I'm a fairly new user of GNU Make. I want to get a list of Golang files and build each one of them using Make.
I want to create a target that will receive the apt Go file as a param.
In the snippet I've written the control of the program never reaches the %.go target.
Here is a snippet of a file.
EXECUTABLES := $(wildcard cmd/*/*/*.go)
%.go:
echo "Build the go file"
build: $(EXECUTABLES)
echo $<
Output:
echo cmd/abc/handler/main.go
cmd/abc/handler/main.go
I modified the script to this but I'm facing the same issue. Also tried replacing %.go with *.go and with cmd/abc/handler/main.go
Here is one of the variants mentioned above.
%.go:
echo "Hello world"
build: $(wildcard cmd/*/*/*.go)
echo $<
Anything I might be missing here?
You have a rule that tells make how to build a .go file. But, you already HAVE a .go file. Make doesn't have to build it, it's a source file that you wrote. That rule has no prerequisites, so as far as make is concerned if the file exists, it's up to date (it doesn't depend on any other file).
So, when you ask make to build that file make looks and says "this file exists already, and it doesn't depend on anything, so the thing you asked me to do is already done and I don't need to run any commands".
When you write a makefile you have to think of it from the end first back to the beginning. What is the thing you want to end up with? That is the first target you write. Then what files are used as inputs to that final thing? Those are the prerequisites of that target. And what commands are needed to create the target from the prerequisites? That is the recipe.
Then once you have that, you think about those prerequisites, considering them as targets. What prerequisites do they have? And what commands do you need to turn those prerequisites into that target?
And you keep going backwards like that until you come to a place where all the prerequisites are original source files that can't be built from anything, then you're done.
Related
In my project, I have a set of sub-directories that contain package.yaml files, for e.g.:
A/package.yaml
B/package.yaml
C/package.yaml
If I run hpack A/package.yaml, the file A/A.cabal is (re-)generated. The list of such directories can change over time, so I want to use GNU make to find all immediate sub-directories containing package.yaml files and generate the corresponding .cabal files using hpack.
I tried this based on another question, but it didn't work:
HPACK_FILES := $(wildcard */package.yaml)
PKG_DIRS := $(subst /,,$(dir $(HPACK_FILES)))
CABAL_FILES := $(addsuffix .cabal,$(join $(dir $(HPACK_FILES)),$(PKG_DIRS)))
test:
#echo $(CABAL_FILES)
update-cabal: $(CABAL_FILES)
%.cabal: package.yaml
hpack $<
However, make update-cabal says there's nothing to be done. make test however does output the right cabal files. How can I fix this?
Cheers!
The problem is this:
%.cabal: package.yaml
There is no file package.yaml. The files are named things like A/package.yaml. That is not the same thing.
Because the prerequisite doesn't exist, make decides that this pattern rule cannot match and so it goes looking for another rule that might be able to build the target. It doesn't find any rule that can build the target, so make says there's nothing to do because all the output files already exist.
Unfortunately what you want to do is not at all easy with make, because make is most comfortable with input and output files that are tied together by the filename with extensions, or similar. And in particular, it has a really hard time with relationships where the variable part is repeated more than once (as in, A/A.cabal where the A is repeated). There's no easy way to do that in make.
You'll have to use an advanced feature such as eval to do this. Something like:
# How to build a cabal file
%.cabal:
hpack $<
# Declare the prerequisites
$(foreach D,$(dir $(HPACK_FILES)),$(eval $D/$D.cabal: $D/package.yml))
I haven't found an answer so far, so I think this is not a repeat question.
I have some Makefile along the lines of:
include prerequisite_2
all: prerequisite_1 prerequisite_2
clean:
rm *.mod
prerequisite_1:
mkdir somedir
prerequisite_2:
re-write existing file
The issue is that I want the prerequisite_2 to rebuild whenever the default goal is called (all) or when prerequisite_2 is called from the command line, and I know I can use touch prerequisite_2, FORCE or .PHONY to achieve this. However, I DO NOT want it to run every time (the written file contains dependency information for the Fortran files involved) as it doesn't make sense to also rebuild this when calling: make clean
Is it possible to emulate the effects of FORCE or .PHONY only when the depending targets are called?
You can see what the goal targets are by looking at the MAKECMDGOALS variable.
So you can do something like:
ifeq (,$(if $(MAKECMDGOALS),$(filter-out all prerequisite-2,$(MAKECMDGOALS))))
include prerequisite-2
endif
The if condition will be true if MAKECMDGOALS is the empty string, or if it contains only all and/or prerequisite-2 but not if it contains any other target.
Usually, this is not what you want though. Usually you want to disable the include only if certain targets (clean is the classic example) are used.
This exact situation is even discussed in the GNU make manual.
I am learning makefiles, and can't just wrap my head around this problem i am having, and would like to understand how/why this fail.
I have half a dozen erlang files in a src directory. I want to compile these into a ebin directory, without having to define a rule for each and every one of them. According to the Gnu make documentation, pattern rules should be right up my alley.
