Greetings fellow problem solvers.
I'll start by saying my level of expertise regarding coding/anything compsci is somewhere right above ZERO (intro to java last semester & currently teaching myself python, but that's it). Also I have a macbook air running 10.14.6(mojave). Ok, here are my questions.
What I did:
I installed macvim version 8.1.2234 before realizing my machine was shipped with vim 8.0.1365 preinstalled. I installed macvim using the download .dmg & "drag/drop to applications" method.
What I'd like to know:
Firstly, MacVim and Vim appear to be separate programs (when I type mvim -v as opposed to vim -v in the terminal, each one shows a different version number as described above). So, how can I remove/replace/update/overwrite or whatever, so that I only have either macvim or vim? I don't really care which one I have as long as I only have one
--> Before telling me to just rename an alias so that one maps to the other, please read the info below <--
I REALLY don't want two nearly identical programs on my computer because, a)it seems like a waste a space b)don't want the possibility of accidentally saving something to the wrong place, or calling something from the wrong place, but mostly c)so I can sleep at night.
That being said, do I NEED both? Does macvim rely on vim to work or do they both exist and work independently? Also does renaming an alias mean that the other will be replaced? Because I would assume that just renaming one would be a lot like having two houses, but making both driveways only go to one house.
Additional info: I have do homebrew but I didn't install macvim using homebrew. I found another post recommending to use (i don't remember exact syntax but something like..) $brew overwrite vim--with-macvim. So I thought great, I'll uninstall macvim since I haven't used it at all yet, and then I'll re-download using the homebrew overwrite method. But then I read that it's a little more complicated than moving the "Vim" folder to the trash, and after two unsuccessful attempts in the terminal that looked like this:
$brew uninstall mvim (throws no keg error)
$brew uninstall macvim (same error)
I decided to reach out for help before I break anything.
Thanks in advance for any info/advice, it is much appreciated!
I don’t have time for a longer explanation at the moment, but:
Breathe Easy
MacVim is nearly completely independent from (terminal) vim. They do share your vimrc, but MacVim also reads gvimrc, and uses its own runtime directories.
You’re not wasting much space, and it would be a Bad Idea™️ to mess with the system installation of some programs.
Related
I recently decided to use emacs as I am starting to learn common lisp. But here is a problem that I feel that I must have done something wrong. After googling around for the past several hours, I still couldn't figure out why.
I am using windows 7. Installing the most recent emacs (24.5) with quicklisp, slime, sbcl etc are all fine. Then I started to install gtk+3 according to http://www.gtk.org/download/win32_tutorial.php. And it went well: I can run gtk3-demo. The problem is that after I put the path in the system environment, emacs was not responsive anymore: When I run runemacs.exe, it starts a window, then hang with a blank window (the menu appears). It can start fine after I remove the /dir-to-gtk-bin/ from the path.
I believe that there must be something wrong with my system setup, since emacs should work smoothly with gtk+ devleopment. Could you please give me a hint on where to start checking? Thanks very much for your help.
Here is my situation, when I download Gentoo and start to run it and downloaded the stage III Tarball from links and then tried to extract it a stream of white sentences flows down my screen really fast for about a minute just like in the YouTube tutorial I was viewing. However, after that instead of going to the correct stage it says cannot right not enough space on device and I tried repartitioning it but I'm not sure what device it is talkingaboutHowever, after that instead of going to the correct stage it says cannot right not enough space on device and I tried repartitioning it but I'm not sure what device it is talking about. Please help
Sorry you're having this issue, though in general, I truly believe Gentoo Handbook is quite well written and even a newbie can follow it... Here are some advices that I hope I can give you (most important is, digest the handbook and follow it carefully, not that I'm saying "RTFM", it's just that for Gentoo, handbook is essential and without it, we can get lost if you're just starting).
From my experiences, the "stream of white sentences" I'd presume would be from verbose un-tar'ing your stage3. Usually, I only want to see the errors so my suggestions is to remove the "v" (i.e. from "tar xjvpf" to "tar xjpf") so that only errors would appear when un-tar'ing. The caveat to this is that you'll be wondering if it hung or is busy un-tar'ing. Use Alt-F1 and Alt-F2 (if on console/tty mode back-and-forth) to log in on another TTY and do 'ps -auxf' to see if it's still tar'ing. If you're using GUI Terminal, just open another tab and 'ps auxf', you get the picture...
Also, learn the commands "df", it'll come in handy. If you're running out of disk space, perhaps you're trying to install/untar stage3 to your ramdisk (grin) rather than your mounted (i.e. "/mnt/gentoo"). Mount your root '/' device to '/mnt/gentoo' and cd to that mounted path then try it (don't forget to mount your '/boot' as well as your proc, dev, sys, etc before you chroot - again, follow the handbook as carefully as you can - oh also, distro such as Debian hybrids including Ubuntu uses symlink to shm, so read that part about 'rm /dev/shm' and follow it carefully; if you're using Gentoo LiveCD, you can ignore that part).
Other useful commands if you're confused (or new to) mounting devices would be to learn to experiment with commands such as 'lsblk' and 'mount' (by itself) to inspect the sizes of your partition (again, use of 'df' comes in handy as well) as well as what is your device (i.e. /dev/sda1 versus /dev/sdb1). Hint: when you do 'mkfs', use "-L" (or for some file system, it's "-N") to label/name your devices, so that when you use commands such as 'mount' or 'lsblk', you can spot them easier. If you're using GUI/desktop versions of some distro, hopefully there are tools such as "gparted" which can give you visual information in GUI of your devices which can be helpful. One think I'd advise you to stay away from if you're just starting, is to avoid RAID (i.e. mdadm) until you're comfortable with how grub/lilo works. Get your kernel (Gentoo-sources) compiled and MBR written (i.e. grub-install), try booting and have fun first (oh also, if you can avoid GUI like installing Gnome/KDE from the get-go, avoid it as well - you'll get into issues such as "should I use SystemD or OpenRC" and then get hit by the obstacle of some gnome parts needs you to use systemd but you've chosen openrc, and so on).
