I'm using ASP.NET Core 3.1. I have written some code like the following and now I want to get the result of these two queries that has the same size and iterate over each one of them and divide their element and store the result in a list. But now the problem is in my zip method, I can not specify exactly which attribute of each query I want to divide.
var mytotal = _context.Apiapp.GroupBy(o => new
{
Month = o.ApiRequestDate.Substring(4, 2),
Year = o.ApiRequestDate.Substring(0, 4)
}).Select(g => new
{
Month = g.Key.Month,
Year = g.Key.Year,
Total = g.Count()
}).OrderByDescending(a => a.Year).ThenByDescending(a => a.Month).ToList();
var numerator = from t1 in _context.Apiapp
join t2 in _context.ApiAppHistory on t1.Id equals t2.ApiApplicantId
join t3 in _context.EntityType on t2.LastReqStatus equals t3.Id
where t1.IsDeleted == false && t1.LastRequestStatus == t2.Id && t3.Name == "granted"
group new { Year = t1.ApiRequestDate.Substring(0, 4), Month = t1.ApiRequestDate.Substring(4, 2) }
by new { t2.LastReqStatus } into g
select new
{
Year = g.Max(n => n.Year),
Month = g.Max(n => n.Month),
GrantedCount = g.Count()
};
var GrantedReqStatus = numerator.ToList();
var GrantedAccessPercent = new List<Double>();
//-------------------------------------------------------
var res = mytotal.Zip(GrantedReqStatus, (total, GrantedCount) => new { Num = total, Denum = GrantedCount });
foreach(var r in res)
{
GrantedAccessPercent.Add(r.Num/r.Denum);
}
Here inside the body of foreach, r.Num and r.Denum is unknown! I appreciate of any help to fix the error.
The Num and DemNum in the Zip function represent objects for the first and second collection, that contains Month,Year and Total for the total object and Month,Year and GrantedCount for the grantedCount object.
You could use total.Total and grantedCount.GrantedCount to get numbers, like the following code:
var res = mytotal.Zip(GrantedReqStatus, (total, grantedCount) => new { Num = total.Total, Denum = grantedCount.GrantedCount });
foreach(var r in res)
{
GrantedAccessPercent.Add(Math.Round(r.Num / (double)r.DemNum, 2));
}
Note that, to divide int1/int2 you need to cast int2 to double, Will give the expected result, and you can use also Math.Round to specify numbers after comma.
I hope this help you fix the issue.
Related
I need to return all records (items) that has a part (X) so I can use that in a group or .GroupBy afterwards
Using this summary data:
ItemName PartName
1 A
1 B
2 A
3 C
So Item1 has two parts (A,B), etc...
I need a LINQ query that will
- find all items that have part A (i.e items 1 and 2)
- return all rows for all these items
1 A
1 B
2 A
Notice that the end result returned the row (1 B) because Item1 has PartA and so I need to get back all rows for Item1.
I was looking at something like:
let items = from data in summary where data.PartName == A select new { data.ItemName } // to get all the items I need
But then, now that I have that list I need to use it to get all the rows for all items listed, and I can't seem to figure it out ...
Actual Source Code (for reference):
NOTE:
Recipe = ITEM
Ingredient = PART
(I was just trying to make it simpler)
ViewFullRecipeGrouping = (
from data in ViewRecipeSummary
group data by data.RecipeName into recipeGroup
let fullIngredientGroups = recipeGroup.GroupBy(x => x.IngredientName)
select new ViewFullRecipe()
{
RecipeName = recipeGroup.Key,
RecipeIngredients = (
from ingredientGroup in fullIngredientGroups
select new GroupIngredient()
{
IngredientName = ingredientGroup.Key
}
).ToList(),
ViewGroupRecipes = (
from data in ViewRecipeSummary
// this is where I am looking to add the new logic to define something I can then use within the next select statement that has the right data based on the information I got earlier in this query.
