Related
Is there a way to do something like this
int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
using Bash?
ternary operator ? : is just short form of if/else
case "$b" in
5) a=$c ;;
*) a=$d ;;
esac
Or
[[ $b = 5 ]] && a="$c" || a="$d"
Code:
a=$([ "$b" == 5 ] && echo "$c" || echo "$d")
If the condition is merely checking if a variable is set, there's even a shorter form:
a=${VAR:-20}
will assign to a the value of VAR if VAR is set, otherwise it will assign it the default value 20 -- this can also be a result of an expression.
This approach is technically called "Parameter Expansion".
if [[ $b -eq 5 ]]; then a="$c"; else a="$d"; fi
The cond && op1 || op2 expression suggested in other answers has an inherent bug: if op1 has a nonzero exit status, op2 silently becomes the result; the error will also not be caught in -e mode. So, that expression is only safe to use if op1 can never fail (e.g., :, true if a builtin, or variable assignment without any operations that can fail (like division and OS calls)).
Note the "" quotes. They will prevent translation of all whitespace into single spaces.
Double square brackets as opposed to single ones prevent incorrect operation if $b is equal to a test operator (e.g. "-z"; a workaround with [ is [ "x$b" == "xyes" ] and it only works for string comparison); they also lift the requirement for quoting.
(( a = b==5 ? c : d )) # string + numeric
[ $b == 5 ] && { a=$c; true; } || a=$d
This will avoid executing the part after || by accident when the code between && and || fails.
We can use following three ways in Shell Scripting for ternary operator :
[ $numVar == numVal ] && resVar="Yop" || resVar="Nop"
Or
resVar=$([ $numVar == numVal ] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop")
Or
(( numVar == numVal ? (resVar=1) : (resVar=0) ))
Update: Extending the answer for string computations with below ready-to-run example. This is making use of second format mentioned above.
$ strVar='abc';resVar=$([[ $strVar == 'abc' ]] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop");echo $resVar
Yop
$ strVar='aaa';resVar=$([[ $strVar == 'abc' ]] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop");echo $resVar
Nop
The let command supports most of the basic operators one would need:
let a=b==5?c:d;
Naturally, this works only for assigning variables; it cannot execute other commands.
Here is another option where you only have to specify the variable you're assigning once, and it doesn't matter whether what your assigning is a string or a number:
VARIABLE=`[ test ] && echo VALUE_A || echo VALUE_B`
Just a thought. :)
There's also a very similar but simpler syntax for ternary conditionals in bash:
a=$(( b == 5 ? 123 : 321 ))
The following seems to work for my use cases:
Examples
$ tern 1 YES NO
YES
$ tern 0 YES NO
NO
$ tern 52 YES NO
YES
$ tern 52 YES NO 52
NO
and can be used in a script like so:
RESULT=$(tern 1 YES NO)
echo "The result is $RESULT"
tern
#!/usr/bin/env bash
function show_help()
{
ME=$(basename "$0")
IT=$(cat <<EOF
Returns a ternary result
usage: BOOLEAN VALUE_IF_TRUE VALUE_IF_FALSE
e.g.
# YES
$ME 1 YES NO
# NO
$ME 0 YES NO
# NO
$ME "" YES NO
# YES
$ME "STRING THAT ISNT BLANK OR 0" YES NO
# INFO contains NO
INFO=\$($ME 0 YES NO)
EOF
)
echo "$IT"
echo
exit
}
if [ "$1" = "help" ] || [ "$1" = '?' ] || [ "$1" = "--help" ] || [ "$1" = "h" ]; then
show_help
fi
if [ -z "$3" ]
then
show_help
fi
# Set a default value for what is "false" -> 0
FALSE_VALUE=${4:-0}
function main
{
if [ "$1" == "$FALSE_VALUE" ] || [ "$1" = '' ]; then
echo $3
exit;
fi;
echo $2
}
main "$1" "$2" "$3"
Here's a general solution, that
works with string tests as well
feels rather like an expression
avoids any subtle side effects when the condition fails
Test with numerical comparison
a=$(if [ "$b" -eq 5 ]; then echo "$c"; else echo "$d"; fi)
Test with String comparison
a=$(if [ "$b" = "5" ]; then echo "$c"; else echo "$d"; fi)
(ping -c1 localhost&>/dev/null) && { echo "true"; } || { echo "false"; }
You can use this if you want similar syntax
a=$(( $((b==5)) ? c : d ))
Some people have already presented some nice alternatives. I wanted to get the syntax as close as possible, so I wrote a function named ?.
This allows for the syntax:
[[ $x -eq 1 ]]; ? ./script1 : ./script2
# or
? '[[ $x -eq 1 ]]' ./script1 : ./script2
In both cases, the : is optional. All arguments that have spaces, the values must be quoted since it runs them with eval.
If the <then> or <else> clauses aren't commands, the function echos the proper value.
