I have a EditParentAndChildren screen where I want a test that:
navigates to page
remembers the name of the parent
pick one of the children rows
remember its id/name
delete it via the Trashcan button on that row
save
navigate to a View
ensure the parent's name appears and the deleted child's name does not
I can't seem to pluck text off of the screen and put it into one of Cypress's #alias variables, and standard js variables aren't allowed by cypress. So, I use .then to get the value that way.
But when I choose a child row and go .within to get its name and click its delete button, I can't then issue the final assertions for the test because I'm still in the .within, I can't escape the .within because the .then for getting the child's name is completely inside, and, trying to .root().closest() doesn't work because the <tr> I'm in is not only getting deleted but I'm doing a page nav afterward.
cy.get('[name=parentname]')
.invoke('val')
.then(parentName => {
cy.get('[class^=childrenTable]')
.find('[name=child_id]')
.first()
.parents('tr')
.within(tr => {
cy.get('[name=child_id]')
.invoke('val')
.then(nameOfchildToDelete => {
// delete this child
cy.get('[class*=trash]').click();
cy.get(loadingSpinner).should('not.exist');
// ERROR can't find submit button, you are still .within the <tr>
cy.contains(/Submit/i).click();
cy.url().should('match', /parent\/\d+$/);
cy.get(loadingSpinner).should('not.exist');
cy.contains('[class*=breadcrumb_currentcrumb]', parentName).should('exist');
cy.contains('table', nameOfChildToDelete).should('not.exist');
});
});
});
One solution is simply never to use .within. Formerly I was selecting the row, then within it selecting & using each piece of the row. Instead, select each piece of a row using the same selector that selects that row.
Not this:
cy.get('[class^=childrenTable]')
.find('[name=child_id]')
.first()
.parents('tr')
.within(tr => {
cy.get('[name=child_id]')
.invoke('val')
.then(nameOfchildToDelete => {
More like this:
cy.get('[class^=childrenTable] [name=sample_id]:first-child')
.invoke('val')
.then(nameOfSampleToDelete => {
// etc...
cy.get('[class^=childrenTable] [class*=trash]').first().click();
Code inside a .then is just like outside the .then excepting the level of indent, so most of the code is the same. But code inside a .within is kind of at a dead-end. You can't return values from a .within and can't set state or js vars from the outer context.
So: don't use .within, always use long selectors, and don't worry about picking "sections" like a particular <tr> or a particular card in a FlexBox for re-use.
If the selectors are very long consider moving them to a const string outside of the file and possibly concatting them if need be. But generally in Cypress trying to enter into a context is something of an anti-pattern.
Related
So I'm working at a co. as a summer intern and have been tasked with writing tests for their application in cypress.
The application extensively uses shadow DOMs and nested shadow DOMs even. I used the includeShadowDom property true to traverse more easily. But I am facing an issue.
I need to type in 2 input boxes having the same ID and same class but they are in separate shadows. Is there a way I can distinguish between them i.e First occurrence of element with id= and nth occurrence of element with id=?
I can't share any code because it goes against company policy
Assuming you have added includeShadowDom: true in your cypress config file then you can use the eq method to get the respective elements.
E.g. eq(0) for first occurrence of the element, eq(1) for the second and so on.
So your code should look like this:
cy.get('input').eq(0).type('some text')
First possible solution is to select every input with class = something and loop over each.
let words = ['First input', 'second input']
cy.get(`input[class="something"]) // this returns x number of Inputs
.each( ($el, index) => {
cy.get($el)
.type(words[index])
})
Second possible solution is to target the parent element incasing the single input.
cy.get('table') //I don't know what is incasing your inputs but lets assume its a table
.within( () => {
cy.get(`input[class="something"`] //trying to get this to return 1 element
.type('words')
})
Without seeing your HTML markup I can't offer up a more exact solutions. Hope this helps. Look up parent() and parentsUntil() cypress commands if you try the second option.
With inputs there's usually some text that allows the user to distinguish them.