However, with the following makefile, all I get from make is make: *** No targets. Stop. Why is that?
ebin/%.beam: src/%.erl
mkdir -p ebin
erlc -o ebin $<
Edit: Based on this answer, I now understand that i would have to explicitly declare the targets, for instance by using make ebin/cmplx.beam. However, i still do not understand how i should write my makefile to get my desired behaviour - since I have half a dozen targets (and in other projects even more), this seems like an unnecessary hassle. Is there not a way to define targets based on the source file names?
The target rule tells make that whenever it needs to produce a beam file in the ebin directory, and there exists a corresponding erl file in the src directory, it can use erlc.
However, this doesn't tell make that this is what it needs to do. You could explicitly tell make what it needs to do by giving it a target on the command line:
make ebin/foo.beam
If you don't give a target on the command line, make will pick the first non-pattern rule in the makefile as its target. However, your makefile doesn't have any non-pattern rules, so there is no target.
What you probably want is that for each existing erl file in src, make should consider the corresponding beam file in ebin to be a target. You can achieve that by calling wildcard and patsubst:
erl_files=$(wildcard src/*.erl)
beam_files=$(patsubst src/%.erl,ebin/%.beam,$(erl_files))
ebin/%.beam: src/%.erl
mkdir -p ebin
erlc -o ebin $<
all: $(beam_files)
(The indented lines need to be actual physical tabs, not spaces.)
That way, running make will rebuild all beam files that are out of date. all gets chosen as the default target, and it in turn depends on all beam existing or potential, each of which in turn depends on the corresponding erl file.
This trick is described in the GNU make manual.
I have a Variable in make that is dependant on a file that must be built before the variable can be set, is there a way to get this to work?
parsable_file: dependancies
commands to make parsable_file
targets=$(shell parse_cmd parsable_file)
$(targets): parsable_file
command to make targets
.phony: all
all:$(targets)
If I run $ make parsable_file && make all this will work (I get an error that parse_cmd cant find parsable_file but it works), but just make all will not work. Is there a Make idiom for this?
Set the variable in a file that you include in the main makefile and include a rule in the main makefile for how to build it (the one you already have should be fine).
I believe that will do what you want.
See Including Other Makefiles and How Makefiles Are Remade (which is linked from the first section) for more details on this concept.
Also, unless parseable_file has a usage independent from that parse_cmd call, it should be possible to do the creation and the parsing at the same time and just have the resulting makefile contain the correct value for $(targets) in one step.
Part of my Makefile:
CPUDEPS=./mydeps.cpu
(...)
deps: $(CPUDEPS)
$(CPUDEPS): $(CCFILES)
#echo [DEPS] CPU
$(CMDECHO)makedepend -Y -s'# CPU sources dependencies generated with "make deps"' \
-w4096 -f- -- $(CFLAGS) -- $^ 2> /dev/null > $(CPUDEPS)
(...)
sinclude $(CPUDEPS)
Problem 1: includes are done during the first phase of processing, targets during the second phase; so, if ./mydeps.cpu doesn't exist and I "make deps", I get first the error
Makefile:335: ./mydeps.cpu: No such file or directory
I hide the error using sinclude instead of include, but the problem is still there: the old file is included, not the just-generated-one. Have to run it twice to include the updated file. This is because make does a two-phase processing; is there any way to tell make to complete the target deps before parsing the includes?
Problem 2: even if the file ./mydeps.cpu doesn't exist and make deps actually creates it, I always get a "make: Nothing to do for deps". This doesn't happen with other targets. I don't understand why and how to avoid it.
Problem 1 is non-existant: before building a target, make automatically rebuilds makefiles (with implicit rules if no explicit rule is provided). So having a rule for the makefile ensures that will always be up to date, there is no need to run deps twice. Additionally, since CPUDEPS is a makefile, it will be updated automatically before any other rule is run, so dependencies will always be updated if necessary and make deps is not needed. You can probably notice this by yourself by observing the [DEPS] line being echoed if any of the CCFILES becomes more recent that the dependency file.
For Problem 2, adding anything to the recipe ensures that make doesn't complain about having nothing to do. If there is nothing else, you can use something like #echo OK to give feedback to the user, or a simple #true if you prefer totally silent makes.
What you are trying to achieve is useless: you can use the dependencies file that was created during the previous build. That's enough.
The main reasoning behind that rule is:
if you haven't changed any of your files, then the dependencies file is up-to-date, and there's nothing to build.
if you have changed anything, even very deep into your #include chain, on an existing file that were used by previous build, then the dependencies file have already caught it. You'll rebuild what is needed.
if you change something in a new file (you add that file!) then it was not used by previous build, and not listed in dependencies. But if you really want to use it, then you have to modify at least one of your other files that was used before, and you're back on the previous case.
The solution is to create the dependencies file during the normal process of the compilation, and to optionally include it (with sinclude) if it is present.