I am from Iran. All Mtproto proxies have been banned by the GWF (the great firewall) and It's impossible to use them, although somehow someone made a weird Mtproto proxy with even weirder server name!
The Server name: cloudflare.com.nokia.com.co.uk.do_yo.want_to.clash_with.this.www.microsoft.com.there_is_no.place_like.localhost.www.bing.com.count_with_me.cyou.com.now_sudo.rm_rf.ddns.net.we_are_here.again_to_fight.everyone.i_am.the_internet.special_nbvd.koromozom.cfd.
It is the only way that we can access Telegram. Does anyone know how to make such proxies with this kind of Domain?
enter image description here
As you can see on the attached image, It is written unknown in the server name box, but when you connect to the proxy, you will see the following domain name.
Please help to create such proxies. I really need this.
Related
The Interactive Borker (IB) has a setting for the proxyRemoteHost which is like this "ib.abcd.com". This config won't work unless it's changed to "X.ib.abcd.com", where X = [1-5]. We need to specify a server to make it to work. Although this looks good for DEV purpose, in product we don't wanna specify the server instead use the base URL.
The Interactive Broker team has been troubleshooting this issue for a while and not able to pin point any reason. I really appreciate if anyone can help me understand probable causes behind this issue, so I can give more input for the relevant team to fix this issue. I can't add the logs due to some sensitive information in them. In logs, we can see the SSO authentication always fails while using proxyRemoteHost setting as base URL ("api.abcd.com") but works when we specify a server ("X.api.abcd.com"). No further info in the logs that mentions any reasons behind the failure.
We have tested this on latest Chrome and Firefox with CORS enabled. Also, once in a blue moon, it works fine with the base URL which totally surprises me.
I just upgraded to the latest Filezilla version - and I can't connect to my websites. I keep getting a "connection timed out" error.
I discovered some sort of "Configuration" feature, so I gave it a try, but I can't copy and paste the results, because the screen closes when I try to copy the text (a very useful feature). However, it did say I had the "wrong external IP address."
I was invited to get the correct IP address on this page. So I typed in that value, but I still get the same results - a connection timed out error and wrong external IP address.
I can connect to my websites fine with Dreamweaver, but not with Filezilla. Does anyone know what the solution is? If not, can you recommend any other FTP clients, preferably something free (or very inexpensive) and user friendly?
P.S. I was going to ask this on Filezilla's forum, but I couldn't register because they don't accept registration from people using Google's e-mail service. WTF???
I would double check that FileZilla is defaulting to plain FTP (rather than SFTP, or some other protocol). If it is working properly in Dreamweaver I would open them both up and check to make sure the settings are all the same.
And if you would like to try a different FTP client I would recommend CyberDuck.
We have two sites setup using the same API Key for uploading videos, one is the public server, another is on my local machine.
Even though they both use exactly the same credentials, the one on the public server is not working anymore (we're using https://github.com/laplacesdemon/django-youtube), throwing an error that credentials are incorrect.
Weirdly, I don't know where can be the problem.
There was one thing on our server, though, we changed the location so the IP address has changed.
Might it be this?
The IP list on the Server Key settings on Google Console is empty, and on the APIs requests graph I can see requests but can't find any log associated with them or something like this to see what's wrong.
Anyway, I guess the access is somehow blocked and there is no way to unblock it.
If anyone experiencing same issue, just create a new YouTube account! The only way of solving it, apparently.
I'm sorry if this is not a programmatic issue, i also may get many down votes for it, but i really need to know in details, what does (Resolving Host) means ?!
I'm trying to configure a connection to a web server hosting a friend's web site, and i'm developing a vb6.0 app. using WinSock.OCX tool, and one of its states is (Resolving Host) so i need to know what does it mean to be able to provide some code for it.
You don't have to handle that state. This is just the phase when WinSock.ocx is converting a DNS name (let's say www.dilbert.com) to the corresponding IP (184.106.169.31). This is handled automatically by WinSock, so you just have to wait.
WinSock might give you errors during this phase, because it could be that
the supplied domain name is/was no longer valid
the supplied domain name is invalid (92$!#d.com, for example)
the DNS server is not available (no network connection, for example)
On Modern Windows, the default configuration is done in such a way that if I network-login as a local user, I actually only get authenticated as a guest (more details about this behavior is explained in http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc786449(WS.10).aspx)
When my program tries to access WMI on this kind of servers via DCOM, I simply get "Access Denied" error, presumably because a guest user isn't allowed to connect to WMI.
I'd like to differentiate this error from other kinds of access denied errors, such as a wrong password or non-existent user name, so that I can explain to the user what they need to fix the problem.
So my question is, what can I do to detect such a server. I'm thinking that if there's some COM components that can be activated by a guest, that would do --- I can try to activate such a component, and if that works, I know that my login credential was correct. But I can't think of any such concrete component.
Does anyone know such a component? Or any other ways of diagnosing this situation?
No, I cannot recall that there is a DCOM server that can be accessed by a guest. Wouldn't that be unsafe?
If you have time you can check all security settings of DCOM servers using dcomcnfg. Maybe there is a guest. But I don't think so.
On the other side. You cannot see the reason behind AccessDenied on the client side because that would make the server more vulnerable. If an attacker could distinguish between different kinds of access denied errors, he probably would be able to adapt his actions accordingly.
But if you have access to the server you can activate DCOM logging (see http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B892500&x=18&y=11)
As a solution, I suggest that you write such a and similar problems and how they happen into a FAQ/Readme/Webpage. People tend to rather search the web than read a message box.