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_Tenants, L("Tenants"), multiTenancySides: MultiTenancySides.Host);
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_CadastrarPdv, L("TituloCadastrarPdv"), multiTenancySides: MultiTenancySides.Host);
}
private static ILocalizableString L(string name)
{
return new LocalizableString(name, PilotoConciliacaoConsts.LocalizationSourceName);
}
}
In the case, it's PermissionNames.Pages_CadastrarPdv.
I've created the constant and the localizable resource.
But when I run the GetAllPermissions service, it only gets 3 of them:
"result": {
"items": [
{
"name": "Pages.Roles",
"displayName": "Funções",
"description": null,
"id": 0
},
{
"name": "Pages.Users.Activation",
"displayName": "Users activation",
"description": null,
"id": 0
},
{
"name": "Pages.Users",
"displayName": "Usuários",
"description": null,
"id": 0
}
]
},
"targetUrl": null,
"success": true,
"error": null,
"unAuthorizedRequest": false,
"__abp": true
What am I missing?
Thanks in advance.
What happening is that you've specified this permission just for host user, as I can see you are logged as a tenant so you won't see this permission neither tenant permission.
If you need MultiTenancy active and you need this permission to all users you have to remove this section of permission especification and put it like this:
context.CreatePermission(PermissionNames.Pages_CadastrarPdv, L("TituloCadastrarPdv"));
If you don't need to use MultiTenancy, you can disable it on:
YourProjectName.Core\YourProjectNameConsts.cs there you'll find a variable
public const bool MultiTenancyEnabled = true; change it to false if you don't need to use it.
You can call ready the entire documentation for Authorization here:
AspnetBoilerplate - Authorization
I'm trying to avoid iterating through this array, but I imagine that is the only way to handle this. Just seeing if there is a way to directly query this value in the array from the Web API URI.
This is the URI example:
https://example.crm.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.0/GlobalOptionSetDefinitions(f4a9de67-1d00-ea11-a811-000d3a33f702)
And this is an example of the response:
{
"#odata.context": "https://example.crm.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.0/$metadata#GlobalOptionSetDefinitions/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.OptionSetMetadata/$entity",
"MetadataId": "f4a9de67-1d00-ea11-a811-000d3a33f702",
"Options": [
{
"Value": 799680006,
"Color": "#0000ff",
"IsManaged": false,
"ExternalValue": "",
"ParentValues": [],
"MetadataId": null,
"HasChanged": null,
"Label": {
"LocalizedLabels": [
{
"Label": "ABC123",
"LanguageCode": 1033,
"IsManaged": false,
"MetadataId": "b4eb2c69-b500-ea11-a811-000d3a33fe19",
"HasChanged": null
}
],
"UserLocalizedLabel": {
"Label": "ABC123",
"LanguageCode": 1033,
"IsManaged": false,
"MetadataId": "b4eb2c69-b500-ea11-a811-000d3a33fe19",
"HasChanged": null
}
}
}
]
}
Basically, I have the "Value": 799680006 which is what I want to somehow add to the URI query parameters, so that I can ultimately get "Label": "ABC123".
Any suggestions or is iterating through the array of objects with if Value = x really the only option?
Let me clarify two things:
Querying metadata like you are using GlobalOptionSetDefinitions to get all the localized labels if you have multiple language packs or for verifying customizations or for Devops deployment purpose is one thing
Getting the label for the selected picklist value in one of the transaction database record is another purpose
If you simply need for second purpose, you can get it by selecting the Formatted value, after adding a header in web api request. Read more in my SO answer
Another way to inspect the label is using stringmap entity.
https://crmdev.crm.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.1/stringmaps?$filter=objecttypecode eq 'account' and attributename eq 'accountclassificationcode' and attributevalue eq 1
Hi, everyone.
I have been trying to use Google Drive API for getting a list with the action items assigned in all files (docs or spreadsheets) in my company's domain using Spring Boot and the google-api-services-drive, but I have faced some issues:
Looks like there is nothing about action items on the API.
Comments are the closest I could get, but they don't include action item information. They only have the emails of people who were mentioned.
Documentation looks broad and not precise. For instance, here they say files resources include an indexableText property, but it is not present on the response.
As explained in Term for followup, looking for actionitems you can apply a query for getting the files with action items. Why is the fullText field not available in the response, or some other equivalent attribute to see the actual content and use it as a workaround to get the action items?
I just need to know who was assigned to the action item from the comment.
Any ideas?
Retrieve the action items with Comments: list specifying fields as comments/replies/action
I agree with you that it is not straightfoward, but there is a way to retrieve the full comment content including action items.
Use Files:list specifying q as fullText contains 'followup:actionitems', just as in the post you mentioned
For each of the retrieve items, use the fileId for the method Comments: list
For better understadning specify first the fields for Comments:list as * - this will return you the complete reponse looking as following:
{
"kind": "drive#commentList",
"comments": [
{
"kind": "drive#comment",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAg",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:04:34.907Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "XXX",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": true
},
"htmlContent": "+\u003ca href=\"mailto:YYY#YYY.com\" data-rawHref=\"mailto:YYY#YYY.com\" target=\"_blank\"\u003eYYY#YYY.com\u003c/a\u003e Could you please check the spelling?",
"content": "+YYY#YYY.com Could you please check the spelling?",
"deleted": false,
"resolved": true,
"quotedFileContent": {
"mimeType": "text/html",
"value": "Hello"
},
"anchor": "kix.94ksxclyqix",
"replies": [
{
"kind": "drive#reply",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAo",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:02.999Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:02.999Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "YYY",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": false
},
"htmlContent": "Will do!",
"content": "Will do!",
"deleted": false
},
{
"kind": "drive#reply",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAs",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "YYY",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": false
},
"deleted": false,
"action": "resolve"
}
]
}
]
}
This response contains the following information:
The quoted file content (the text to which the comment refers)
The content of the initial comment and the replies
The user to whom the comment was assigned
The reply of the user including his user name
And finally, the action taked by the user
Now, if you are not interested in all fields but only in the action, you can see that action is a resources nested in comments/replies
To query for action, replace the * in fields with comments/replies/action
as for your question about indexableText, the documentation specifies that it is a property of contentHints and
contentHints
Additional information about the content of the file.