./script; ? Success! : "Failure :("
The function
?() {
local lastRet=$?
if [[ $1 == --help || $1 == -? ]]; then
echo $'\e[37;1mUsage:\e[0m
? [<condition>] <then> [:] <else>
If \e[37;1m<then>\e[0m and/or \e[37;1m<else>\e[0m are not valid commands, then their values are
printed to stdOut, otherwise they are executed. If \e[37;1m<condition>\e[0m is not
specified, evaluates the return code ($?) of the previous statement.
\e[37;1mExamples:\e[0m
myVar=$(? "[[ $x -eq 1 ]] foo bar)
\e[32;2m# myVar is set to "foo" if x is 1, else it is set to "bar"\e[0m
? "[[ $x = *foo* ]] "cat hello.txt" : "cat goodbye.txt"
\e[32;2m# runs cat on "hello.txt" if x contains the word "foo", else runs cat on
# "goodbye.txt"\e[0m
? "[[ $x -eq 1 ]] "./script1" "./script2"; ? "Succeeded!" "Failed :("
\e[32;2m# If x = 1, runs script1, else script2. If the run script succeeds, prints
# "Succeeded!", else prints "failed".\e[0m'
return
elif ! [[ $# -eq 2 || $# -eq 3 || $# -eq 4 && $3 == ':' ]]; then
1>&2 echo $'\e[37;1m?\e[0m requires 2 to 4 arguments
\e[37;1mUsage\e[0m: ? [<condition>] <then> [:] <else>
Run \e[37;1m? --help\e[0m for more details'
return 1
fi
local cmd
if [[ $# -eq 2 || $# -eq 3 && $2 == ':' ]]; then
cmd="[[ $lastRet -eq 0 ]]"
else
cmd="$1"
shift
fi
if [[ $2 == ':' ]]; then
eval "set -- '$1' '$3'"
fi
local result=$(eval "$cmd" && echo "$1" || echo "$2")
if command -v ${result[0]} &> /dev/null; then
eval "${result[#]}"
else
echo "${result[#]}"
fi
}
Obviously if you want the script to be shorter, you can remove the help text.
EDIT: I was unaware that ? acts as a placeholder character in a file name. Rather than matching any number of characters like *, it matches exactly one character. So, if you have a one-character file in your working directory, bash will try to run the filename as a command. I'm not sure how to get around this. I thought using command "?" ...args might work but, no dice.
Simplest ternary
brew list | grep -q bat && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
This example will determine if you used homebrew to install bat or not yet
If true you will see "yes"
If false you will see "no"
I added the -q to suppress the grepped string output here, so you only see "yes" or "no"
Really the pattern you seek is this
doSomethingAndCheckTruth && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
Tested with bash and zsh
Here are some options:
1- Use if then else in one line, it is possible.
if [[ "$2" == "raiz" ]] || [[ "$2" == '.' ]]; then pasta=''; else pasta="$2"; fi
2- Write a function like this:
# Once upon a time, there was an 'iif' function in MS VB ...
function iif(){
# Echoes $2 if 1,banana,true,etc and $3 if false,null,0,''
case $1 in ''|false|FALSE|null|NULL|0) echo $3;;*) echo $2;;esac
}
use inside script like this
result=`iif "$expr" 'yes' 'no'`
# or even interpolating:
result=`iif "$expr" "positive" "negative, because $1 is not true"`
3- Inspired in the case answer, a more flexible and one line use is:
case "$expr" in ''|false|FALSE|null|NULL|0) echo "no...$expr";;*) echo "yep $expr";;esac
# Expression can be something like:
expr=`expr "$var1" '>' "$var2"`
This is much like Vladimir's fine answer. If your "ternary" is a case of "if true, string, if false, empty", then you can simply do:
$ c="it was five"
$ b=3
$ a="$([[ $b -eq 5 ]] && echo "$c")"
$ echo $a
$ b=5
$ a="$([[ $b -eq 5 ]] && echo "$c")"
$ echo $a
it was five
A string-oriented alternative, that uses an array:
spec=(IGNORE REPLACE)
for p in {13..15}; do
echo "$p: ${spec[p==14]}";
done
which outputs:
13: IGNORE
14: REPLACE
15: IGNORE
to answer to : int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
just write:
b=5
c=1
d=2
let a="(b==5)?c:d"
echo $a # 1
b=6;
c=1;
d=2;
let a="(b==5)?c:d"
echo $a # 2
remember that " expression " is equivalent to $(( expression ))
Two more answers
Here's some ways of thinking about this
bash integer variables
In addition to, dutCh, Vladimir and ghostdog74's corrects answers and because this question is regarding integer and tagged bash:
Is there a way to do something like this
int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
There is a nice and proper way to work with integers under bash:
declare -i b=' RANDOM % 3 + 4 ' c=100 d=50 a=' b == 5 ? c : d '; echo $b '-->' $a
The output line from this command should by one of:
4 --> 50
5 --> 100
6 --> 50
Of course, declaring integer type of variable is to be done once:
declare -i a b c d
c=100 d=50 b=RANDOM%3+4
a=' b == 5 ? c : d '
echo $a $b
100 5
b=12 a=b==5?c:d
echo $a $b
50 12
Digression: Using a string as a math function:
mathString=' b == 5 ? c : d '
b=5 a=$mathString
echo $a $b
100 5
b=1 a=$mathString
echo $a $b
50 1
Based on parameter expansion and indirection
Following answers from Brad Parks and druid62, here is a way not limited to integer:
c=50 d=100 ar=([5]=c)
read -p 'Enter B: ' b
e=${ar[b]:-d};echo ${!e}
If b==5, then ar[b] is c and indirection do c is 50.
