We have a large solution with a number of files being created by bundleconfig.cs. But for some reason the last two projects added to the solution don't seem to be getting the files creating. The pages that use them fail cause they aren't there, or not being found.
Example of project successfully getting the files created:
const string ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI = "~/app/ediViewer/";
const string VIRTUAL_BUNDLE_PATH_EDI = ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI + "main.js";
bundles.Add(
new ScriptBundle(VIRTUAL_BUNDLE_PATH_EDI)
.Include(ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI + "ediViewerApp.js")
.IncludeDirectory(ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI, "*.js", searchSubdirectories: true)
);
Example of one that's not:
const string ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI_SC = "~/app/SupplyChain/";
const string VIRTUAL_BUNDLE_PATH_EDI_SC = ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI_SC + "main.js";
bundles.Add(
new ScriptBundle(VIRTUAL_BUNDLE_PATH_EDI_SC)
.Include(ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI_SC + "SupplyChainApp.js")
.IncludeDirectory(ANGULAR_APP_ROOT_EDI_SC, "*.js", searchSubdirectories: true)
);
very similar, both Angular(js) projects with similar directory structures. but the second one gets no files. I have other projects with a similar structure that are working.
I was hoping there was a way to put breakpoints in the bundleconfig file to see if if it was hitting the code, but apparently you can't, or I didn't successfully set one up.
There are a number of bundles appearing after the new one (the standard Angular libraries) that are getting created, so it doesn't appear to be stopping in the middle or anything.
The workaround was I simply added the scripts needed manually to the aspx page, but I shouldn't have to. It's happened for two new projects so far, so I'm prepared to bet it may happen for a third, so if I can find a fix it'd be useful.
Any ideas what might be happening, or how I can troubleshoot it?
Related
I'm building a Standalone app which will load a folder with c# code, and allow the user to write Regex to select and rename namespace/types/fields/properties/methods/argument/variable/events'name, but i'm stuck at renaming source code.
I have analyzed the SyntaxTree and collected all items, and also searched/matched/renamed with regex.
I have done a plenty of codes trying to get roslyn rename "items", but i only the first "item" is renamed while all the next ones are discarded.
I am aware of Immutability of the Syntax API, and after calling Renamer I save the solution, and also re-search the document in the new solution in the next loop.
//renaming code
var newSolution = await Renamer.RenameSymbolAsync(solution, isymbol, newName, solution.Workspace.Options).ConfigureAwait(false);
this.solution = newSolution;
//re-search code
if (solution.Projects.First ().ContainsDocument(doc.Document.Id)) {
var document = project.GetDocument(doc.Document.Id);
...
}
At the end i call SyntaxTree.GetRoot().ToString (); to get the final edited code, which as mentioned above has only the first edit.
Could anyone explain me the correct way to do this or provide me a sample how this could be implemented so i can try on my own?
I am trying to automate refactoring tasks. While some refactoring tasks work with reusage of refactoring API (LTK and JDT-based), Move Method doesn't. Am I missing something with this code:
MoveInstanceMethodProcessor processorMM = new MoveInstanceMethodProcessor(method,null);
processorMM.setTargetName(method.getDeclaringType().toString());
IVariableBinding[] candidateTargets = processorMM.getCandidateTargets();
IVariableBinding[] targets= processorMM.getPossibleTargets();
processorMM.setTarget(targets[1]);
MoveRefactoring refactoringMM = new MoveRefactoring(processorMM);
RefactoringStatus statusMM = refactoringMM.checkAllConditions(monitor);
Change changeMM = refactoringMM.createChange(monitor);
undoChange = changeMM.perform(monitor);
These candidateTargets and targets are always empty, and no possible target can be found even if I loop through the all methods in the project. Some method can be moved manually, but my code doesn't find them.
Am I missing something? What is the proper way of getting target for Move Method refactoring?
NOTE: I want to avoid, as much as possible, writing my own code for anything that I can feel is already there.
I'm currently using MvvmCross DownloadCache -- and it's working alright -- especially nice when I just need to drop in an Image URL and it automagically downloads / caches the image and serves up a UIImage.
I was hoping to leverage the code for one other use case -- which is I'd like to grab source images from URL's and cache the files on the local file system, but what I really want for this other use case is the image path on the local file system instead of the UIImage itself.
What would help me most if I could get an example of how I might accomplish that. Is it possible to make that happen in a PCL, or does it need to go into the platform specific code?
Thanks -- that works, but just in case anyone else is following along, I wanted to document how I got the Mvx.Resolve<IMvxFileDownloadCache>() to work. In my setup.cs (in the touch project), I had:
protected override void InitializeLastChance ()
{
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.DownloadCache.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.File.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.Json.PluginLoader.Instance.EnsureLoaded();
...
}
But that wasn't enough, because nothing actually registers IMvxFileDownloadCache inside the DownloadCache plugin (which I was expecting, but it's just not the case).
