I have a very basic problem for which I am not able to find any solution.
So I am using Watir Webdriver with testunit to test my web application.
I have a test method which I would want to run against multiple set of test-data.
While I can surely use old loop tricks to run it but that would show as only 1 test ran which is not what I want.
I know in testng we have #dataprovider, I am looking for something similar in testunit.
Any help!!
Here is what I have so far:
[1,2].each do |p|
define_method :"test_that_#{p}_is_logged_in" do
# code to log in
end
end
This works fine. But my problem is how and where would I create data against which I can loop in. I am reading my data from excel say I have a list of hash which I get from excel something like
[{:name =>abc,:password => test},{:name =>def,:password => test}]
Current Code status:
class RubyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
def setup
#excel_array = util.get_excel_map //This gives me an array of hash from excel
end
#excel_array.each do |p|
define_method :"test_that_#{p}_is_logged_in" do
//Code to check login
end
end
I am struggling to run the loop. I get an error saying "undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)" on class declaration line
You are wanting to do something like this:
require 'minitest/autorun'
describe 'Login' do
5.times do |number|
it "must allow user#{number} to login" do
assert true # replace this assert with your real code and validation
end
end
end
Of course, I am mixing spec and test/unit assert wording here, but in any case, where the assert is, you would place the assertion/expectation.
As this code stands, it will pass 5 times, and if you were to report in story form, it would be change by the user number for the appropriate test.
Where to get the data from, that is the part of the code that is missing, where you have yet to try and get errors.
Related
I'm trying to get some rspec tests run using a mix of Capybara, Selenium, Capybara/webkit, and Poltergeist. I need it to run headless in certain cases and would rather not use xvfb to get webkit working. I am okay using selenium or poltergeist as the driver for phantomjs. The problem I am having is that my tests run fine with selenium and firefox or chrome but when I try phantomjs the elements always show as not found. After looking into it for a while and using page.save_screenshot in capybara I found out that the phantomjs browser wasn't loaded up when the driver told it to find elements so it wasn't returning anything. I was able to hack a fix to this in by editing the poltergeist source in <gem_path>/capybara/poltergeist/driver.rb as follows
def visit(url)
if #started
sleep_time = 0
else
sleep_time = 2
end
#started = true
browser.visit(url)
sleep sleep_time
end
This is obviously not an ideal solution for the problem and it doesn't work with selenium as the driver for phantomjs. Is there anyway I can tell the driver to wait for phantom to be ready?
UPDATE:
I was able to get it to run by changing where I included the Capybara::DSL. I added it to the RSpec.configure block as shown below.
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include Capybara::DSL
I then passed the page object to all classes I created for interacting with the webpage ui.
An example class would now look like this
module LoginUI
require_relative 'webpage'
class LoginPage < WebPages::Pages
def initialize(page, values = {})
super(page)
end
def visit
browser.visit(login_url)
end
def login(username, password)
set_username(username)
set_password(password)
sign_in_button
end
def set_username(username)
edit = browser.find_element(#selectors[:login_edit])
edit.send_keys(username)
end
def set_password(password)
edit = browser.find_element(#selectors[:password_edit])
edit.send_keys(password)
end
def sign_in_button
browser.find_element(#selectors[:sign_in_button]).click
end
end
end
Webpage module looks like this
module WebPages
require_relative 'browser'
class Pages
def initialize(page)
#page = page
#browser = Browser::Browser.new
end
def browser
#browser
end
def sign_out
browser.visit(sign_out_url)
end
end
end
The Browser module looks like this
module Browser
class Browser
include Capybara::DSL
def refresh_page
page.evaluate_script("window.location.reload()")
end
def submit(locator)
find_element(locator).click
end
def find_element(hash)
page.find(hash.keys.first, hash.values.first)
end
def find_elements(hash)
page.find(hash.keys.first, hash.values.first, match: :first)
page.all(hash.keys.first, hash.values.first)
end
def current_url
return page.current_url
end
end
end
While this works I don't want to have to include the Capybara::DSL inside RSpec or have to include the page object in the classes. These classes have had some things removed for the example but show the general structure. Ideally I would like to have the Browser module include the Capybara::DSL and be able to handle all of the interaction with Capybara.
Your update completely changes the question so I'm adding a second answer. There is no need to include the Capybara::DSL in your RSpec configure if you don't call any Capybara methods from outside your Browser class, just as there is no need to pass 'page' to all your Pages classes if you limit all Capybara interaction to your Browser class. One thing to note is that the page method provided by Capybara::DSL is just an alias for Capybara.current_session so technically you could just always call that.