Else ar[any value other than 5] is empty, so parameter expansion will default to d, where indirection give 100.
Same demo using an array instead of an integer
ternArrayDemo(){
local -a c=(foo bar) d=(foo bar baz) e=(empty) ar=([5]=c [2]=d)
local b=${ar[$1]:-e}
b+=[#] # For array indirection
printf ' - %s\n' "${!b}"
}
Then
ternArrayDemo 0
- empty
ternArrayDemo 2
- foo
- bar
- baz
ternArrayDemo 4
- empty
ternArrayDemo 5
- foo
- bar
ternArrayDemo 6
- empty
Or using associative arrays
ternAssocArrayDemo(){
local -a c=(foo bar) d=(foo bar baz) e=(empty)
local -A ar=([foo]=c[#] [bar]=d[#] [baz]=d[-1])
local b=${ar[$1]:-e[#]}
printf ' - %s\n' "${!b}"
}
Then
ternAssocArrayDemo hello
- empty
ternAssocArrayDemo foo
- foo
- bar
ternAssocArrayDemo bar
- foo
- bar
- baz
ternAssocArrayDemo baz
- baz
The top answer [[ $b = 5 ]] && a="$c" || a="$d" should only be used if you are certain there will be no error after the &&, otherwise it will incorrectly excute the part after the ||.
To solve that problem I wrote a ternary function that behaves as it should and it even uses the ? and : operators:
Edit - new solution
Here is my new solution that does not use $IFS nor ev(a/i)l.
function executeCmds()
{
declare s s1 s2 i j k
declare -A cmdParts
declare pIFS=$IFS
IFS=$'\n'
declare results=($(echo "$1" | grep -oP '{ .*? }'))
IFS=$pIFS
s="$1"
for ((i=0; i < ${#results[#]}; i++)); do
s="${s/${results[$i]}/'\0'}"
results[$i]="${results[$i]:2:${#results[$i]}-3}"
results[$i]=$(echo ${results[$i]%%";"*})
done
s="$s&&"
let cmdParts[t]=0
while :; do
i=${cmdParts[t]}
let cmdParts[$i,t]=0
s1="${s%%"&&"*}||"
while :; do
j=${cmdParts[$i,t]}
let cmdParts[$i,$j,t]=0
s2="${s1%%"||"*};"
while :; do
cmdParts[$i,$j,${cmdParts[$i,$j,t]}]=$(echo ${s2%%";"*})
s2=${s2#*";"}
let cmdParts[$i,$j,t]++
[[ $s2 ]] && continue
break
done
s1=${s1#*"||"}
let cmdParts[$i,t]++
[[ $s1 ]] && continue
break
done
let cmdParts[t]++
s=${s#*"&&"}
[[ $s ]] && continue
break
done
declare lastError=0
declare skipNext=false
for ((i=0; i < ${cmdParts[t]}; i++ )) ; do
let j=0
while :; do
let k=0
while :; do
if $skipNext; then
skipNext=false
else
if [[ "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]}" == "\0" ]]; then
executeCmds "${results[0]}" && lastError=0 || lastError=1
results=("${results[#]:1}")
elif [[ "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]:0:1}" == "!" || "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]:0:1}" == "-" ]]; then
[ ${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]} ] && lastError=0 || lastError=1
else
${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]}
lastError=$?
fi
if (( k+1 < cmdParts[$i,$j,t] )); then
skipNext=false
elif (( j+1 < cmdParts[$i,t] )); then
(( lastError==0 )) && skipNext=true || skipNext=false
elif (( i+1 < cmdParts[t] )); then
(( lastError==0 )) && skipNext=false || skipNext=true
fi
fi
let k++
[[ $k<${cmdParts[$i,$j,t]} ]] || break
done
let j++
[[ $j<${cmdParts[$i,t]} ]] || break
done
done
return $lastError
}
function t()
{
declare commands="$#"
find="$(echo ?)"
replace='?'
commands="${commands/$find/$replace}"
readarray -d '?' -t statement <<< "$commands"
condition=${statement[0]}
readarray -d ':' -t statement <<< "${statement[1]}"
success="${statement[0]}"
failure="${statement[1]}"
executeCmds "$condition" || { executeCmds "$failure"; return; }
executeCmds "$success"
}
executeCmds separates each command individually, apart from the ones that should be skipped due to the && and || operators. It uses [] whenever a command starts with ! or a flag.
