I have a messaging call that will process my payload which starts from MyClass. In load test i see that the first payload is getting over written by the next. All my classes are spring managed by #Autowired. Obviously the bean scope is singleton and thats why this is happening. But i do not want to use new operator and want it to be spring annotation configured. Is there any way to fix this issue of losing data ?
UPDATE
My configuration looks like below :
Public class MyClass {
...
#Autowired
public MyService myService;
...
}
#Component
#Scope(value="prototype", proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS)
public class MyService{
#Autowired
public Aone one;
#Autowired
public Atwo two;
...
}
#Component
#Scope(value="prototype")
public class Aone {
}
I am attempting this configuration after suggestions from net. For every call i get in MyClass a new instance of MyService will be created and from there on all other instances like Aone / Atwo should have new instance, will this configuration be ok ?
I've created this custom test configuration:
#TestConfiguration
public static class RestTemplateTestConfiguration {
#Bean
#Primary
public static ApplicationDao applicationDao() {
ApplicationDao mock = Mockito.mock(ApplicationDao.class);
// some stuff code
return mock;
}
}
I've set a breakpoint on applicationDao, but it's never reached, and therefore mock is never injected.
EDIT
ApplicationDao is an #Repository annotated class:
#Repository
public interface ApplicationDao extends MongoRepository<Application, String> {
So, how could I override this #Repository annotated AplicationDao?
Currently, I'm getting this message when spring starts:
Skipping bean definition for [BeanMethod:name=applicationDao,declaringClass=net.gencat.transversal.espaidoc.functional.references.GroupReferencesTest$RestTemplateTestConfiguration]: a definition for bean 'applicationDao' already exists. This top-level bean definition is considered as an override.
Any ideas?
If your method applicationDao() is never called it means that your spring boot is not scanning the package where RestTemplateTestConfiguration is located.
The simplest solutions is to move the configuration under the same package (or its children) as the one that contains the class annotated with #SpringBootApplication.
OBS : This rule applies even though the configuration is in the test directory instead of main.
Another solution is to add #ComponentScan with the configuration package or to use #Import(RestTemplateTestConfiguration.class) at your spring boot test level.
SUGGESTION:
For your problem you can use:
#Mock
ApplicationDao applicationDao;
and if you have another service that uses this one to use:
#InjectMock
MyService myService;
I have the following components, in two different files:
#Component
public class Chauffeur {
Car car;
public Chauffeur(Car car){
this.car = car;
}
public void go(){
System.out.println("Chauffeur");
car.drive();
}
}
#Component
public class Car{
public void drive() {
System.out.println("Drive car");
}
}
the following configuration file:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
public class DriveableConfiguration {
}
and the following test:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes=DriveableConfiguration.class)
public class DriveableTest {
#Autowired
Chauffeur chauffeur;
#Test
public void chauffeurTest(){
chauffeur.go();
}
}
All the classes above are in the same package and the test is passing.
In the test I annotated chauffer with #Autowired, which should mean that the Spring container looks after the creation of the instance of Chauffeur without the developer needing to explicitly instantiate it.
Now, the constructor for Chauffer needs an instance of Car, so there is no default constructor for that class. Nonetheless the container creates it, injecting the required instance in the constructor.
Is the #Autowired saying to the container to instantiate the element with whatever (Components, Beans) it can provide, included parameters in the constructor? If so, in what case is it needed to use #Autowired to annotate a constructor?
Only if you use Spring 4.3+. In such a case #Autowired on constructor is optional if you have one non default constructor.
You can check the example here.
So as of 4.3, you no longer need to specify an explicit injection annotation in such a single-constructor scenario. This is particularly elegant for classes which otherwise do not carry any container annotations at all, for example when programmatically registered
For versions lower than 4.3 you will an exception will be thrown:
the container will throw an exception looking for a default
constructor, unless you explicitly indicate autowire mode
‘constructor’ in your bean definition setup (e.g. in an XML )
In my application I have interface with default implementation that is service:
public interface MessageGenerator {
Message getMessage();
}
#Service
public class PropertiesMessageGenerator implements MessageGenerator {
#Override
public Message getMessage() {
return doSmth();
}
}
This service is loaded by spring boots #ComponentScan and everything works fine until I've added new implementation with #Profile
#Service
#Profile("p1")
public class ProfileMessageGenerator implements MessageGenerator {
#Override
public Message getMessage() {
return doSmthWithProfile();
}
}
How can I stop loading into DI service PropertiesMessageGenerator when ProfileMessageGenerator is in context?
