I just installed a standard license on jBASE but when I run jlicensinginfo it doesn't show the license as being changed. What did I do wrong?
You normally need to run "jLicenseUpgrade -r" to refresh shared memory before the new licensing information is available:
https://docs.zumasys.com/jbase/administration/installation-guides/licensing-a-jbase-system/#examples
Then use "jlicensinginfo -V" to verify that the license details are correct.
Mike
Related
I need to find an older version of Advanced Installer - specifically v12.7.2 - I know this is really old - for reasons out of my control this is the version I have to use. Could anyone point me where to download this installer? The website is up to v18 and I can't find anywhere there to get older versions.
Link of the company website https://www.advancedinstaller.com/download.html
If you have a license key, enter it here: https://www.advancedinstaller.com/customer-information.html
Otherwise, you can contact the company and they may be able to find it for you.
I am trying to write a cookbook to download and install Nessus Agent found here:
https://www.tenable.com/downloads/nessus-agents
But am having trouble due to an explicit download url not being provided, and the requirement of accepting the license agreement.
I am using windows_package to try and install it. Any help is appreciated.
I'm doing a similar thing with Ansible. For now I'm working around it by keeping the install package in my Ansible files and uploading it to the target for deployment.
Not the most efficient approach. But does also ensure we've accepted the license agreement prior to download, which is probably what Tenable want.
Anyone have this error, ITMS-90046?
In the Apple Developer Center in the App IDs section check if you activated the Associated Domains capabilities for your Bundle
If yes and you do not need it disable it and regenerate your App Store mobileprovision.
If you really need that feature you need to setup the associated domains within your app. More information on Apple Doc
Apple Developer Program Support
technical notes and troubleshooting steps for this kind of issue:
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/technotes/tn2415/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40016427-CH1-INTRODUCTION-EXAMPLE_ERRORS
and "Checking Distribution Entitlements”:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/qa/qa1798/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40014167
and this one as I can see that there is something about the Bundle in the error message which you are receiving:
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/General/Conceptual/DevPedia-CocoaCore/Bundle.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008195-CH4-SW1
You may also check:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/IDEs/Conceptual/AppDistributionGuide/ConfiguringYourApp/ConfiguringYourApp.html
For moderators: this question is about development of RPM based installer.
I'm developing packaging system for our software. We've designed our update management so that when we want to move to the new major version, we change RPM package to install all files into another directory (with another suffix) and change the package version. We keep the same name for the package (like: a-package-1.0.0 --> a-package-2.0.0). We want to install the new package keeping the old one to make user able to continue work with the old version while he moving to the new one.
So there is no file conflicts between our packages and RPM utility install them simultaneously without any issues (rpm -ivh ...). But Yum thinks that the new version is an update for the old one.
Is there a way to produce such RPM packages to make 'yum install a-package-1.0.0 a-package-2.0.0' installing them both? Maybe some flag in the package have to be set? I've found nothing.
Seems there is no way to install two RPM packages with the same name and without file conflicts usnig Yum.
So in my case I need to use some version suffix included into the package name.
I called RH and their preliminary answer is that there is no way to do this in YUM/RPM as this might cause confusion. After some discussion among their engineers, there does appear to be a way to do this, but they said it is cumbersome. I've asked them to send me their documentation (if any). I'm afraid you will need to call their customer service line and make the same request.
Here is the response from RH.
Thank you so much for your time on the phone today. You called asking if there was a way of installing different versions of tools like maven or java using yum to install them. After the engineers discussed it they have provided a document that shows you how to do this. I must say, if you do not have a log in to the customer portal, you will not be able to view the whole document.
How to switch Java Environment in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6?
- https://access.redhat.com/solutions/21059
The engineers have also provided additional documents just for general use with Developer Toolset and Software Collections:
How to use Red Hat Software Collections (RHSCL) or Red Hat Developer Toolset (DTS)?
- https://access.redhat.com/solutions/472793
Developer Toolset and Red Hat Software Collections use in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- https://access.redhat.com/solutions/915023
What's the difference between /etc/alternatives and the dynamic software collections framework?
- https://access.redhat.com/solutions/528643
If you do require further assistance, please provide me with a valid account number, login, or contract number, and I can get a case started and you will be able to be in direct contact with one of our Red Hat engineers.
I'm trying to install the web developer plugin, and it's failing with a message that "Web Developer 1.1.8 could not be installed because it is not compatible with Firefox 3.6.13".
I don't believe that it's actually incompatible; rather I think the problem is because the installation fails during a validation check, probably because the corp. network is messing with the connections. The message I get is that:
services.addons.mozilla.org uses an invalid security certificate
and when I view the certificate, it's issued by the networking group, not mozilla.
Is there a way to by-pass the version check so I can install it?
The most likely explanation is that the XPI you were trying to install had em:maxVersion in its install.rdf smaller than the Firefox version, so Firefox was checking with addons.mozilla.org to see if the version you were trying to install was marked as compatible (addons.mozilla.org allows to bump the maxVersion, but doesn't update the XPI it serves to the users).
If for any reason that update check failed, Firefox wouldn't let you install the extension.
The solution in that case (extension version actually compatible with Firefox, but has stale information in its install.rdf) would be to edit the XPI to bump maxVersion manually before attempting to install the XPI.
That's weird that it's giving you the "not compatible with Firefox version x" message since, as you say, that doesn't seem to be the actual problem. See if this works: Right-click on the installer link and select "Save Link As..." and save the file on your hard drive. It will be called something like webdeveloper.xpi. Then just drag and drop the file onto Firefox.