I'm new to Spotfire and trying to fix this already for some hours but cannot find a solution for this rather simple question.
I have data in the following format (see image):
Type 1 [Unit1], Type 1 [Unit2], Type 2 [Unit1], Type 2 [Unit 2]
Table
What I would like is to rename the chart labels to show only Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 and not with its unit. I don't want to rename the column names themselves (because otherwise its confusing whether I'm dealing with Unit 1 or Unit 2); but only the names in the visualization. Please see the attached image.
How can I do this with e.g. custom expressions?
Related
I have a table like this：
a
b
c
1
2
abc
2
3
4.00
note c2 is text while c3 is a number.
When I do
=QUERY(A1:C,"select *")
The result is like
a
b
c
1
2
2
3
4.00
The "text" in C2 has been missed. You can see the live sheet here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UOiP1JILUwgyYUsmy5RzQrpGj7opvPEXE46B3xfvHoQ/edit?usp=sharing
How to deal with this issue?
QUERY is very useful, but it has a main limitation: only can handle one kind of data per column. The other data is left as blank. There are usually ways to try to overcome this from inside the QUERY, but I've found them unfruitful. What you can do is just to use:
={A:C}
You can work with filters by its own, but as a step-by-step to adapt the main features of query: If you need to add conditions, use LAMBDA INDEX and FILTER
For example, to check where A is not null:
=LAMBDA(quer,FILTER(quer,INDEX(quer,,1)<>""))({A:C}) --> with INDEX(quer,,1), I've accesed the first column
Where B is more than one cell and less than other:
=LAMBDA(quer,FILTER(quer,INDEX(quer,,2)>D1,INDEX(quer,,2)<D2))({A:C})
For sorting and limiting an amount of items, use SORTN. For example, you want to sort by 3rd column and limit to 5 higher values in that column:
=LAMBDA(quer,SORTN(FILTER(quer,INDEX(quer,,1)<>""),5,1,3,0))({A:C})
Or, to limit to 5 elements without sorting use ARRAY_CONSTRAIN:
=ARRAY_CONSTRAIN(LAMBDA(quer,FILTER(quer,INDEX(quer,,1)<>""))({A:C}),5)
There are other options, you can use REGEXMATCH and other options, and emulate QUERYs functions without missing data. Let me know!
shenkwen,
If you are comfortable with adding an Google App Script in your sheet to give you a custom function, I have a QUERY replacement function that supports all standard SQL SELECT syntax. I don't analyze the column data to try and force to one type based on which is the most common data in the column - so this is not an issue.
The custom function code - is one file and is at:
https://github.com/demmings/gsSQL/tree/main/dist
After you save, you have a new function from your sheet. In your example, the syntax would be
=gsSQL("select a,b,c from testTable", {{"testTable", "F150:H152", 60, true}})
If your data is on a separate tab called 'testTable'(or whatever you want), the second parameter is not required.
I have typed in your example data into my test sheet (see line 150)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zmyk7a7u0xvICrxen-c0CdpssrLTkHwYx6XL00Tb1ws/edit?usp=sharing
I am working with a spread designer in visual basic 6 and am looking to change the display index of my table. I am adding extra columns and I need to rearrange them to match another form.
I am using visual basic 6 with spread designer 6.0
I have tried the below when loading the form:
lstTheLines.Col(1).DisplayIndex = 1
lstTheLines.Columns(25).DisplayIndex = 2
does anyone know how to do this without having to delete and re-add all columns?
The best way I found so far was to add the columns in the place I want using the spread designer and create an Enum in the code for each column index. This way I can give the columns a name and use that instead when populating the data. The benefit to this is that I can now rename the columns or add new ones and I just need to change the names around in the Enum given that the column type is correct.
I have a simple data set something like this one.
data = [ {column:'a',value:10},
{column:'a',value:2},
{column:'a',value:5},
{column:'b',value:12},
{column:'b',value:1},
{column:'b',value:8},
{column:'c',value:6}]
I have created a group on top of this data and used in data table which shows something like this
(* considering all the dimension and groups are created at this stage)
Column Value
A 17
B 21
C 6
The real problem comes when I try to filter the data, I have attached a text filter to this. Whenever I try to filter it the records which have value == 0 doesn't not disappear rather it stays showing the value as 0 something like this
Case 1 : The textfilter is filtered with column 'a' the table is showing like this.