So then I tried adding this line here:
Mvx.LazyConstructAndRegisterSingleton<IMvxFileDownloadCache, MvxFileDownloadCache>();
But that failed because MvxFileDownloadCache constructor takes a few arguments. So I ended up with this:
protected override void InitializeLastChance ()
{
...
var configuration = MvxDownloadCacheConfiguration.Default;
var fileDownloadCache = new MvxFileDownloadCache(
configuration.CacheName,
configuration.CacheFolderPath,
configuration.MaxFiles,
configuration.MaxFileAge);
Mvx.RegisterSingleton<IMvxFileDownloadCache>(fileDownloadCache);
...
}
And the resolve works okay now.
Question:
I do wonder what happens if two MvxFileDownloadCache objects that are configured in exactly the same way will cause issues by stepping on each other. I could avoid that question by changing the cache name on the one I'm constructing by hand, but I do want it to be a single cache (the assets will be the same).
If you look at the source for the plugin, you'll find https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/blob/3.2/Plugins/Cirrious/DownloadCache/Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.DownloadCache/IMvxFileDownloadCache.cs - that will give you a local file path for a cached file:
public interface IMvxFileDownloadCache
{
void RequestLocalFilePath(string httpSource, Action<string> success, Action<Exception> error);
}
You can get hold of a service implementing this interface using Mvx.Resolve<IMvxFileDownloadCache>()
To then convert that into a system-wide file path, try NativePath in https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/blob/3.2/Plugins/Cirrious/File/Cirrious.MvvmCross.Plugins.File/IMvxFileStore.cs#L27
I recorded some test cases with CUIT in VS2010. Everything worked fine the day before. So, today I run again, all the test failed, with the warning: The following element is no longer available ... and I got the exception : Can't perform "Click" on the hidden control, which is not true because all the controls are not hidden. I tried on the other machine, and they failed as well.
Does anyone know why it happens? Is it because of the web application for something else? Please help, thanks.
PS: So I tried to record a new test with the same controls that said "hidden controls", and the new test worked!? I don't understand why.
EDIT
The warning "The following element blah blah ..." appears when I tried to capture an element or a control while recording. The source code of the button is said 'hidden'
public HtmlImage UIAbmeldenImage
{
get
{
if ((this.mUIAbmeldenImage == null))
{
this.mUIAbmeldenImage = new HtmlImage(this);
#region Search Criteria
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Id] = null;
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Name] = null;
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Alt] = "abmelden";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.AbsolutePath] = "/webakte-vnext/content/apps/Ordner/images/logOut.png";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Src] = "http://localhost/webakte-vnext/content/apps/Ordner/images/logOut.png";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.LinkAbsolutePath] = "/webakte-vnext/e.consult.9999/webakte/logout/index";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Href] = "http://localhost/webakte-vnext/e.consult.9999/webakte/logout/index";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Class] = null;
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.ControlDefinition] = "alt=\"abmelden\" src=\"http://localhost/web";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.TagInstance] = "1";
this.mUIAbmeldenImage.WindowTitles.Add("Akte - Test Akte Coded UI VS2010");
#endregion
}
return this.mUIAbmeldenImage;
}
}
Although I am running Visual Studio 2012, I find it odd that we started experiencing the same problem on the same day, I can not see any difference in the DOM for the Coded UI Tests I have for my web page, but for some reason VS is saying the control is hidden and specifies the correct ID of the element it is looking for (I verified that the ID is still the same one). I even tried to re-record the action, because I assumed that something must have changed, but I get the same error.
Since this sounds like the same problem, occurring at the same time I am thinking this might be related to some automatic update? That's my best guess at the moment, I am going to look into it, I will update my post if I figure anything out.
EDIT
I removed update KB2870699, which removes some voulnerability in IE, this fixed the problems I was having with my tests. This update was added on the 12. september, so it fits. Hope this helps you. :)
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/800953/security-update-kb2870699-for-ie-breaks-existing-coded-ui-tests#tabs
Official link to get around the problem :
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2013/09/17/coded-ui-mtm-issues-on-internet-explorer-with-kb2870699.aspx
The problem is more serious than that! In my case I can't even record new Coded UI Tests. After I click in any Hyper Link of any web page of my application the coded UI test builder cannot record that click "The following element is no longer available....".
Apparently removing the updates, as said by AdrianHHH do the trick!
Shut down VS2010, launch it again "Run as administrator".
There may be a field in the SearchProperties (or possible the FilterProperties) that has a value set by the web site, or that represents some kind of window ID on your desktop. Another possibility is that the web page title changes from day to day or visit to visit. Different executions of the browser or different visits to the web page(s) create different values. Removing these values from the SearchProperties (or FilterProperties) or changing the check for the title from an equals to a contains for a constant part of the title should fix the problem. Coded UI often searches for more values than the minimum set needed.