let a = ViewRecipeSummary.GroupBy(x => x.RecipeName)
.Where(g => g.Any(x => x.IngredientName == recipeGroup.Key))
.Select(g => new ViewRecipe()
{
RecipeName = g.Key,
IngredientName = g.Select(x => x.IngredientName)
})
select new GroupRecipe()
{
// use the new stuff here
}).ToList(),
}).ToList();
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
I believe this does what you want:
var data = /* enumerable containing rows in your table */;
var part = "X";
var items = new HashSet<int>(data
.Where(x => x.PartName == part)
.Select(x => x.ItemName));
var query = data.Where(x => items.Contains(x.ItemName));
If I understand your comment at the end, I believe this also does what you want:
var query = data
.GroupBy(x => x.ItemName)
.Where(g => g.Any(x => x.PartName == part))
.Select(g => new
{
ItemName = g.Key,
PartNames = g.Select(x => x.PartName)
});
I have an array filled with long type values and for each value in the array I need to implement a query. I used foreach loop as you can see from the code below:
var result;
foreach(long id in PrdIdArr)
{
var mainQuery = (from o in db.OPERATIONs
join u in db.UNITs on o.OP_UNIT_ID equals u.UNIT_ID into smt
from s in smt
join x in db.XIDs on s.UNIT_ID equals x.UNIT_ID
where o.OP_OT_CODE == OtCode
where x.IDTYP_CD == "BSN"
where s.START_PRD_ID == id
where o.OP_UPD_DATE >= _StartDate
where o.OP_UPD_DATE <= _EndDate
select new
{
o.OP_ID,
o.OP_UPD_DATE,
x.EXTERNAL_ID,
o.OP_OS_CODE,
o.OP_START,
o.OP_ST_STATION,
s.START_PRD_ID
}).Take(_RowNumber);
//var result = mainQuery.ToList();
result.add(mainQuery.ToList());
}
data = this.Json(result);
data.JsonRequestBehavior = JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet;
return data;
However, I have a problem in my code; I have to define a main list just before the foreach loop so that I could add results of each query to the that main list. my question is: How can I define this list as you can see at the beginning of my code? Thanks for the help...
How can I define this list as you can see at the beginning of my code?
Make
new {
o.OP_ID,
o.OP_UPD_DATE,
x.EXTERNAL_ID,
o.OP_OS_CODE,
o.OP_START,
o.OP_ST_STATION,
s.START_PRD_ID
}
into a concrete type (say QueryResult, although something a little more specific than that), and then just declare
var result = new List<QueryResult>();
Also, you should consider turning
foreach(long id in PrdIdArr)
and
where s.START_PRD_ID == id
into
where PrdIdArr.Contains(s.Start_PRD_ID)
var result = new List<object>();
foreach(long id in PrdIdArr)
{
....
result.Add(mainQuery.ToList());
}
You could do this:
var result = PrdIdArr.Select(id =>
from o in db.OPERATIONs
join u in db.UNITs on o.OP_UNIT_ID equals u.UNIT_ID into smt
from s in smt
join x in db.XIDs on s.UNIT_ID equals x.UNIT_ID
where o.OP_OT_CODE == OtCode
where x.IDTYP_CD == "BSN"
where s.START_PRD_ID == id
where o.OP_UPD_DATE >= _StartDate
where o.OP_UPD_DATE <= _EndDate
select new
{
o.OP_ID,
o.OP_UPD_DATE,
x.EXTERNAL_ID,
o.OP_OS_CODE,
o.OP_START,
o.OP_ST_STATION,
s.START_PRD_ID
}
.Take(_RowNumber)
.ToList()
).ToList();
I highly recommend performing some Extract Method refactorings, as the code is pretty complex and hard to understand/mange this way.
Just create the anonymous type outside with the same property names and the correct type
var result = Enumerable.Range(0, 0).Select(x => new
{
OP_ID = 1,
OP_UPD_DATE = DateTime.Now,
EXTERNAL_ID = 1,
OP_OS_CODE = 1,
OP_START = DateTIme.Now,
OP_ST_STATION = "",
START_PRD_ID = 1,
}).ToList();
And in your loop call AddRange
result.AddRange(mainQuery.ToList());
The following code works, but it's not a nice code. (low performance)
I have a dictionary with value and key.
