How I change my Makefile so it has a specific DEBUG option? - makefile

Currently I have a very simple Makefile. When I run it, it compiles my code with some specific options so I can debug it later on. I would like to be able to execute it with a normal "make" without option that creates my code withouth debug option, and one more complex, that add such as debuging. Currently my makefile only compiles with the debug options avaiable, see here the makefile:
main: main.o comandos.o utils.o
main.o:
gcc -Wall -gstabs -DDEBUG -c src/main.c
comandos.o:
gcc -Wall -gstabs -DDEBUG -c src/comandos.c
utils.o:
gcc -Wall -gstabs -DDEBUG -c src/utils.c
clean:
rm main \
*.o
Any advise on how to customize it for both debugging and not debugging options? I was thinking to add a CFLAGS variable at the start, and supressing the variables at gcc lines, but not sure on how I can run on easy way differents values for CFLAGS, one for debuging, with -gstabs -DDEBUG, and only for normal, with only -Wall.
EDIT I: I am aware I can do different targets, and do a specific TARGET called Debug, but the issue I see there is that when I am generating a commands.o, for example, that will be used later on in target main, I already have commands.o precompiled with some specific flags. I am looking for away to have 2 differents targets generatings the same "commands.o", one with debbuging flags other with normal,
and have the main target being able to use the correct one.

I think I found the solution, my main problem was to define two different $FLAGS depending on the target, so I can have a default FLAGS when doing a "normal" release and different flags when I had a debug. I did it this way:
CFLAGS = -Wall
CC = gcc
main: main.o comandos.o utils.o
debug: CFLAGS = -Wall -gstabs -DDEBUG
debug: main
main.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c src/main.c
comandos.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c src/comandos.c
utils.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c src/utils.c
clean:
rm main \
*.o
Not sure if this is the correct way to do it, but seems is working. Thks to #tripple to redirect me to How can I configure my makefile for debug and release builds?.

Related

How to configure a dynamic library using a macro / variable in a makefile?

I'm writing a small study project in C. I need to create a dynamic library and configure its use with macros. First, I create object files with the command:
$gcc -fPIC -c ../data_module/data_process.c
$gcc -fPIC -c ../data_libs/data_stat.c
Then I create a dynamic library like this:
$gcc -shared -o data_process.so data_process.o data_stat.o
And finally I build an executable file using this library:
$gcc main_executable_module.o ../data_libs/data_io.o ../yet_another_decision_module/decision.o -L. data_process.so -o test_main
It works and the executable works correctly. But there is a task to configure the library using macros:
Make the necessary changes to the code of the main_executable_module, configuring the use of the dynamic library using macros.
That is, if I understand correctly, you need to add macros to the main_executable_module.o so that you do not use the -L flags during assembly. But I can't find information anywhere on how to do it. Can you please tell me how to implement this or where can I read about it?
UPD: John Bollinger says
It is possible that the word "macros" is intended to be interpreted as makefile macros, which many people instead call (makefile) "variables". That would make this a question about make / makefiles, not about C.
My Makefile:
CC=gcc
LDFLAGS=
CFLAGS=-c -Wall -Wextra -Werror
SOURCES=main_executable_module.c ../data_libs/data_stat.c ../data_libs/data_io.c ../yet_another_decision_module/decision.c ../data_module/data_process.c
DYNLIB=../data_module/data_process.c
STAT=../data_libs/data_stat.c
BUILDDYN=main_executable_module.c ../data_libs/data_io.c ../yet_another_decision_module/decision.c
OBJECTS=$(SOURCES:.c=.o)
OBJBUILDDYN=$(BUILDDYN:.c=.o)
OBJDYNLIB=data_process.o
OBJDATASTAT=data_stat.o
EXECUTABLE=../../build/main
DEXECUTABLE=../../build/Quest_6
DLIBS=data_process.so
all: $(SOURCES) $(EXECUTABLE)
data_stat.a: $(OBJLIB) $(LIBS)
ar -rcs $(LIBS) $(OBJLIB)
data_process.so: $(OBJDYNLIB) $(OBJDATASTAT)
$(CC) -shared -o $(DLIBS) $(OBJDYNLIB) $(OBJDATASTAT)
$(OBJDYNLIB): $(DYNLIB)
$(CC) -fPIC -c $(DYNLIB)
$(OBJDATASTAT): $(STAT)
$(CC) -fPIC -c $(STAT)
build_with_dynamic:$(OBJECTS) $(EXECUTABLE)
$(CC) $(OBJBUILDDYN) -L. $(DLIBS) -o $(DEXECUTABLE)
$(EXECUTABLE): $(OBJECTS)
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o $#
.c.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
clean:
rm -rf $(EXECUTABLE) $(OBJECTS)
lclean:
rm -rf $(LEXECUTABLE) $(OBJECTS) $(LIBS) $(DEXECUTABLE)
rebuild: clean $(SOURCES) $(EXECUTABLE)
The results of the checks revealed nothing. There are two opinions about this task.
Leave everything as above. And in the file itself, add a header process.h. Then everything is assembled and working. And at the same time, if you change the code in the library, rebuild it, and do not rebuild the executable file, then the changes will be taken into account. That is, the idea of ​​a dynamic library is respected.
Implement in such a way that there is no need to include headers in the main_executable_module.c. Then a special library is used for working with dynamic libraries, which allows you to write the path to the library and take individual functions from it. More about it here.
What was meant when it was said about macros, I still did not understand ...

