"kill %1" fails and prints "No such process" inside script - shell

I am currently using dash as main shell.
I tried to write a little function that should imitate wait, but with some text.
Here's a minimal, working code:
#!/bin/dash
wait() {
echo Waiting...
local pid="${1}"; shift
local delay=.250
while kill -0 "${pid}" 2>/dev/null; do
echo Still waiting...
sleep "${delay}"
done
echo Resuming
}
main() {
sleep 3 &
wait %1
}
main
If you copy-paste it in a dash shell you can see the code works just fine.
Anyway, if you try to save it in a file, it does not.
After some troubleshooting I've done I found out that deleting 2>/dev/null, you can see an error message: kill: No such process, but using command wait "${pid}" it just waits for it.
So for example:
#!/bin/dash
wait() {
echo Waiting...
local pid="${1}"; shift
command wait "${pid}"
echo Resuming
}
main() {
sleep 3 &
wait %1
}
main
works fine as a file script, too.
I am not sure where/what I am wrong in this piece of code and some things I tried didn't help.
Among the trials I tried to convert %1 to its pid, but jobs -p %1 in a subshell (such as var="$(jobs -p %1)") fails badly.
Any tip?

Job control is disabled in non-interactive shells. Enable it with set -m, or by appending -m to the shebang, and it'll work.
Example:
$ dash -c 'sleep 1 & kill %1 && echo success'
dash: 1: kill: No such process
$ dash -m -c 'sleep 1 & kill %1 && echo success'
success

Related

how do I watch for a process to have died in shell script?

I'm running a shell test program that I can view a progress bar but when I run it I keep getting a unary error . Is kill -0 a way to kill a subprocess in shell ?
Or is there another method to test if my process has died?
heres my code to run a progress bar until my command ends:
#!/bin/sh
# test my progress bar
spin[0]="-"
spin[1]="\\"
spin[2]="|"
spin[3]="/"
sleep 10 2>/dev/null & # run as background process
pid=$! # grab process id
echo -n "[sleeping] ${spin[0]}"
while [ kill -0 $pid ] # wait for process to end
do
for i in "${spin[#]}"
do
echo -ne "\b$i"
sleep 0.1
done
done
enter code here
1. Is kill -0 a way to kill a subprocess in shell ?
On Linux OS, kill -0 is just a way to try to kill a process and see what happens, '0' is not a POSIX signal, it does nothing at all.
If the process is running, kill will return 0, if not, it will return 1.
ps $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 could do the same job.
To kill a process, one generally use the SIGQUIT/3 (quit program) or SIGKILL/9 (terminate program) ; the process could trap the signal and make a clean exit, or it could ignore the signal so the OS has to terminate it 'quick and dirty'.
2. test and '['
The square bracket '[' is an utility ( /bin/[ ), and expect something you didn't provide correctly.
The syntax of while is while list; do list; done where list will return an exit code, so you don't have to use something else.
3. how do I watch for a process to have died in shell script?
Like you did, the code below will do the job:
#!/bin/bash
spin[0]="-"
spin[1]="\\"
spin[2]="|"
spin[3]="/"
sleep 10 2>/dev/null & # run as background process
pid=$! # grab process id
echo -n "[sleeping] ${spin[0]}"
#while ps -p $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 # using ps
while kill -0 $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 # using kill
do
for i in "${spin[#]}"
do
echo -ne "\b$i"
sleep 0.5
done
done
CAVEATS
I use /bin/bash as interpreter, as some of the Bourne Shell (sh) could not support the use of an array (ie spin[n]).
It's probably cleaner to run the spinner in the background and kill it when the process (running in the foreground) terminates. Or, you could open another file descriptor and write something into it after the background process terminates, and have the main process block on a read. eg:
#!/bin/bash
# test my progress bar
spin[0]='-'
spin[1]='\'
spin[2]='|'
spin[3]='/'
{ { { sleep 10 2>/dev/null; echo >&5; } & # run as background process
} 5>&1 1>&3 | { # wait for process to end
while ! read -t 1; do
printf "\r[sleeping] ${spin[ $(( i = ++i % 4 )) ]}"
done
}
} 3>&1

shell script - how to stop "watch" command in the shell script [duplicate]

