I am currently using an s25fl256s flash memory, but when I try accessing it (using an SPI master on an Artix7 FPGA) the first read access has a delay of 19 clock cycle (more or less) and afterward the data is received correctly, does anyone know what causes the delay on the first read access ? according to the datasheet there should be no delays : https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-S25FL128S_S25FL256S_128_Mb_(16_MB)_256_Mb_(32_MB)_3.0V_SPI_Flash_Memory-DataSheet-v18_00-EN.pdf?fileId=8ac78c8c7d0d8da4017d0ecfb6a64a17
I was expecting to start receiving the data on the first sclk rising edge that follws the LSB of my adress
Be sure to observe the power up delay, tPU, describe on page 33 of the datasheet before trying to communicate with the device.
Related
I have a problem using the SPI bus user space driver (spidev) in version 4.14 of lnx-xlnx. Sometimes only one byte (instead of for example the desired 4 bytes) is written to the MOSI due to SCLK dropping, for no apparent reason in a full duplex transfer. What could be happening?
I am using the internal oscillator (FOSC = 7.37 Mhz) of the dsPIC33EV256GM102. I have a 1602 LCD connected to the PIC via 4 data, and enable, RW, and RS control lines.
I write initialization commands to the LCD and then two lines of text. That works fine.
After 2 minutes and 10 seconds the enable line quickly pulses high-low causing something to be written to the LCD. It happens again in another 2:10 and then again, repeatably.
All my program does right now is initialize the LCD, write two lines of text and go directly into a while(1).
I have tried setting the LCD enable low on every iteration of the While. I have tried latching the enable low before going into the While. I have moved the enable to another pin but the pulse still occurs on that pin. If I remove the enable line after writing the data, the problem goes away.
Any thoughts what might cause this kind of behavior or what additional troubleshooting steps I might take?
I am using pin 24 labeled RPI45/PWM1L2/CTPLS/RB13 for the enable but I have also tried pin 23 labeled RPI44/PWM1H2/RB12. I am not executing any code related to peripheral pin select yet.
When I download the program via the Pickit3, for the first POR while the Pickit3 is still in the circuit, there is some spurious text written to the LCD. So I have to disconnect the Pickkit3 and do another POR before the two line of text are written correctly without any unwanted additional data writes.
In conclusion there are two issues really or perhaps they are related?
Is it possible to query serial port tx (send) pin status if it is active or not ?
For example when issuin break command (SetCommBreak) tx pin is set to active (low). I'd like to know when it is active or not. Thanks.
No. (at least not likely)
If you are using the "16550" family of UARTs, then I am confident that you can not query the serial port tx pin status. Of course, if you are using some new version or other UART family, maybe.
You can assume that the TX pin is in the SPACE state ('0', +Volts) whilst performing SetCommBreak(), but I suspect that is not enough for you.
If you are look to debug your code to know if a break occurred, you can short pins 2 & 3 on a 9-pin D-sub, thus loop backing the transmit to the receive. A paper clip will do. Your receive code would detect the incoming BREAK. Shorting to the incorrect pin does not cause a lasting problem with a conforming serial port, but be careful. Try this first with simple data, before testing BREAK condition.
If you have a "16550"-like UART.
You can put the UART into loop-back mode and see if you receiving you own outgoing BREAK signal. Its somewhat complicated in current PCs. Other UART type may support loop-back.
I can properly read/write to a 2GB Kingston Micro SD using single pin SPI, but after writing using the WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK command to write several blocks, the card goes into idle mode. I know this because when I try send a command to write more data, the card returns an 'in idle state' flag. I created a work around that pulls the card from idle after each write but this severely reduces the bandwidth. Does anyone know why this happens?
Also, the maximum SPI Baud I have obtained is 1Mbs. When I set the SPI clk to >1MHz the commands do not work properly. If I send commands at a baud of < 1Mbs then send the data at >1Mbs, the data is corrupted. Is there a reason I have not been able to get the 25MHz specification speed as listed in the SDCARD.org spec on p2?
https://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/sdio/sdio_spec/Simplified_SDIO_Card_Spec.pdf
I got SPI Speeds less than 1 MBit/s when I tried to use the wrong SPI clock polarity once. Double check this, and this is also a possible candidate as a source for you "idle" error.
I am using EVK1105 development board with AVR Studio 5 as development IDE for my AVR project.
I am using FreeRTOS in it. I have 3 USART ports on this board. One external module is connected to my AVR32 board via USART-RS232 mode. It sends me continuous serial data to my board on USART0 with 19230 baudrate, 7-databits, odd parity, stopbit-1 and normal-channel mode. I created a new task for this purpose. After each 9 data bytes it sends '\n' and '\r'. So in my task I keep on collecting the 9 databytes in a string buffer and then transmit it on USART1. I am using polling method to collect data from USAR0 which is receiving port. But I am facing problem in receiving data. I don't know if its timing issue or something or the scheduler switches the task while collects the data. But I don't get the required data.
Following are things I have already checked as troubleshooting
1. Connected my external module to my PC hyper-terminal which gives me perfect result.
2. Implemented the same thing of using receiving from USART0 and whatever received is transmitted to USART1 as without FreeRTOS. Its works fine.
Please suggest some idea what may be wrong. I am using a queue to communicate between Tx and Rx task to pass the string buffer from USART0 to USART1. Is it problem in handling queue? How can I troubleshoot the queue?
I am using a delay of 50ms in my infinite task loop in Rx Task. Can it create a problem? If I don't use any delay the OS crashes. Please suggest some good practices to create a new task in FreeRTOS so that I will not get any timing issue.
For such a use case, I would not use a polling method with 50ms delay to retrieve data from UART peripheral. You can easily lose received data depending on the system load and UART reception buffer size.
At least use an interrupt on UART data reception that copies every received byte into a local buffer that will be read by your TX thread.
You can have an even better solution using a DMA channel to receive your data frame and be notified when 9 bytes have been received. I don't know if your AVR device has a DMA peripheral or not.
Are you still working on this? The statement of your problem is vague, but there I have several suggestions/leading questions.
1) You may want some documents to see what the registers are
Get the giant datasheet pdfs at
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_docs.asp?category_id=163&family_id=607&subfamily_id=2138&part_id=4117
2) In this and an earlier post you state that you have, in some cases, been able to RX data. You will need to find the USART HW initialization code from those example projects and get them into the freeRTOS example project. In particular calls to
gpio_enable_module() with {AVR32_USART0_RXD_0_0_PIN, AVR32_USART0_RXD_0_0_FUNCTION}
To connect to USART to CPU
and i believe
InitRs232()
Just doing this requires poking around a lot of code - there's alot of dependencies.
2) What function are you calling to retrieve data from USART0? 19kbaud is approximately 2000bytes/sec or 1 byte/0.5ms, so 50ms polling is not nearly enough. I'd suggest that your RX task poll continuously (never sleep explicitly) but at a lower priority than the TX task.
3) Concentrate on debugging the RX task at the call to retrieve data. Use the debugger to look at the hardware registers for the usart. In particular
USART0 cr register AVR32_USART_CR_RXEN_MASK should be set to enable RX
USART0 csr register AVR32_USART_CSR_RXRDY_MASK will indicate if there is new data there
You can also check the overlow flag to see if you have missed some data.
When the read of USART0 rhr occurs it should be a byte that you sent.
If you are still working on this I can look into this a bit more.