Generate debug versions of targets in a DRY method

I am using GNUmake and I have a makefile with some targets defined and their respective dependencies. I would like to create a debug version of these targets, so I have this:
TARGET := a b c
all: $(TARGET)
a: a.o e.o
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCDIRS) -c $(^) -o $(#)
b: b.o g.o
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCDIRS) -c $(^) -o $(#) -pthread
c: f.o c.o
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCDIRS) -lm -c $(^) -o $(#)
%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCDIRS) -c $(^) -o $(#)
So this is all good, but now I would like to create debug versions of these rules, but I don't want to have to rewrite the rules. I just want to add additional flags like -g -DDEBUG to the CFLAGS variable and change the names of the targets.
I tried this static rule stuff
$(TARGET:%=debug_%): %: * #<--- not sure how to specify the dependencies
# CFLAGS += -g -DDEBUG <-- uncommenting this line is an error
This didn't work. I wanted the above rule to match the targets I already specified, but add additional parameters to CFLAGS which will then generate files like debug_a, debug_b, debug_c etc. I am not sure if this is possible with make but that was just the way I was reasoning about this.
Any help will be appreciated, thanks
So I finally found a suitable solution:
DEBUG_TARGET := $(TARGET:%=debug_%)
debug: $(DEBUG_TARGET)
$(DEBUG_TARGET):
debug_%: CFLAGS += -g -DDEBUG
debug_%: %
#mv $* debug_$*
This will generate a debug version of each target without having to create separate rules.
The last line was the sweet spot for me and this accomplishes what I wanted without having to repeat myself too much

Compiling SDL project on Raspberry Pi

I am trying to build a project with make (gcc on Raspbian)
Here is the makefile (I removed some unnecessary parts):
objects = 3d.o Affichage.o [...]
cflags = -I/usr/local/include/SDL2 -L/usr/local/lib -lSDL2
poly : %(objects)
gcc $(cflags) $(objects) -o poly
($objects) : types.h
[...]
When running Make, I got:
cc -c -o Affichage.o Affichage.c
fatal error: SDL.h: No such file or directory
#include <SDL.h>
I checked the folders, everything seems ok. SDL.h is indeed in /usr/local/include/SDL2. I tried to remove options one by one in cflags, no luck...
What am I missing?
Make told you exact command it tried to execute:
cc -c -o Affichage.o Affichage.c
This don't have -I path, which is the source of an error.
You have target for your resulting executable but not for object files. Make have builtin rule to compile object files from C sources, but it isn't aware of your cflags variable. So far your options are:
Define your own pattern rule
e.g:
%.o: %.c
gcc $(cflags) -c $< -o $#
However, your cflags contains -lSDL2, which is linking flag, which should be specified only on linking phase (so technically it isn't cflag). Move it to separate variable (usually LIBS, which may then be enfolded into make's semi-standard LDFLAGS).
Use variables that make is aware of
In that case, it is CFLAGS:
CC:=gcc
CFLAGS:=-I/usr/local/include/SDL2
LIBS:=-lSDL2
LDFLAGS:=-L/usr/local/lib $(LIBS)
objects:=3d.o Affichage.o
poly: $(objects)
$(CC) $^ -o $# $(LDFLAGS)
$(objects): types.h
The rest will be done by implicit rules.