I have a bash script that launches a child process that crashes (actually, hangs) from time to time and with no apparent reason (closed source, so there isn't much I can do about it). As a result, I would like to be able to launch this process for a given amount of time, and kill it if it did not return successfully after a given amount of time.
Is there a simple and robust way to achieve that using bash?
P.S.: tell me if this question is better suited to serverfault or superuser.
(As seen in:
BASH FAQ entry #68: "How do I run a command, and have it abort (timeout) after N seconds?")
If you don't mind downloading something, use timeout (sudo apt-get install timeout) and use it like: (most Systems have it already installed otherwise use sudo apt-get install coreutils)
timeout 10 ping www.goooooogle.com
If you don't want to download something, do what timeout does internally:
( cmdpid=$BASHPID; (sleep 10; kill $cmdpid) & exec ping www.goooooogle.com )
In case that you want to do a timeout for longer bash code, use the second option as such:
( cmdpid=$BASHPID;
(sleep 10; kill $cmdpid) \
& while ! ping -w 1 www.goooooogle.com
do
echo crap;
done )
# Spawn a child process:
(dosmth) & pid=$!
# in the background, sleep for 10 secs then kill that process
(sleep 10 && kill -9 $pid) &
or to get the exit codes as well:
# Spawn a child process:
(dosmth) & pid=$!
# in the background, sleep for 10 secs then kill that process
(sleep 10 && kill -9 $pid) & waiter=$!
# wait on our worker process and return the exitcode
exitcode=$(wait $pid && echo $?)
# kill the waiter subshell, if it still runs
kill -9 $waiter 2>/dev/null
# 0 if we killed the waiter, cause that means the process finished before the waiter
finished_gracefully=$?
sleep 999&
t=$!
sleep 10
kill $t
I also had this question and found two more things very useful:
The SECONDS variable in bash.
The command "pgrep".
So I use something like this on the command line (OSX 10.9):
ping www.goooooogle.com & PING_PID=$(pgrep 'ping'); SECONDS=0; while pgrep -q 'ping'; do sleep 0.2; if [ $SECONDS = 10 ]; then kill $PING_PID; fi; done
As this is a loop I included a "sleep 0.2" to keep the CPU cool. ;-)
(BTW: ping is a bad example anyway, you just would use the built-in "-t" (timeout) option.)
Assuming you have (or can easily make) a pid file for tracking the child's pid, you could then create a script that checks the modtime of the pid file and kills/respawns the process as needed. Then just put the script in crontab to run at approximately the period you need.
Let me know if you need more details. If that doesn't sound like it'd suit your needs, what about upstart?
One way is to run the program in a subshell, and communicate with the subshell through a named pipe with the read command. This way you can check the exit status of the process being run and communicate this back through the pipe.
Here's an example of timing out the yes command after 3 seconds. It gets the PID of the process using pgrep (possibly only works on Linux). There is also some problem with using a pipe in that a process opening a pipe for read will hang until it is also opened for write, and vice versa. So to prevent the read command hanging, I've "wedged" open the pipe for read with a background subshell. (Another way to prevent a freeze to open the pipe read-write, i.e. read -t 5 <>finished.pipe - however, that also may not work except with Linux.)
rm -f finished.pipe
mkfifo finished.pipe
{ yes >/dev/null; echo finished >finished.pipe ; } &
SUBSHELL=$!
# Get command PID
while : ; do
PID=$( pgrep -P $SUBSHELL yes )
test "$PID" = "" || break
sleep 1
done
# Open pipe for writing
{ exec 4>finished.pipe ; while : ; do sleep 1000; done } &
read -t 3 FINISHED <finished.pipe
if [ "$FINISHED" = finished ] ; then
echo 'Subprocess finished'
else
echo 'Subprocess timed out'
kill $PID
fi
rm finished.pipe
Here's an attempt which tries to avoid killing a process after it has already exited, which reduces the chance of killing another process with the same process ID (although it's probably impossible to avoid this kind of error completely).
run_with_timeout ()
{
t=$1
shift
echo "running \"$*\" with timeout $t"
(
# first, run process in background
(exec sh -c "$*") &
pid=$!
echo $pid
# the timeout shell
(sleep $t ; echo timeout) &
waiter=$!
echo $waiter
# finally, allow process to end naturally
wait $pid
echo $?
) \
| (read pid
read waiter
if test $waiter != timeout ; then
read status
else
status=timeout
fi
# if we timed out, kill the process
if test $status = timeout ; then
kill $pid
exit 99
else
# if the program exited normally, kill the waiting shell
kill $waiter
exit $status
fi
)
}
Use like run_with_timeout 3 sleep 10000, which runs sleep 10000 but ends it after 3 seconds.
This is like other answers which use a background timeout process to kill the child process after a delay. I think this is almost the same as Dan's extended answer (https://stackoverflow.com/a/5161274/1351983), except the timeout shell will not be killed if it has already ended.
After this program has ended, there will still be a few lingering "sleep" processes running, but they should be harmless.
This may be a better solution than my other answer because it does not use the non-portable shell feature read -t and does not use pgrep.
Here's the third answer I've submitted here. This one handles signal interrupts and cleans up background processes when SIGINT is received. It uses the $BASHPID and exec trick used in the top answer to get the PID of a process (in this case $$ in a sh invocation). It uses a FIFO to communicate with a subshell that is responsible for killing and cleanup. (This is like the pipe in my second answer, but having a named pipe means that the signal handler can write into it too.)
run_with_timeout ()
{
t=$1 ; shift
trap cleanup 2
F=$$.fifo ; rm -f $F ; mkfifo $F
# first, run main process in background
"$#" & pid=$!
# sleeper process to time out
( sh -c "echo \$\$ >$F ; exec sleep $t" ; echo timeout >$F ) &
read sleeper <$F
# control shell. read from fifo.
# final input is "finished". after that
# we clean up. we can get a timeout or a
# signal first.
( exec 0<$F
while : ; do
read input
case $input in
finished)
test $sleeper != 0 && kill $sleeper
rm -f $F
exit 0
;;
timeout)
test $pid != 0 && kill $pid
sleeper=0
;;
signal)
test $pid != 0 && kill $pid
;;
esac
done
) &
# wait for process to end
wait $pid
status=$?
echo finished >$F
return $status
}
cleanup ()
{
echo signal >$$.fifo
}
I've tried to avoid race conditions as far as I can. However, one source of error I couldn't remove is when the process ends near the same time as the timeout. For example, run_with_timeout 2 sleep 2 or run_with_timeout 0 sleep 0. For me, the latter gives an error:
timeout.sh: line 250: kill: (23248) - No such process
as it is trying to kill a process that has already exited by itself.
#Kill command after 10 seconds
timeout 10 command
#If you don't have timeout installed, this is almost the same:
sh -c '(sleep 10; kill "$$") & command'
#The same as above, with muted duplicate messages:
sh -c '(sleep 10; kill "$$" 2>/dev/null) & command'

