I trying to produce ticks for scaleLog().base(2).
Seems to be, it does not work correctly.
For instance, for the call:
d3.scaleLog().base(2).domain([50,500]).ticks(10)
I got:
[ 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500 ]
Which just linear placed ticks. For base(10) it works properly.
d3.scaleLog().base(10).domain([50,500]).ticks(10)
[ 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 ]
I using d3.js version 6.1.1.
I am missing something?
You're not missing anything, but there is this line, inside the source code:
if (z.length * 2 < n) z = ticks(u, v, n);
Here, z is the generated array (in this case [64, 128, 256]), n is the required number of ticks (10), and u and v are the domain (50 and 500).
Because the number of generated ticks is too low, d3 defaults to a linear scale. Try one of the following instead:
console.log(d3.scaleLog().base(2).domain([50, 500]).ticks(6));
console.log(d3.scaleLog().base(2).domain([32, 512]).ticks(10));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/d3/6.1.1/d3.min.js"></script>
If all parameters are variable, you could calculate the maximum possible number of ticks and use that as an upper bound:
const domain = [50, 500];
const ticks = 100;
console.log(d3.scaleLog().base(2).domain(domain).ticks(ticks));
function getNTicks(domain, ticks) {
const maxPossibleTicks = Math.floor(Math.log2(domain[1]) - Math.log2(domain[0]));
return Math.min(ticks, maxPossibleTicks);
}
console.log(d3.scaleLog().base(2).domain(domain).ticks(getNTicks(domain, ticks)));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/d3/6.1.1/d3.min.js"></script>
Related
How do i specify the axis range in React-Vis
For Ex:
0 to 100 for Y Axis and the data is as below
data={[ {x: 1, y: 45}, {x: 2, y: 50}, {x: 3, y: 85} ]}/>
The YAxis must range 0 to 100 even though the max Y value here is 85
Use the xDomain or yDomain props on the XYPlot component <XYPlot xDomain={[0, 50]}
From their docs about scales at:
https://uber.github.io/react-vis/documentation/general-principles/scales-and-data
"To redefine a scale, you must pass a prop to the series that uses that scale. The prop names are based on the name of the attribute: name + Domain, name + Range, name + Type, name + Padding (for instance: yDomain, colorType, xRange)."
So for your purpose, you would set <XYPlot yDomain=[0,100]></XYPlot>
I'm using easeljs to build a certain structure.
Inside that structure, there are many containers and shapes.
I ran across a problem where I needed to change the color of a certain element when the user hovered it with his mouse. I managed to do it However there is a considerable delay until the color is drawn and return to its original color because the stage redraws itself.
I saw that I could use the cache for this purpose so I follow the example in the docs like this:
myShape.cache(150, 150, 100, 100, 1); however nothings happens and I don't see the shape.
I have to say that the shape resides inside a container which is added to the stage.
Here's the relevant code:
enter code here
var g = curShape.graphics.clone().clear();
g.beginFill("#2aa4eb");
g.drawRoundRect(0, 0, curShape.width, curShape.height, 1.5);
//g.drawRect(0, 0, curShape.width + 2, curShape.height + 2);
g.endFill();
g.endStroke();
var newShape= new createjs.Shape(g);
newShape.cache(150, 150, 100, 100, 2);
Any help would be appreciated
You are caching at x:150 and y:150, but you are drawing your shapes at 0,0. If your shape is smaller than 150x150, then it will be caching nothing. Change your cache to 0,0, and it should be fine.
Additionally, you are not providing the 5th parameter (corner radius) to the drawRoundRect call, which will make it fail. Here is a quick sample with a modified version of your code.
http://jsfiddle.net/LNXVg/
var stage = new createjs.Stage("canvas");
var g = new createjs.Graphics();
g.beginFill("#2aa4eb");
g.drawRoundRect(0, 0, 300, 200, 5);
var newShape = new createjs.Shape(g);
//newShape.cache(150, 150, 100, 100, 2);
newShape.cache(0, 0, 100, 100, 2);
stage.addChild(newShape);
stage.update();
The below one is my code. I am unable to click and edit in the second Input control.
#include <GUIConstants.au3>
$gui = GuiCreate("Hello World", 700, 600)
$Label_HelloWorld = GuiCtrlCreateLabel("Path / Directory", 40, 20, 300, 18)
$file = GUICtrlCreateInput("", 140, 20, 300, 20)
$Label_boot = GuiCtrlCreateLabel("path of boot.c", 40, 60, 300, 18)
$file2 = GUICtrlCreateInput("", 140, 60, 300, 20)
$Button_OK = GuiCtrlCreateButton("CHECK", 400, 90, 50, 20)
GuiSetState(#SW_SHOW, $gui)
Sleep(10000)
Your labels are overlapping the controls (again), this time horizontally. A width of 300px when the inputs are 100px to the right means the first 200px is overlapping. If you try to click in the last 100px of the input then it will work.