There are two ways to pass commands to it:
Pass the individual commands unquoted but be sure to quote ;, &&, and || operators.
t ls / ? ls qqq '||' echo aaa : echo bbb '&&' ls qq
Pass all the commands quoted:
t 'ls /a ? ls qqq || echo aaa : echo bbb && ls qq'
NB I found no way to pass in && and || operators as parameters unquoted, as they are illegal characters for function names and aliases, and I found no way to override bash operators.
Old solution - uses ev(a/i)l
function t()
{
pIFS=$IFS
IFS="?"
read condition success <<< "$#"
IFS=":"
read success failure <<< "$success"
IFS=$pIFS
eval "$condition" || { eval "$failure" ; return; }
eval "$success"
}
t ls / ? ls qqq '||' echo aaa : echo bbb '&&' ls qq
t 'ls /a ? ls qqq || echo aaa : echo bbb && ls qq'
What about such approach:
# any your function
function check () {
echo 'checking...';
# Change the following to 'true' to emulate a successful execution.
# Note: You can replace check function with any function you wish.
# Be aware in linux false and true are funcitons themselves. see 'help false' for instance.
false;
}
# double check pattern
check && echo 'update' \
|| check || echo 'create';
See how conditional statements works in the RxJs (i.e. filter pipe).
Yes, it is code duplication but more functional approach from my point of view.
I am attempting to run a block of code if one flag is set to true and the other is set to false. ie
var1=true
var2=false
if [[ $var1 && ! $var2 ]]; then var2="something"; fi
Since that did not evaluate the way that I expected I wrote several other test cases and I am having a hard time understanding how they are being evaluated.
aa=true
bb=false
cc="python"
if [[ "$aa" ]]; then echo "Test0" ; fi
if [[ "$bb" ]]; then echo "Test0.1" ; fi
if [[ !"$aa" ]]; then echo "Test0.2" ; fi
if [[ ! "$aa" ]]; then echo "Test0.3" ; fi
if [[ "$aa" && ! "$bb" ]]; then echo "Test1" ; fi
if [[ "$aa" && ! "$aa" ]]; then echo "Test2" ; fi
if [[ "$aa" ]] && ! [[ "$bb" ]]; then echo "test3" ; fi
if [[ "$aa" ]] && ! [[ "$cc" ]]; then echo "test4" ; fi
if [[ $aa && ! $bb ]]; then echo "Test5" ; fi
if [[ $aa && ! $aa ]]; then echo "Test6" ; fi
if [[ $aa ]] && ! [[ $bb ]]; then echo "test7" ; fi
if [[ $aa ]] && ! [[ $cc ]]; then echo "test8" ; fi
When I run the preceding codeblock the only output I get is
Test0
Test0.1
Test0.2
however, my expectation is that I would get
Test0
Test1
Test3
Test5
Test7
I have tried to understand the best way to run similar tests, however most examples I have found are set up in the format of
if [[ "$aa" == true ]];
which is not quite what I want to do. So my question is what is the best way to make comparisons like this, and why do several of the test cases that I would expect to pass simply not?
Thank you!
Without any operators, [[ only checks if the variable is empty. If it is, then it is considered false, otherwise it is considered true. The contents of the variables do not matter.
Your understanding of booleans in shell context is incorrect.
var1=true
var2=false
Both the above variables are true since those are non-empty strings.
You could instead make use of arithmetic context:
$ a=1
$ b=0
$ ((a==1 && b==0)) && echo y
y
$ ((a==0 && b==0)) && echo y
$
$ ((a && !(b))) && echo y; # This seems to be analogous to what you were attempting
y
The shell does not have Boolean variables, per se. However, there are commands named true and false whose exit statuses are 0 and 1, respectively, and so can be used similarly to Boolean values.
var1=true
var2=false
if $var1 && ! $var2; then var2="something"; fi
The difference is that instead of testing if var1 is set to a true value, you expand it to the name of a command, which runs and succeeds. Likewise, var2 is expanded to a command name which runs and fails, but because it is prefixed with ! the exit status is inverted to indicate success.
(Note that unlike most programming languages, an exit status of 0 indicates success because while most commands have 1 way to succeed, there are many different ways they could fail, so different non-zero values can be assigned different meanings.)
true and false are evaluated as strings ;)
[[ $var ]] is an equivalent of [[ -n $var ]] that check if $var is empty or not.
Then, no need to quote your variables inside [[. See this reminder.
Finally, here is an explication of the difference between && inside brackets and outside.
The closest you can come seems to be use functions instead of variables because you can use their return status in conditionals.
$ var1() { return 0; }
$ var2() { return 1; } # !0 = failure ~ false
and we can test this way
$ var1 && echo "it's true" || echo "it's false"
it's true
$ var2 && echo "it's true" || echo "it's false"
it's false
or this way
$ if var1; then echo "it's true"; else echo "it's false"; fi
it's true
$ if var2; then echo "it's true"; else echo "it's false"; fi
it's false
Hope this helps.
I'm currently writing a bash testing framework, where in a test function, both standard bash tests ([[) as well as predefined matchers can be used. Matchers are wrappers to '[[' and besides returning a return code, set some meaningful message saying what was expected.