Try targeting the input label or placeholder text, finding the input with "Traversal" commands.
<div>
<label>User name</label>
<input type="text" placeholder="Enter user name" />
<div>
Some basic approaches:
cy.contains('label', 'User name')
.next() // move to next element in the DOM
.type('something')
cy.contains('div', 'User name') // go to common parent of label and input
.find('input') // gives just the input inside parent
.type('something')
cy.get('input[placeholder="Enter user name"]') // use unique placeholder attribute
.type('something')
With shadow DOM be aware you can configure it in the test header
it('searches inside all shadow dom roots', {includeShadowDom: true}, () => {
...
})
I see some posts about this exact topic, but none of them using data classes like I am as selectors, so it makes this conditional test a bit harder to write.
The idea is that I have a table with pagination on it. My idea is to check if the [data-cy-pagination-next] has or doesn't have the disabled attribute on it, which would mean there's more than one page and therefore the test can continue.
Most posts I see use a syntax like this:
cy.get('my-button')
.then($button => {
if ($button.is(':enabled')) {
cy.wrap($button).click()
}
})
But I don't have the $button like they described. What I would be clicking on is a button, but does that really matter?
It doesn't seem like I can write
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]')
.then('[data-cy=pagination-next]' => {
if ('[data-cy=pagination-next]'.is(':enabled')) {
cy.wrap('[data-cy=pagination-next]').click()
}
})
How can I get this conditional to work?
If there is more than one page, this test works great, but in the cases that there is no second page, I just want the test to end there.
Any tips would be greatly appreciated!
Cheers!
Here is the test currently
it('Data Source has Pagination and test functionality', () => {
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination]').should('exist')
// assert that we are at the first page and the start and back button is disabled
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]').contains('Page 1 of')
// If there are multiple pages then do the following tests
// click next button and assert that the current page is page 2
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]').contains('Page 2 of')
// click end button and assert that the end and next buttons are disabled
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-end]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-end]').should('be.disabled')
// click start button button and assert that the current page is page 1 and next and start buttons are disabled
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-start]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]').contains('Page 1 of')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-start]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-back]').should('be.disabled')
})
You can use the page indicator to split the test logic
it('Data Source has Pagination and test functionality', () => {
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination]').should('exist')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]')
.then($pageList => {
if ($pageList.text() === 'Page 1 of 1')
// single page assertions
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-end]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-start]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-back]').should('be.disabled')
} else {
// multi page assertions
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]')
.should('contain', 'Page 2 of') // assert on second page
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-end]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-start]').click()
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]').contains('Page 1 of')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-start]').should('be.disabled')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-back]').should('be.disabled')
}
})
Better still, control the test data so that only a single page exists, then run two tests under known conditions and eliminate flaky conditional testing.
I think you're misunderstanding how yielding and callbacks work. The reason there is $button in the .then() is because it is yielded by cy.get(). It could be named anything, so long as it is a valid name (note: a string literal, like you are trying to do, is not valid).
So, $button is just the yielded element from your cy.get('my-button'). Which is why we can then use JQuery functions and Chai assertions on it.
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]')
.then($el => { // naming the yielded object from `cy.get()` to $el
if ($el.is(':enabled')) { // using JQuery function `.is` to check if the element is enabled
cy.wrap($el).click() // Cypress requires the JQuery element to be wrapped before it can click it.
}
})
You can do something like this. You can use an each to loop over all the pagination elements. So in case, you don't have only 2 buttons the loop will check for only 2 buttons and then terminate.