First i go trough every webcodes who exist. Then i load all participants in a list (where webcode equals the actual webcode in the foreach). After that i add the data (parameter of the webcode and a count of participants to the dictionary).
Guid compID = Guid.Parse(wID);
ChartModel webcodes = new ChartModel();
webcodes.Title = "Webcodes Statistics";
webcodes.Data = new Dictionary<string, int>();
var webcodesData = db.t_Webcode;
foreach (var w in webcodesData)
{
var wData = db.t_Participant.Where(t => t.FK_Competition == compID && t.Webcode == w.Webcode);
if (wData.Count() != 0)
webcodes.Data.Add(w.Parameter, wData.Count());
}
ViewBag.Webcodes = webcodes;
TIA
You need something along these lines:
webcodes.Data = (from w in db.t_Webcode
join p in db.t_Participant on w.Webcode equals p.Webcode
where p.FK_Competition == compID
group w by w.Parameter into g
select new { g.Key, Count = g.Count() }).ToDictionary();
I can't test it but that is the type of query you need.
This will assume that you have relationships defined in your database and that your LINQ to SQL datacontext are aware of them. If not, you will need to join manually on t_Participants from tWebcode.
This should execute in 1 single SQL query, instead of 1 query per row in tWebcode.
var webcodesAndNoOfParticipants =
from webcode in db.tWebcode
// Define number of participants for this webcode
let numberOfParticipants = webcode.t_Participants.Count(participant => participant.FK_Competition == compID)
where numberOfParticipants > 0
select new {
WebcodeParameter = webcode.Parameter,
NoOfParticipants = numberOfParticipants
};
webcodes.Data = webcodesAndNoOfParticipants.ToDictionary(x => x.WebcodeParameter, x => x.NoOfParticipants);
I have the following linq and its working great but i need to be able to check a variable and depending on value only show a subset of the records. I will explain..
Here is the SQL
var test = from c in db.C
select new {
Period = c.M.Period,
Group = c.Code,
Code = c.ClientCode,
Name = c.ClientName,
Amount = (System.Int32)
((from m0 in db.M
where
m0.ClientCode == c.ClientCode
group m0 by new {
m0.ClientCode
} into g
select new {
Expr1 = (System.Int32)g.Sum(p => p.Amount)
}).First().Expr1)
}
This returns 6 records, The amount is the following in each record
100
200
300
400
500
600
I need to dynamically bolt on a where and check a variable called filter (in c#) and if filter is = 1 then return all records <300 and if filter is = 2 return all records >= 300 and if the variable is empty don't apply any filter and return all records.
Now where i am getting confused is that Amount isn't in the DB it is actually subquery.
Can anyone lend a hand?
I think it would help if you simplified your query to start with. You're using anonymous types for no particular reason (if there's only a single property, why bother?) and grouping by a value which you've already filtered by. In other words, your query is equivalent to:
var test = from c in db.C
select new {
Period = c.M.Period,
Group = c.Code,
Code = c.ClientCode,
Name = c.ClientName,
Amount = db.M
.Where(m0 => m0.ClientCode == c.ClientCode)
.Sum(m0 => m0.Amount)
};
Having a simpler query may make it easier to fix the rest of your problem. It may be as simple as:
var filtered = filter == 1 ? test.Where(t => t.Amount < 300)
: filter == 2 ? test.Where(t => t.Amount >= 300)
: test;
try this
var test = from c in db.C
select new {
Period = c.M.Period,
Group = c.Code,
Code = c.ClientCode,
Name = c.ClientName,
Amount = (System.Int32)
((from m0 in db.M
where
m0.ClientCode == c.ClientCode
group m0 by new {
m0.ClientCode
} into g
select new {
Expr1 = (System.Int32)g.Sum(p => p.Amount)
}).First().Expr1).Where(i =>
{
if (filter == 1)
i.Expr1 < 300;
else if (filter == 2)
i.Expr1 >= 300;
})
Basically I took Jon's answer and integrated the filter into the query:
int filter = 1;
Func<int, bool> isRelevant = (amount)=>{
switch(filter)
{
case 1: return amount < 300;
case 2: return amount > 300;
default: throw new ArgumentException();
}
};
var test = from c in db.C
let amount = db.M
.Where(m0 => m0.ClientCode == c.ClientCode)
.Sum(m0 => m0.Amount)
where isRelevant(amount)
select new
{
Period = c.M.Period,
Group = c.Code,
Code = c.ClientCode,
Name = c.ClientName,
Amount = amount
};
I have a linq statement which calls a stored proc and returns a list of items and descriptions.