Link static library using gcc with gnu make

I'm following Zed Shaw's tutorial "Learn C the Hard Way" and trying to teach myself c programming language.
On my ubuntu desktop, I encountered the linking problem he mentioned in the note of this post.
That is, when linking a static library with gcc, using a command like this:
gcc -Wall -g -DNDEBUG -lmylib ex29.c -o ex29
The linker fails to find the functions in the lib. To link correctly, I have to change the order of source file and lib to this:
gcc -Wall -g -DNDEBUG ex29.c -lmylib -o ex29
And I'm trying to use the makefile offered by Zed to automate unit test. The makefile looks like this:
TEST_SRC=$(wildcard tests/*_tests.c)
TESTS=$(patsubst %.c,%,$(TEST_SRC))
TARGET=build/libYOUR_LIBRARY.a
tests: CFLAGS += $(TARGET)
tests: $(TESTS)
sh ./tests/runtests.sh
The rest part of the makefile that isn't listed here can build the $(TARGET) lib flawlessly.
The problem is Zed append the lib to the $(CFLAGS) and use the implicit rule to compile the test files which leads to a command like this:
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Isrc -rdynamic -DNDEBUG tests/hashmap_tests.c build/mylib.a -o tests/list_tests
The command fails because of the link problem mentioned before as expected.
The solution I came up with was to write the compilation command explicitly like this so I can change the order:
$(TESTS): $(TARGET)
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $^ $(TARGET) -o $#
This works fine if there is only one main source file. Unfortunately, I have several out there under the ./tests directory, and a command like this is a total disaster.
My question is, how should I change my makefile to make it work or is there any other way I can do the same work as elegant as expected?
CFLAGS holds compiler flags, like -g -O2. You should not add linker flags to it. CPPFLAGS holds preprocessor flags like -Isrc -DNDEBUG. LDFLAGS holds linker flags, which would include things like -L (capital L) if you need it to find libraries, and -rdynamic. And the LDLIBS variable holds libraries, so you should do this:
CPPFLAGS = -Isrc -DNDEBUG
CFLAGS = -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra
LDFLAGS = -rdynamic
LDLIBS = -lmylib
Now you can use the built-in rules for GNU make to build your program. You can see a list of the build-in rules by running make -p -f/dev/null.
Of course the above are just the default variables make defines and uses with its default rules. You don't have to use them, but in general it's better to follow conventions rather than flaunt them.

Recompile with -fPIC option, but the option is already in the makefile

I get this error when I do the make:
relocation R_X86_64_32 against `vtable for Torch::MemoryDataSet' can not be used
when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
It says that I should recompile with the -fPIC option. I did that, adding
the -fPIC option to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, but I still get the same error. Is there any way to solve this? I have seen that this problem is related with the use of a 64-bit machine, and it is true that I am using one.
I had this problem quite a while back and if I remember correctly, the fix was moving the placement of -fPIC just after gcc in the command line. Made absolutely no sense, and less so now, but as I remember, that fixed it.
I encountered the same problem, but it had an extra twist. The answer by #clintm solved it, but I thought I would describe my variation of the problem here for future reference...
Makefile on 32-bit machine:
CXX=g++
CXXFLAGS= -O3 -Wall
...
...
%.o: %.c
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -fpic -c $<
libmylibrary.so: $(OBJECTS)
$(CXX) -shared -Wl,-soname,$# -o $# $(OBJECTS)
This compiled correctly. But the same Makefile failed when I tried it on a 64-bit machine. I changed "-fpic" to "-fPIC" and it still failed. I changed the object rule to:
%.o: %.c
$(CXX) -fPIC $(CXXFLAGS) -c $<
and it still failed.
Finally, I placed "-fPIC" in the actual compiler variable (so that now "-fPIC" appears in the rule for each object and the rule for the shared library):
CXX=g++ -fPIC
CXXFLAGS= -g -O3 -Wall
...
%.o: %.c
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o $# $<
libalglib.so: $(OBJECTS)
$(CXX) -shared -Wl,-soname,$# -o $# $(OBJECTS)
And it worked!
Let's say you have some makefile like:
CFLAGS = -g -Wall
SOURCES = $(wildcard *.c)
OBJECTS = ...
TARGET = libmyawesomelib.a
all: $(TARGET) main
just add the -fPIC flag like so:
$(TARGET): CFLAGS += -fPIC
$(TARGET): $(OBJECTS)
.
.
.
so on so forth with the rest of the makefile.
I ran into this problem cross-compiling with the android-ndk toolchain. I ended up having to use
CC="$CROSS/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-gcc -pie --sysroot=$SYSROOT"
Neither -fPIC nor -fPIE worked for me in this situation.
I was cross compiling shadowsocks-libev on a CentOS 7 machine, the same problem happened to me, it works perfectly on my laptop with
CC=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-gcc CXX=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-g++ AR=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-ar RANLIB=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-ranlib make SHARED=1 CFLAGS=-fPIC
but on travis ci, it did not work, I have to add -fPIC to CC and CXX in order to get it to work
CC="mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-gcc -fPIC" CXX="mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-g++ -fPIC" AR=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-ar RANLIB=mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc-ranlib make SHARED=1
I had this issue after I upgraded gcc. I had one .o file (sqlite) that hadn't been cleaned by the Makefile and as a result I had this issue (assuming because it was compiled with an older version of gcc). After removing that file and rebuilding this error went away.
if the project you'd like to compile has a correct configure script use like this:
$ ./configure 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fPIC ....' --enable-some-thing
so the flag will be all the Makefile's rule ...
few days before i've need an elder ver. of VLC to compile on an x64 machine, it has a nice configure script ;-)

Resources