I am using this technique to concatenate a list of values per group. Before grouping I sorted the group field and the value field in ascending order.
this is the result after concatenating (column [Custom]):
In a following step I expand one column of the table in the last column, causing the [Custom] column to change sorting... ???
This is the content of the dd_center_tbi_variable column:
Related
I need a FILTER formula to get an output of the cells within the range of the two labels matching the conditions from the two drop-down lists.
For example, given the below sheet, I need the output to be what's highlighted, given the two conditions from the drop-down lists:
I also need to be able to add more date rows, expanding downward.
I've tried using QUERY:
=TRANSPOSE(QUERY(Accounts!B2:F, "SELECT * WHERE B="""&B2&""" ",1))
This only gives me the row of contents (apple, carrot, cake, steak, soda).
Here you can find my solution:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cWBLLmJx6mTlYrvPRvRE_y9NpBOJj_ILBgXmoB9suv4/copy
Note that when you merge cells, the value is only in the top one or the leftmost one. So if you have multiple rows for each data, you should multiplicate these cells.
I make additional column for this - first date I just copy and below it I insert a formula: (in H5)
=if(isblank(A5),H4,A5) - it says - if cell in column A is empty, take value from above, but if you find something there, put it here. Then I copy this formula down the sheet.
Then it gets easier.
To filter with data validation you have to first find right column using formulas INDEX and MATCH and then filter it against data values in additional column.
Does it work for you?
I have added a table in the webi designer. This is made up of 2 columns, "category" and "measure" and there are 3 rows of data. I wanted to add a column that will hold the row count, so I added a third column titled, row count, and added the formula
=(RowIndex())
This appeared to work as it now populated with 1,2,3 in that order. But if I sort the table by measure ascending, this sort works but my row count is now 2,3,1 in that order. I think this is to do with the formula =(RowIndex()) pulls back the "row count" from the intial sql order and then does not update.
Is there a way to update this so row count is dynamic and recalculates as different sorts are added. So it always stays in order i.e 1,2,3
You are correct that RowIndex() represents the row number from the SQL result set (the "microcube"). You want to use RunningCount() instead.
RunningCount() requires a dimension or measure object as a parameter, as it counts non-null values. But you can pass a static value to count all rows: =RunningCount(1)
I have a matrix report with 9 Row Groups and 1 Column Group (Months).
Instead of showing duplicate rows on the row groups, SSRS and Excel merge those fields. I would like them unmerged! I would like them to duplicate on my report.
I tried going to the parent group and grouping by every other field. This worked until I added two rows within the group, (which I need).
I guess you could also say that I really want my row groups to look like a table. If there's a better way to do that, I'm all ears!
enter image description here
Is it TYPE field that you need all the lines for?
The bracket to the left (under Row Groups) indicates that you are Grouping on something. Remove the Group Only (but not the rows and columns) so you are not grouping and all lines will be displayed.
I have this table:
When executed, it looks like:
This table is sorted by alphabetical order. I would like to sort it by the column named "No Vencido", which is generated in runtime combining 2 dimensions of a cube (one dimension is called "Class 1", the other dimension is called "value".
How can i sort a table by an autogenerated field?
Thanks
You can sort by any sort of expression - SSRS will quite happily sort something like two fields concatenated together:
=Fields!Class1.Value & Fields!value.Value
Just be careful to make sure the sorting is applied at the appropriate level to avoid unexpected, i.e. make sure you don't have different sorting expressions in any row group or detail group if not required.
If No Vencido is the grouping expression, apply the sorting at the group level.
If you don't want to sort on an expression, you can create a calculated field for each row in the dataset with the expression =Fields!Class1.Value & Fields!value.Value and group/sort on that calculated field as required.
Edit after comment
OK, I think you need to apply a sort expression like this to the groups that apply to the Top and Otros rows:
=Sum(IIf(Fields!Clase_1.Value = "No Vencido", Fields!Monto.Value, Nothing))
This is still sorting by the total Monto for each row group, but only considering the rows where Clase_1 is No Vencido.
Once this is set up sort by A-Z or Z-A as required.
I have a report which uses a dataset returned from a stored procedure. There are two key columns: Name and Value
I am using this dataset for two tablixes. The first is just a straightforward tablix displaying the data.
The second groups the data based on a Name column. I need to order this data based on the Sum of Value column
However I get the following error:
[rsAggregateInDataRowSortExpression] A
sort expression for the tablix
'table1' includes an aggregate
function. Aggregate functions cannot
be used in data row sort expressions.
Is there another way I can show the data grouped by name and still order it by Sum(Value)?
Instead of sorting on the tablix you need to sort against the row group. Remove the sort on the tablix and then go to the row group properties and put the same sort expression under the sorting section there, this should then work.
OK, I just had to add an extra column for the the Sum value to my query and then use that. Not ideal, but it works