How can I make an external program interruptible in this trap-captured bash script?

I am writing a script which will run an external program (arecord) and do some cleanup if it's interrupted by either a POSIX signal or input on a named pipe. Here's the draft in full
#!/bin/bash
X=`date '+%Y-%m-%d_%H.%M.%S'`
F=/tmp/$X.wav
P=/tmp/$X.$$.fifo
mkfifo $P
trap "echo interrupted && (rm $P || echo 'couldnt delete $P') && echo 'removed fifo' && exit" INT
# this forked process will wait for input on the fifo
(echo 'waiting for fifo' && cat $P >/dev/null && echo 'fifo hit' && kill -s SIGINT $$)&
while true
do
echo waiting...
sleep 1
done
#arecord $F
This works perfectly as it is: the script ends when a signal arrives and a signal is generated if the fifo is written-to.
But instead of the while true loop I want the now-commented-out arecord command, but if I run that program instead of the loop the SIGINT doesn't get caught in the trap and arecord keeps running.
What should I do?
It sounds like you really need this to work more like an init script. So, start arecord in the background and put the pid in a file. Then use the trap to kill the arecord process based on the pidfile.
#!/bin/bash
PIDFILE=/var/run/arecord-runner.pid #Just somewhere to store the pid
LOGFILE=/var/log/arecord-runner.log
#Just one option for how to format your trap call
#Note that this does not use &&, so one failed function will not
# prevent other items in the trap from running
trapFunc() {
echo interrupted
(rm $P || echo 'couldnt delete $P')
echo 'removed fifo'
kill $(cat $PIDFILE)
exit 0
}
X=`date '+%Y-%m-%d_%H.%M.%S'`
F=/tmp/$X.wav
P=/tmp/$X.$$.fifo
mkfifo $P
trap "trapFunc" INT
# this forked process will wait for input on the fifo
(echo 'waiting for fifo' && cat $P >/dev/null && echo 'fifo hit' && kill -s SIGINT $$)&
arecord $F 1>$LOGFILE 2>&1 & #Run in the background, sending logs to file
echo $! > $PIDFILE #Save pid of the last background process to file
while true
do
echo waiting...
sleep 1
done
Also... you may have your trap written with '&&' clauses for a reason, but as an alternative, you can give a function name as I did above, or a sort of anonymous function like this:
trap "{ command1; command2 args; command3; exit 0; }"
Just make sure that each command is followed by a semicolon and there are spaces between the braces and the commands. The risk of using && in the trap is that your script will continue to run past the interrupt if one of the commands before the exit fails to execute (but maybe you want that?).