PS
I cannot use #Profile("default") on MultipleMessages, because I've got more profiles that I load at one time.
A bit late to the party, but might help future visitors:
I've got it working in Spring Boot 2.5.1 by configuring my service like this:
#Service
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(value = BaseService.class, ignored = DefaultService.class)
public class DefaultService implements BaseService {
...
}
Without the ignored field in the annotation, the condition will match DefaultService and thus not instantiate it. That behavior is a bit strange, but excluding itself from the condition makes it work. With this, I can create an additional implementation of BaseService that is just annotated with #Service and instead it will not instantiate DefaultService but the other implementation.
If you don't use component scanning you could define and pick the bean using #Qualifier
If you want to maintain using component scanning use the #Conditional annotation.
Create your own implementation of 'org.springframework.context.annotation.Condition.class' and pass this to the annotation.
This could read a property to define when it returns true which could be set when what you want is in the context.
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(MessageGenerator.class) can be used if you do not want to implement your own Condition.
Or just annotate ProfileMessageGenerator with #Primary.
I'm developing an application using Spring. I need to use the #Service annotation. I have ServiceI and ServiceImpl such that ServiceImpl implements ServiceI. I'm confused here as to where should I keep the #Service annotation.
Should I annotate the interface or the implementation with #Service? What are the differences between these two approaches?
I never put #Component (or #Service, ...) at an interface, because this make the interface useless. Let me explain why.
claim 1: If you have an interface then you want to use that interface for the injection point type.
claim 2: The purpose of an interface is that it define a contract that can been implemented by several implementations. On the other side you have your injection point (#Autowired). Having just one interface and only one class that implement it, is (IMHO) useless, and violates YAGNI.
fact: When you put:
#Component (or #Service, ...) at an interface,
have multiple classes that implements it,
at least two classes become Spring Beans, and
have an injection point that use the interface for type based injection,
then you will get and NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException
(or you have a very special configurations setup, with Environment, Profiles or Qualifiers ...)
Conclusion: If you use #Component (or #Service, ...) at an interface then you must violate at least one of the two clains. Therefore I think it is not useful (except some rare scenarios) to put #Component at interface level.
Spring-Data-JPA Repository interfaces are something complete different
Basically annotations like #Service, #Repository, #Component, etc. they all serve the same purpose:
auto-detection when using annotation-based configuration and classpath
scanning.
From my experience I am always using #Service annotation on the interfaces or abstract classes and annotations like #Component and #Repository for their implementation. #Component annotation I am using on those classes which serves basic purposes, simple Spring beans, nothing more. #Repository annotation I am using in the DAO layer, for e.g. if I have to communicate to the database, have some transactions, etc.
So I would suggest to annotate your interface with the #Service and other layers depending on the functionality.
I used #Component, #Service, #Controller and #Repository annotations only on the implementation classes and not on the interface. But #Autowired annotation with Interfaces still worked for me. If there's only one implementation of your interface Spring component scan automatically finds it with just #Autowired annotation. In case you have multiple implementations, you will need to use the #Qualifier annotation along with #Autowired to inject the correct implementation at the injection point.
1. #Service on Interfaces
#Service
public interface AuthenticationService {
boolean authenticate(String username, String password);
}
Normally, that's fine, but there's a drawback. By putting Spring's #Service on interfaces, we create an extra dependency and couple our interfaces with an outside library.
Next, to test the autodetection of our new service beans, let's create an implementation of our AuthenticationService:
public class InMemoryAuthenticationService implements AuthenticationService {
#Override
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
//...
}
}
We should pay attention that our new implementation, InMemoryAuthenticationService, doesn't have the #Service annotation on it. We left #Service only on the interface, AuthenticationService.
So, let's run our Spring context with the help of a basic Spring Boot setup:
#SpringBootApplication
public class AuthApplication {
#Autowired
private AuthenticationService authService;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(AuthApplication.class, args);
}
}
When we run our app, we may get the infamous NoSuchBeanDefinitionException, and the Spring context fails to start.
Therefore, placing #Service on interfaces isn't enough for the auto-detection of Spring components.
2. #Service on Abstract Classes
Using the #Service annotation on abstract classes isn't common.
We'll start by defining an abstract class from scratch and putting the #Service annotation on it:
#Service
public abstract class AbstractAuthenticationService {
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
return false;
}
}
Next, we extend AbstractAuthenticationService to create a concrete implementation without annotating it:
public class LdapAuthenticationService extends AbstractAuthenticationService {
#Override
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
//...