Example:
string_equals() {
if [[ ! $1 = $2 ]]; then
error_message="Expected '$1' to be '$2'."
return 1
fi
}
So, when a matcher is used, and it fails, only then an error_message is set.
Now, at some point later, I test whether the tests succeeded. If it succeeded, I print the expectation in green, if it failed in red.
Furthermore, there may be an error_message set, so I test if a message exists, print it, and then unset it (because the following test may not set an error_message):
if [[ $error_message ]]; then
printf '%s\n' "$error_message"
unset -v error_message
fi
Now my question is, if it is better to unset the variable, or to just set it to '', like
error_message=''
Which one is better? Does it actually make a difference? Or maybe should I have an additional flag indicating that the message was set?
Mostly you don't see a difference, unless you are using set -u:
/home/user1> var=""
/home/user1> echo $var
/home/user1> set -u
/home/user1> echo $var
/home/user1> unset var
/home/user1> echo $var
-bash: var: unbound variable
So really, it depends on how you are going to test the variable.
I will add that my preferred way of testing if it is set is:
[[ -n $var ]] # True if the length of $var is non-zero
or
[[ -z $var ]] # True if zero length
As has been said, using unset is different with arrays as well
$ foo=(4 5 6)
$ foo[2]=
$ echo ${#foo[*]}
3
$ unset foo[2]
$ echo ${#foo[*]}
2
So, by unset'ting the array index 2, you essentially remove that element in the array and decrement the array size (?).
I made my own test..
foo=(5 6 8)
echo ${#foo[*]}
unset foo
echo ${#foo[*]}
Which results in..
3
0
So just to clarify that unset'ting the entire array will in fact remove it entirely.
Based on the comments above, here is a simple test:
isunset() { [[ "${!1}" != 'x' ]] && [[ "${!1-x}" == 'x' ]] && echo 1; }
isset() { [ -z "$(isunset "$1")" ] && echo 1; }
Example:
$ unset foo; [[ $(isunset foo) ]] && echo "It's unset" || echo "It's set"
It's unset
$ foo= ; [[ $(isunset foo) ]] && echo "It's unset" || echo "It's set"
It's set
$ foo=bar ; [[ $(isunset foo) ]] && echo "It's unset" || echo "It's set"
It's set
Is it possible to override Bash's test builtin? So that
[[ $1 = 'a' ]]
not just does the test but also outputs which result was expected when it fails? Something like
echo "Expected $1 to be a.'
EDIT
I know this is bad :-).
The test expression compound command does real short-circuiting that affects all expansions.
$ set -x
$ [[ 0 -gt x=1+1 || ++x -eq $(tee /dev/fd/3 <<<$x) && $(echo 'nope' >&3) ]] 3>&1
+ [[ 0 -gt x=1+1 ]]
++ tee /dev/fd/2
2
+ [[ ++x -eq 2 ]]
So yes you could do anything in a single test expression. In reality it's quite rare to have a test produce a side-effect, and almost never used to produce output.
Also yes, reserved words can be overridden. Bash is more lenient with ksh-style function definitions than POSIX style (which still allows some invalid names).
function [[ { [ "${#:1:${##}-1}" ]; }; \[[ -a -o -a -o -a ]] || echo lulz
Yet another forky bomb.
if function function if function if if \function & then \if & fi && \if & then \function & fi && then \function fi
Something like this?
if [[ $1 == 'a' ]]; then
echo "all right";
else
echo 'Expected $1 to be "a"'
fi
Anyway, what's the point of the test if you only expect one answer? Or do you mean that for debugging purposes?
[[ 'a' = 'a' ]] || echo "failed"
[[ 'b' = 'a' ]] || echo "failed"
failed
Is there a way to do something like this
int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
using Bash?
ternary operator ? : is just short form of if/else
case "$b" in
5) a=$c ;;
*) a=$d ;;
esac
Or
[[ $b = 5 ]] && a="$c" || a="$d"
Code:
a=$([ "$b" == 5 ] && echo "$c" || echo "$d")
If the condition is merely checking if a variable is set, there's even a shorter form:
a=${VAR:-20}
will assign to a the value of VAR if VAR is set, otherwise it will assign it the default value 20 -- this can also be a result of an expression.
This approach is technically called "Parameter Expansion".
if [[ $b -eq 5 ]]; then a="$c"; else a="$d"; fi
The cond && op1 || op2 expression suggested in other answers has an inherent bug: if op1 has a nonzero exit status, op2 silently becomes the result; the error will also not be caught in -e mode. So, that expression is only safe to use if op1 can never fail (e.g., :, true if a builtin, or variable assignment without any operations that can fail (like division and OS calls)).
Note the "" quotes. They will prevent translation of all whitespace into single spaces.
Double square brackets as opposed to single ones prevent incorrect operation if $b is equal to a test operator (e.g. "-z"; a workaround with [ is [ "x$b" == "xyes" ] and it only works for string comparison); they also lift the requirement for quoting.