You don't show in your code how you're handling any assertions/expectations on the page content - so depending on how you're doing that you may need to include Capybara::RSpecMatchers in your RSpec config and/or your WebPages::Pages class.
Your example code has a couple of issues that immediately pop out, firstly your Browser#find_elements (assuming I'm reading your intention for having find first correctly) should probably just be
def find_elements(hash)
page.all(hash.keys.first, hash.values.first, minimum: 1)
end
Secondly, your LoginPage#login method should have an assertion/expectation on a visual change that indicates login succeeded as its final line (verify some message is displayed/logged in menu exists/ etc), to ensure the browser has received the auth cookies, etc before the tests move on. What that line looks like depends on exactly how you're architecting your expectations.
If this doesn't answer your question, please provide a concrete example of what exactly isn't working for you since none of the code you're showing indicates any need for Capybara::DSL to be included in either of the places you say you don't want it.
Capybara doesn't depend on visit having completed, instead the finders and matchers will retry up to a specified period of time until they succeed. You can increase this amount of time by increasing the value of Capybara.default_max_wait_time. The only methods that don't wait by default are first and all, but can be made to wait/retry by specifying any of the count options
first('.some_class', minimum: 1) # will wait up to Capybara.default_max_wait_time seconds for the element to exist on the page.
although you should always prefer find over first/all whenever possible
If increasing the maximum wait time doesn't solve your issue, add an example of a test that fails to your question.
I've searched for an answer to this but I just can't seem to figure out what's going wrong. I have an api client test that looks like the following:
module MyTests
describe '#update' do
# using a before(:all) block for setup
before(:all) do
#client1 = Client.new
#initial_payload_state = #client1.update.payload
end
context 'with a known starting payload' do
# The payload is some nasty nested json so I grab an existing one
# and then use a helper method to convert it to a full payload.
# Then I update the client with the new payload. I'm using before(:each)
# so I can get the client into this state for every test.
before(:each) do
#full_payload_state = helper_method(#initial_payload_state)
end
context 'alter_payload_1 works' do
# now that I have the payload in its full state I'd like to alter it to
# produce a certain output
before(:all) do
#new_payload_state = alter_payload_1(#full_payload_state)
end
# I now want to update the client with the altered payload and make sure
# it has the same data. The request and response bodies are formatted slightly
# differently in this case.
it 'works' do
#updated_payload_state = #client1.update(#new_payload_state)
expect(payloads_equal?(#full_payload_state, #new_payload_state).to eq true
end
end
context 'alter_payload_2 works' do
before(:all) do
#new_payload_state = alter_payload_2(#full_payload_state)
end
it 'works' do
#updated_payload_state = #client1.update(#new_payload_state)
expect(payloads_equal?(#full_payload_state, #new_payload_state).to eq true
end
end
In reality, my before block for setup is much longer, so I think it makes sense to keep it that way. I tried to use a before(:each) block so I could have the same known state to start each of the alter_payload contexts. The problem is that with this setup, I get a no method error for this line:
#new_payload_state = alter_payload_1(#full_payload_state)
suggesting that #full_payload_state is nil. I'm certain I've got something wrong with respect to scope, but I'm not sure why or how to fix it. Any help greatly appreciated!
Looks like a scope issue with before(:all).
In general, it's wise to stop using before(:all) because it entangles your tests.
Replace your before(:all) lines with before(:each), and this will make each of your tests independent of the others. This will likely help you find your glitch.
I'm following along in the RSpec Book and I can't get the cucumber test to pass a certain spot. I've even tried running cucumber on the source code from the book and it still won't pass. I'm not sure if it's the fact that I'm using a newer version of cucumber but there must be a way to make it pass!
When I get to the point where the program should start a new game I'm told there's an undefined method 'puts'. Why is it undefined and how else should I capture what the program puts out in Cucumber? Running the test in RSpec to make sure the game puts the message works just fine, not sure how to make it pass in cucumber.
(Cucumber version 1.3.17, Ruby version 2.1.2)
Basically, I have these features:
Feature: code-breaker starts game
As a code-breaker
I want to start a game
So that I can break the code
Scenario: start game
Given I am not yet playing
When I start a new game
Then I should see "Welcome to Codebreaker!"
