type Query {
"""
ErrorCode: EMAIL_DUPLICATED
type EmailDuplicatedError {
email: String!
source: UserSource!
}
enum UserSource {
Google
Facebook
Github
}
"""
register(email: String!, password: String!): AccessToken!
}
"""
The AccessToken scalar type is a string of 16 characters.
"""
scalar AccessToken
Hope you can get what I mean through the above schema. I'd like to know if there is any code generator can support errors documented this way, so I can reduce the code I write on both client and server side.
I don't want to define errors like the following
type Query {
register(email: String!, password: String!): RegisterResponse
}
type RegisterResponse {
accessToken: AccessToken
error: EmailDuplicatedError
}
type EmailDuplicatedError {
email: String!
source: UserSource!
}
enum UserSource {
Google
Facebook
Github
}
"""
The AccessToken scalar type is a string of 16 characters.
"""
scalar AccessToken
Because I'd like errors to be responded in errors field, and api only shows what you can get when you succeeded.
Thank you for your time reading this post.
There's some ways to do error handling with GraphQL, I'll recommend you two:
Using response extensions:
GraphQL JSON response.error has a field called extensions, you can use this to set a code field like:
{
"error": {
"errors": [
{
"message": "example",
"extensions": {
"code": "YOUR CODE"
}
}
]
}
}
Using unions:
There is an medium post by Sasha Solomon that talks about that:
https://sachee.medium.com/200-ok-error-handling-in-graphql-7ec869aec9bc
Using the examples in this post, the way to handle graphql errors with unions is like this:
type User {
id: ID!
name: String
}
type Suspended {
reason: String
}
type IsBlocked {
message: String
blockedByUser: User
}
type UnavailableInCountry {
countryCode: Int
message: String
}
"User, or reason we can't get one normally"
union UserResult = User | IsBlocked | Suspended
type Query {
user: UserResult!
}
Related
I'm pretty new to graphql and I'm working on a project in nodejs where I am trying to return users when a getUsers query is performed. The issue is that when I test this query in graphql studio, I'm getting an error stating: "GraphQLError: Cannot query field \"users\" on type \"User\". I'm really confused as to why I'm having this issue. I've seen a number of examples where people where able to return just an array and didn't have a problem, but every time I've tried this I end up getting a similar error. Due to this, I've only been able to return a value for a query or mutation when I am super specific such as for my user query:
...
const user = await requireAuth(user)
return {
_id: user._id,
username: user.username,
firstName: user.firstName,
email: user.email,
}
Does anyone know why this is happening? I would really appreciate any help or advice. Thank you!
Query getUsers in graphql,
{
getUsers {
users
}
}
Query in user-resolvers.js
getUsers: async(parent, args, context, info) => {
try {
let users = await User.find()
console.log(users)
// console.log(users) shows all of the users in the format found in type Users
return users;
}
catch (error) {
throw error;
}
},
schema.js
export default`
type Users {
_id: ID!
username: String
email: String!
firstName: String
lastName: String
basicInfo: [BasicInfo]!
avatar: String
date: Date
}
type BasicInfo {
birth_date: String!
age: Int!
feet: Int!
inches: Int!
}
...
type Query {
getUsers: [Users]
}
...
schema {
query: Query
mutation: Mutation
}
`;
index.js
import UserResolvers from './user-resolvers.js';
import User from '../../models/User.js';
export default {
Query: {
user: UserResolvers.user,
getUsers: UserResolvers.getUsers,
},
...
};
In the query you specify the fields you want to return and you don't have a field users, you must only specify fields that exist in your schema:
{
getUsers {
id
username
email
...
}
}
More info here
I'm trying to implement mutation query with an array as a parameter and String as a return type.
Here is my schema file:
input OrganizationInput {
orgId: String!
orgName: String!
}
type Mutations {
importOrganizations(input: [OrganizationInput]): String
}
Here is my mutation:
mutation importOrganizations($orgs: [OrganizationInput]) {
importOrganizations(
input: {
orgId: id,
orgName: name
}
)
}
This code doesn't work, but I don't know how to do it properly.
Maybe someone more experienced in GraphQL could help me?
Do you have any errors that can help?