(( a = b==5 ? c : d )) # string + numeric
[ $b == 5 ] && { a=$c; true; } || a=$d
This will avoid executing the part after || by accident when the code between && and || fails.
We can use following three ways in Shell Scripting for ternary operator :
[ $numVar == numVal ] && resVar="Yop" || resVar="Nop"
Or
resVar=$([ $numVar == numVal ] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop")
Or
(( numVar == numVal ? (resVar=1) : (resVar=0) ))
Update: Extending the answer for string computations with below ready-to-run example. This is making use of second format mentioned above.
$ strVar='abc';resVar=$([[ $strVar == 'abc' ]] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop");echo $resVar
Yop
$ strVar='aaa';resVar=$([[ $strVar == 'abc' ]] && echo "Yop" || echo "Nop");echo $resVar
Nop
The let command supports most of the basic operators one would need:
let a=b==5?c:d;
Naturally, this works only for assigning variables; it cannot execute other commands.
Here is another option where you only have to specify the variable you're assigning once, and it doesn't matter whether what your assigning is a string or a number:
VARIABLE=`[ test ] && echo VALUE_A || echo VALUE_B`
Just a thought. :)
There's also a very similar but simpler syntax for ternary conditionals in bash:
a=$(( b == 5 ? 123 : 321 ))
The following seems to work for my use cases:
Examples
$ tern 1 YES NO
YES
$ tern 0 YES NO
NO
$ tern 52 YES NO
YES
$ tern 52 YES NO 52
NO
and can be used in a script like so:
RESULT=$(tern 1 YES NO)
echo "The result is $RESULT"
tern
#!/usr/bin/env bash
function show_help()
{
ME=$(basename "$0")
IT=$(cat <<EOF
Returns a ternary result
usage: BOOLEAN VALUE_IF_TRUE VALUE_IF_FALSE
e.g.
# YES
$ME 1 YES NO
# NO
$ME 0 YES NO
# NO
$ME "" YES NO
# YES
$ME "STRING THAT ISNT BLANK OR 0" YES NO
# INFO contains NO
INFO=\$($ME 0 YES NO)
EOF
)
echo "$IT"
echo
exit
}
if [ "$1" = "help" ] || [ "$1" = '?' ] || [ "$1" = "--help" ] || [ "$1" = "h" ]; then
show_help
fi
if [ -z "$3" ]
then
show_help
fi
# Set a default value for what is "false" -> 0
FALSE_VALUE=${4:-0}
function main
{
if [ "$1" == "$FALSE_VALUE" ] || [ "$1" = '' ]; then
echo $3
exit;
fi;
echo $2
}
main "$1" "$2" "$3"
Here's a general solution, that
works with string tests as well
feels rather like an expression
avoids any subtle side effects when the condition fails
Test with numerical comparison
a=$(if [ "$b" -eq 5 ]; then echo "$c"; else echo "$d"; fi)
Test with String comparison
a=$(if [ "$b" = "5" ]; then echo "$c"; else echo "$d"; fi)
(ping -c1 localhost&>/dev/null) && { echo "true"; } || { echo "false"; }
You can use this if you want similar syntax
a=$(( $((b==5)) ? c : d ))
Some people have already presented some nice alternatives. I wanted to get the syntax as close as possible, so I wrote a function named ?.
This allows for the syntax:
[[ $x -eq 1 ]]; ? ./script1 : ./script2
# or
? '[[ $x -eq 1 ]]' ./script1 : ./script2
In both cases, the : is optional. All arguments that have spaces, the values must be quoted since it runs them with eval.
If the <then> or <else> clauses aren't commands, the function echos the proper value.
./script; ? Success! : "Failure :("
The function
?() {
local lastRet=$?
if [[ $1 == --help || $1 == -? ]]; then
echo $'\e[37;1mUsage:\e[0m
? [<condition>] <then> [:] <else>
If \e[37;1m<then>\e[0m and/or \e[37;1m<else>\e[0m are not valid commands, then their values are
printed to stdOut, otherwise they are executed. If \e[37;1m<condition>\e[0m is not
specified, evaluates the return code ($?) of the previous statement.
\e[37;1mExamples:\e[0m
myVar=$(? "[[ $x -eq 1 ]] foo bar)
\e[32;2m# myVar is set to "foo" if x is 1, else it is set to "bar"\e[0m
? "[[ $x = *foo* ]] "cat hello.txt" : "cat goodbye.txt"
\e[32;2m# runs cat on "hello.txt" if x contains the word "foo", else runs cat on
# "goodbye.txt"\e[0m
? "[[ $x -eq 1 ]] "./script1" "./script2"; ? "Succeeded!" "Failed :("
\e[32;2m# If x = 1, runs script1, else script2. If the run script succeeds, prints
# "Succeeded!", else prints "failed".\e[0m'
return
elif ! [[ $# -eq 2 || $# -eq 3 || $# -eq 4 && $3 == ':' ]]; then
1>&2 echo $'\e[37;1m?\e[0m requires 2 to 4 arguments
\e[37;1mUsage\e[0m: ? [<condition>] <then> [:] <else>
Run \e[37;1m? --help\e[0m for more details'
return 1
fi
local cmd
if [[ $# -eq 2 || $# -eq 3 && $2 == ':' ]]; then
cmd="[[ $lastRet -eq 0 ]]"
else
cmd="$1"
shift
fi
if [[ $2 == ':' ]]; then
eval "set -- '$1' '$3'"
fi
local result=$(eval "$cmd" && echo "$1" || echo "$2")
if command -v ${result[0]} &> /dev/null; then
eval "${result[#]}"
else
echo "${result[#]}"
fi
}
Obviously if you want the script to be shorter, you can remove the help text.