}
}
Accordingly, we also update our AuthApplication, to inject the new service class:
#SpringBootApplication
public class AuthApplication {
#Autowired
private AbstractAuthenticationService authService;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(AuthApplication.class, args);
}
}
After we run our AuthApplication, the Spring context doesn't start. It ends up with the same NoSuchBeanDefinitionException exception again.
So, using #Service annotation on abstract classes doesn't have any effect in Spring.
3. #Service on Concrete Classes
Contrary to what we've seen above, it's quite a common practice to annotate the implementation classes instead of abstract classes or interfaces.
In this way, our goal is mostly to tell Spring this class is going to be a #Component and mark it with a special stereotype, which is #Service in our case.
Therefore, Spring will autodetect those classes from the classpath and automatically define them as managed beans.
So, let's put #Service on our concrete service classes this time around. We'll have one class that implements our interface and a second that extends the abstract class that we defined previously:
#Service
public class InMemoryAuthenticationService implements AuthenticationService {
#Override
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
//...
}
}
#Service
public class LdapAuthenticationService extends AbstractAuthenticationService {
#Override
public boolean authenticate(String username, String password) {
//...
}
}
We should take notice here that our AbstractAuthenticationService doesn't implement the AuthenticationService here. Hence, we can test them independently.
Finally, we add both of our service classes into the AuthApplication and give it a try:
#SpringBootApplication
public class AuthApplication {
#Autowired
private AuthenticationService inMemoryAuthService;
#Autowired
private AbstractAuthenticationService ldapAuthService;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(AuthApplication.class, args);
}
}
Our final test gives us a successful result, and the Spring context boots up with no exceptions. Both of the services are automatically registered as beans.
You might have a look at this page for the other explanations.
Pros of putting annotation on #Service is that it gives a hint that it is a service. I don't know if any implementing class will by default inherit this annoation.
Con side is that you are coupling your interface with a specific framework i.e. Spring, by using spring specific annotation.
As interfaces are supposed to be decoupled from implementation, I would not suggest using any framework specific Annotations or object part of your interface.
I would put #Service on your class but put the name of the interface as a parameter to the annotation e.g.
interface ServiceOne {}
#Service("ServiceOne")
class ServiceOneImpl implements ServiceOne{}
By doing that you get all the benefits and can still inject the interface but get the class
#Autowired
private ServiceOne serviceOne;
So your interface is not tied to spring framework and you can change the class at any time and not have to update all your injection points.
So if I wanted to change the implementation class I could just annotate the new class and remove from the first but that's all that is required to be changed. If you inject the class you could have a lot of work when ever you want to change the impl class.
One benefit of spring is to easily switch Service (or other) implementation.
For this, you need to annotate on the interface and declare variable like this :
#Autowired
private MyInterface myVariable;
and not :
#Autowired
private MyClassImplementationWhichImplementsMyInterface myVariable;
Like the first case, you can activate which implementation to inject from the moment it is unique (only one class implements the interface).
In the second case, you need to refactor all your code (the new class implementation has another name).
As a consequence, the annotation needs to be on the interface as much as possible. Furthermore, JDK proxies are well suited for this : they are created and instantiated at application startup because runtime type is known by advance, contrary to CGlib proxies.
interface MyService {}
#Service
class MyServiceImpl implements MyService{}
#Autowired
private MyService myService;
My testing result on spring-boot 2.7.4 is:
Adding #Service ONLY to interface doesn't create spring bean named MyService. It will error on Autowired.
#Service will need to be added to implementation class to create bean com.*.service.impl.MyServiceImpl $$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$9140ae19 Spring will wire it to private MyService myService;
There are 5 annotations which could be used for making spring beans. List in below of answers.
Do you really need an interface? If you are going to have one implementation for each service interface, just avoid it, use only class. Of course, if you don't have RMI or when interface proxy is required.
#Repository - use for injecting your dao layer classes.
#Service - use for injecting your service layer classes. In service layer also you might need to use #Transactional annotation for db transaction management.
#Controller - use for your frontend layer controllers, such as JSF managed beans injecting as spring beans.
#RestController - use for spring rest controllers, this would help you to avoid every time to put #ResponseBody and #RequestBody annotations in your rest methods.
#Component - use it in any other case when you need to Inject spring bean which is not controller, service, or dao class
To put it simply:
#Service is a Stereotype annotation for the service layer.
#Repository is a Stereotype annotation for the persistence layer.
#Component is a generic stereotype annotation used to tell Spring to create an instance of the object in the Application Context. It's possible to
define any name for the instance, the default is the class name as camel case.