Anyways your mutation need to return fields, e.g.:
mutation importOrganizations($orgs: [OrganizationInput]) {
importOrganizations(
input: {
orgId: id,
orgName: name
})
{
id
name
}
}
I am trying to trigger a mutation in the aws console. I have linked my resolver function to a None type data source.
However, when I define my mutation with an input type as a parameter, the error " Error Cannot return null for non-nullable type: 'String' within parent MyModelType' (/createMyModelType/id)." occurs. Everything is fine though if I replace the input type with key word arguments.
I am certain it has to do with my resolver mapping template.
Just if you're wondering why I am using a None type, I want to be able to trigger a subscription without making real database changes or mutations.
I am not sure how to make it work with input types. Here is my code for the template:
{
"version": "2017-02-28",
"payload": $util.toJson($context.args)
}
My Schema:
input CreateMyModelType5Input {
title: String
}
type Mutation {
createMyModelType5(input: CreateMyModelType5Input!): MyModelType5
}
type MyModelType5 {
id: ID!
title: String
}
type Subscription {
onCreateMyModelType5(id: ID, title: String): MyModelType5
#aws_subscribe(mutations: ["createMyModelType5"])
}
Query I am trying to run:
mutation createMyModelType($createmymodeltypeinput: CreateMyModelTypeInput!) {
createMyModelType(input: $createmymodeltypeinput) {
id
title
}
}
Query Variables for the mutation query
{
"createmymodeltype5input": {
"title": "Hello, world!"
}
}
So I have been working on passing my arguments in the graphql mutation and using the input type seemed the only straight forward way around.
However, I have been able to do it with this way:
mutation = """mutation CreateMyModelType($id: String!, $title: String!){
createMyModelType(id: $id, title: $title){
id
title
}
}
"""
input_params = {
"id": "34",
"title": "2009-04-12"
}
response = app_sync.createMyModelType(mutation, input_params)
this can be a good guide
graphql service 1 type defs:
import { gql } from 'apollo-server';
const typeDefs = gql`
type Post {
postId: ID!
postTitle: String!
postContent: String!
postAuthorId: ID
}
input PostTag {
name: String!
}
input PostInput {
postTitle: String!
postContent: String!
postAuthorId: ID!
postTags: [PostTag!]!
}
type CommonResponse {
code: Int!
message: String!
}
type Query {
posts: [Post]!
}
type Mutation {
addPost(post: PostInput): CommonResponse!
}
`;
export { typeDefs };
Now, graphql service 2 wants to extend PostTag input type from graphql service 1 like this:
import { gql } from 'apollo-server';
const typeDefs = gql`
extend input PostTag {
color: String
}
`;
export { typeDefs };
I print stitching schema, it's correct.
enum CacheControlScope {
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
}
type CommonResponse {
code: Int!
message: String!
}
type Mutation {
addPost(post: PostInput): CommonResponse!
}
type Post {
postId: ID!
postTitle: String!
postContent: String!
postAuthorId: ID
}
input PostInput {
postTitle: String!
postContent: String!
postAuthorId: ID!
postTags: [PostTag!]!
}
input PostTag {
name: String!
color: String
}
type Query {
posts: [Post]!
}
"""The `Upload` scalar type represents a file upload."""