EDIT: I was unaware that ? acts as a placeholder character in a file name. Rather than matching any number of characters like *, it matches exactly one character. So, if you have a one-character file in your working directory, bash will try to run the filename as a command. I'm not sure how to get around this. I thought using command "?" ...args might work but, no dice.
Simplest ternary
brew list | grep -q bat && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
This example will determine if you used homebrew to install bat or not yet
If true you will see "yes"
If false you will see "no"
I added the -q to suppress the grepped string output here, so you only see "yes" or "no"
Really the pattern you seek is this
doSomethingAndCheckTruth && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
Tested with bash and zsh
Here are some options:
1- Use if then else in one line, it is possible.
if [[ "$2" == "raiz" ]] || [[ "$2" == '.' ]]; then pasta=''; else pasta="$2"; fi
2- Write a function like this:
# Once upon a time, there was an 'iif' function in MS VB ...
function iif(){
# Echoes $2 if 1,banana,true,etc and $3 if false,null,0,''
case $1 in ''|false|FALSE|null|NULL|0) echo $3;;*) echo $2;;esac
}
use inside script like this
result=`iif "$expr" 'yes' 'no'`
# or even interpolating:
result=`iif "$expr" "positive" "negative, because $1 is not true"`
3- Inspired in the case answer, a more flexible and one line use is:
case "$expr" in ''|false|FALSE|null|NULL|0) echo "no...$expr";;*) echo "yep $expr";;esac
# Expression can be something like:
expr=`expr "$var1" '>' "$var2"`
This is much like Vladimir's fine answer. If your "ternary" is a case of "if true, string, if false, empty", then you can simply do:
$ c="it was five"
$ b=3
$ a="$([[ $b -eq 5 ]] && echo "$c")"
$ echo $a
$ b=5
$ a="$([[ $b -eq 5 ]] && echo "$c")"
$ echo $a
it was five
A string-oriented alternative, that uses an array:
spec=(IGNORE REPLACE)
for p in {13..15}; do
echo "$p: ${spec[p==14]}";
done
which outputs:
13: IGNORE
14: REPLACE
15: IGNORE
to answer to : int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
just write:
b=5
c=1
d=2
let a="(b==5)?c:d"
echo $a # 1
b=6;
c=1;
d=2;
let a="(b==5)?c:d"
echo $a # 2
remember that " expression " is equivalent to $(( expression ))
Two more answers
Here's some ways of thinking about this
bash integer variables
In addition to, dutCh, Vladimir and ghostdog74's corrects answers and because this question is regarding integer and tagged bash:
Is there a way to do something like this
int a = (b == 5) ? c : d;
There is a nice and proper way to work with integers under bash:
declare -i b=' RANDOM % 3 + 4 ' c=100 d=50 a=' b == 5 ? c : d '; echo $b '-->' $a
The output line from this command should by one of:
4 --> 50
5 --> 100
6 --> 50
Of course, declaring integer type of variable is to be done once:
declare -i a b c d
c=100 d=50 b=RANDOM%3+4
a=' b == 5 ? c : d '
echo $a $b
100 5
b=12 a=b==5?c:d
echo $a $b
50 12
Digression: Using a string as a math function:
mathString=' b == 5 ? c : d '
b=5 a=$mathString
echo $a $b
100 5
b=1 a=$mathString
echo $a $b
50 1
Based on parameter expansion and indirection
Following answers from Brad Parks and druid62, here is a way not limited to integer:
c=50 d=100 ar=([5]=c)
read -p 'Enter B: ' b
e=${ar[b]:-d};echo ${!e}
If b==5, then ar[b] is c and indirection do c is 50.
Else ar[any value other than 5] is empty, so parameter expansion will default to d, where indirection give 100.
Same demo using an array instead of an integer
ternArrayDemo(){
local -a c=(foo bar) d=(foo bar baz) e=(empty) ar=([5]=c [2]=d)
local b=${ar[$1]:-e}
b+=[#] # For array indirection
printf ' - %s\n' "${!b}"
}
Then
ternArrayDemo 0
- empty
ternArrayDemo 2
- foo
- bar
- baz
ternArrayDemo 4
- empty
ternArrayDemo 5
- foo
- bar
ternArrayDemo 6
- empty
Or using associative arrays
ternAssocArrayDemo(){
local -a c=(foo bar) d=(foo bar baz) e=(empty)
local -A ar=([foo]=c[#] [bar]=d[#] [baz]=d[-1])
local b=${ar[$1]:-e[#]}
printf ' - %s\n' "${!b}"
}
Then
ternAssocArrayDemo hello
- empty
ternAssocArrayDemo foo
- foo
- bar
ternAssocArrayDemo bar
- foo
- bar
- baz
ternAssocArrayDemo baz
- baz
The top answer [[ $b = 5 ]] && a="$c" || a="$d" should only be used if you are certain there will be no error after the &&, otherwise it will incorrectly excute the part after the ||.
