I have the step_definition called "ForPreEdit.rb", whose tag is #preed when I want to run this separate step (which works perfectly).
I also have the step_definition called "LoginSolic.rb", whose tag is #loginSolicitante (also works perfectly).
Inside "When .... End" of step_definition "ForPreEdit" I need to run step_definition "LoginSolic" to login. I'm using the following syntax for this:
"steps %Q {
When I want to Login as Requester
}"
When executing, no error is reported, simply the code is being ignored. My version of Gemfile Cucumber is 5.2. More code details below:
09 When('I perform my Login as Requester:') do |table|
10 # LOGIN
11 steps %Q{
12 When I want to Login as Requester
13 }
14 find('#Country').find(:xpath, 'option[5]').select_option
15 sleep 5
16 find('#DocumentType').find(:xpath, 'option[2]').select_option
Lines 11, 12 and 13 are ignored, the program starts executing from line 14, and on line 14 an error occurs because it depends on the execution of line 12. Again, when running separately, both work perfectly.
In general nesting steps is an anti-patten and should be avoided. As you are using ruby you should do the following ideally with all your steps.
Make each step implementation a call to a helper method
When you want to nest steps replace the nesting with a call to a helper method and do the nesting in the helper method
An example
module LoginStepHelper
def create_registered_user
User.create ...
...
end
def login(as: )
fill_in 'name', with: #i.name
fill_in 'password', with: #i.password
submit_form
end
def register_and_login
login as: create_registered_user
end
end
World LoginStepHelper
Given "I am registered" do
#i = create_registered_user
end
When "I login" do
login as: #i
end
# BAD
Given "I am logged in" do
steps %Q{
Given "I am registered"
And "I login"
}
end
# Good
Given "I am logged in" do
register_and_login
end
It is always much cleaner and simpler to extract any nesting into a helper method, and its particularly easy if you ensure all your step definitions are implemented by default as calls to helper methods. As your suite of cukes grows the benefits you get from avoiding nesting in steps multiply.
There are a set of features and steps illustrating this concept in more depth here https://github.com/diabolo/cuke_up/tree/master/features. I think you will gain alot by studying them.
Related
Newbie engineer question here, but I've searched and can't find a solution.
Environment: Mac OS, Chrome, Capybara with Selenium Chrome-driver, Ruby with Rspec running the test.
Situation:
Testing a React app where the user logs in using a username and password, followed by clicking on a sidebar nav link that loads up....followed by other actions. Capybara continues to fail to find the sidebar nav link to click on. I believe the sidebar nav is its own React component and loads asynchronously
App & Test Behavior:
Sometimes Capybara finds the link element, clicks the link and the test passes. Other times it completely fails to find the element and fails the test.
Solutions I've tried:
Upping the default time for finder methods to continue to search to 15+ seconds(I've never noticed the app take more than 5 seconds on anything)
I only have used finder methods that SHOULD be repeat-searching for the default time for the element to appear (page.find, page.has_css?, etc)before attempting the .click action. What I have found is that after the login happens, and while the nav is loading, the test just seems to fail with element not found. The page.find does NOT seem to continue to search for 15 seconds before failing - instead, the login happens, then a second later I get a fail with element not found.
I have tried passing a wait into the find (example: page.find(some element, wait:15).click . This runs into the same problem as above where it doesn't seem to continue searching for 15 seconds for the element to appear and then click it.
What does seem to work is adding in sleeps before searching for an element (example: login, sleep(5), page.find(something).click).
Unfortunately I'm having this same problem with other elements all over in the app - for example a div may have a bunch of cards in it. When a new card is added it takes 2-3 seconds to show up in the list (probably due to sending out the card info to the database, and refreshing the cards on the page). If I try and page.find immediately after adding a card, the test will almost immediately fail with an element not found message. If I add the card, sleep(3), THEN try page.find, it will find it.
I can't just add sleep all over the place in the app, because its huge and it would slow down the tests immensely. I think I've tried all the typically suggested fixes for asynchronous loading. Any idea what is going on here and what I can do to fix it
editing to add some requested code.
I'm using capybara 3.2.
We are using a bit of a page object style framework so I"ll try and post the actual test with its methods in bold and helper methods nested in it.
