Disable automatic registration of WebFilter - spring

In a spring-boot 2.4 application, I have two SecurityWebFilterChains. For only one of them, I want to add some WebFilters via addFilterBefore().
#Configuration
#EnableWebFluxSecurity
class WebSecurityConfig {
#Bean
fun filter1(service: Service): WebFilter = Filter1(service)
#Bean
fun filter2(component: Component): WebFilter = Filter2(component)
#Bean
#Order(1)
fun apiSecurityConfiguration(
http: ServerHttpSecurity,
filter1: WebFilter,
filter2: WebFilter
): SecurityWebFilterChain = http
.securityMatcher(pathMatchers("/path/**"))
.addFilterBefore(filter1, SecurityWebFiltersOrder.AUTHENTICATION)
.addFilterAt(filter2, SecurityWebFiltersOrder.AUTHENTICATION)
.build()
#Bean
#Order(2)
fun actuatorSecurityConfiguration(
http: ServerHttpSecurity,
reactiveAuthenticationManager: ReactiveAuthenticationManager
): SecurityWebFilterChain = http
.securityMatcher(pathMatchers("/manage/**"))
.authenticationManager(reactiveAuthenticationManager)
.httpBasic { }
.build()
}
However, as those WebFilters are created as beans, they are registered automatically and are applied to all requests, seemingly outside the security chain.
For servlet filters, it is possible to disable this registration with a FilterRegistrationBean (see spring-boot documentation).
Is there a similar way for reactive WebFilters, or do I have to add additional URL filtering into those filters?

To find a solution, we first have to dig in a little deeper into how spring works and its internals.
All beans of type WebFilter are automatically added to the main web handling filter chain.
See spring boot documentation on the topic:
WebFilter beans found in the application context will be automatically used to filter each exchange.
So that happens even if you want them to be applied only to a specific spring-security filter chain.
(IMHO, it is a bit of a flaw of spring-security to re-use the Filter or WebFilter interfaces and not have something security-specific with the same signature.)
In code, the relevant part is in spring-web's WebHttpHandlerBuilder
public static WebHttpHandlerBuilder applicationContext(ApplicationContext context) {
// ...
List<WebFilter> webFilters = context
.getBeanProvider(WebFilter.class)
.orderedStream()
.collect(Collectors.toList());
builder.filters(filters -> filters.addAll(webFilters));
// ...
}
Which in turn is called in a spring-boot's HttpHandlerAutoConfiguration to create the main HttpHandler.
#Bean
public HttpHandler httpHandler(ObjectProvider<WebFluxProperties> propsProvider) {
HttpHandler httpHandler = WebHttpHandlerBuilder.applicationContext(this.applicationContext).build();
// ...
return httpHandler;
}
To prevent those filters to be applied to all exchanges, it might be possible to simply not create them as beans and create them manually, as suggested in a comment above. Then the BeanProvider will not find them and not add them to the HttpHandler. However, you leave IoC-country and lose autoconfiguration for the filters. Not ideal when those filters become more complex or when you have a lot of them.
So instead my solution is to manually configure a HttpHandler for my application, which does not add my security-specific filters to the global filter chain.
To make this work, I first declare a marker interface for my filters.
interface NonGlobalFilter
class MySecurityFilter : WebFilter, NonGlobalFilter {
// ...
}
Then, a configuration class is required where the custom HttpHandler is created. Conveniently, WebHttpHandlerBuilder has a method to manipulate its filter list with a Consumer.
This will prevent spring-boot to use its own HttpHandler from HttpHandlerAutoConfiguration because it is annotated with #ConditionalOnMissingBean(HttpHandler.class).
#Configuration
class WebHttpHandlerConfiguration(
private val applicationContext: ApplicationContext
) {
#Bean
fun httpHandler() = WebHttpHandlerBuilder
.applicationContext(applicationContext)
.filters {
it.removeIf {
webFilter -> webFilter is NonGlobalFilter
}
}
.build()
}
And that's it! As always, spring provides a lot of useful defaults out of the box, but when it gets in your way, there will be a means to adjust it as necessary.

Related

How to Inject custom method argument in Spring WebFlux using HandlerMethodArgumentResolver?

