Trying to manage a conversation flow by "Go to action" action (sorry for tautology). All tests to call all types of actions by ID from *.dialog return error.
ClassName:"System.ArgumentException" Message:"GotoAction: could not find an action of "cW0raQ"."
How reference looks
I didn't find any mention in the documentation how to work with this action, therefore it must be pretty simple, but I can't catch the correct way.
As usually, answer myself.
Had a look at MS tests in their repo https://github.com/microsoft/botbuilder-dotnet/ and found out that it requires creating ID for action manually. Automatic $designer.id doesn't work.
{
"$kind": "Microsoft.GotoAction",
"$designer": {
"id": "uFOn5P"
},
"actionId": "targetID"
},
...
{
"id": "targetID",
"$kind": "Microsoft.SendActivity",
"$designer": {
"id": "oWxpDh",
"comment": "",
"name": "GoTo test"
},
"activity": "${SendActivity_oWxpDh()}"
}
Moreover, this action works in scope of trigger only, not dialog.
Related
I have a use case where I need to show following information in my personal application.
List of channels in teams where bot is installed.
List of users in teams where bot is installed.
I was exploring connector client for the same and came up with following code:-
const credentials = new MicrosoftAppCredentials(appId, appPassword);
const connectorClient = new ConnectorClient(credentials, {
baseUri: serviceUrl
});
const token = await credentials.getToken();
axios.defaults.headers.common.Authorization = `Bearer ${ token }`;
# To get channels
const response = await axios.get(
'https://smba.trafficmanager.net/in/v3/teams/{teamId}/conversations'
);
# To get members
const users = await connectorClient.conversations.getConversationPagedMembers(teamId);
This works perfect as long as I have the teamId.
But the issue I am facing here is with respect to finding teamId in personal scope. I install my bot application as follows by choosing the Add option.
As far as I understand, the above installs the bot in the personal scope of the user. Now, in this scenario the team id information is not present in conversationUpdate event at all. Please note that this is the first time I am installing the bot in the team, so the data should be available as per Microsoft documentation, but the only information available in channel object is tenant.
{
"membersAdded": [
{
"id": "28:f5d48856-5b42-41a0-8c3a-c5f944b679b0"
}
],
"type": "conversationUpdate",
"timestamp": "2017-02-23T19:38:35.312Z",
"localTimestamp": "2017-02-23T12:38:35.312-07:00",
"id": "f:5f85c2ad",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/amer-client-ss.msg/",
"from": {
"id": "29:1I9Is_Sx0OIy2rQ7Xz1lcaPKlO9eqmBRTBuW6XzkFtcjqxTjPaCMij8BVMdBcL9L_RwWNJyAHFQb0TRzXgyQvA"
},
"conversation": {
"isGroup": true,
"conversationType": "channel",
"id": "19:efa9296d959346209fea44151c742e73#thread.skype"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "28:f5d48856-5b42-41a0-8c3a-c5f944b679b0",
"name": "SongsuggesterBot"
},
"channelData": {
// for me this object is empty
"team": {
"id": "19:efa9296d959346209fea44151c742e73#thread.skype"
},
"eventType": "teamMemberAdded",
"tenant": {
"id": "72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47"
}
}
}
Next, I also tried to install the bot in the team scope by using Add To Teams option. In this case it prompts me to select a channel to install, in which I choose general.
Now, I do get the team object inside channelData in onConversationUpdate and this flow works perfectly fine.
{
"membersAdded": [
{
"id": "28:64564f44-dd7c-441a-b427-efcd662f21b5"
}
],
"type": "conversationUpdate",
"timestamp": "2021-10-14T13:22:01.6072361Z",
"id": "f:4ebc9a41-5140-7621-33f5-31d97275ce00",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/in/",
"from": {
"id": "29:17ZGff4Pvqz_zSNqEexg-86uBFcB6vnOBZzCwu4_puGdDsrYWCW_DdlB15PrcjC--nLlqD5CwtLMJyzXPY5OSsg",
"aadObjectId": "eac26e98-104a-4785-87aa-bcf77ea1d7c1"
},
"conversation": {
"isGroup": true,
"conversationType": "channel",
"tenantId": "c8fef0de-e240-4456-b523-3285ecc62087",
"id": "19:y7qDBfGH2jE_Ze6G8mJS_CiWiqCaRFfH77jFZvJ1xgU1#thread.tacv2"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "28:64564f44-dd7c-441a-b427-efcd662f21b5",
"name": "Trick"
},
"channelData": {
"team": {
"aadGroupId": "5bc77aa9-9487-49ae-958f-b37b2191e64d",
"name": "test 5",
"id": "19:y7qDBfGH2jE_Ze6G8mJS_CiWiqCaRFfH77jFZvJ1xgU1#thread.tacv2"
},
"eventType": "teamMemberAdded",
"tenant": {
"id": "c8fef0de-e240-4456-b523-3285ecc62087"
}
}
}
So what I am trying to understand here is that, why is the information not coming in case the bot is installed in personal scope?