This is very easy to check for, just use the autoit window info tool and look at the outlines of the controls.
I have this simple linear scale:
var x = d3.scale.linear().domain([0, 250]);
x.ticks(6), as expected, returns:
[0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250]
However, x.ticks(11) returns:
[0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240]
When what I want is:
[0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250]
How do I fix this?
I had a similar issue with ordinal scales, I simply wrote some code to pick evenly spaced intervals in my data. Since I wanted it to always choose the first and last data element on the axis, I calculate the middle part only. Since some things do not divide evenly, rather than having the residual in one or two bins, I spread it out across the bins as I go; until there is no more residual.
There is probably a simpler way to accomplish this but here's what I did:
function getTickValues(data, numValues, accessor)
{
var interval, residual, tickIndices, last, i;
if (numValues <= 0)
{
tickIndices = [];
}
else if (numValues == 1)
{
tickIndices = [ Math.floor(numValues/2) ];
}
else
{
// We have at least 2 ticks to display.
// Calculate the rough interval between ticks.
interval = Math.floor(data.length / (numValues-1));
// If it's not perfect, record it in the residual.
residual = Math.floor(data.length % (numValues-1));
// Always label our first datapoint.
tickIndices = [0];
// Set stop point on the interior ticks.
last = data.length-interval;
// Figure out the interior ticks, gently drift to accommodate
// the residual.
for (i=interval; i<last; i+=interval)
{
if (residual > 0)
{
i += 1;
residual -= 1;
}
tickIndices.push(i);
}
// Always graph the last tick.
tickIndices.push(data.length-1);
}
if (accessor)
{
return tickIndices.map(function(d) { return accessor(d); });
}
return tickIndices.map(function(i) { return data[i]; });
}
You call the function via:
getTickvalues(yourData, numValues, [optionalAccessor]);
Where yourData is your array of data, numvalues is the number of ticks you want. If your array contains a complex datastructure then the optional accessor comes in handy.
Lastly, you then feed this into your axis. Instead of ticks(numTicks) which is only a hint to d3 apparently, you call tickValues() instead.
I learned the hard way that your tickValues have to match your data exactly for ordinal scales. This may or may not be as helpful for linear scales, but I thought I'd share it anyways.
Hope this helps.
Pat
You can fix this by replacing the x.ticks(11) with your desired array.
So if your code looks like this and x is your linear scale:
chart.selectAll("line")
.data(x.ticks(11))
.enter()
.append("line")
.attr("x1", x)
.attr("x2", x)
.attr("y1", 0)
.attr("y2",120)
.style("stroke", "#CCC");
You can replace x.ticks(11) with your array:
var desiredArray = [0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250]
chart.selectAll("line")
.data(desiredArray)
.enter()
.append("line")
.attr("x1", x)
.attr("x2", x)
.attr("y1", 0)
.attr("y2",120)
.style("stroke", "#CCC");
The linear scale will automatically place your desired axes based on your input. The reason why the ticks() isn't giving you your desired separation is because d3 just treats ticks() as a suggestion.
axis.tickvalues((function(last, values) {
var myArray = [0];
for(var i = 1; i < values; i++) {
myArray.push(last*i/(values-1))
}
return myArray;
})(250, 11));
This should give you an evenly spaced out array for specifying the number of tick values you want in a particular range.
I want to write a Bash shell script function to return the x, y coordinates of the first local minimum data point in simple 2 column CSV data.
The function would take as an input a Bash variable (say "${myData}") storing data such as the following:
10, 0.14665
20, 0.144971
30, 0.14262
40, 0.142424
50, 0.142370
60, 0.142375
70, 0.142375
80, 0.142375
90, 0.142375
100, 0.142375
110, 0.142306
120, 0.142017
130, 0.141054
140, 0.140148
150, 0.139993
160, 0.139972
170, 0.139958
180, 0.139932
190, 0.139886
200, 0.139876
210, 0.13987
220, 0.139865
230, 0.139861
240, 0.13986
250, 0.139857
260, 0.139855
270, 0.139853
280, 0.139852
290, 0.139847
300, 0.139847
I want the function to spot the first local minimum point (in this case, this would correspond to the coordinate 50, 0.142370) and return the coordinate of this point. Could you suggest a simple way of doing this?
You can use awk, either on one line or prettily indented as in here:
awk '
NR > 1 {
if ($2 > n) {
print line;
exit(0);
}
}
{
line=$0;
n=$2
}
' <<< "${myData}"
You can also take out the exit(0); to show all local minimas.