I want to create an custom method argument Resolver using Spring WebFlux. I am following link but its seem to be not working.
I am able to create the custom argument resolver using WebMvc.
import org.springframework.web.reactive.result.method.HandlerMethodArgumentResolver;
public class MyContextArgumentResolver implements HandlerMethodArgumentResolver {
#Override
public boolean supportsParameter(MethodParameter parameter) {
return MyCustomeObject.class.isAssignableFrom(parameter.getParameterType())
}
#Override
public Mono<Object> resolveArgument(MethodParameter parameter, BindingContext bindingContext,
ServerWebExchange exchange) {
.....
return Mono.just(new MyCustomeObject())
}
Please note that i am using HandlerMethodArgumentResolver from .web.reactive. package.
My AutoConfiguration file look like
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnClass(EnableWebFlux.class) // checks that WebFlux is on the class-path
#ConditionalOnWebApplication(type = ConditionalOnWebApplication.Type.REACTIVE)//checks that the app is a reactive web-app
public class RandomWebFluxConfig implements WebFluxConfigurer {
#Override
public void configureArgumentResolvers(ArgumentResolverConfigurer configurer) {
MyContextArgumentResolver[] myContextArgumentResolverArray = {contextArgumentResolver()};
configurer.addCustomResolver(myContextArgumentResolverArray );
}
#Bean
public MyContextArgumentResolver contextArgumentResolver() {
return new MyContextArgumentResolver ();
}
My spring.factories looks like
# Auto Configure
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration=\
com.XXXX.XXX.XXX.RandomWebFluxConfig
Please note that above configuration is part of the jar which is added in Spring WebFlux Boot project enabled using #EnableWebFlux .
It seems you're conflating two different problems here.
First, you should make sure that your method argument resolver works in a regular project.
For that, you need a #Configuration class that implements the relevant method in WebFluxConfigurer. Your code snippet is doing that but with two flaws:
Your configuration is using #EnableWebFlux, which is disabling the WebFlux auto-configuration in Spring Boot. You should remove that
it seems you're trying to cast a list of MethodArgumentResolver into a single instance and that's probably why things aren't working here. I believe your code snippet could be just:
configurer.addCustomResolver(contextArgumentResolver());
Now the second part of this question is about setting this up as a Spring Boot auto-configuration. I guess that you'd like WebFlux applications to automatically get that custom argument resolvers if they depend on your library.
If you want to achieve that, you should first make sure to read up a bit about auto-configurations in the reference documentation. After that, you'll realize that your configuration class is not really an auto-configuration since it will be applied in all cases.
You should probably add a few conditions on that configuration like:
#ConditionalOnClass(EnableWebFlux.class) // checks that WebFlux is on the classpath
#ConditionalOnWebApplication(type = ConditionalOnWebApplication.Type.REACTIVE) // checks that the app is a reactive web app

