I was studying about the Proxy Object which spring gives when we autowire any interface. This is a very good link for understanding that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEvGdWjeCy4&t=310s. Here he explains that If a POJO implements any interface then Spring proxy bean also implements that interface (using JDK Proxy mechanism) and adds additional logic such as transactional logic (if the method was annotated using jdbc code or delegating it to PlatformTransactionManager). Spring gives us a wrapper object which has the reference to the real object and it has additional code which it runs before and after the original method is invoked using MethodInvocationHandler. So My question is that how exactly spring is managing that transaction.Where that jdbc code to get connection and start transaction is written. Is it in the Spring Proxy object or any Aspect Class.
As in AOP there as Aspects which are basically the cross cutting concerns such as transaction common to the whole application. Is Spring inserting Transaction behavior code in the Proxy Object or is it Using PlatformTransactionManager to do that And Where does This AOP fits in this Flow. How the Aspect handling Transactional behavior getting invoked here if it is. How the call is getting transferred to it?
In term of JDK proxy , you have to supply a InvocationHandler implementation when creating a proxy object. When the proxy object is invoked , this InvocationHandler will be invoked around the actual object. (see this for a hello world example for how does JDK proxy works)
In term of the spring transaction , it already shipped with an InvocationHandler implementation (i.e. JdkDynamicAopProxy). It will then somehow invoke the transaction aspect (i.e. TransactionInterceptor). The transaction aspect is responsible for controlling the whole workflow such as when to create , commit or rollback the transaction and when to actually execute the actual method etc.
The transaction aspect also delegates to the PlatformTransactionManager to actually start , commit and rollback a transaction. Because different technologies has their own ways to start , commit and rollback a transaction , it is necessary to introduce a PlatformTransactionManager as an interface to abstract these operations such that we can switch different transaction technology by simply switching the PlatformTransactionManager implementation inside the transaction aspect .
So back to your questions :
Where that jdbc code to get connection and start transaction is
written. Is it in the Spring Proxy object or any Aspect Class.
None of them. It is actually the PlatformTransactionManager to get the connection and start the transaction which is invoked by the aspect.
Is Spring inserting Transaction behaviour code in the Proxy Object or
is it Using PlatformTransactionManager to do that And Where does This
AOP fits in this Flow.
Spring inserts the transaction behaviour in the aspect object (i.e. TransactionInterceptor). The aspects then delegate to the PlatformTransactionManager to actually start , commit and rollback the transaction.
How the Aspect handling Transactional behaviour getting invoked here
if it is. How the call is getting transferred to it?
Assuming the JDK proxy is used , the call flow is something like :
Someone invokes on the JDK proxy
InvocationHandler of this proxy will be invoked (i.e JdkDynamicAopProxy)
InvocationHandler somehow calls spring transaction aspect (i.e TransactionInterceptor)
Transaction aspect delegates to PlatformTransactionManager to actually start , commit and rollback the transaction if necessary.
Related
We upgraded Spring Boot from 1.5.8 to 2.6.2. It has introduced a problem that has us perplexed: Transactional saves are not processing from inside spawned threads.
We use JPA managed entities on a Mysql database and make calls down to the CrudRepository to save them.
Transactions inside the main thread work fine. However, when called from an asynchronous operation things go awry:
both async and sync calls go through the Spring SimpleJpaRepository.save() method. But the entityManager returns the object to persist with a null id in the case of the async operation.
I followed the flow through in both types of calls and can see that the save propagates down to the org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl service.
From there it makes its way to AbstractSaveEventListener.class and that is where the discrepancy appears to be. In the performSaveOrReplicate method (hibernate-core:5.6.3), inTrx boolean is false in the async workflow whereas it is true in the synch one. Because of that the shouldDelayIdentityInserts flag gets set and an id does not appear to be generated for any entities in this thread.
We have tried different things to get this to work. For example, we used the transactionTemplate to have some specific control here, but that has not changed the behavior.
We were originally creating this async process by using the ApplicationEventPublisher to create an event. We also tried using completablefuture and other constructs with the same result as well as annotating the method with #Async and calling it directly.
The issue was that, with the upgrade to Spring Boot 2.6, Spring Batch implements a new Transaction Manager.
What we didn't realize is that this transaction manager was being autowired into our other services and did not work in this threaded context. You do not want to share a Batch processing Tx Manager with your API/misc services. Declaring a specific Transaction Manager there to keep them separate solved the issue.
Here is an example marking a PlatformTransactionManager with the Primary annotation to test its usage explicitly.
#Primary
#Bean
public PlatformTransactionManager platformTransactionManager(DataSource dataSource) {
JpaTransactionManager transactionManager = new JpaTransactionManager();
transactionManager.setEntityManagerFactory(entityManagerFactory(dataSource).getObject());
return transactionManager;
}
Title speaks for itself.
Is PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor used solely for JPA implementations or is it relevant to use it with Spring's JdbcTemplate too?
And if there are two datasources needed each with their own JPA entity manager and transaction manager, do I still only need to specify one PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor for the entire application?
The auto-award bounty answer is wrong
~~~The correct answer is as follows~~~
I believe I've discovered the answer here:
http://www.deroneriksson.com/tutorials/java/spring/introduction-to-the-spring-framework/component-scanning-and-repository
The #Repository annotation can have a special role when it comes to converting exceptions to Spring-based unchecked exceptions. Recall that the JdbcTemplate handled this task for us. When we work with Hibernate, we’re not going to work with a Spring template that handles this conversion of Hibernate-based exceptions to Spring-based exceptions. As a result, in order to handle this conversion automatically, Hibernate DAOs annotated with #Repository will have their Hibernate exceptions rethrown as Spring exceptions using a PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor.
