Initially I thought that sentry gathers only those errors, which were proccessed with Sentry.captureException, so I created ErrorBoundary around my component, and when error inside of it happens, it triggers Sentry.captureException. But somewhy I get all the errors that occur inside my application, and it doesn't matter if I used captureException or not. So could you explain to me, why do need captureException then and how to disable gathering errors from the whole application? My Sentry.Init is simple, it contains only dsn.
Related
When I am creating a new session (or try to access from an other computer) in Vaadin Flow I get this error:
Can't move a node from one state tree to another
From this link, I read something about UI and getUIId().
However, I don't understand how I should change my application in order to fix the error.
As Denis mentioned in the forum post you linked, wrong scope sounds like the most likely culprit. In other words, you are trying to use the exact same component instance in two different UIs, when both UIs should have their own instance. It's not possible to use the same instance in two places at the same time.
You can find the documentation for Vaadin Spring scopes here: https://vaadin.com/docs/latest/flow/integrations/spring/scopes
One possible cause of errors such as that is that if you're storing a Component in a static variable. You shouldn't do that - a Component instance can only belong to a single UI. A single UI in turn (in practice) means a single browser tab.
Strange enough that I have to ask such a simple question.
I started automating with UFT and I suppose the correct way to check if for instance my login has worked is to add a checkpoint on the next page.
But how do I do that?
All info I get from google is on how to add an already existing checkpoint to may page. But I don't have any.
Here is how I go about automating:
I add manually the relevant objects to the object repository
I create parameters for my action
I create the code that does the steps on the page
one action per page seems to be fine for me
But in the Object Repository of UFT 14.53, there is no button to add a Checkpoint.
A workaround for me would be to just add another Object and check it's existence and forget about checkpoints. Until I hopefully get an answer here, I will try to do just that.
In UFT there are typically two ways to verify that things are working as expected.
Flow (implicit) - In order to verify that progress in the application is successful (e.g. login) one usually just keeps working with the app, assuming that if the previous step failed, the objects needed for the next steps won't exist and the test will fail due to ObjectNotFound errors
State (explicit) - In order to see that objects have a specific state, checkpoints are usually used. Checkpoints are typically added during a record session, I'm not sure if there's a way to add them directly to the repository. An alternative to checkpoints, which works better with keyword driven testing (no recording), is to use the built in CheckProperty method.
I have the following question:
I have an application that I'm using Marionette.Layout and this Layout has regions.
I want to add the option to the user to change language(on run time), meaning after the application is already render and the user is working, he can change the language and all the application should be change it to the selected language.
My Question:
1. I need to 'refresh/re-render' all the application, how is this done, I didn't found or I miss it, how to re-render the application?
I already have a a mechanism that the 'templates' are like:
https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/issues/216
This is working when the application is started, the first time, I need on run time to re-render/refresh with the new data
Unfortunately there isn't anything in the Marionette to do this for you. You will have to write the code to re-render the entire application with the new language setting, yourself.
I'm writing a Cocoa app, and I need to indicate to the user that a view is invalid and can't respond until a background job is completed.
Longer version:
A view in my app contains some data fetched from a server. When the app determines that the data is invalid, it fetches fresh information and displays it. Usually the update happens too quickly to see, but if server or network problems cause the background job to take more than a second or two, I need to make sure the user
Cannot interact with the view until the job is finished;
Can tell that the view is awaiting an update; and
Can continue to interact with other parts of the application until the job is finished.
1) is important because any operation initiated with the stale data will fail, and if the network or the server is slow, I don't want the user to waste his time with futile attempts to interact with that part of the application. (It's fine if the user can still see the data. That could conceivably be helpful, actually, but it isn't crucial.)
What is the standard way to do this in Cocoa? For what it's worth, in the Eclipse framework I think I used the showBusy method on ViewPart.
If there isn't a standard way, does anyone have any suggestions for tackling it? I haven't been using OS X very long, so I'm not even sure how an app is supposed to look and behave in this situtaion. (The screenshots on this page looking promising, but it's iOS, not OS X: http://cocoawithlove.com/2009/04/showing-message-over-iphone-keyboard.html)
Right now I'm working on replacing the whole view with an NSProgressIndicator and restoring the view after the task finishes, but removing the view means my app could end up in a funky state if something goes wrong. Also, I'd like to be able to factor this functionality out into its own class or category(?) since I will have this issue with several different view classes in my application. Ideally I'd like to end up with something as simple as Eclipse's view.showBusy(true)/view.showBusy(false).
Any and all help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Why not just draw another view on top of the busy view? You could either have it display an image that means busy, or draw it as semitransparent, so it shades out the before-update version of the busy view.
I kick off 5 uploads (of varying size) via the BackgroundTransferService. I have the following questions about the way it works:
It seems that on the emulator it does 2 uploads at a time. Is this how it works on the actual device? Can I programmatically change this behavior?
Can I count on the uploads going out in the order that I submitted them? I seem to be getting conflicting results in my testing.
When I inspect the BackgroundTransferService in my application, does it contain requests from other apps as well or just mine?
Do I need to reconnect events for all the BackgroundTransferRequest objects when coming back from being tombstoned? What about coming back from being reactivated?
Do I need to disconnect events from the BackgroundTransferRequest when I remove it from the BackgroundTransferService.Requests collection?
When I try to upload a non-existing URL:Port (on the localhost), the TransferStatus is reported as WaitingForNonVoiceBlockingNetwork. The upload never actually completes/fails. Is this how it is on the device? Should I remove the request when it encounters this TransferStatus?
You cannot influence the behaviour of the BTS. If you don't like the way it works you can write the transfer functionality as part of your own application but then you have to handle running in the background yourself.
There is no guarantee on sequence.
The BTS may be handling requests from other apps but you won't be able to see the details. Requests() will only return details for your app.
Surely a quick test will tell you this.
It's good practice to.
Have you checked the TransferError property whe you reach this situation? This is a perfectly valild status in other situations and so you shouldn't treat this as a automatic fail.