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-page-list]').should('contain.text', 'Page 1 of')
cy.get('[data-cy=pagination-next]').each(($ele, index) => {
if ($ele.is(':enabled')) {
cy.wrap($ele).click()
cy.wrap($ele).should('contain.text', `Page ${index + 2} of`) //index starts from 0
}
})
I was trying to automate a text submit form using cypress. The 'Create student' button is disabled even after all the fields have been filled
Please see the cypress error
code :
it('should be able to add a new student and update the details, remove from the class and delete the account', function () {
cy.visit(
'https://readingeggs.blake-staging.com/district_ui#/reading/manage-schools/students/195286/new'
)
cy.findByLabelText('First Name').type('ark')
cy.get('#first-name').should('have.value', 'ark')
cy.findByLabelText('Last Name').type('last')
cy.get('#last-name').should('have.value', 'last')
cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select('1')
cy.get('#grade-dropdown').should('have.value', '1')
cy.get('[data-test-select-teacher]').select('Lehner, Abbey')
cy.get('#teacher-dropdown').should('have.value', '3068134')
cy.get('[data-test-submit-new-student]').click()
cy.get('#main')
.findByRole('alert')
.should('include.text', `Successfully created a student`)
})
})
Be careful using click({force:true}) as suggested in the error message, there may be another problem that your test will now ignore!
You can first try an assertion that the button is not disabled.
Sometimes the test can run too quickly, and the web page has not yet enabled the button before the test tries to click it.
Adding .should('not.be.disabled') will retry this check for up to 4 seconds, which should be enough time for the page to complete changes.
cy.get('[data-test-submit-new-student]')
.should('not.be.disabled')
.click()
If using .should('not.be.disabled') does not work (I agree, it should be the first thing to try), try adding a trigger event to each input - in case the .type() command is not triggering the validation change.
cy.findByLabelText('First Name').type('ark').trigger('change')
cy.get('#first-name').should('have.value', 'ark')
cy.findByLabelText('Last Name').type('last').trigger('change')
cy.get('#last-name').should('have.value', 'last')
cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select('1').trigger('change')
cy.get('#grade-dropdown').should('have.value', '1')
cy.get('[data-test-select-teacher]').select('Lehner, Abbey').trigger('change')
cy.get('#teacher-dropdown').should('have.value', '3068134')
cy.get('[data-test-submit-new-student]').click()
If still no joy, use .click({force:true})
By the way, cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select('1') looks a bit suspicious. The select command can take a display value as a string or a position value as a number. The screenshot shows "K" is selected, so I would expect either of these to work
cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select(1) // number passed
// or
cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select('K') // string passed
One option would be to use {force: true} with click().
it('should be able to add a new student and update the details, remove from the class and delete the account', function () {
cy.visit(
'https://readingeggs.blake-staging.com/district_ui#/reading/manage-schools/students/195286/new'
)
cy.findByLabelText('First Name').type('ark')
cy.get('#first-name').should('have.value', 'ark')
cy.findByLabelText('Last Name').type('last')
cy.get('#last-name').should('have.value', 'last')
cy.get('[data-test-select-grade]').select('1')
cy.get('#grade-dropdown').should('have.value', '1')
cy.get('[data-test-select-teacher]').select('Lehner, Abbey')
cy.get('#teacher-dropdown').should('have.value', '3068134')
cy.get('[data-test-submit-new-student]').click({force: true})
cy.get('#main')
.findByRole('alert')
.should('include.text', 'Successfully created a student')
})
Among many, One of my test looks like
it("Admin is able to edit new group", () => {
cy.intercept("PUT", /\/api\/groups/).as("editGroupAPI");
cy.get("#groups").then(groups => {
const group = groups[0];
// go to edit page cancel and come back to groups page
app.groupsPage.card
.groupActionIcon(group.name, "modify")
.scrollIntoView()
.click();
app.commonElements
.toolBarTitle()
.should("have.text", "Edit Group");
app.groupsPage.groupDetailsForm.cancelButton().click();
app.commonElements.toolBarTitle().should("have.text", "Groups");
// edit group - 1
app.groupsPage.card
.groupActionIcon(group.name, "modify")
.scrollIntoView()
.click();
app.groupsPage.groupDetailsForm
.groupDescription()
.type(" edited");
app.groupsPage.groupDetailsForm.saveButton().click();
cy.wait("#editGroupAPI");
// validate that Groups page have loaded
app.commonElements.toolBarTitle().should("have.text", "Groups");
// validate whether group card description is reflected on card
app.groupsPage.card
.groupDescription(group.name)
.should("have.text", group.description + " edited");
});
});
app is top level parent obj, and this test uses Page Object Model.