Column Value
A 17
B 0
C 0
How do I make the ones with zero value disappear from the table on filter while using groups in the data table ?
I am assuming you are looking for something like the chart build in following link:
dc charts with filtering removing
You can see the source code, they have written a method called "remove_empty_bins". You can also implement something like that.
I hope this answer your question. If you need more help, please create a demo for your problem.
I am new to informatica power center tool and performing some assignment.
I have input data in a flat file.
data.csv contains
A,2
B,3
C,2
D,1
And Required output will be
output.csv should be like
A
A
B
B
B
C
C
D
Means I need to create output rows depending upon value in column. I tried it using java transformation and I got the result.
Is there any other way to do it.
Please help.
Java transformation is a very good approach, but if you insist on an alternative implementation, you can use a helper table and a Joiner transformation.
Create a helper table and populate it with appropriate amount of rows (you need to know the maximum value that may appear in the input file).
There is one row with COUNTER=1, two rows with COUNTER=2, three rows with COUNTER=3, etc.
Use a Joiner transformation to join data from the input file and the helper table - since the latter contains multiple rows for a single COUNTER value, the input rows will be multiplied.
COUNTER
-------------
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
(...)
Depending on your RDBMS, you may be able to produce the contents of the helper table using a SQL query in a source qualifier.
i'm writing a program at work for a categorizing issue.
i get data in the form of CODE, DESCRIPTION, SUB-TOTAL for example:
LIQ013 COGNAC 25
LIQ023 VODKA 21
FD0001 PRETZELS 10
PP0502 NAPKINS 5
Now it all generally follows something like this...the problem is my company supplies numerous different bars. So there are like 800 records a month with data like this. My boss wants to breakdown the data so she knows how much we spend on a certain category each month. For example:
ALCOHOL 46
FOOD 10
PAPER 5
What I've thought of is I setup a sort of "data-base" which is really a csv text file that contains entries like this:
LIQ,COGNAC,ALCOHOL
LIQ,VODKA,ALCOHOL
FD,PRETZELS,FOOD
FD,POPCORN,FOOD
I've already written code that imports the database as a worksheet and separates each field into its own column. I want excel to look through the file and when it sees LIQ and COGNAC to assign it the ALCOHOL designator. That way I can use a pivot table to get the category sums. For example I want the final product to look like this:
LIQ013 COGNAC 25 ALCOHOL
LIQ023 VODKA 21 ALCOHOL
FD0001 PRETZELS 10 FOOD
PP0502 NAPKINS 5 PAPER
Does anyone have any suggestions? My worry is that a single point expression match to JUST the code i.e. just to LIQ without a match to COGNAC as well would maybe result in problems later when there are conflicting descriptions? I'd also like the user to be able to add ledger entries so that the database of recognized terms grows and becomes more expansive and hopefully more accurate.
EDIT
as per #Marc 's request i'm including my solution:
code file
please note that this is a pretty dumb-ed down solution. i removed a bunch of the fail-safes and other bits of code that were relevant to a robust code but not to our particular solution.
in order to get this to work there are two parts:
the first is the macro source code
the second is the actual file
because all the fail-safes are removed, the file needs to be imported to excel exactly the way it appears. i.e. Sheet1 on the googleDoc should be Sheet1 on the excel, start pasting data at cell "A1". before the macro is run, be sure to select cell "A1" in Sheet1. as i said, there are implementations in the finished product to make it more user friendly! enjoy!
EDIT2
These links suck. They don't paste well into excel.
If your comfortable with it I can email you the actual workbook. Which would help in preserving the formatting etc.
Use a lookup table in a separate sheet. Column A of the lookup sheet contains the lookup value (e.g. PRETZELS), Column B contains the category (FOOD, ALCOHOL, etc). In the cells where you want the category to show up in your original sheet (let's use D3 for the result where B3 holds the "PRETZELS" value), type this formula:
=VLOOKUP(B3,OtherSheet!$A$1:$B$500,2,FALSE)
That assumes that your lookup table is in range A1:B500 of a worksheet named "OtherSheet".
This formula tells Excel to find the lookup value (B3) in column A of your lookup and return the corresponding value from column B of your lookup table. Absolute references (the $) ensure that your formula won't increment cell references when you copy/paste the formula in other cells.
When you get new categories and/or inventory, you can update your lookup table in this one place by just adding new rows to it.