Spring Boot with Two MVC Configurations

I have a Spring Boot app with a REST API, using Jackson for the JSON view configuration. It works great and I can get all the Spring Boot goodness.
However, I need to add an additional REST API that is similar but with different settings. For example, among other things, it needs a different Jackson object mapper configuration because the JSON will look quite a bit different (e.g. no JSON arrays). That is just one example but there are quite a few differences. Each API has a different context (e.g. /api/current and /api/legacy).
Ideally I'd like two MVC configs mapped to these different contexts, and not have to give up any of the automatic wiring of things in boot.
So far all I've been able to get close on is using two dispatcher servlets each with its own MVC config, but that results in Boot dropping a whole bunch of things I get automatically and basically defeats the reason for using boot.
I cannot break the app up into multiple apps.
The answer "you cannot do this with Boot and still get all its magic" is an acceptable answer. Seems like it should be able to handle this though.
There's several ways to achieve this. Based on your requirement , Id say this is a case of managing REST API versions.
There's several ways to version the REST API, some the popular ones being version urls and other techniques mentioned in the links of the comments.
The URL Based approach is more driven towards having multiple versions of the address:
For example
For V1 :
/path/v1/resource
and V2 :
/path/v2/resource
These will resolve to 2 different methods in the Spring MVC Controller bean, to which the calls get delegated.
The other option to resolve the versions of the API is to use the headers, this way there is only URL, multiple methods based on the version.
For example:
/path/resource
HEADER:
X-API-Version: 1.0
HEADER:
X-API-Version: 2.0
This will also resolve in two separate operations on the controller.
Now these are the strategies based on which multiple rest versions can be handled.
The above approaches are explained well in the following: git example
Note: The above is a spring boot application.
The commonality in both these approaches is that there will need to be different POJOS based on which Jackson JSON library to automatically marshal instances of the specified type into JSON.
I.e. Assuming that the code uses the #RestController [org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestController]
Now if your requirement is to have different JSON Mapper i.e. different JSON mapper configurations, then irrespective of the Spring contexts you'll need a different strategy for the serialization/De-Serialization.
In this case, you will need to implement a Custom De-Serializer {CustomDeSerializer} that will extend JsonDeserializer<T> [com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer] and in the deserialize() implement your custom startegy.
Use the #JsonDeserialize(using = CustomDeSerializer.class) annotation on the target POJO.
This way multiple JSON schemes can be managed with different De-Serializers.
By Combining Rest Versioning + Custom Serialization Strategy , each API can be managed in it's own context without having to wire multiple dispatcher Servlet configurations.
Expanding on my comment of yesterday and #Ashoka Header idea i would propose to register 2 MessageConverters (legacy and current) for custom media types. You can do this like that:
#Bean
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter currentMappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter() {
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter jsonConverter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
// set features
jsonConverter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
jsonConverter.setSupportedMediaTypes(Arrays.asList(new MediaType("json", "v2")));
return jsonConverter;
}
#Bean
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter legacyMappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter() {
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter jsonConverter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
// set features
jsonConverter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
return jsonConverter;
}
Pay attention to the custom media-type for one of the converters.
If you like , you can use an Interceptor to rewrite the Version-Headers proposed by #Ashoka to a custom Media-Type like so:
public class ApiVersionMediaTypeMappingInterceptor extends HandlerInterceptorAdapter {
#Override
public boolean preHandle(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, Object handler) throws Exception {
try {
if(request.getHeader("X-API-Version") == "2") {
request.setAttribute("Accept:","json/v2");
}
.....
}
}
This might not be the exact answer you were looking for, but maybe it can provide some inspiration. An interceptor is registered like so.
If you can live with a different port for each context, then you only have to overwrite the DispatcherServletAutoConfiguration beans. All the rest of the magic works, multpart, Jackson etc. You can configure the Servlet and Jackson/Multipart etc. for each child-context separately and inject bean of the parent context.
package test;
import static org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.web.DispatcherServletAutoConfiguration.DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_BEAN_NAME;
import static org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.web.DispatcherServletAutoConfiguration.DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_REGISTRATION_BEAN_NAME;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration;
import org.springframework.boot.builder.SpringApplicationBuilder;
import org.springframework.boot.context.embedded.ServletRegistrationBean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.PropertySource;
import org.springframework.http.converter.json.Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurerAdapter;
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {
Application.Context1.class,
Application.Context2.class
})
public class Application extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Bean
public TestBean testBean() {
return new TestBean();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
final SpringApplicationBuilder builder = new SpringApplicationBuilder().parent(Application.class);
builder.child(Context1.class).run();
builder.child(Context2.class).run();
}
public static class TestBean {
}
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {Application.class, Context2.class})
#PropertySource("classpath:context1.properties")
public static class Context1 {
#Bean(name = DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_BEAN_NAME)
DispatcherServlet dispatcherServlet() {
DispatcherServlet dispatcherServlet = new DispatcherServlet();
// custom config here
return dispatcherServlet;
}
#Bean(name = DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_REGISTRATION_BEAN_NAME)
ServletRegistrationBean dispatcherServletRegistration() {
ServletRegistrationBean registration = new ServletRegistrationBean(dispatcherServlet(), "/test1");
registration.setName(DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_BEAN_NAME);
// custom config here
return registration;
}
#Bean
Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder(TestBean testBean) {
System.out.println(testBean);
Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder builder = new Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder();
// custom config here
return builder;
}
}
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {Application.class, Context1.class})
#PropertySource("classpath:context2.properties")
public static class Context2 {
#Bean(name = DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_BEAN_NAME)
DispatcherServlet dispatcherServlet() {
DispatcherServlet dispatcherServlet = new DispatcherServlet();
// custom config here
return dispatcherServlet;
}
#Bean(name = DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_REGISTRATION_BEAN_NAME)
ServletRegistrationBean dispatcherServletRegistration() {
ServletRegistrationBean registration = new ServletRegistrationBean(dispatcherServlet(), "/test2");
registration.setName(DEFAULT_DISPATCHER_SERVLET_BEAN_NAME);
// custom config here
return registration;
}
#Bean
Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder(TestBean testBean) {
System.out.println(testBean);
Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder builder = new Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder();
// custom config here
return builder;
}
}
}
The context1/2.properties files currently only contain a server.port=8080/8081 but you can set all the other spring properties for the child contexts there.
In Spring-boot ypu can use different profiles (like dev and test).
Start application with
-Dspring.profiles.active=dev
or -Dspring.profiles.active=test
and use different properties files named application-dev.properties or application-test.properties inside your properties directory.
That could do the problem.