If I may add my opinions, in my opinion, Gentoo (also Arch and FreeBSD) is an excellent place to start if you want to learn the inside of Linux application workings (library dependencies, why packages are important rather than downloading each libs manually and compile them one by one, etc). I hope this won't discourage you from switching to another distro, but if it does frustrate you on installation and all you want to do is test-drive Linux, there are much easier distro that you'd not have to understand USE and other compilation mechanisms (if you have an old i586, it makes sense to build it with pick-and-chose libraries so that leaner can be faster, but if you have fast machine, why compile binaries when somebody who is expert at it already have done it for you?). SUSE and Fedora/RedHat/CentOS used to be the least frustrating for it was able to find/detect hardwares (legacy and new) but these days, I usually tell people, "if you know how to install Windows, you can install Ubuntu" so that too may be a good way to wet your feet. Good luck!
0_o wow, well.. how about some 411 like size of your hdd and exactly how you partioned it? Linux will look for specific directorys and if missing will instead start to install into the root dir. How you partion is an importent first step. Once you got a generally good partion setup most linux installs will go fine. Most basic tables include /, /home,/var and a swap.
this is probably a total newbie question but try as I might, I cannot seem to get my terminal to recognize the psql command. So far, I have tried the following:
Added PATH="/Applications/Postgres.app/Contents/Versions/9.3/bin:$PATH" to my .profile file, saved, and reopened terminal. No luck. (Path that is given in the Postgres.App installation instructions on their site.)
Added PATH="/Applications/Postgres.app/Contents/Versions/9.3/bin:$PATH" to my .bash_profile file, saved, and reopened terminal. No luck. (Tried another file to be sure.)
Added export PATH="/Applications/Postgres.app/Contents/MacOS/bin:$PATH" to my .profile file, saved, and reopened terminal. No luck. (Recommended in another question asked here on Stack.)
Same deal as previous but in .bash_profile. No luck.
Same deal but with /Users/my_user/Library/Application Support/Postgres/var-9.3 in both .profile and .bash_profile. No luck. (Data directory given in the app preferences, running out of ideas.)
What am I missing? This shouldn't be this hard. Thanks for the help!
Okay, so it never ceases to amaze me how much is knowledge is assumed by the courses, programs, and even installation instructions dealing with unix based systems. Like I thought, it was a silly issue.
I've heard repeatedly and from multiple sources that to make sure changes are applied, restart your terminal. Well, in this case, that is not enough. If you find yourself in the same situation, you must either restart your computer or (and much more simply) issue the following command in terminal:
source ~/.bash_profile
While a silly little issue, ignorance doesn't care and your stuff won't work until eradicate said ignorance. The good thing is that with each new hard won gem of knowledge, that's one more thing I won't forget anytime soon and insight into how to better diagnose future problems.
For some reasons I had to uninstall/reinstall homebrew on my MacBook Pro (OS X 10.9).
I wanted to reinstall swi-prolog via homebrew (like I did the first time). The installation process worked without any visible issue, but now every time in want to run swi-prolog in my terminal this message appears: "Abort trap: 6"
I have no clue of what that means. There is a lot of things about this message on the internet but I can't relate them with my issue.
Could you help me?
For some reason it seems that the symbolic link doesn't work correctly. In my version of swi-prolog I had to type the full path to get it to run correctly, for example:
/usr/local/Cellar/swi-prolog/6.4.1/bin/swipl
Remember to keep in mind that your version number could be different than what I have listed above.
This became extremely tedious however to remember when having to type it every time I wanted to use Prolog, so I was able to add it as an alias with this command:
alias prolog='/usr/local/Cellar/swi-prolog/6.4.1/bin/swipl'
From that point on in the current terminal session, I was able to open it by just typing:
prolog
This way is obviously much easier, however you need to remember to change the alias if the version also changes.
The command "prolog" can of course be exchanged with any command you wish to use.
Keep in mind, if you want this command to be more permanent (as in after you close the terminal window), you will need to also add the above alias command to the ~/.bash_profile file so it runs on startup.
Hope this helps!
if i am not mistaken, swi-prolog required x11 to run but now in mac 10.9, there were no x11 anymore instead of xQuartz.
i am not sure if this is the real problem now.
I got darwinbuild off macports to get a single unix executable (long story, see Where/how to get the Mac OSX "login" command). I was having trouble figuring out how it worked, so I tried their website's example build, "darwinbuild xnu"
It worked, and when I opened the new volume it mounted in finder, it appeared to be building a whole new mac osx (I know this is probably not the case, but that is what it looked like to me at least.) So I grabbed the binary I wanted, hit control-c in terminal, and unmounted the volume. Everything seemed to work out, but even after restarting the computer, I could not get the 2gig or so that build/mount/kernal/thing took up.
I even tried restoring a timemachine backup, but even that would not bring the free space back.
So how do I get rid of this thing once and for all?
If you know the location the files were written to, navigate there in Finder then delete them. If you don't, read the documentation that comes with the Darwin stuff you downloaded (it'll be there, believe me) to find out or download a drive space analyzer app to locate it.
Really, I don't see how these questions are about programming? They're more "how do I fix something I screwed up ancillary to programming-related efforts," which are of course superuser.com material.