These fields are never populated in responses.
A way to make indexableText "useful" is e.g. apply it in queries like
Files:list with q : fullText contains 'indexableText'
The good new are that if you not happy with the way how actions are retrieved now and can think of a better method to implement it, you can file a Feature request on Google's Public Issue Tracker. If enough users show interest in the feature, Google might implement it in the future.
I send this object as HTTP POST:
{
"email_address": "rickard#transticket.se",
"status": "subscribed",
"merge_fields": {
"APA": "1",
"HEJ": "2"
}
}
to https://us13.api.mailchimp.com/3.0/lists/045dfc0a43/members
and I got this response:
{
"type": "http://developer.mailchimp.com/documentation/mailchimp/guides/error-glossary/",
"title": "Invalid Resource",
"status": 400,
"detail": "The resource submitted could not be validated. For field-specific details, see the 'errors' array.",
"instance": "",
"errors": [ {
"field": "",
"message": "Schema describes object, array found instead"
}]
}
Any ideas?
I would have preferred to post a comment but I am still lacking in SO rep pts.
My short answer would be, without more information on the code you're using, that the error means that you have not passed a properly 'set' JSON object to the API. It will be good to remember that even though you have set it as a JSON object initially, you must be sure that the name-value pairs in your "merge_fields" must also be a JSON object.
However, if you're certain that the main and inner name-value pairs were indeed both set in JSON correctly, kindly post the code and I will try to help more.
This is quite easy and your code POST request is right. Maybe the Merge fields don't exist in your list. The merge_fields parameter takes a dict with some pre-defined keys. See below.
{
apikey: "yourmailmergekey"
email_address: "test_email#gmail.com"
status: "subscribed"
merge_fields: {
"FNAME: "-- First Name --",
"LNAME": "-- Last Name --",
"PHONE": "-- Phone Number --",
"ADDRESS": "-- Address --"
}
}
Hope that helps
this code be working for me.
{
"email_address": "test_email#gmail.com",
"status": "subscribed",
"merge_fields": {
"FNAME": "teste",
"LNAME": "92988410440"
}
}
link helpful - https://mailchimp.com/developer/marketing/guides/create-your-first-audience/
I have setup an Alexa Smart Home Skill, all settings done, oauth2 processed done and skill is enabled on my Amazon Echo device. Lambda function is setup and linked to the skill. When I "Discover Devices" I can see the payload hit my Lambda function in the log. I am literally returning via the context.succeed() method the following JSON with a test appliance. However Echo tells me that it fails to find any devices.
{
"header": {
"messageId": "42e0bf9c-18e2-424f-bb11-f8a12df1a79e",
"name": "DiscoverAppliancesResponse",
"namespace": "Alexa.ConnectedHome.Discovery",
"payloadVersion": "2"
},
"payload": {
"discoveredAppliances": [
{
"actions": [
"incrementPercentage",
"decrementPercentage",
"setPercentage",
"turnOn",
"turnOff"
],
"applianceId": "0d6884ab-030e-8ff4-ffffaa15c06e0453",
"friendlyDescription": "Study Light connected to Loxone Kit",
"friendlyName": "Study Light",
"isReachable": true,
"manufacturerName": "Loxone",
"modelName": "Spot"
}
]
}
}
Does the above payload look correct?
According to https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/smart-home-skill-api-reference#discovery-messages the version attribute is required. Your response seems to be missing that attribute.
In my (very short) experience with this, even the smallest mistake in the response would generate a silent error like the one you are experiencing.
I had the same problem. If you are creating discovery for "Entertainment Device", make sure you have wrapped the output in 'event' key for context.succeed
var payload = {
endpoints:
[
{
"endpointId": "My-id",
"manufacturerName": "Manufacturer",
"friendlyName": "Living room TV",
"description": "65in LED TV from Demo AV Company",
"displayCategories": [ ],
"cookie": {
"data": "e.g. ip address",
},
"capabilities":
[
{
"interface": "Alexa.Speaker",
"version": "1.0",
"type": "AlexaInterface"
},
]
}
]
};
var header = request.directive.header;
header.name = "Discover.Response";
context.succeed({ event: {
header: header, payload: payload
} });
Although, in the sample code, this is never mentioned and an incorrect example is given (https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/steps-to-create-a-smart-home-skill). However, the response body provided includes the "event" key.
Recreating lambda function helped me fix the issue. I also set "Enable trigger" check button while creating, though I'm not sure if that matters. After that my device provided by skill was found successfully.
Edit: Answer was wrong. Only useful information was this
This context.fail syntax is actually deprecated. Look up the Lambda context object properties, it should look more like "callback(null, resultObj)" now.
Did you include the return statement in your function?
return {
"header": header,
"payload": payload
}
It was missing in the example and after adding it, I was able to 'discover' my device.