I am trying to remove dbo from tablename using expression.
TableName: dbo.product
#concat('schema.',split(item().tablename,'.')[1])
I need to replace dbo to schema from tablename. would anyone please help. I tried the above code but it is giving an error: Cannot fit unknown into the function parameter string list item.
Did you try debugging it? I also got a similar error in expression builder, but when I run my pipeline, it is still able to get the output as 'schema.product'.
Related
I build a dynamic Dictionary in ClickHouse DB. It will create the dictionary before the SQL commands execute. Also, the dictionary name was created at the same time.
The dictionary name was a combined string by date and table name. Because I don't want to keep so much data in the long-term dictionary, the short-term Dictionary could be a great help to release the memory after maybe an hour when no one is using it.
And the error happened.
When I use the dictionary in my SQL commands it is okay with solid commands.
e.g.
dictGet(CONCAT('2022-04-06', 'MyTableName'), 'GetBackColumnName',myKeyColumn) AS col_name
But when I change to using the column from Table, it was broken.
e.g.
dictGet(CONCAT(DATE_COL, 'MyTableName'), 'GetBackColumnName',myKeyColumn) AS col_name
And the error message shows up.
Illegal type String of the first argument of function dictGet,
expected a const string.
Does anyone know how to fix the issue?
My CH version is: 20.8.7.15
I try to find the resolution from the ClickHouse office report but nothing can fix this issue. And I tried lots of functions of String to figure out what happened.
We are trying to create a dynamic query subject filter. To do this, we are trying to nest an Oracle user-defined function inside of a macro.
Example query subject filter:
#strip(ORACLE_USER_DEFINED_FUNCTION())#
We have imported the oracle function ORACLE_USER_DEFINED_FUNCTION into Framework Manager. The function returns a VARCHAR2 of the desired expression. For testing purposes, this function is simply returning VARCHAR2 value of '1=1' (the single quotes are not part of the VARCHAR2 return value).
The idea being that we want the query subject filter expression to be dynamically generated at run-time so the resulting query contains '...WHERE 1=1'. The strip macro is the mechanism to pre-process and invoke the user-defined function before the query is sent to the database.
However, when attempting to verify/check the query subject filter we receive the following error.
XQE-GEN-0018 Query Service internal error has occurred, please see the log for details.
I'm trying to get a hold of the query service log, but don't yet have it.
Perhaps there is some casting needed to convert the oracle VARCHAR2 output from the function to an IBM/Cognos string that is acceptable input for the IBM/Cognos macro.
Your assistance is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Using Oracle 12c and Cognos 11.1.
With the exception of the queryValue macro function, macros are evaluated prior to accessing the database. This means the macro does not know what the Oracle UDF is or what its supposed to do. If you are able to call the UDF via a FM query subject you maybe able to get away with something similar to the queryValue answer found here:
Cognos 11.1.7 Framework manager change the table for the query subject, type data
I have a (semi) basic data cube set up with a cascading parameters of State and Area. The state select box is straight forward as is the Area; when a user selects a State, the Area options are set accordingly. However, the value for Area is a long list of strings that will be sent to the mysql select statement which will use both params (State & the list of strings from Area) several time. Its a big ugly collection of UNIONS. My problem is somewhere between the before Start and query time.
//beforeOpen script...LState & LAreas the name of the report param
this.queryText = this.queryText.replace('stateList', params["LStates"].value);
this.queryText = this.queryText.replace('areaList', params["LAreas"].value);
In my mysql statement I use them in the following way:
SELECT ..XXX..
FROM ..XXX..
WHERE ..XXX..
State.State_Location in ('stateList')
AND Range_Locator.Range in ('areaList')
UNION ALL
SELECT ..XXX..
FROM ..XXX..
WHERE ..XXX..
State.State_Location in ('stateList')
AND Range_Locator.Range in ('areaList')
The two errors I get from BIRT are:
(Pretty obvious)
Cannot get the result set. org.eclipse....SQL statement doesn ot return a ResultSet object.
(Not so obvious to me)
A BIRT exception occured. Error evaluating Javascript expression. Script engine error: Can't find method java.lang.String.replace(string.java.lang.Object[]).
There are error evaluating script "this.queryText = this.queryText.replace('stateList', params["LStates"].value);this.queryText = this.queryText.replace('areaList', params["LAreas"].value);"
Any ideas? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
It seems LStates is defined as a "multi-value" parameter, therefore params["LStates"].value returns an array of values: this is why this replace method does not work.
You should try like this:
this.queryText = this.queryText.replace('stateList', params["LStates"].value.join("','"));
I am not exactly sure what you are doing in beforeOpen script, but your SQL is looking for the string values 'stateList' & 'areaList' and is probably not happy about the (). You need to use question marks to call the parameters you define in the 'parameters' you set up in the data set design.
SELECT ..XXX..
FROM ..XXX..
WHERE ..XXX..
State.State_Location in ?
AND Range_Locator.Range in ?
UNION ALL
SELECT ..XXX..
FROM ..XXX..
WHERE ..XXX..
State.State_Location in ?
AND Range_Locator.Range in ?
I don't recall using
in ?
In any queries, I usually try and set it to use
like ?
There are number of issues in sending multiple choice parameters to SQL via BIRT. you might want to look at How do I set a parameter to a list of values in a BIRT report? There are also some security concerns. When I have to filter on multiples, I usually do it in a filter (data set design option) after the SQL has run. Thought this can be a resource problem if your SQL returns lots of values.
Thanks for the replies but since I was unable to get these options to work, I wound up restructuring the database & sql statements to run better. To address some previous suggestions:
#dom the states parameter has only one value and while using "IN ('stateList')" is not efficient (disclaimer, not my code) adding the .join(',') did throw an error specific to that; I tried and mysql/BIRT seemed to be expecting a comma separated list but got a string with a trailing comma.
#James I tried using the question mark (?) instead of the 'stateList' & 'areaList' but I think mysql/BIRT was not able to recognize which value went with which question mark...not too sure though since I was not able to debug well enough and find out exactly why. Could be a form to param mapping issue that I didn't notice. Thanks for the help.
Im having to edit code in very old classic asp.
Im comparing two values.
I am getting an error saying Type mismatch
This is where it occurs:
if oRsDropDown(id_col) = variable then
the drop down is created form a sql execution
I think the issue may be that the ID column in the db being compared is a big int?
Without knowing the type that oRsDropDown returns, does it work with is?
if oRsDropDown(id_col) is variable then
Hello I am using Entity Framework and I am using the ExecuteStoreCommand to do a query against the database. well I am basically calling a user defined function.
This is the call:
string result = m.ExecuteStoreQuery (SQL).FirstOrDefault();
I query the User Defined Function and I get the following result.
2.09,2.06,2.06,2.0098,2.04,2.04,2.04,2.04,2.04,2,2.1,2.04,2.04,2.04
The return type for the user defined function is
RETURNS Varchar(200). The result above is from the same cell.
When I execute the code from MVC controller I get the following error.The data reader has more than one field. Multiple fields are not valid for EDM primitive types.
What datatype I should be using instead of string.
Any ideas and suggestions.
Apparently, the return type is not only a string.
On the SQL Server side, try to surround the code of your query with:
SET NOCOUNT ON
<your current sql code>
SET NOCOUNT OFF
Maybe EF is getting the rows affected in the result and gets messed up.