scalar Upload
But when client sends a mutation like this:
mutation{
addPost(post: {
postTitle: "ez2on",
postContent: "golang",
postAuthorId: "1",
postTags: [{
name: "222",
color: "red"
}]
}){
code
message
}
}
Got this error:
{
"errors": [
{
"message": "Variable \"$_v0_post\" got invalid value { postTitle: \"ez2on\", postContent: \"golang\", postAuthorId: \"1\", postTags: [[Object]] }; Field \"color\" is not defined by type PostTag at value.postTags[0].",
"locations": [
{
"line": 7,
"column": 3
}
],
"path": [
"addPost"
],
"extensions": {
"code": "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR",
"exception": {
"errors": [
{
"message": "Variable \"$_v0_post\" got invalid value { postTitle: \"ez2on\", postContent: \"golang\", postAuthorId: \"1\", postTags: [[Object]] }; Field \"color\" is not defined by type PostTag at value.postTags[0].",
"locations": []
}
],
"stacktrace": [
"Error: Variable \"$_v0_post\" got invalid value { postTitle: \"ez2on\", postContent: \"golang\", postAuthorId: \"1\", postTags: [[Object]] }; Field \"color\" is not defined by type PostTag at value.postTags[0].",
" at new CombinedError (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/stitching/errors.ts:90:5)",
" at Object.checkResultAndHandleErrors (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/stitching/errors.ts:111:11)",
" at CheckResultAndHandleErrors.transformResult (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/transforms/CheckResultAndHandleErrors.ts:15:12)",
" at /Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/transforms/transforms.ts:37:45",
" at Array.reduce (<anonymous>)",
" at applyResultTransforms (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/transforms/transforms.ts:35:21)",
" at /Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/src/stitching/delegateToSchema.ts:104:12",
" at step (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/dist/stitching/delegateToSchema.js:31:23)",
" at Object.next (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/dist/stitching/delegateToSchema.js:12:53)",
" at fulfilled (/Users/ldu020/workspace/github.com/mrdulin/apollo-graphql-tutorial/node_modules/graphql-tools/dist/stitching/delegateToSchema.js:3:58)"
]
}
}
}
],
"data": null
}
It's important to keep in mind that makeRemoteExecutableSchema just "uses the [provided] link to delegate requests to the underlying service". When you query fields from the remote schema, it's delegating the request for those particular fields to the remote server, effectively rerouting the request. This is true whether you stitch the schema with some other one, or use it by itself.
Schema stitching allows you to combine any number of local and remote schemas. However, any remote schemas will still have their fields resolved by their respective servers.
Because stitching merges the provided schemas' type definitions, you can use the extend keyword inside one schema to modify types from another, even if it's a remote schema. If we extend an object type, we can also add some resolvers to help resolve the fields we've added.
Extending a remote schema's input object is a bit different. There's no "resolving" input objects. Instead, all we do by extending it is saying "these fields are also valid". However, when we request some remote schema field that takes this modified input object as an argument, the resolution of this field is, again, delegated to the underlying remote schema. It gets the modified input object and when it validates it, it finds extra fields and throws an error.
In other words, it's not possible to extend input types like this. And consider, even if the request didn't fail validation -- even if you extend the input type, the original resolver has not been changed and so it necessarily won't know how to handle the additional input type fields anyway.
NOTE: If you do the above but with two local schemas, the extension should work as expected because there is no delegation in this case. You're still left with a resolver that doesn't necessarily know how to handle the new input object field though.
I try to use fragments in GraphQL
There is my schema
user/getUser.gql
input GetUserByUsernameInput {
username: String!
}
fragment UserFragment on User {
username
information
pictureUrl
}
type UserType {
...UserFragment
}
type GetUserByUsernameResponse {
user: UserType
errors: [Error]!
}
type Query {
getUserByUsername(input: GetUserByUsernameInput!): GetUserByUsernameResponse!
}
shared/User.gql
type User {
id: Int!
username: String!
email: String!
information: String
pictureUrl: String
}
And I got dummy error
(node:26206) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Syntax Error: Expected Name, found ...
GraphQL request (12:9)
11: type UserType {
12: user: ...UserFragment
^
13: }
How should my code looks like to use GraphQL fragments?
PS. I use graphql-code-generator
Fragments only exist in queries; you can't use them in the schema language.
In your example the response should include a reference to the User that's being returned:
type GetUserByUsernameResponse {
user: User
errors: [Error]!
}
When you make a query, though, you can include the fragment.
query WhoAreYou($username: String!) {
getUserByUsername(input: {username: $username}) {
user { ...UserFragment }
errors { message }
}
}
fragment UserFragment on User {
username
information
pictureUrl
}
Fragments tend to be somewhat more useful if either you have reason to request the same fields on the same type of object multiple times in one query, or if you have a client library that's capable of picking fragments out of a "library" of GraphQL queries you'll use multiple places. (For example, the Ruby graphql-client gem can be configured with a file of many queries, and you can make a specific query out of it by operation name and it will make a query with that operation and any fragments it references, so you can reuse the same fragments across several queries.)