In other api gateways, like Gloo, it is possible to create a route that instead of going downstream, it returns a "directResponseAction", like status = 200 and body = "hello".
Is it possible to do the same thing in Ocelot API Gateway?
To make it very clear, I am trying to accomplish the following:
User requests https://mygateway/hardcoded
Ocelot returns HTTP 200 "Hello" (no downstream host involved)
Related
I am using KrakenD to make a call to a Salesforce endpoint
/services/data/v56/jobs/ingest/{{_jobId}}/batches
This backend endpoint doesn't return any data in the response body and as a result the call fails with a 500. From the logs -
[00] [KRAKEND] 2023/01/27 - 23:39:45.615 ▶ ERROR [ENDPOINT: /ingest/:jobId/batches] EOF
How do I solve this error? How can I tell KrakenD to expect the empty response body?
I am not using any custom plugins.
You should check the encoding defined at the backend section (by default, it's JSON) and select one that suits your backend responses. Here you'll find some recommendations: https://www.krakend.io/docs/backends/supported-encodings/#how-to-choose-the-backend-encoding
If you are expecting empty responses, you could use no-op (https://www.krakend.io/docs/endpoints/no-op/)
can anyone help on below issue?
I have two microservices A and B where service A sends request to B, B fetches data from database and sends the response back to A, based on received data, I am doing few operations.
At present, I am using Http client call.I don't want to use http request? How can I proceed further?
Thanks,
Revathi
If you want to use HTTP to communicate between 2 services, you need a HTTP client that allows you to specify the parameters related to your request. Example in Java (more details here):
HttpClient client = HttpClient.newHttpClient();
HttpRequest request = HttpRequest.newBuilder()
.uri(URI.create("<YOUR_ENDPOINT>"))
.build();
client.sendAsync(request, BodyHandlers.ofString())
.thenApply(HttpResponse::body)
.thenAccept(System.out::println)
.join();
If you don't want to use HTTP 1.1, you can take a look at gRPC, there are plenty examples on the web on how to use both of them
I'm not able to figure out why the REST API call works just fine in Postman but not in the GraphQL Playground. If I could see the actual REST call being made by GraphQL, would be helpful to debug the issue.
Firecamp's GraphQL client lets you test the GraphQL as an API call or as a Query way.
Here is the dedicated GraphQL client
Here is REST like GraphQL client
Note: Make sure that you double-check the method and headers while using REST-like GraphQL client. IN most cases method would be post and header should contains Content-Type: application-json / application/graphql
The GraphQL playground allows to send GraphQL queries/mutations to your GraphQL server. You can see the requests that are send using the network tab of a browser dev tools.
For example, if a server is in running at the following address http://localhost:4000/graphql, sending a query/mutation, a XHR request will be sent to it. In the Request Payload of the Headers section there is the query/mutation itself.
In the Response section you can see the returned response.
You can start having a look at the returned response of your query/mutation. Perhaps there is something wrong in the related resolve function in GraphQL.
I have my own instance of Parse Server running on AWS and until now Cloud Functions have been working great, but with one caveat: they cannot be successfully called publicly, i.e. they require an authorisation key be sent in the REST request header.
I want to set up a Slack Slash Command to my server, and it has to be able to POST a payload without any headers or extra parameters. As a result, my requests are currently unauthorised (returning 403 statuses).
Is there a way to create granular control over a Parse Cloud Function's authorisation (i.e. if it requires master-key header or not), and if not — is there a way of forwarding the request but still through the Parse server?—Or even a way of manipulating the headers of a Slack request? I would rather not have to use another service just for request forwarding.
Thanks!
Two options
Pass in the master key on the client request which should bypass authorization. It's a blunt approach but might be okay in your case (without knowing more details).
Or run a new express endpoint alongside parse and from there call the parse cloud function using the masker key.
var api = new ParseServer(...)
var app = express();
app.use('/parse', api);
app.get('/api/slack', function(req, res) {
//call cloud function passing in master key
// add X-Parse-Master-Key as http header
unirest.post("http://myhost.com:1337/parse/functions/mycloudfunction")
.headers({'X-Parse-Master-Key', MASTER_KEY)
.end(function(response) {
}
I am currently trying to setup AWS Api Gateway, to proxy to another api, that has fully functional methods, response content, status codes etc. This is fairly simple to setup, but I have noticed that the Api Gateway always returns 200 OK no matter what the origin api responds with.
Fx. if there was a bad request (in the origin api) which results in a error message in JSON and a 400 Bad Request, the Api Gateway will respond with a the exact same error message, but a status code of 200 OK
If I remove all settings from the Message Response in the API Gateway web-interface, I get an internal error in the API Gateway. Can it be true that I have to map all the different status codes from the origin api manually in the Api Gateway?
I would prefer if it was possible to just let the status code (as well as the response, which currently works great) pass through, and not have the Api Gateway touch it in any way.
Proxy integration can be used to achieve this. In this case, it is HTTP Proxy. Lambda Proxy integration can also be used but will need some code logic in lambda. API GW will then return the result as-is.
You are correct that currently when using API Gateway you are required to map all response codes in your integration responses. We have heard this "pass through" request from other customers and we may consider including this in future updates to the service.