Best way to make a shell script daemon?

I'm wondering if there is a better way to make a daemon that waits for something using only sh than:
#! /bin/sh
trap processUserSig SIGUSR1
processUserSig() {
echo "doing stuff"
}
while true; do
sleep 1000
done
In particular, I'm wondering if there's any way to get rid of the loop and still have the thing listen for the signals.
Just backgrounding your script (./myscript &) will not daemonize it. See http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/programmer/faq/, section 1.7, which describes what's necessary to become a daemon. You must disconnect it from the terminal so that SIGHUP does not kill it. You can take a shortcut to make a script appear to act like a daemon;
nohup ./myscript 0<&- &>/dev/null &
will do the job. Or, to capture both stderr and stdout to a file:
nohup ./myscript 0<&- &> my.admin.log.file &
Redirection explained (see bash redirection)
0<&- closes stdin
&> file sends stdout and stderr to a file
However, there may be further important aspects that you need to consider. For example:
You will still have a file descriptor open to the script, which means that the directory it's mounted in would be unmountable. To be a true daemon you should chdir("/") (or cd / inside your script), and fork so that the parent exits, and thus the original descriptor is closed.
Perhaps run umask 0. You may not want to depend on the umask of the caller of the daemon.
For an example of a script that takes all of these aspects into account, see Mike S' answer.
Some of the top-upvoted answers here are missing some important parts of what makes a daemon a daemon, as opposed to just a background process, or a background process detached from a shell.
This http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/programmer/faq/ describes what is necessary to be a daemon. And this Run bash script as daemon implements the setsid, though it misses the chdir to root.
The original poster's question was actually more specific than "How do I create a daemon process using bash?", but since the subject and answers discuss daemonizing shell scripts generally, I think it's important to point it out (for interlopers like me looking into the fine details of creating a daemon).
Here's my rendition of a shell script that would behave according to the FAQ. Set DEBUG to true to see pretty output (but it also exits immediately rather than looping endlessly):
#!/bin/bash
DEBUG=false
# This part is for fun, if you consider shell scripts fun- and I do.
trap process_USR1 SIGUSR1
process_USR1() {
echo 'Got signal USR1'
echo 'Did you notice that the signal was acted upon only after the sleep was done'
echo 'in the while loop? Interesting, yes? Yes.'
exit 0
}
# End of fun. Now on to the business end of things.
print_debug() {
whatiam="$1"; tty="$2"
[[ "$tty" != "not a tty" ]] && {
echo "" >$tty
echo "$whatiam, PID $$" >$tty
ps -o pid,sess,pgid -p $$ >$tty
tty >$tty
}
}
me_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
me_FILE=$(basename $0)
cd /
#### CHILD HERE --------------------------------------------------------------------->
if [ "$1" = "child" ] ; then # 2. We are the child. We need to fork again.
shift; tty="$1"; shift
$DEBUG && print_debug "*** CHILD, NEW SESSION, NEW PGID" "$tty"
umask 0
$me_DIR/$me_FILE XXrefork_daemonXX "$tty" "$#" </dev/null >/dev/null 2>/dev/null &
$DEBUG && [[ "$tty" != "not a tty" ]] && echo "CHILD OUT" >$tty
exit 0
fi
##### ENTRY POINT HERE -------------------------------------------------------------->
if [ "$1" != "XXrefork_daemonXX" ] ; then # 1. This is where the original call starts.
tty=$(tty)
$DEBUG && print_debug "*** PARENT" "$tty"
setsid $me_DIR/$me_FILE child "$tty" "$#" &
