this is my first time working with Ruby.
I am currently working with a program that includes a module in the start with "include MODULENAME".
My goal is to "rebuild" this programm to implement it in my own software.
My problem is I can't figure out where this module is coming from.
The program allows the entry of further commands (in Ruby). So my question is, are there any commands i can use to find where this module comes from?
I apreciate any kind of help.
Object.const_source_location(MODULENAME)
should tell your where MODULENAME is defined. See docs for const_source_location
Related
I am trying to run COPASI in commandline but there is very little documentation.
I have downloaded and unzipped binary, I am not sure how to proceed in order to do something as simple as import an SBML file?
Here is all the documentation I found:
http://copasi.org/Support/User_Manual/Model_Creation/Commandline_Version_and_Commandline_Options/
It doesn't say which command do I use to call COPASI?
The command line version of COPASI is CopasiSE, which you can install besides the GUI CopasiUI via any source here http://copasi.org/Download/.
For example, see https://github.com/ICB-DCM/solverstudy/blob/master/Bash_Scripts/install_copasi.sh, in which case the executable resides in a local folder.
Regarding usage, I am not sure whether extensive API documentation is available. It probably won't help much, but here's how we wrapped it in a study via Python to call an underlying CPS model file https://github.com/ICB-DCM/solverstudy/blob/master/Python_Scripts/simulation_wrapper_copasi.py#L77.
I am trying to build a program that requires SDL. I have downloaded SDL for Windows so that I have a folder containing the include and lib suborders.
When I run CMake I get the following error:
Could NOT find SDL (missing: SDL_LIBRARY SDL_INCLUDE_DIR)
This is despite the fact that I have created two environment variables called SDL_LIBRARY and SDL_INCLUDE_DIR, pointing to the lib and include folders respectively.
I have no idea what to do.
In my experience, the best method when find scripts don't work as expected is to check their source code. Often you will identify the problem by just reading through the documentation at the top, but if that still doesn't work out, digging into the source is often the only thing that helps.
From the documentation alone you can see for instance, that CMake does only consider one environment variable SDLDIR for searching. SDL_INCLUDE_DIR and SDL_LIBRARY are the names of the CMake variables to hold the results of the find script. You can set them via the command line (or the cmake-gui), but I would advise against that, as it kind of undermines the purpose of using a find script in the first place.
Instead, verify that your directory structure corresponds to what the find script expects and simply set SDLDIR accordingly.
Please note that the script that currently ships with CMake does not work with the newer SDL2. If you are using SDL2, you will have to write your own script.
I am using a class module in my project. I made an EXE of the project. But this EXE gives error when I run this on another PC... even in mine PC, if run from another folder.
I get following error - 5 - Invalid procedure call or argument.
Can somebody guide me how to use the Class module while making EXE..?
A class module is analogous to a form module or a standard module (which is called just "module") in VB6. Basically, anything that has its own code window is a module. Class modules are saved with a .cls extension.
The probable reason for your error is that you can't see the class at the point you're attempting to use it.
Your question could mean several different things. Please give me a list of all the projects (maybe you have just one, but you could have more), all the forms, all the standard modules (just called "modules"), and all the class modules you are using. That will help me understand better how to answer your question.
Does anyone have any insights regarding compiling Ruby code for Windows? I've tried both "Ruby2Exe" and "OCRA", but both present their own issues. Ruby2Exe keeps presenting vague or confusing warnings such as "can't modify frozen string". OCRA on the other hand seems to want to run your script and assumes that there are no dynamic items.
For the record, my script accepts command line arguments as well as reading in and parsing a text file. OCRA doesn't like this aspect at all, and actually throws the warnings in my code as if I tried to run the script.
Anyway, if anyone has any quality means by which to compile ruby code for Windows, I'm all ears.
As a bit of an FYI, my goal with this particular script is to send email over SMTP. It is part of a larger non-ruby application, but the framework is incapable of sending email. I find Ruby enjoyable and rather easy to work with but don't wish to have every end user install Ruby -- hence, the need/desire to "compile" it.
I'm on a short time table and can't really afford to expend resources on writing this in C++, etc. However, if anyone has any insights on any existing Windows-compatible libaries/applications, do tell.
Much appreciated.
"OCRA on the other hand seems to want to run your script..."
The constant Ocra is defined at compile-time but not at run-time. So you can include logic based on whether or not the Ocra constant is defined. For example:
app = MyApp.new
if not defined?(Ocra)
app.main_loop
end
In Java when you compile a .java file which defines a class, it creates a .class file. If you provide these class files to your coworkers then they cannot modify your source. You can also bundle all of these class files into a jar file to package it up more neatly and distribute it as a single library.
Does Ruby have any features like these when you want to share your functionality with your coworkers but you don't want them to be able to modify the source (unless they ask you for the actual .rb source file and tell you that they want to change it)?
I believe the feature you are looking for is called "trust" (and a source code control repository). Ruby isn't compiled in the same way that Java is, so no you can't do this.
I have to say your are in a rough position, not wanting to share code with a coworker. However, given that this is an unassailable constraint perhaps you could change the nature of the problem.
If you have a coworker that needs access to some service provided by a library of yours, perhaps you could expose it by providing a web/rest service instead of as a .rb file.
This way you can hide your code behind a web server, and if there is a network architecture that allows for low latency making these service calls, you can effectively achive the same goal.
Trust is a lot easier though.
edit:
Just saw this on HN: http://blog.astrails.com/2009/5/12/ruby-http-require, allows a ruby file to include another file through http instead of the filesystem.
Ruby is
A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity.
So like all interpreted languages, you need to give the source code to anyone who want's to execute your program/script.
By the way searching "compiled ruby" on google returned quiet a few results.
I don't think there is one. Ruby is purely an interpreted language, which means ruby interprets your source code directly in order to run it. Java is compiled, so there's an intermediate bytecode (the .class). You can obfuscate your ruby if you really wish, but it's probably more trouble than it's worth.
Just to make sure you realize, however, upwards of 95% of Java can be decompiled back into source using various free utilities, so in reality, Java's compilation isn't much better than distributing Ruby source.
This is not a language specific problem and one that can be managed more effectively through source control software.
There is a library called ruby2c that compiles a subset of Ruby into C code (which you can then compile into native code, if you want).
It was actually originally written as a Ruby code obfuscator (but has since been used for lots of other stuff, including Ruby Arduino development).