One example of POM class is :
class CommonElements {
burgerMenu() {
return cy.get("#widgets-banner-appBanner-sideDrawerButton-content");
}
toolBarTitle() {
return cy.get("h1.app-toolbar__title__main-title");
}
toolBarTitleWithText(text) {
return cy.contains("h1.app-toolbar__title__main-title", text);
}
globalScopeButton() {
return cy.get("#global-scope-switch-toggleSwitch-button");
}
}
So as it is evident that, cy.wait() and then call to pageObjectModel function to grab title element:
cy.wait("#editGroupAPI");
// validate that Groups page have loaded
app.commonElements.toolBarTitle().should("have.text", "Groups");
Now sometimes this fails, so as I have seen in docs, plain js code get executed immediately, but since in this case whole test is wrapped in cy.get("alias"), will it still matter (or execute js immediately)?
This might sound very obvious, but I just want to confirm.
Final question: does mix usage of Page Object Model functions and cy.command contribute to test flakiness?
Short answer: no, mixing Cypress commands with Page Object model functions does not itself contribute to test flakiness.
Explanation: a Cypress command is never executed immediately. It does not matter if a Cypress command is called in any 'external' function (including a POM function) or directly in a test case function. Either way, Cypress commands are only enqueued when statements of a function are executed. And they later will be executed in the same order regardless whether they defined inside 'external' function or test case one.
This is also true for a command that was called inside a cypress synchronous block of code (in a then/should callback). Even in this case the command will not be executed immediately.
In a nutshell, using a POM function to call a Cypress command does not influence on how and when this command is executed and so using POM approach can not itself contribute to any test flakiness.
You can play and see the order of command execution using such a script:
You can either open Dev console to see the console output or use breakpoints to see the execution live.
The gif above shows the debugging directly from IDE (IntelliJ) using the Cypress Support Pro plugin
I'm working on a jsPlumb problem. When I try to programatically remove all of an elements connections, I get Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'left' of undefined
I have several "nodes" (html elements) that each have 1 input endpoint (an end point that accepts) and n output endpoints. Each node also has a javascript object behind it. I have a "selected" state in my software. Users can select multiple nodes and the objects are pushed to an array called selected. I have a key listener for the delete key. When the key is pressed it loops through selected nodes, deleting them and removing their endpoints. This works great when there are no connections, but when there are connections I the error.
The output endpoints are attached to child HTML elements of the main node…
There's a lot of code doing lots of stuff, but I'll try to share the relevant parts:
function Node(jsonFromServer){
/* … this is the constructor method… some code omitted*/
this.endpoints = [];
this.endpoints.push(jsPlumb.addEndpoint(this.el.attr("id"),targetEndpoint,{anchor:"TopCenter",uuid: this.el.attr("id") + "TopCenter"}));
this.addConnectionEndpoints();
}
Node.prototype.addConnectionEndPoints = function(){
//omitting code… loops through 'connections' that don't have 'has endpoint' marked….
this.endpoints.push(jsPlumb.addEndpoint(connection['el'].attr("id"),sourceEndpoint,{anchor:"RightMiddle",uuid:connection['el'].attr("id")+"RightMiddle"}));
connection.hasEndPoint = true;
}
So that was the setup. Here's how I delete
when key pressed
If key is delete /* all this stuff works */
loop through selected array (the array of selected Node elements:works)
node.el.hide(250).remove();
loop through node's endpoints array
//endpoint is the correct object... proved with console.log
//the following line is the error
jsPlumb.deleteEndpoint(endpoint);
ajax call to server to delete stuff on the backend
Fixed it! When I said node.el.hide(250).remove(); I removed an html element that was required in the delete process. I moved the remove part to the callback of the ajax request, and it works like a charm.