$DEBUG && [[ "$tty" != "not a tty" ]] && echo "PARENT OUT" >$tty
exit 0
fi
##### RUNS AFTER CHILD FORKS (actually, on Linux, clone()s. See strace -------------->
# 3. We have been reforked. Go to work.
exec >/tmp/outfile
exec 2>/tmp/errfile
exec 0</dev/null
shift; tty="$1"; shift
$DEBUG && print_debug "*** DAEMON" "$tty"
# The real stuff goes here. To exit, see fun (above)
$DEBUG && [[ "$tty" != "not a tty" ]] && echo NOT A REAL DAEMON. NOT RUNNING WHILE LOOP. >$tty
$DEBUG || {
while true; do
echo "Change this loop, so this silly no-op goes away." >/dev/null
echo "Do something useful with your life, young padawan." >/dev/null
sleep 10
done
}
$DEBUG && [[ "$tty" != "not a tty" ]] && sleep 3 && echo "DAEMON OUT" >$tty
exit # This may never run. Why is it here then? It's pretty.
# Kind of like, "The End" at the end of a movie that you
# already know is over. It's always nice.
Output looks like this when DEBUG is set to true. Notice how the session and process group ID (SESS, PGID) numbers change:
<shell_prompt>$ bash blahd
*** PARENT, PID 5180
PID SESS PGID
5180 1708 5180
/dev/pts/6
PARENT OUT
<shell_prompt>$
*** CHILD, NEW SESSION, NEW PGID, PID 5188
PID SESS PGID
5188 5188 5188
not a tty
CHILD OUT
*** DAEMON, PID 5198
PID SESS PGID
5198 5188 5188
not a tty
NOT A REAL DAEMON. NOT RUNNING WHILE LOOP.
DAEMON OUT
# double background your script to have it detach from the tty
# cf. http://www.linux-mag.com/id/5981
(./program.sh &) &
Use your system's daemon facility, such as start-stop-daemon.
Otherwise, yes, there has to be a loop somewhere.
$ ( cd /; umask 0; setsid your_script.sh </dev/null &>/dev/null & ) &
It really depends on what is the binary itself going to do.
For example I want to create some listener.
The starting Daemon is simple task :
lis_deamon :
#!/bin/bash
# We will start the listener as Deamon process
#
LISTENER_BIN=/tmp/deamon_test/listener
test -x $LISTENER_BIN || exit 5
PIDFILE=/tmp/deamon_test/listener.pid
case "$1" in
start)
echo -n "Starting Listener Deamon .... "
startproc -f -p $PIDFILE $LISTENER_BIN
echo "running"
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 start"
exit 1
;;
esac
this is how we start the daemon (common way for all /etc/init.d/ staff)
now as for the listener it self,
It must be some kind of loop/alert or else that will trigger the script
to do what u want. For example if u want your script to sleep 10 min
and wake up and ask you how you are doing u will do this with the
while true ; do sleep 600 ; echo "How are u ? " ; done
Here is the simple listener that u can do that will listen for your
commands from remote machine and execute them on local :
listener :
#!/bin/bash
# Starting listener on some port
# we will run it as deamon and we will send commands to it.
#
IP=$(hostname --ip-address)
PORT=1024
FILE=/tmp/backpipe
count=0
while [ -a $FILE ] ; do #If file exis I assume that it used by other program
FILE=$FILE.$count
count=$(($count + 1))
done
# Now we know that such file do not exist,
# U can write down in deamon it self the remove for those files
# or in different part of program
mknod $FILE p
while true ; do
netcat -l -s $IP -p $PORT < $FILE |/bin/bash > $FILE
done
rm $FILE
So to start UP it : /tmp/deamon_test/listener start
and to send commands from shell (or wrap it to script) :
test_host#netcat 10.184.200.22 1024
uptime
20:01pm up 21 days 5:10, 44 users, load average: 0.62, 0.61, 0.60
date
Tue Jan 28 20:02:00 IST 2014
punt! (Cntrl+C)
Hope this will help.
Have a look at the daemon tool from the libslack package:
http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/05/18/todays-sysadmin-tip-using-libslack-daemon-to-daemonize-a-script/
On Mac OS X use a launchd script for shell daemon.