Compare the search properties etc for the same control in the two recorded tests.
Update based extra detail given in the comments:
I solved a similar problem as follows. I copied property code similar to that shown in your question into a method that called FindMatchingControls. I checked how many controls were returned, in my case up to 3. I examined various properties of the controls found, by writing lots of text to a debug file. In my case I found that the Left and Top properties were negative for the unwanted, ie hidden, controls.
For your code rather than just using the UIAbmeldenImage property, you might call the method below. Change an expression such as
HtmlImage im = UIMap.abc.def.UIAbmeldenImage;
to be
HtmlImage im = FindHtmlHyperLink(UIMap.abc.def);
Where the method is:
public HtmlImage FindHtmlHyperLink(HtmlDocument doc)
{
HtmlImage myImage = new HtmlImage(doc);
myImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Id] = null;
myImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Name] = null;
myImage.SearchProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Alt] = "abmelden";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.AbsolutePath] = "/webakte-vnext/content/apps/Ordner/images/logOut.png";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Src] = "http://localhost/webakte-vnext/content/apps/Ordner/images/logOut.png";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.LinkAbsolutePath] = "/webakte-vnext/e.consult.9999/webakte/logout/index";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Href] = "http://localhost/webakte-vnext/e.consult.9999/webakte/logout/index";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.Class] = null;
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.ControlDefinition] = "alt=\"abmelden\" src=\"http://localhost/web";
myImage.FilterProperties[HtmlImage.PropertyNames.TagInstance] = "1";
myImage.WindowTitles.Add("Akte - Test Akte Coded UI VS2010");
UITestControlCollection controls = myImage.FindMatchingControls();
if (controls.Count > 1)
{
foreach (UITestControl con in controls)
{
if ( con.Left < 0 || con.Top < 0 )
{
// Not on display, ignore it.
}
else
{
// Select this one and break out of the loop.
myImage = con as HtmlImage;
break;
}
}
}
return myImage;
}
Note that the above code has not been compiled or tested, it should be taken as ideas not as the final code.
I had the same problem on VS 2012. As a workaround, you can remove that step, and re-record it again. That usually works.
One of the biggest problem while analyzing the Coded UI test failures is that the error stack trace indicates the line of code which might be completely unrelated to the actual cause of failure.
I would suggest you to enable HTML logging in your tests - this will display step by step details of how Coded UI tried to execute the tests - with screenshots of your application. It will also highlight the control in red which Coded UI is trying to search/operate upon.This is very beneficial in troubleshooting the actual cause of test failures.
To enable tracing you can just add the below code to your app.config file --
I just migrated my language service from VS2008 to VS2010. Everything works fine except for one important thing: I no longer get LanguageService.ParseSource invoked for ParseReason.Check. It do get a single invoke after opening a file. But after editing code, it no longer gets invoked.
Any ideas what could be causing that?
I also migrated a language service from 2008 to 2010. Can you check if you've fallowed all of these steps?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd885475.aspx
I didn't have to do anything else, which I verified by diffing the important files in our depot before and after the change.
I don't know if you ever figured your question out, but have you tried making sure that your Source class' LastParseTime is set to 0 when creating it? I seem to recall some issues with Check not happening unless you manually set LastParseTime to 0 when creating your Source object.
Protip: If you use .NET Reflector, you can disassemble all of the base classes for the LanguageService framework and get a pretty good understanding of how it all works under the hood. The classes you'd be interested in live in Microsoft.VisualStudio.Package.LanguageService.10.0.dll, which should be installed in the GAC. I've found this to be unimaginably helpful when trying to figure out why things weren't working in my own Language Service, and being able to step through the source code in the debugger mitigates almost all the pain of working with these frameworks!
When your Source object is initialized, it starts off with a LastParseTime of Int32.MaxValue. The code that causes fires off a ParseRequest with ParseReason.Check checks the LastParseTime value to see if the time since the last change to the text is less than the time it takes to run a parse (or the CodeSenseDelay setting, whichever is greater).
The code that handles the response from ParseSource is supposed to set the LastParseTime, but as far as I can tell, it only does that if the ParseReason is Check.
You can get around this issue by setting Source.LastParseTime = 0 when you initialize your Source. This has the side-effect of setting CompletedFirstParse to true, even if the first parse hasn't finished yet.
Another way to fix this issue is to override Source.OnIdle to fire off the first call to BeginParse() This is the way I would recommend.
public override void OnIdle(bool periodic)
{
// Once first "Check" parse completes, revert to base implementation
if (this.CompletedFirstParse)
{
base.OnIdle(periodic);
}
// Same as base implementation, except we don't check lastParseTime
else if (!periodic || this.LanguageService == null || this.LanguageService.LastActiveTextView == null || (this.IsCompletorActive) || (!this.IsDirty || this.LanguageService.IsParsing))
{
this.BeginParse();
}
}