We have log messages that look like the following:
<TE CT="20:33:57.258102" Sv="N" As="CTWare.PerimeterService" T="PerimeterService" M="GetWallboard" TID="1" TN="" MID="" ID="" MSG="Exit method 'GetWallboard' took 00:00:00.0781247" />
Right now, we use the following Grok filter:
match => { "message" => "<TE CT=\"%{DATESTAMP:log_timestamp}\" Sv=%{QS:severity} As=%{QS:assembly} T=%{QS:T} M=%{QS:M} TID=%{QS:TID} TN=%{QS:TN} MID=%{QS:MID} ID=%{QS:ID} MSG=%{QS:log_raw} />" }
Inside the "MSG" / "log_raw" field, however, I want to try and extract the timestamp after "...took" into its own field. I was hoping to accomplish it by using a custom regex to extract "MSG" / "log_raw" up to a specific point, then another regex to capture the "took" timestamp and make a new field. But, when I test with online Grok debuggers I'm not having any luck. Is it even possible to do something like this?
Your CT field does not match DATESTAMP. It will match TIME. You can then use a second grok to pull the time from the [log_raw] field.
grok { match => { "[log_raw]" => "took %{TIME:someField}" } }
to get
"someField" => "00:00:00.0781247",
I would be tempted to use an xml filter to parse that [message], since it will adjust if there are ever additional or missing fields.
Related
I'm trying to work with grok to parse a certain log file into fields to use on a ingest pipeline for filebeat. This is my grok pattern as it looks now:
%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:log_time} %{NOTSPACE:device_id} %{DATA:OS} %{GREEDYDATA:message}
Everything gets working but the message field in particular comes off like this:
"message": [
[
"a:d:l: Notifying connector 'DEVICE DISCONNECTED' [sn=0046750038, version=8.0, model=Moto Z2 Play, manufacture=motorola]"
I want to have these itens in message as separate fields. For example: version into version field, model into model and manufacture into manufacture.
This is the log I'm working with:
2022-07-18 11:55:54,327 [0046750038] [Android] a:d:l: Notifying connector 'DEVICE DISCONNECTED' [sn=0046750038, version=8.0, model=Moto Z2 Play, manufacture=motorola]
I'm a beginner dealing with grok and been trying out to make it happen by what I see on the internet but still couldn't make it. If anyone is able to help I'll be glad!
Best regards.
You can use grok with kv in this case
grok
{
match => {"message" => "%{TIME:TIMESTAMP_ISO8601} \[%{WORD:device_id}\] \[%{DATA:OS}\] %{GREEDYDATA:some} \'%{GREEDYDATA:status}\' \[%{GREEDYDATA:device_details}\]"}
}
kv {
source => "device_details"
field_split_pattern => ","
value_split => "="
}
i have this data in elastic search logs saved in a referer field
/clientReq?sessionid=3332&UID=ed91b-517234-4f4c211-a20e-d2e1aefc126a&signUp=false
i want to use ruby to save this data ed91b-517234-4f4c211-a20e-d2e1aefc126a in a separate field.
i have tried this in ruby in my pattern configuration file,
ruby {
code => "
saveid=event[referer].match((\w+[-]?)+)+)
event.set('saved',saveid) "
}
this doesn't even save the entire filed. So i went ahead to try grok filter instead and tried this,
grok {
match => {"message" => "%{COMBINEDAPACHELOG}"}
add_field => { "savedData" => "%{referer}" }
}
neither of these works. I have tested configuration and if configuring successfully. when i visit kibana front end i don't see new field created either.
Ruby hash syntax event[field] = foo is not used anymore, and has been replaced by Get API for example, event.get(referrer).
Beside that, your regex is not correct to get desired results. One of the solutions is to use Positive Lookbehind to check for UID,
this should work,
ruby {
code => "
saveid = event.get('referer').match(/(?<=UID=)((\w+[-]?)+)+/)[1]
event.set('saved',saveid)
"
}
for grok, you can create a new filter for your referer field, and use the gork's predefined UUID pattern to match your string...can you try this,
grok {
match => {"referer" => "UID=%{UUID:saveData}"}
}
hope this helps.
I'm using logstash, filebeat and grok to send data from logs to my elastisearch instance. This is the grok configuration in the pipe
filter {
grok {
match => {
"message" => "%{SYSLOGTIMESTAMP:messageDate} %{GREEDYDATA:messagge}"
}
}
}
This works fine, the issue is that messageDate is in this format Jan 15 11:18:25 and it doesn't have a year entry.