If I had a script.sh and i wanted to execute it from bash and leave it running even when I want to close my bash session then I would combine nohup and & at the end.
example: nohup ./script.sh < inputFile.txt > ./logFile 2>&1 &
inputFile.txt can be any file. If your file has no input then we usually use /dev/null. So the command would be:
nohup ./script.sh < /dev/null > ./logFile 2>&1 &
After that close your bash session,open another terminal and execute: ps -aux | egrep "script.sh" and you will see that your script is still running at the background. Of cource,if you want to stop it then execute the same command (ps) and kill -9 <PID-OF-YOUR-SCRIPT>
See Bash Service Manager project: https://github.com/reduardo7/bash-service-manager
Implementation example
#!/usr/bin/env bash
export PID_FILE_PATH="/tmp/my-service.pid"
export LOG_FILE_PATH="/tmp/my-service.log"
export LOG_ERROR_FILE_PATH="/tmp/my-service.error.log"
. ./services.sh
run-script() {
local action="$1" # Action
while true; do
echo "### Running action '${action}'"
echo foo
echo bar >&2
[ "$action" = "run" ] && return 0
sleep 5
[ "$action" = "debug" ] && exit 25
done
}
before-start() {
local action="$1" # Action
echo "* Starting with $action"
}
after-finish() {
local action="$1" # Action
local serviceExitCode=$2 # Service exit code
echo "* Finish with $action. Exit code: $serviceExitCode"
}
action="$1"
serviceName="Example Service"
serviceMenu "$action" "$serviceName" run-script "$workDir" before-start after-finish
Usage example
$ ./example-service
# Actions: [start|stop|restart|status|run|debug|tail(-[log|error])]
$ ./example-service start
# Starting Example Service service...
$ ./example-service status
# Serive Example Service is runnig with PID 5599
$ ./example-service stop
# Stopping Example Service...
$ ./example-service status
# Service Example Service is not running
Here is the minimal change to the original proposal to create a valid daemon in Bourne shell (or Bash):
#!/bin/sh
if [ "$1" != "__forked__" ]; then
setsid "$0" __forked__ "$#" &
exit
else
shift
fi
trap 'siguser1=true' SIGUSR1
trap 'echo "Clean up and exit"; kill $sleep_pid; exit' SIGTERM
exec > outfile
exec 2> errfile
exec 0< /dev/null
while true; do
(sleep 30000000 &>/dev/null) &
sleep_pid=$!
wait
kill $sleep_pid &>/dev/null
if [ -n "$siguser1" ]; then
siguser1=''
echo "Wait was interrupted by SIGUSR1, do things here."
fi
done
Explanation:
Line 2-7: A daemon must be forked so it doesn't have a parent. Using an artificial argument to prevent endless forking. "setsid" detaches from starting process and terminal.
Line 9: Our desired signal needs to be differentiated from other signals.
Line 10: Cleanup is required to get rid of dangling "sleep" processes.
Line 11-13: Redirect stdout, stderr and stdin of the script.
Line 16: sleep in the background
Line 18: wait waits for end of sleep, but gets interrupted by (some) signals.
Line 19: Kill sleep process, because that is still running when signal is caught.
Line 22: Do the work if SIGUSR1 has been caught.
Guess it does not get any simpler than that.
Like many answers this one is not a "real" daemonization but rather an alternative to nohup approach.
echo "script.sh" | at now
There are obviously differences from using nohup. For one there is no detaching from the parent in the first place. Also "script.sh" doesn't inherit parent's environment.
By no means this is a better alternative. It is simply a different (and somewhat lazy) way of launching processes in background.
P.S. I personally upvoted carlo's answer as it seems to be the most elegant and works both from terminal and inside scripts
try executing using &
if you save this file as program.sh
you can use
$. program.sh &