Simple Reverse Proxy with Spring Boot and Netflix Zuul

I'm looking to implement a simple reverse proxy with Spring Boot that is:
Easy to add routes
Ability to add custom authentication on a per route basis
Add additional headers as needed
I've looked at the facilities provided by the #EnableZuulProxy annotation but it seems too heavyweight as I don't have a desire to use Eureka, Ribbon, or Hystrix. However, #EnableZuulServer is a bit light on configuration.
Would anyone be able to provide an example of what I'm after? Is Netflix Zuul the right choice for this or is there another library I should be looking at?
Thanks!
Simple Reverse Proxy Server
It's easy to set up a simple proxy reverse using Spring Boot without Ribbon, Eureka, or Hystrix.
Simply annotate your main application class with #EnableZuulProxy and set the following property in your configuration:
ribbon.eureka.enabled=false
Then define your routes in your configuration like such:
zuul.routes.<route_name>.path=<route_path>
zuul.routes.<route_name>.url=http://<url_to_host>/
where <route_name> is an arbitrary name for your route and <route_path> is a path using Ant-style path matching.
So a concrete example would be something like this
zuul.routes.userservice.path=users/**
zuul.routes.userservice.url=http://localhost:9999/
Custom Filters
You can also implement your custom authentication and any additional headers by extending and implementing the ZuulFilter class and adding it as an #Bean to your #Configuration class.
So another concrete example:
public class MyFilter extends ZuulFilter {
#Override
public String filterType() {
// can be pre, route, post, and error
return "pre";
}
#Override
public int filterOrder() {
return 0;
}
#Override
public boolean shouldFilter() {
return true;
}
#Override
public Object run() {
// RequestContext is shared by all ZuulFilters
RequestContext ctx = RequestContext.getCurrentContext();
HttpServletRequest request = ctx.getRequest();
// add custom headers
ctx.addZuulRequestHeader("x-custom-header", "foobar");
// additional custom logic goes here
// return isn't used in current impl, null is fine
return null;
}
}
and then
#Configuration
public class GatewayApplication {
#Bean
public MyFilter myFilter() {
return new myFilter();
}
}
Zuul is a good choice. Am not sure about other alternatives but, we've started building Zuul filters (Pre/Post and Route) that could intercept the request and do all pre/post processing and route based upon your need. It is not mandatory to use the whole bunch of Eureka, Ribbon and Hysterix along with Zuul.