And I should see "Enter guess:"
and these step definitions:
class Output
def messages
#messages ||= []
end
def puts(message)
messages << message
end
end
def output
#output ||= Output.new
end
Given /^I am not yet playing$/ do
end
When /^I start a new game$/ do
game = Codebreaker::Game.new(output)
game.start
end
Then /^I should see "([^"]*)"$/ do |message|
output.messages.should include(message)
end
and this ruby code:
module Codebreaker
class Game
def initialize(output)
#output = output
end
def start
#output.puts 'Welcome to Codebreaker!'
end
end
end
and I keep getting this error:
When I start a new game # features/step_definitions/codebreaker_steps.rb:16
private method `puts' called for #<RSpec::Matchers::BuiltIn::Output:0x007fa4ea200ad0> (NoMethodError)
./lib/codebreaker/game.rb:10:in `start'
./features/step_definitions/codebreaker_steps.rb:18:in `/^I start a new game$/'
features/codebreaker_starts_game.feature:7:in `When I start a new game'
How do I fix this so that it passes in cucumber?
There are a lot of things that have changed since this RSpec Book was published but I got it working by replacing your code_break_steps.rb file with this:
Given /^I am not yet playing$/ do
end
When /^I start a new game$/ do
#messenger = StringIO.new
game = Codebreaker::Game.new(#messenger)
game.start
end
Then /^I should see "([^"]*)"$/ do |message|
expect(#messenger.string.split("\n")).to include(message)
end
RSpec 3 has a class that you're trying to overwrite called Output and it was causing way too much confusion. I just simplified this so you're tests are still talking to each other along with stdout.
You can use the same should syntax on the last line but it will be deprecated soon so better to get used to the expect syntax I used. For now if that's more confusing you can still use:
#messenger.string.split("\n").should include(message)
I'm following this book right now and tried Anthony's technique. But I got into trouble again a little later in the book (most probably because I'm kind of a beginner in Rails and couldn't translate Anthony's technique to another case ^^). But anyway, I found an easier way not to interfere with RSpec Output class and still not divert too much form the lesson flow:
rename the project Output class to something else, say OOutput
and change all output variables to o_output.
Et voilà ;-)
I was able to make that particular example pass in only two adjustments on the same "codebreaker_steps.rb" file, so you can still follow the book's curriculum. You don't have to touch the class name, just the output() method following it.
RSpec 3 contains an output() method that causes conflicts when you try to define another output() method. So in knowing that, take the book's instructions:
def output
#output ||= Output.new
end
and rename it to:
def see_output #new
#output ||= Output.new
end
(or name it anything that makes sense for the project)
Then go down to your When() method definition:
When /^I start a new game$/ do
game = Codebreaker::Game.new(output)
game.start
end
and update the second line to:
When ("I start a new game") do
game = Codebreaker::Game.new(see_output) #new
game.start
end
Sorry if this is plain simple. i am new to ruby as well as rspec and it seems rspec is a very 'obscure' world (esp when coming from a .net background).
In my 'spec', i have:
before(:each) do
expect(File).to receive(:exist?).with("dummy.yaml").and_return (true)
end
This works fine for all my 'examples', except one where i want it to return false.
expect(File).to receive(:exist?).with("non_existent.yaml").and_return (false)
This obviously fails my test because although "non_existent.yaml" expectation was met, the "dummy.yaml" was not:
(<File (class)>).exist?("dummy.yaml")
expected: 1 time with arguments: ("dummy.yaml")
received: 0 times
So how can i do a 'Reset' on 'File.exist?' (a class method mock) before i setup the new expectation for it? (... "non_existent.yaml"..)
i googled and it yielded:
RSpec::Mocks.proxy_for(your_object).reset
but this gives me:
NoMethodError:
undefined method `proxy_for' for RSpec::Mocks:Module
I could not find anywhere in the documentation that this is how you should do it, and past behaviors goes to show that this solution might also change in the future, but apparently this is how you can currently do it:
RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for(your_object).reset
I would follow #BroiSatse's remark, though, and think about re-designing the tests, aiming to move the expectation from the before block. The before block is meant for setup, as you say, and the setup is a very weird place to put expectations.
I'm not sure how you came to this design, but I can suggest two possible alternatives:
If the test is trivial, and will work anyway, you should create one test with this explicit expectation, while stubbing it for the other tests:
before(:each) do
allow(File).to receive(:exist?).with("dummy.yaml").and_return (true)
end
it "asks if file exists" do
expect(File).to receive(:exist?).with("dummy.yaml").and_return (true)
# do the test...
end
If the expectation should run for every test, since what changes in each scenario is the context, you should consider using shared examples:
shared_examples "looking for dummy.yaml" do
it "asks if file exists" do
expect(File).to receive(:exist?).with("dummy.yaml").and_return (true)
# do the test...
end
end
it_behaves_like "looking for dummy.yaml" do
let(:scenario) { "something which sets the context"}
end
You might also want to ask myron if there is a more recommended/documented solution to reset mocked objects...