Further reading: http://www.deroneriksson.com/tutorials/java/spring/introduction-to-the-spring-framework/hibernate-daos
The paragraph above explicitly says:
Recall that the JdbcTemplate handled this task for us
So, to answer my own question, there is no need to use PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor with jdbcTemplate
Yes you can, The Spring exception translation mechanism can be applied transparently to all beans annotated with #Repository – by defining an exception translation bean post processor bean in the Context:
<bean id="persistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor"
class="org.springframework.dao.annotation.PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor" />
As per it doc
Bean post-processor that automatically applies persistence exception translation to any bean marked with Spring's #Repository
annotation, adding a corresponding
PersistenceExceptionTranslationAdvisor to the exposed proxy (either an
existing AOP proxy or a newly generated proxy that implements all of
the target's interfaces).
Translates native resource exceptions to Spring's DataAccessException hierarchy. Autodetects beans that implement the
PersistenceExceptionTranslator interface, which are subsequently asked
to translate candidate exceptions.
All of Spring's applicable resource factories (e.g. LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean) implement the
PersistenceExceptionTranslator interface out of the box. As a
consequence, all that is usually needed to enable automatic exception
translation is marking all affected beans (such as Repositories or
DAOs) with the #Repository annotation, along with defining this
post-processor as a bean in the application context.
So you can use it with Jdbctemplate as well as with any Jpa vendor implementation
As per is doc All of Spring's applicable resource factories (e.g. LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean) implement the PersistenceExceptionTranslator interface out of the box, I think you still need to use PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor, because it used to translate all errors generated during the persistence process (HibernateExceptions, PersistenceExceptions...) into DataAccessException objects.
I have a third party jar in my class path which has some services and DAO's developed on top of Spring 2.0.6 and Hibernate3.2.6. I need to call some of the services and daos.
Using ClassPathXmlApplicationContext I'm able to load the application context and able to access the services and daos. Both the service and dao are following ProxyFactoryBean pattern.
Problem comes when I'm accessing a DAO which has some single valued associations.When I'm accessing associated entity I'm getting lazy initialization problem.
To solve this problem:- If it is in my own application JAR I'll be able to change the fetch type into join or in DAOImpl method I could use Hibernate.initialize().
Is there a way to avoid this problem from the stand alone code itself? Or any other way to solve this issue without modifying applicationContext.xml and DAOImpl
You need to put the caller method into one single transaction.
If you have Spring transactional environment, you can put the call of the DAO services/repositories in your own service/method which is marked as #Transactional, or if transaction support is not enabled, but you still have spring support in your application, you can just use TransactionTemplate directly, provided by spring
#Autowire
private PlatformTransactionManager txManager;
TransactionTemplate template = new TransactionTemplate(this.txManager);
template.execute( new TransactionCallback<Object>(){
public void doInTransaction(TransactionStatus status){
// work done here will be wrapped by a transaction and committed.
// status.setRollbackOnly(true) is called or an exception is thrown
}
});
Otherwise you have manually handle transactionality by your own , depending on the technologies your app is using.
Spring AOP and AspectJ are usually used for Exception handling and Logging. Is there any other feature for which we are using aspectJ and spring AOP.
Yes, transactional behavior is the first to come to mind. Take a look at the #Transactional annotation. You mark a method with the annotation and the container will take the necessary steps to start a transaction before your method executes and commit or roll back the transaction when it ends.
Security is another nice application of AOP. You can annotate a method to mark it as requiring certain permissions. For example, in a web application, you might have a few handler methods for requests that require the user to be an administrator. Instead of implementing that logic in each handler method, you extract it to some AOP advice and put a joinpoint at each of those methods.
Aspects can be used as any type of filter really. You can allow, prevent, modify access to a method.
Note that Spring's support for AOP is limited to method invocation join points.
I'm working on a Spring MVC project and trying to integrate Apache Shiro for the security. Everything was going just swimmingly until I realized Hibernate was prematurely closing the session/connection after a single query and causing a lazyinit exception. Not surprising, what I was doing should be done within a transaction so the session isn't closed.
Dilemmas…
I tried putting #Transactional on my controller method, but I get 404's then. Looking at my logs, I can see that when Spring is bootstrapping it ignores any mappings in my HomeController if that #Transactional annotation is on any method within the controller.
Without the #Transactional and it loads up just fine, and Ih can see the RequestMappingHandlerMapping bean sees all the #RequestMapping annotations in my controller.
With #Transactional but without DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator, and it works except Shiro annotations are simply ignored.
tldr: Shiro requires DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator, but if I create that bean, Spring blows up when using the #Transactional annotation.
I'm asking for help because I'm completely at a loss for how to proceed at this point.
This is typically because when you put #Transactional on a method, Spring creates a dynamic proxy for that bean - if the bean implements an interface then dynamic proxy is created based on that interface, otherwise CGLIB will be used for creating the proxy.
The problem in your case, I am guessing is because you probably have based your controller on some interface, or you are extending it based on a base class. This is ending up creating a proxy based on that interface, because of this when it comes time for mappings to be created for your request, Spring MVC is probably not finding your mappings from your bean.
The fix could be a few:
a. You can try and force proxies to be based on CGLIB for your transactions:
<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager" proxy-target-class="true"/>
b. You can use pure Aspectj,either load time weaving or compile time weaving
c. You can move the #Transactional into a Service (which has an interface) and delegate the call from the controller to the service, this way avoiding #Transaction on the controller