To solve that problem I wrote a ternary function that behaves as it should and it even uses the ? and : operators:
Edit - new solution
Here is my new solution that does not use $IFS nor ev(a/i)l.
function executeCmds()
{
declare s s1 s2 i j k
declare -A cmdParts
declare pIFS=$IFS
IFS=$'\n'
declare results=($(echo "$1" | grep -oP '{ .*? }'))
IFS=$pIFS
s="$1"
for ((i=0; i < ${#results[#]}; i++)); do
s="${s/${results[$i]}/'\0'}"
results[$i]="${results[$i]:2:${#results[$i]}-3}"
results[$i]=$(echo ${results[$i]%%";"*})
done
s="$s&&"
let cmdParts[t]=0
while :; do
i=${cmdParts[t]}
let cmdParts[$i,t]=0
s1="${s%%"&&"*}||"
while :; do
j=${cmdParts[$i,t]}
let cmdParts[$i,$j,t]=0
s2="${s1%%"||"*};"
while :; do
cmdParts[$i,$j,${cmdParts[$i,$j,t]}]=$(echo ${s2%%";"*})
s2=${s2#*";"}
let cmdParts[$i,$j,t]++
[[ $s2 ]] && continue
break
done
s1=${s1#*"||"}
let cmdParts[$i,t]++
[[ $s1 ]] && continue
break
done
let cmdParts[t]++
s=${s#*"&&"}
[[ $s ]] && continue
break
done
declare lastError=0
declare skipNext=false
for ((i=0; i < ${cmdParts[t]}; i++ )) ; do
let j=0
while :; do
let k=0
while :; do
if $skipNext; then
skipNext=false
else
if [[ "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]}" == "\0" ]]; then
executeCmds "${results[0]}" && lastError=0 || lastError=1
results=("${results[#]:1}")
elif [[ "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]:0:1}" == "!" || "${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]:0:1}" == "-" ]]; then
[ ${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]} ] && lastError=0 || lastError=1
else
${cmdParts[$i,$j,$k]}
lastError=$?
fi
if (( k+1 < cmdParts[$i,$j,t] )); then
skipNext=false
elif (( j+1 < cmdParts[$i,t] )); then
(( lastError==0 )) && skipNext=true || skipNext=false
elif (( i+1 < cmdParts[t] )); then
(( lastError==0 )) && skipNext=false || skipNext=true
fi
fi
let k++
[[ $k<${cmdParts[$i,$j,t]} ]] || break
done
let j++
[[ $j<${cmdParts[$i,t]} ]] || break
done
done
return $lastError
}
function t()
{
declare commands="$#"
find="$(echo ?)"
replace='?'
commands="${commands/$find/$replace}"
readarray -d '?' -t statement <<< "$commands"
condition=${statement[0]}
readarray -d ':' -t statement <<< "${statement[1]}"
success="${statement[0]}"
failure="${statement[1]}"
executeCmds "$condition" || { executeCmds "$failure"; return; }
executeCmds "$success"
}
executeCmds separates each command individually, apart from the ones that should be skipped due to the && and || operators. It uses [] whenever a command starts with ! or a flag.
There are two ways to pass commands to it:
Pass the individual commands unquoted but be sure to quote ;, &&, and || operators.
t ls / ? ls qqq '||' echo aaa : echo bbb '&&' ls qq
Pass all the commands quoted:
t 'ls /a ? ls qqq || echo aaa : echo bbb && ls qq'
NB I found no way to pass in && and || operators as parameters unquoted, as they are illegal characters for function names and aliases, and I found no way to override bash operators.
Old solution - uses ev(a/i)l
function t()
{
pIFS=$IFS
IFS="?"
read condition success <<< "$#"
IFS=":"
read success failure <<< "$success"
IFS=$pIFS
eval "$condition" || { eval "$failure" ; return; }
eval "$success"
}
t ls / ? ls qqq '||' echo aaa : echo bbb '&&' ls qq
t 'ls /a ? ls qqq || echo aaa : echo bbb && ls qq'
What about such approach:
# any your function
function check () {
echo 'checking...';
# Change the following to 'true' to emulate a successful execution.
# Note: You can replace check function with any function you wish.
# Be aware in linux false and true are funcitons themselves. see 'help false' for instance.
false;
}
# double check pattern
check && echo 'update' \
|| check || echo 'create';
See how conditional statements works in the RxJs (i.e. filter pipe).
Yes, it is code duplication but more functional approach from my point of view.