Its getting caught in the before action of this particular feature on the final method to click on the sidebar. I'm a little limited on what I can show, but I think this will make sense....
The actual before action:
before do
**app.launch_app(app.url)**
# this instantiates an instance of the framework and helper methods and # goes to the app url
**app.login.full_login(app.username('Some User'), app.password)**
# def full_login(user, pass)
# enter_email(user)
# def enter_email(user)
# return if already_logged_in?
# def already_logged_in?
# page.has_css?("a[href*='/me']", wait: false)
# end
# fill_field('email', user)
# def fill_field(field, text)
# sleep 0.1
# page.find("input[type=#{field}]").send_keys text
# end
# click_button 'Log In'
# def click_button(text)
# page.click_on text
# end
# end
# login_using_second_auth(user, pass)
# def login_using_second_auth(user, pass)
# page.fill_in 'username', with: user
# page.fill_in 'password', with: pass
# click_button 'Sign In'
# end
# end
app.nav.click_sidebar_link('Admin Account', 'Admin')
# def click_sidebar_link(link, section)
# sleep(2)
# page.find('div[class^=app__wrapper] > div > div > div', text:
# section)
# .find('span[class^=nav-item]', text: link).click
# end
end
Sorry that looks so messy, but I think you guys can make sense of it.
The test is flaky so after running it a few times I can't get the exact error, but its usually element not found on the span with the text Admin
Here as you can see I am trying fetch a value from .yml file located in config/environments in Examples: table.
But instead of fetching it is sending the value as it is?
Is it possible to pass parameter like this? If Yes, how?
If not, which Ruby or Cucumber feature/concept refrains user to do so and why?
Feature: Verify login of all test users
I want to verify all test users can login.
Scenario Outline: Login as different users on the website
Given I am on login page
When I enter "<username>" and password
Then I click Login button
And I see "<user>" successfully logged in
Examples:
|user|username|
|testuser1|#{FigNewton.test1_email}|
|testuser2|FigNewton.test2_email|
First of all this is a pretty poor feature, better would be
Scenario: Test Users can login
Given there are some test users
When the test users login
Then all test users should be logged in
or something like that. Features are for stating what you want to do and why, not how you do things.
IF you do the above then all the programming will be done in the step definitions. This will allow you do do whatever you want.
You can implement this quite easily e.g
Given 'there are some test users' do
#test_users = create_test_users
end
When 'the test users login' do
#login_results = login_each(#test_users)
end
Then 'all test users should be logged in' do
expect(check_for_errors(#login_results).count).to eql 0
end
then implement the methods you need in a step helper e.g
module TestUsersLoginStepHelper
def create_test_users
...
def login_each(users)
users.each do
...
...
end
World TestUsersLoginStepHelper
By putting all the work in the step definitions, you make your live much easier, as you can use the full power of ruby to do what you need
Answer to query1:
You can parametrize via Examples: table but not directly passing value using FigNewton gem because it is a .feature file not a Ruby .rb file.
Answer to query2:
How you do it:
Parametrize and Loop it on username and in you steps definition mention what to do when particular user name found. By this you can easily parametrize.
Examples:
|user|username|
|testuser1|test1|
|testuser2|test2|
Step definition
When(/^I enter "([^"]*)" and password$/) do |username|
case username
when 'test1'
on(LoginPage).user_email = FigNewton.test1_email
when 'test'
on(LoginPage).user_email = FigNewton.test2_email
end
....
....
end
You can use this DDD scenario in project whenever its needed - by using this we do not need to create multiple test cases, it will fetch data value from Example outline.
Feature file : Test case
Scenario Outline: Login to application
When I enter "username>" and "password>"
Then I click Login button
And I see user successfully logged in
Examples:
|username|password|
|abc#gmail.com|Test1234!|
|abc#yahoo.com|Test1234!|
Step definition:
When(/^I enter "([^"])" and "([^"])"$/) do |username,password|
sleep 20
on(Login).email_edit_text_element.send_keys username
on(Login).password_edit_text_element.send_keys password
end
Then(/^I click Login button$/) do
sleep 20
on(Login).login_button_element.click
end
Then(/^I see user successfully logged in$/) do
expect(on(Login).account_bg_cover_element.displayed?).to be_truthy
puts 'Login Success'
end
In ruby file, you have created methods, you are calling that methods in step definition.