How to suppress Terminated message after killing in bash?

How can you suppress the Terminated message that comes up after you kill a
process in a bash script?
I tried set +bm, but that doesn't work.
I know another solution involves calling exec 2> /dev/null, but is that
reliable? How do I reset it back so that I can continue to see stderr?
In order to silence the message, you must be redirecting stderr at the time the message is generated. Because the kill command sends a signal and doesn't wait for the target process to respond, redirecting stderr of the kill command does you no good. The bash builtin wait was made specifically for this purpose.
Here is very simple example that kills the most recent background command. (Learn more about $! here.)
kill $!
wait $! 2>/dev/null
Because both kill and wait accept multiple pids, you can also do batch kills. Here is an example that kills all background processes (of the current process/script of course).
kill $(jobs -rp)
wait $(jobs -rp) 2>/dev/null
I was led here from bash: silently kill background function process.
The short answer is that you can't. Bash always prints the status of foreground jobs. The monitoring flag only applies for background jobs, and only for interactive shells, not scripts.
see notify_of_job_status() in jobs.c.
As you say, you can redirect so standard error is pointing to /dev/null but then you miss any other error messages. You can make it temporary by doing the redirection in a subshell which runs the script. This leaves the original environment alone.
(script 2> /dev/null)
which will lose all error messages, but just from that script, not from anything else run in that shell.
You can save and restore standard error, by redirecting a new filedescriptor to point there:
exec 3>&2 # 3 is now a copy of 2
exec 2> /dev/null # 2 now points to /dev/null
script # run script with redirected stderr
exec 2>&3 # restore stderr to saved
exec 3>&- # close saved version
But I wouldn't recommend this -- the only upside from the first one is that it saves a sub-shell invocation, while being more complicated and, possibly even altering the behavior of the script, if the script alters file descriptors.
EDIT:
For more appropriate answer check answer given by Mark Edgar
Solution: use SIGINT (works only in non-interactive shells)
Demo:
cat > silent.sh <<"EOF"
sleep 100 &
kill -INT $!
sleep 1
EOF
sh silent.sh
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/15798
Maybe detach the process from the current shell process by calling disown?
The Terminated is logged by the default signal handler of bash 3.x and 4.x. Just trap the TERM signal at the very first of child process:
#!/bin/sh
## assume script name is test.sh
foo() {
trap 'exit 0' TERM ## here is the key
while true; do sleep 1; done
}
echo before child
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
foo &
pid=$!
sleep 1 # wait trap is done
echo before kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
kill $pid ## no need to redirect stdin/stderr
sleep 1 # wait kill is done
echo after kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
Is this what we are all looking for?
Not wanted:
$ sleep 3 &
[1] 234
<pressing enter a few times....>
$
$
[1]+ Done sleep 3
$
Wanted:
$ (set +m; sleep 3 &)
<again, pressing enter several times....>
$
$
$
$
$
As you can see, no job end message. Works for me in bash scripts as well, also for killed background processes.
'set +m' disables job control (see 'help set') for the current shell. So if you enter your command in a subshell (as done here in brackets) you will not influence the job control settings of the current shell. Only disadvantage is that you need to get the pid of your background process back to the current shell if you want to check whether it has terminated, or evaluate the return code.
This also works for killall (for those who prefer it):
killall -s SIGINT (yourprogram)
suppresses the message... I was running mpg123 in background mode.
It could only silently be killed by sending a ctrl-c (SIGINT) instead of a SIGTERM (default).
disown did exactly the right thing for me -- the exec 3>&2 is risky for a lot of reasons -- set +bm didn't seem to work inside a script, only at the command prompt
Had success with adding 'jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null' to the script, not certain if it will help anyone else's script, but here is a sample.
while true; do echo $RANDOM; done | while read line
do
echo Random is $line the last jobid is $(jobs -lp)
jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null
sleep 3
done
Another way to disable job notifications is to place your command to be backgrounded in a sh -c 'cmd &' construct.
#!/bin/bash
# ...
pid="`sh -c 'sleep 30 & echo ${!}' | head -1`"
kill "$pid"
# ...
# or put several cmds in sh -c '...' construct
sh -c '
sleep 30 &
pid="${!}"
sleep 5
kill "${pid}"
'
I found that putting the kill command in a function and then backgrounding the function suppresses the termination output
function killCmd() {
kill $1
}
killCmd $somePID &
Simple:
{ kill $! } 2>/dev/null
Advantage? can use any signal
ex:
{ kill -9 $PID } 2>/dev/null

Resources