I am asking this mainly because without personal scope added for bot(i.e if I keep scope only as team), the application does not show for user, inside Apps. But if I allow the scope to be extended to personal the user might select that while installing the application and my teamId information will not be available to fetch the data, that I need.
This brings to my next question, which is, is there any way in which the default add button on the add app screen installs the bot in such a way that I get team object inside channelData, in conversationUpdate in every scenario, i.e whether I choose add or add to team?
Is this how it is supposed to behave or am I missing something. Would love to hear some thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
It might be that you're over thinking this - here's a more simple view:
if you install a bot into a Team, you'll get a Team Id (and any related channel where it is installed).
if you have "personal" scope set up for the bot, then the user also has the option to install the bot into "personal" scope. As this implies, they are NOT installing the bot INTO an actual Team - that's why you're not receiving a Team Id. It's not broken - it's entirely correct.
If you don't WANT your bot to be able to be installed in personal scope, simply remove that option in your manifest (the "personal" scope) - you have the ability to choose because it depends what you're wanting the user to be able to do with your bot. Some bots only make sense inside a Team, others only in Personal Scope, others only in Group Chat or in a Meeting - you can allow your bot to installed in any/all of these are relevant.
Hi, everyone.
I have been trying to use Google Drive API for getting a list with the action items assigned in all files (docs or spreadsheets) in my company's domain using Spring Boot and the google-api-services-drive, but I have faced some issues:
Looks like there is nothing about action items on the API.
Comments are the closest I could get, but they don't include action item information. They only have the emails of people who were mentioned.
Documentation looks broad and not precise. For instance, here they say files resources include an indexableText property, but it is not present on the response.
As explained in Term for followup, looking for actionitems you can apply a query for getting the files with action items. Why is the fullText field not available in the response, or some other equivalent attribute to see the actual content and use it as a workaround to get the action items?
I just need to know who was assigned to the action item from the comment.
Any ideas?
Retrieve the action items with Comments: list specifying fields as comments/replies/action
I agree with you that it is not straightfoward, but there is a way to retrieve the full comment content including action items.
Use Files:list specifying q as fullText contains 'followup:actionitems', just as in the post you mentioned
For each of the retrieve items, use the fileId for the method Comments: list
For better understadning specify first the fields for Comments:list as * - this will return you the complete reponse looking as following:
{
"kind": "drive#commentList",
"comments": [
{
"kind": "drive#comment",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAg",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:04:34.907Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "XXX",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": true
},
"htmlContent": "+\u003ca href=\"mailto:YYY#YYY.com\" data-rawHref=\"mailto:YYY#YYY.com\" target=\"_blank\"\u003eYYY#YYY.com\u003c/a\u003e Could you please check the spelling?",
"content": "+YYY#YYY.com Could you please check the spelling?",
"deleted": false,
"resolved": true,
"quotedFileContent": {
"mimeType": "text/html",
"value": "Hello"
},
"anchor": "kix.94ksxclyqix",
"replies": [
{
"kind": "drive#reply",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAo",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:02.999Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:02.999Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "YYY",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": false
},
"htmlContent": "Will do!",
"content": "Will do!",
"deleted": false
},
{
"kind": "drive#reply",
"id": "AAAAGlyxwAs",
"createdTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"modifiedTime": "2020-06-08T09:05:07.279Z",
"author": {
"kind": "drive#user",
"displayName": "YYY",
"photoLink": "//ssl.gstatic.com/s2/profiles/images/silhouette96.png",
"me": false
},
"deleted": false,
"action": "resolve"
}
]
}
]
}
This response contains the following information:
The quoted file content (the text to which the comment refers)
The content of the initial comment and the replies
The user to whom the comment was assigned
The reply of the user including his user name
And finally, the action taked by the user
Now, if you are not interested in all fields but only in the action, you can see that action is a resources nested in comments/replies
To query for action, replace the * in fields with comments/replies/action
as for your question about indexableText, the documentation specifies that it is a property of contentHints and
contentHints
Additional information about the content of the file.
These fields are never populated in responses.
A way to make indexableText "useful" is e.g. apply it in queries like
Files:list with q : fullText contains 'indexableText'
The good new are that if you not happy with the way how actions are retrieved now and can think of a better method to implement it, you can file a Feature request on Google's Public Issue Tracker. If enough users show interest in the feature, Google might implement it in the future.
I have created a bot for teams and added it to a channel (testChannel1) as a tab (using a configuration page). I have received a ConversationUpdate event to my server. When I try to send message using the context object that I have received in ConversationUpdate event the message was sent in General channel instead of testChannel1. I have added my bot to testChannel1 but I dont know why the message is sent in General. I am also not able to get the channels list using that context object it is throwing error Error: This method is only valid within the scope of a MS Teams Team..
contextActivityObject :- {
"membersAdded": [
{
"id": "28:[guid]"
}
],
"type": "conversationUpdate",
"timestamp": "2020-04-24T12:00:06.7125247Z",
"id": "f:[guid]",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/in/",
"from": {
"id": "29:[id]",
"aadObjectId": "[guid]"
},
"conversation": {
"isGroup": true,
"conversationType": "channel",
"tenantId": "[guid]",
"id": "19:aba[id]#thread.tacv2"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "28:[guid]",
"name": "teststandups"
},
"channelData": {
"team": {
"aadGroupId": "[guid]",
"name": "nikhilp",
"id": "19:aba[id]#thread.tacv2"
},
"eventType": "teamMemberAdded",
"tenant": {
"id": "[guid]"
}
}
}
The scope I have provided for my bot is Team
I would be thankful for any help
So you've asked a couple of questions, I'll try answer as best as possible. Basically, that Conversation ID (19:aba[id]#thread.tacv2) is unique per channel, so if you're using the "General" channel one, it will for sure go into General.