This worked for me to unmock a specific method from a class:
mock = RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for(MyClass)
mock.instance_variable_get(:#method_doubles)[:my_method].reset
Note: Same logic of
RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for(MyClass).reset which resets all methods
Expanding on #Uri Agassi's answer and as I answered on another similar question, I found that I could use RSpec::Mocks.space.registered? to check if a method was a mock, and RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for(my_mocked_var).reset to reset it's value.
Here is the example I included in my other answer:
Example: Resetting a mocked value
For example, if we wanted to reset this mock back to it's unmocked
default value, we can use the RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for helper to
find our mock, then reset it:
# when
# Rails.configuration.action_controller.allow_forgery_protection == false
# and
# allow(Rails.configuration.action_controller).to receive(:allow_forgery_protection).and_return(true)
RSpec::Mocks.space.registered?(Rails.configuration.action_controller)
# => true
Rails.configuration.action_controller.allow_forgery_protection
# => true
RSpec::Mocks.space.proxy_for(Rails.configuration.action_controller).reset
Rails.configuration.action_controller.allow_forgery_protection
# => false
Notice however that the even though the mock value has been reset, the
mock remains registered?:
RSpec::Mocks.space.registered?(Rails.configuration.action_controller)
# => true
When using "expect_any_instance" I had success using the following method to change the mock (e.g. our example: Putting out a Twitter post and returning a different tweet id)
expect_any_instance_of(Twitter::REST::Client).to receive(:update).and_return(Hashie::Mash.new(id: "12"))
# post tweet
RSpec::Mocks.space.verify_all
RSpec::Mocks.space.reset_all
expect_any_instance_of(Twitter::REST::Client).to receive(:update).and_return(Hashie::Mash.new(id: "12346"))
# post another tweet
I've just started writing a reasonably straightforward site using sinatra. My problem is that I wanted to refactor the main app.rb file but am getting errors trying to access the url params.
In my get '/' action, Sinatra's looking at which params are set and then needs to do a few different things depending on what's in the url. Something like this.
class App < Sinatra::Application
...
get '/' do
if params['code1']
#network = 'code1'
mode code here
elsif params['called'] && params['mac']
#network = 'code2'
mode code here
elsif params['code3']
#network = 'code3'
mode code here
end
end
The problem is that I need to require a file that also uses the params.
I've put the following in the above code:
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/lib/networks/code1.rb'
Where code1.rb includes:
class App < Sinatra::Application
if params['login'] # == 'login'
pass = 'uampass'
elsif
...
But that gives me the following error:
undefined local variable or method `params' for main:Object
How can I refactor this without causing an error
As far as i know you can't use two (or more) Sinatra applications in, well one application. Since both files define a Sinatra::Application descendant this isn't possible.
Also if you want to use values from the params-hash you should define helper methods Helper Documentation, which you call when processing the route, or you just create Class which has class or instance methods which take params-values as parameters. Actually calling params from another file/class doesn't seem like good practice.
To put this in context: Sinatra applications are organised as handlers. The Sinatra::Application descendant is something like the main handler which uses support methods(helpers and instance methods of the Sinatra::Application descendant) or support Classes, which are usually defined in other files, but do not descend from Sinatra::Application.
To make this a little bit more clearly:
Your main Sinatra file:
require_relative 'another_file.rb'
class App < Sinatra::Application
# ...
#a_handler = MyHandler.new
get '/' do
if params['something'] == 'wanted_value'
#a_handler.handle_it(params)
end
end
Another file ('another_file.rb'):
class MyHandler
def initialize
#an_instance_variable = 'foobar'
end
def handle_it(params_hash)
if params_hash['login'] # == 'login'
pass = 'uampass'
elsif
# ...
end
# ...
# do some stuff
# ....
return pass
end
end
Actual code would of course depend on the real problem you're trying to solve, so if you would elaborate i could be more precise...
The error message contains everything you need to know, and it's nothing to do with Sinatra.
You are requiring code1.rb, which contains this (slightly edited so it will run):
require 'sinatra'
class App < Sinatra::Application
if params['login'] # == 'login'
pass = 'uampass'
end
end
Ruby evaluates code as it encounters it. In this case, you've required 'code1.rb', so it evaluates the code in that file. It encounters 'params' and asks "is there a local variable or method with that name?". There isn't, so it fails as you've seen. Open an irb session and check it out.
Class definitions in ruby are just an expression with a scope.
In relation to Sinatra: params is available in the block that a route declaration takes.
I'd recommend reading Sinatra: Up and Running, which explains some of the 'magic' that is going on (a good companion to the Sinatra Book).