It will work. make sure about the name of parameter you are passing.
I have a very basic problem for which I am not able to find any solution.
So I am using Watir Webdriver with testunit to test my web application.
I have a test method which I would want to run against multiple set of test-data.
While I can surely use old loop tricks to run it but that would show as only 1 test ran which is not what I want.
I know in testng we have #dataprovider, I am looking for something similar in testunit.
Any help!!
Here is what I have so far:
[1,2].each do |p|
define_method :"test_that_#{p}_is_logged_in" do
# code to log in
end
end
This works fine. But my problem is how and where would I create data against which I can loop in. I am reading my data from excel say I have a list of hash which I get from excel something like
[{:name =>abc,:password => test},{:name =>def,:password => test}]
Current Code status:
class RubyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
def setup
#excel_array = util.get_excel_map //This gives me an array of hash from excel
end
#excel_array.each do |p|
define_method :"test_that_#{p}_is_logged_in" do
//Code to check login
end
end
I am struggling to run the loop. I get an error saying "undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)" on class declaration line
You are wanting to do something like this:
require 'minitest/autorun'
describe 'Login' do
5.times do |number|
it "must allow user#{number} to login" do
assert true # replace this assert with your real code and validation
end
end
end
Of course, I am mixing spec and test/unit assert wording here, but in any case, where the assert is, you would place the assertion/expectation.
As this code stands, it will pass 5 times, and if you were to report in story form, it would be change by the user number for the appropriate test.
Where to get the data from, that is the part of the code that is missing, where you have yet to try and get errors.
I'd like to know about idioms or best practices for testing a multi-step workflow using rspec.
Let's take as an example a "shopping cart" system, where the buying process might be
when user submits to basket and we are not using https, redirect to https
when user submits to basket and we are using https and there is no cookie, create and display a new basket and send back a cookie
when user submits to basket and we are using https and there is a valid cookie and the new item is for a different product than the first item, add a line to the basket and display both lines
when user submits to basket and we are using https and there is a valid cookie and the new item is for the same product as a previous one, increment that basket line's quantity and display both lines
when user clicks 'checkout' on the basket page and is using https and there is a cookie and the basket is non-empty and ...
...
I've read http://eggsonbread.com/2010/03/28/my-rspec-best-practices-and-tips/ which advises i.a that each "it block" should contain only one assertion: instead of doing the computation and then testing several attributes in the same block, use a "before" inside a context to create (or retrieve) the object under test and assign it to #some_instance_variable, then write each attribute test as a separate block. That helps a little, but in a case such as outlined above where testing step n requires doing all the setup for steps [1..n-1] I find myself either duplicating setup code (obviously not good) or creating lots of helper functions with increasingly unwieldy names (def create_basket_with_three_lines_and_two_products) and calling them consecutively in each step's before block.
Any tips on how to do this less verbosely/tediously? I appreciate the general principle behind the idea that each example should not depend on state left behind by previous examples, but when you're testing a multi-step process and things can go wrong at any step, setting up the context for each step is inevitably going to require rerunning all the setup for the previous n steps, so ...
Here's one possible approach -- define an object that creates the necessary state for each step and pass it forward for each successive one. Basically you need to mock/stub the method calls for all the setup conditions:
class MultiStep
def initialize(context)
#context = context
end
def init_vars
#cut = #context.instance_variable_get(:#cut)
end
def setup(step)
init_vars
method(step).call
end
def step1
#cut.stub(:foo).and_return("bar")
end
def step2
step1
#cut.stub(:foo_bar).and_return("baz_baz")
end
end
class Cut # Class Under Test
def foo
"foo"
end
def foo_bar
"foo_bar"
end
end
describe "multiple steps" do
before(:each) do
#multi_stepper = MultiStep.new(self)
#cut = Cut.new
end
it "should setup step1" do
#multi_stepper.setup(:step1)
#cut.foo.should == "bar"
#cut.foo_bar.should == "foo_bar"
end
it "should setup step2" do
#multi_stepper.setup(:step2)
#cut.foo.should == "bar"
#cut.foo_bar.should == "baz_baz"
end
end
Certainly too late for OP, but this could be handy for others - the rspec-steps gem seems to be built for this exact situation: https://github.com/LRDesign/rspec-steps
It might be worthwhile to look at https://github.com/railsware/rspec-example_steps and https://github.com/jimweirich/rspec-given as well. I settled on rspec-steps, but I was in a rush and these other options might actually be better for all I know.