Like so;
var q = from i in doh.usp_Report_PLC()
where i.QTYGood == 0
orderby i.PartNumber
select new Parts() { PartNumber = i.PartNumber, Description = i.Descritpion.TrimEnd() };
I then have another SQL statement which returns the quantities on order and delivery date for each of those items. The Parts class has two other properties to store these. How do I update the existing Parts list with the other two values so that there is one Parts list with all four values?
UPDATE
The following code now brings out results.
var a = from a1 in db.usp_Optos_DaysOnHand_Report_PLC()
where a1.QTYGood == 0
orderby a1.PartNumber
select new Parts() { PartNumber = a1.PartNumber, Description = a1.Descritpion.TrimEnd() };
var b = from b1 in db.POP10110s
join b2 in db.IV00101s on b1.ITEMNMBR equals b2.ITEMNMBR
//from b3 in j1.DefaultIfEmpty()
where b1.POLNESTA == 2 && b1.QTYCANCE == 0
group b1 by new { itemNumber = b2.ITMGEDSC } into g
select new Parts() { PartNumber = g.Key.itemNumber.TrimEnd(), QtyOnOrder = g.Sum(x => Convert.ToInt32(x.QTYORDER)), DeliveryDue = g.Max(x => x.REQDATE).ToShortDateString() };
var joinedList = a.Join(b,
usp => usp.PartNumber,
oss => oss.PartNumber,
(usp, oss) =>
new Parts
{
PartNumber = usp.PartNumber,
Description = usp.Description,
QtyOnOrder = oss.QtyOnOrder,
DeliveryDue = oss.DeliveryDue
});
return joinedList.ToList();
Assuming your "other SQL statement" returns PartNumber, Quantity and DeliveryDate, you can join the lists into one:
var joinedList = q.Join(OtherSQLStatement(),
usp => usp.PartNumber,
oss => oss.PartNumber,
(usp, oss) =>
new Parts
{
PartNumber = usp.PartNumber,
Description = usp.Description,
Quantity = oss.Quantity,
DeliveryDate = oss.DeliveryDate
}).ToList();
You can actually combine the queries and do this in one join and projection:
var joinedList = doh.usp_Report_PLC().
Where(i => i.QTYGood == 0).
OrderBy(i => i.PartNumber).
Join(OtherSQLStatement(),
i => i.PartNumber,
o => o.PartNumber,
(i, o) =>
new Parts
{
PartNumber = i.PartNumber,
Description = i.Description,
Quantity = o.Quantity,
DeliveryDate = o.DeliveryDate
}).ToList();
And again: I assume you have PartNumber in both returned collections to identify which item belongs to which.
Edit
In this case the LINQ Query syntax would probably be more readable:
var joinedList = from aElem in a
join bElem in b
on aElem.PartNumber equals bElem.PartNumber into joinedAB
from abElem in joinedAB.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new Part
{
PartNumber = aElem.PartNumber,
Description = aElem.Description,
DeliveryDue = abElem == null ? null : abElem.DeliveryDue,
QtyOnOrder = abElem == null ? null : abElem.QtyOnOrder
};
Your DeliveryDue and QtyOnOrder are probably nullable. If not, replace the nulls by your default values. E.g. if you don't have the element in b and want QtyOnOrder to be 0 in the resulting list, change the line to
QtyOnOrder = abElem == null ? 0 : abElem.QtyOnOrder