To find out how to get the channel Ids, have a look at Get the list of channels in a team. That will show you -how- to get the info, but you need to get a trigger in order to be able to make that call. To do that, the best way is to hook into one of the triggers, like receiving a message from a user, or being added to the team. Included in these set of events, are channels being added and deleted. See more here.
I'm trying to create a "Global OptionSet"-attribute (sd_MyAttribute) for an existing entity (entity ID = 70816501-edb9-4740-a16c-6a5efbc05d84) via Dynamics CRM WebAPI.
The JSON I send is this using method "POST":
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.PicklistAttributeMetadata",
"OptionSet": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.OptionSetMetadata",
"IsGlobal": true,
"Name": "sd_MyPickList",
"OptionSetType": "Picklist",
"MetadataId": "a50cfc0a-e206-ea11-a811-000d3ab82e70"
},
"AttributeType": "Picklist",
"SchemaName": "sd_MyAttribute",
"Description": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.Label",
"LocalizedLabels": [
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.LocalizedLabel",
"Label": "This is the attribute I want to create.",
"LanguageCode": 1033
}
]
},
"DisplayName": {
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.Label",
"LocalizedLabels": [
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.LocalizedLabel",
"Label": "This is the attribute I want to create.",
"LanguageCode": 1033
}
]
},
"RequiredLevel": {
"Value": "None",
"CanBeChanged": true
}
}
I expected to get a status 204 response, indicating that a new Picklist attribute on the entity using the sd_MyPickList option set has been created.
Unfortunately, the response is:
{
"error": {
"code": "0x80048403",
"message": "Only Local option set can be created through the attribute create. IsGlobal flag must be set to 'false'.",
"innererror": {
"message": "Only Local option set can be created through the attribute create. IsGlobal flag must be set to 'false'.",
"type": "Microsoft.Crm.CrmException",
"stacktrace": " ...)"
}
}
}
There is already an issue in the github project (see https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/dynamics-365-customer-engagement/issues/601), but I wonder whether there is a way around this problem - what json do I need to send to create an attribute adressing a global option set? Is there someone who has successfully created such an entity attribute via web-api?
There is a usecase, I don't have the ability to use an existing library for that and importing a solution is not an option in my case.
Would be perfect if someone can provide a simple json that can be send e.g. using the Contact entity and any global optionset.
Finally, I found a way to accomplish what I need. To specify the global option set I need to use the "#odata.bind" action in the JSON data. For an attribute "sd_MyAttribute" that uses the global OptionSet with the MetaDataId "62654906-7A0b-ea11-a817-000d3ab826fd", I need to do POST:
{
"#odata.type": "Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.PicklistAttributeMetadata",
"GlobalOptionSet#odata.bind": "/GlobalOptionSetDefinitions(62654906-7A0b-ea11-a817-000d3ab826fd)",
"AttributeType": "Picklist",
"SchemaName": "sd_MyAttribute",
"Description": { ... },
"DisplayName": { ... },
"RequiredLevel": { ... }
}
If the entity does have the MetaDataId "70916b01-edb2-4840-a16b-6a2efbc75d84", the URI for the POST would be "/api/data/v9.0/EntityDefinitions(70916b01-edb2-4840-a16b-6a2efbc75d84)/Attributes" (logical- or schema-names are not supported).
Hope my question and answer does help someone who gets the same error message.
I now use bot framework with Azure functions.
it now works when the user sends his message its writes it to queue storage then picked up by Azure function and sends it back to the bot with direct line build in Azure function connector.
I want to change the functionality to LogicAppp and return the answer to the user with direct-line with http rest.
I have a key and have a json input that the function got like this:
{
"relatesTo": {
"user": {
"id": "default-user",
"name": "User"
},
"bot": {
"id": "b5023440-b1ce-11e8-9ad8-f5b615a4c6c3",
"name": "Bot"
},
"conversation": {
"id": "33cd0410-bf46-11e8-a228-a5c7cd21a798|livechat"
},
"channelId": "emulator",
"serviceUrl": "https://0a87dff1.ngrok.io"
},
"text": "example",
"isTrustedServiceUrl": true
}
I try to answer the chat using
https://directline.botframework.com/v3/directline/conversations/{conversationId}/activitie
I can't make it work, the conversation id looks different, it's like a guid instead of an id.
how can help me with the right POST syntax from the json provided?