Custom default headers for REST API only using Spring Data REST

I have a use case where my application hosts REST API and web application and we need to add custom header to REST APIs only. REST APIs are enabled through Spring Data REST. Typically we could use Servlet Filter to achieve this but we need code the logic of isolating requests to our REST API and add the custom headers. It would be nice if Spring Data REST API allows to add a default header to all the responses it generates. What are your thoughts? Don't say I am lazy :)
For folks looking for actual implementation details..
Interceptor
public class CustomInterceptor extends HandlerInterceptorAdapter {
#Override
public boolean preHandle(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, Object handler) throws Exception {
System.out.println("adding CORS headers.....");
response.addHeader("HEADER-NAME", "HEADER-VALUE");
return true;
}
}
Java Configuration
#Configuration
public class RepositoryConfig extends
RepositoryRestMvcConfiguration {
#Override
public RequestMappingHandlerMapping repositoryExporterHandlerMapping() {
RequestMappingHandlerMapping mapping = super
.repositoryExporterHandlerMapping();
mapping.setInterceptors(new Object[] { new CustomInterceptor() });
return mapping;
}
}
As Spring Data REST is built on top of Spring MVC, the easiest way is to configure a custom HandlerInterceptor as described in the reference documentation.
With Spring Data REST the easiest way is to extend RepositoryRestMvcConfiguration and override repositoryExporterHandlerMapping, call the parent method and then invoke ….setInterceptors(…) on it.
Finally I managed to make the setup of custom interceptor working also on spring-data-rest 2.4.1.RELEASE.
#Configuration
public class RestMvcConfig extends RepositoryRestMvcConfiguration {
#Autowired UserInterceptor userInterceptor;
#Autowired ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public DelegatingHandlerMapping restHandlerMapping() {
RepositoryRestHandlerMapping repositoryMapping = new RepositoryRestHandlerMapping(resourceMappings(), config());
repositoryMapping.setInterceptors(new Object[] { userInterceptor }); // FIXME: not nice way of defining interceptors
repositoryMapping.setJpaHelper(jpaHelper());
repositoryMapping.setApplicationContext(applicationContext);
repositoryMapping.afterPropertiesSet();
BasePathAwareHandlerMapping basePathMapping = new BasePathAwareHandlerMapping(config());
basePathMapping.setApplicationContext(applicationContext);
basePathMapping.afterPropertiesSet();
List<HandlerMapping> mappings = new ArrayList<HandlerMapping>();
mappings.add(basePathMapping);
mappings.add(repositoryMapping);
return new DelegatingHandlerMapping(mappings);
}
}
I had to override the restHandlerMapping method, copy-paste it's content and add a line repositoryMapping.setInterceptors for adding custom interceptor, in my case the UserInterceptor.
Is there any better way?

What does the #Secure annotation do and what package is it apart of

I'm writing an API using Java EE, JAX-RS, Jersey. In doing this I've implemented my own security context and security filter.
Looking at questions like this one (How to get MIME type of uploaded file in Jersey) I've seen the #Secure annotation but what does it do? My hope was that is was an annotation that queries the isSecure method of the security context in the same way that #RolesAllowed does for checking if a user has the right to access a particular method. If so is there such a way of doing so with annotations or am I stuck to using the #Context to get the security context and just from that.
The #Secure annotation seems to be a custom one. JAX-RS/Jersey does not support such feature out-of-the-box but it's not that hard to implement. Lets say you have your own #Secure annotation and you want to do checks whether a communication channel is secure for methods annotated with this annotation. You need to create a custom ResourceFilterFactory in which you'll assign a special filter for such methods:
public class IsSecureResourceFilterFactory implements ResourceFilterFactory {
private class IsSecureFilter implements ResourceFilter, ContainerRequestFilter {
// ResourceFilter
#Override
public ContainerRequestFilter getRequestFilter() {
return this;
}
#Override
public ContainerResponseFilter getResponseFilter() {
return null;
}
// ContainerRequestFilter
#Override
public ContainerRequest filter(final ContainerRequest request) {
// Check whether the channel is secure.
if (request.isSecure()) {
return request;
}
// Throw an exception if it's not.
throw new WebApplicationException(Response.Status.FORBIDDEN);
}
}
#Override
public List<ResourceFilter> create(final AbstractMethod abstractMethod) {
// Add IsSecureFilter for resource methods annotated with #Secure annotation (ignore other resource methods).
return abstractMethod.isAnnotationPresent(Secure.class)
? Collections.<ResourceFilter>singletonList(new IsSecureFilter()): null;
}
}
Now you need to tell Jersey about this ResourceFilterFactory. There are 2 ways:
via web.xml
<init-param>
<param-name>com.sun.jersey.spi.container.ResourceFilters</param-name>
<param-value>my.package.IsSecureResourceFilterFactory</param-value>
</init-param>
or via META-INF/services mechanism - you need to create a file called META-INF/services/com.sun.jersey.spi.container.ResourceFilterFactory which would contain a fully qualified name of your factory (in this case my.package.IsSecureResourceFilterFactory) and make sure this file is on the class-path of your application.

Resources