I want to reuse some Cucumber steps but can't seem to find the right way.
I want to write a step like:
Given /^I login with (.*) credentials$/ |type|
# do stuff with type being one of "invalid" or "valid"
end
But then have another step like:
Given /^I login successfully$
# call "Given I login with valid credentials"
end
So in testing user authentication I can use the former, but most other places, I can use the latter, and not actually have to repro code.
Is there a way to call that other step, or do I just put the logic in a helper method, and call said method from each task (basically a method extraction refactoring, which, after reading my question makes me believe that's actually the best way anyway)?
Note that the method for calling steps within steps has changed in recent versions of cucumber, which you'll see if you get an error like "WARNING: Using 'Given/When/Then' in step definitions is deprecated, use 'step' to call other steps instead:/path/to/step_definitions/foo_steps.rb:631:in `block in '
". See the cucumber wiki for details.
The gist of the change is that you should now use the step or steps methods.
When /^I make all my stuff shiny$/
step "I polish my first thing"
end
When /^I make all my stuff shiny$/
steps %Q{
When I polish my first thing
When I shine my second thing
}
end
UPDATE: The method described below has been deprecated. The recommended way to call a step from within another step now looks like this:
Given /^I login successfully$/
step "I login with valid credentials"
end
Old, deprecated method (for reference):
You can call steps from other steps like this:
Given /^I login successfully$/
Given "I login with valid credentials"
Then "I should be logged in"
end
If all of the scenarios within a feature require this (or other steps), you can also add a Background to each features, with the common steps, like so:
Background:
Given I log in with valid credentials
Scenario: Change my password
Given I am on the account page
Calling steps from step definitions is a bad practice and has some disadvantages:
If scenario will fail and there are nested step invocations, you will get only the last invoked step definition in the stack trace. It may be hard to find from which place that last stepdef was called
Call to stepdef is sometimes harder to find and read than ruby method
Ruby methods give you more power than calling steps from step defs
Aslak Hellesøy recommends to extract popular actions to World instead of reusing steps. It isolates those actions in one place, makes this code easier to find. You can extract code to usual Ruby classes or modules as well.
#/support/world_extensions.rb
module KnowsUser
def login
visit('/login')
fill_in('User name', with: user.name)
fill_in('Password', with: user.password)
click_button('Log in')
end
def user
#user ||= User.create!(:name => 'Aslak', :password => 'xyz')
end
end
World(KnowsUser)
#/step_definitions/authentication_steps.rb
When /^I login$/ do
login
end
Given /^a logged in user$/ do
login
end
Here is a useful discussion on the subject in Cucumber mailing list - link
Best wrap your steps in %{} rather than quotes. Then, you don't need to escape double quotes which you'll need to use frequently.:
Given /^I login successfully$
step %{I login with valid credentials}
end
Given /^I login with (.*) credentials$/ |type|
# do stuff with type being one of "invalid" or "valid"
end
Reuse keywords in feature file which will provide code reusability.
It is highly NOT recommended to call step defs within step defs.
I would write my feature file this way,
Scenario Outline: To check login functionality
Given I login with "<username>" and "<password>"
Then I "<may or may not>" login successfully
Examples:
|username|password|may or may not|
|paul |123$ |may |
|dave |1111 |may not |
In my step definition, (This is Java)
#Given(I login with \"([^\"]*)\" and \"([^\"]*)\"$)
public void I_login_with_and(String username, String password){
//login with username and password
}
#Then(I \"([^\"]*)\" login successfully$)
public void I_login_successully_if(String validity){
if(validity.equals("may")){
//assert for valid login
}
else
if(validity.equals("may not")){
//assert for invalid login
}
}
In this way, there is a lot of code reusability.
Your same Given and Then handles both valid and invalid scenarios.
At the same time, your feature file makes sense to the readers.