Now, i actually know the year these files were created in and i was wondering if it is possible to add the value to the field during the process, that is, somehow turn Jan 15 11:18:25 into 2016 Jan 15 11:18:25 before sending to elasticsearch (obviously without editing the files, which i could do and even with ease but it'll be a temporary fix to what i have to do and not a definitive solution)
I have tried googling if it was possible but no luck...
Valepu,
The only way to modify the data from a field is using the ruby filter:
filter {
ruby {
code => "#your code here#"
}
}
For more information like...how to get,set field values, here is the link:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/plugins-filters-ruby.html
If you have a separate field for date as a string, you can use logstash date plugin:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/plugins-filters-date.html
If you don't have it as a separate field (as in this case) use this site to construct your own grok pattern:
http://grokconstructor.appspot.com/do/match
I made this to preprocess the values:
%{YEAR:yearVal} %{MONTH:monthVal} %{NUMBER:dayVal} %{TIME:timeVal} %{GREEDYDATA:message}
Not the most elegant I guess, but you get the values in different fields. Using this you can create your own date field and parse it with date filter so you will get a comparable value or you can use these fields by themselves. I'm sure there is a better solution, for example you could make your own grok pattern and use that, but I'm gonna leave some exploration for you too. :)
By reading thoroughly the grok documentation i found what google couldn't find for me and which i apparently missed the first time i read that page
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/plugins-filters-grok.html#plugins-filters-grok-add_field
Using the add_field and remove_field options i managed to add the year to my date, then i used the date plugin to send it to logstash as a timestamp. My filter configuration now looks like this
filter {
grok {
match => {
"message" => "%{SYSLOGTIMESTAMP:tMessageDate} %{GREEDYDATA:messagge}"
add_field => { "messageDate" => "2016 %{tMessageDate}" }
remove_field => ["tMessageDate"]
}
}
date {
match => [ "messageDate", "YYYY MMM dd HH:mm:ss"]
}
}
And it worked fine
I'm having a log file, which actually has INFOs' and ERRORs. So I tried to match only the needful INFOs by using the grok filter. So this is how my log lines look like. Few of them from the file.
And this is how my grok look like in my logstash conf:
grok {
patterns_dir => ["D:/elk_stack_for_ideabiz/elk_from_chamith/ELK_stack/logstash-5.1.1/bin/patterns"]
match => {
"message" => [
"^TID\: \[0\] \[AM\] \[%{LOGTIMESTAMPTWO:logtimestamp}]%{REQUIREDDATAFORAPP:app_message}",
"^TID\: \[0\] \[AM\] \[%{LOGTIMESTAMPTWO:logtimestamp}]%{REQUIREDDATAFORRESPONSESTATUS:response_message}"
]
}
}
The pattern seems to be working fine. I could provide the pattern if required.
I've got two questions. One is I wanted only the grok matched lines to be sent to the index, and prevent Logstash from indexing the non-matched ones and the second is to prevent Logstash from showing the message in every single ES record.
I tried using the overwrite as such under the match but still no luck:
overwrite => [ "message" ]
All in all what I need to see in my indice are the messages (app_message, response_message from the above match), which should match the above two conditions. Where as now, all the lines are getting indexed.
Is it possible do something like this? Or does Logstash index all of them by default?
Where am I going wrong? Any help could be appreciated.
Indexing only the lines you want is pretty straightforward.
By default, if grok fails to match anything it will add the tag _grokparsefailure.
Now what you want to do is check for that tag and then use the drop filter.
if "_grokparsefailure" in [tags] {
drop { }
}
sysadmin1138 mentioned that you can select between different grok filters by adding tag_on_failure => ['_INFOFailure' ]
For your sencond question you can simply remove the field. Every filter has a remove_field option but I use the mutate filter to indicate that I am manipulating the message.
mutate {
remove_field => ["message"]
}
I am trying to parse a bunch of strings in Logstash and output is set as ElasticSearch.
Sample input string is: 2016 May 24 10:20:15 User1 CREATE "Create a new folder"
The grok filter is:
match => { "message" => "%{SYSLOGTIMESTAMP:timestamp} %{WORD:user} %{WORD:action_performed} %{WORD:action_description} "}
In Elasticsearch, I am not able to see separate columns for different field such as timstamp, user, action_performed etc.
Instead the whole string is under a single column "message".
I would like to store the information in separate fields instead of just a single column.
Not sure what to change in logstash filter to achieve as desired.
Thanks!
You need to change your grok pattern with this, i.e. use QUOTEDSTRING instead of WORD and it will work!
match => { "message" => "%{SYSLOGTIMESTAMP:timestamp} %{WORD:user} %{WORD:action_performed} %{QUOTEDSTRING:action_description}"}